The URL can be used to link to this page

91-1277��'�� ` �. Council File ,� f � . ( _ � � Green Sheet � ,��ooZ RESOLUTION CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA � � Presented By Referred To L.� Committee: Date RESOLVED, that the Saint Paul City Council consents to and approves of the appointments and reappointments, made by the Mayor, of the following individuals to serve on the CHILD CARE PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM SELECTION TEAM: RECEIVED APPOINTMENTS REAPPOINTMENTS JUL 0 9 1991 Erma sims sharon Davies CITY CLERK Laurie Kramer Judy Rothenberg Amparo Gaston Joan Baber-Hinkley Pamela Bohm Janet Delmore Denise Brinkman Laura McNellis--Youth Each shall serve a one-year term which will expire July 1, 1992. Yeas Navs Absent Requested by Department of: imon oswz z —� on � acca ee 1 et man "—� un e �— i son � BY� � Adopted by Council: Date JUL 2 3 1991 Form Approved by City Attorney Adoption ertified by Council Secretary By: s ,. _ �j r By� Approved by Mayor for Submission to Approved by Ma or: Date JUL 2 4 1991 counci� � B .�4c'./i�� By s �� Y� Poe�isHfQ ,��- 3'91 . . �-�r-�a77 OEPARTM[NT�OFFICE/COUNpL DATE INITIATED �a ox Scheibe7,�'.s. Of.��:c� �-s-9�. GREEN SHEET No. �J962 CONTACT PERSON 8 PNONE �NITWJ DATE INITIAUDATE �DE ENT DIRECTOR �CITY OOUNCIL 1 � e--4 7 3 6 � TY AITORNEY �CITY CLERK MU8T BE ON COUNCIL A�ENDA BY(DAT� IIpUTN�O BUDOET DIRECTOR �FIN.i MOT.SERVI�B DIR. MAYOR(OR AS813TANn � TOTAL#�OF 81QNATURE PAtiES 1 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR S#QNATUR� ACT10N HEGUESTED: Approval of the appointments and reappointments of inembers to the Child Care Partnership Program Selection Team. RE TIONH:AvP►�i�U a►�(R) COUNCIL CaAMIl'TEElRESEARCFI I�PORT OPTIONAL _PUWNIi�Ki OOMMISSION _dVll 8ERV1�COMMI8810N �VST PMONE N0. _p8 OOMMITTEE _ _STAFF _ COMMENTS: _DISTRICT COURT _ SUPPORTS WFNCFI COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? fNITIATINO PROBLEM�IS8l1E�OPPORTUNRY(WAo�WMt.WMn.Wl�sre.WhY$ RFCEIVED �� 9 1991 CI T y C�ERK ADVANTAOE8IF APPROYED: i 'I I I II DISADVANTAOES IF/�PPROVED: i D18ADVANTAGEB IF NOT APPROVED: i I I I I I , TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRAN6ACTION = C08T/REVENUE SIlDOETED(dRCLE ONH) VE8 NO FUNDING S01lRCE ACTIVITY NUMSEN FINANCIAL INFORMATION:(EXPWN) �w � . w - r �. , _� NO'fE: OOMPLEtE�RECTIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THE Q�REEN 8HEET IN$TRUCTIONAL MANl7Al AVAILABLE IN THE PURCHASINi3 OFFlCE(PHONE NO.298-4225). ROUTIN(3 ORDER: Bebw are p�xred routin�s for ths ti�re most frsqueM typss oi docunieMS: CONTRACTS , (assum�s autl�o�lz�d OOUNqL RES�.UTION (Amertd�.8dpts.l � bud�st sxirts) Acxept. (3rents) 1. Outside Agency 1. DspartmeM DireCtor 2. InRiaNng MpaRmsr�t 2. Buclpst Director 3. City Attomsy 3. City Attorney 4. Mayor 4. Meycu/Aesistant 5. Flnance�AApmt Svcs. Director 5. Gty Council 6. Finsncs I1coa�Minp 6. Chlsf AxouMant� Fin 6 Mpmt Svcs. ADMINI3TRATIVE ORDER (Budpet CaUNCIL RESOLUTION (all othera) . Revision) and ORDINANCE 1. Activiy Mampsr t. InitiaNng DepartmeM Dirsctor 2. D�rtmsnt AocouMaM 2. City Attoms�► 3. Mp�u�tmsM Director 3. Meyor/AaMant 4. BucJgst DUeCtor 4. City CoutlCil 5. City qeAt 6. (�IM AccouMeu�t, Fln d�Mgmt Svcs. ADMINISTHATIVE ORDER3 (eN othere) 1. IMdsdng prputment 2. qly Attorney 3. MayroNAssfetant 4. City derk TOTAL NU#ABER t�F S14NATU E PAtiES ' Irbicate thm N M ppss on whicl�sipndures are requirod and Qe�rCl�i each of thees p�gK. ACTION REUIJESTED Dsscrik�wFqw�t the praj�.Y/r�qwst seoks to scxompNsh in efth�r chrorwlo�i- t�i ordsr or ords�of in�oRar�os.rrhbhwsr is most approp�ate for ths iseue. Do not writs oomaets esMerx�s. Bepin eech�em in your list with a vsrb. RECOAAMENDATION8 Complsts M Ms i�ue in questbn has bee�preanted before any body�Public a private. 3UPPORTS WHlt�i OOUNCIL OBJECTIVE? I�dicate which CouncH obJsathn(�Y��p►o1��1��PPo�bY listin� ths ksy word(s)(HOU3INO, REL'FIEATION, N£K3HBORHOODS,EOONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, BUDQET,SEWER SEPARATION).(3EE(�MPLE7E LIST IN IN8TRUCTIONAL MANUAL.) COUNCIL OOMMITFEE/RE8EARCH REPORT-OPTIONAL AS RE(]UE8TED BY COUNCIL INITUTING PROBLEM, 138UE,OPPORTUNITY Explain the aitustion cx condiUons that created a nead for your project or request. ADVANTAtiES IF APPROVED Indicate whether this is sfmply an annual budget procedure roquired by law! charter or whethsr there ars sp�ciflc wa in whfch ths City of Saint Psul � and ks ciNzens wHl benslit fran this�action. DiSADVANTAfiES IF APPROVED What nspatfve effects or�ch�n�s to existing or past procesasa might this projacUreqwst produca H it Is pessed(e.p.,traHic delays, noise, tax ir�r�abe a amessrtbnu)?To Whom?Whsn4 For how long? DI8ADVANTAC3E$IF NOT APPROVED What will be ths npaNve conssquences ff ths promfsed action is not approvsd?Inability to dsliver service?Continued high traHic, noiee, accidsrn rats?Lop ot revenue? RNANGAL IMPACT Althouph you must Wlor the i�ormation you provide hare to the issue you are addressing, in psnsnl you must answer tMro questions: Hau much is it goin�to c�st?Who is�Ndng to pay� ��turn copy to: %-'��Council File # - q�70 Real Estate Division r� r� � ' � 218 City Hall / Green Sheet � /,��/ �� ' (YK) (Reso�ution) RESOLUTION C1TY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA Presented By Referred To Committee: Date � � RESOLVED, that the City of Saint Paul authorizes and and directs the proper City officials to deliver a quit claim to Independent School District �625 for so long as the described property is used for public school purposes of the Ames School site described as follows : Lots 11 through 32 , Block 3 , Hazel Park from the City of Saint Paul to Independent School District #625 . Yeas Nava Abseat R ted by ep of: 0 1. onw -- _�� acca e � ettman �- j�� "�—/ u e — � i son �. By� � JUL 1 6 1991 Form Approved by City Attorney Adopted by Council: Date _ — � Adopti Certified by Council Secretary gy; � � .-a�— `�� $Y� Approved by Mayor for S ission to '� 19�� council Approved by Mayor: Dats ��w.� By: _ � .�� -- By: PU�USNED JUl 27'9� �yf-i�� DEPA ENT/OPFICE/COUNCIL DATE INITIATED �� _ 15 0 0 7 Fir��nce/Rea1 Estate Division GREEN SHEET � CONTACT PERSON 6 PHONE INITIAUDATE INITIAUDATE Yvonne Kastens 298-5317 DEPARTMENTDIRECTOR �CITYCOUNCIL ASSION g CITY ATTORNEY � � G �,r �CITY CLERK MUST BE ON COUNCIL ACiENDA BY(DATE) NUMBER FOR ❑BUDGET DIRECTOR �FIN.&M(3T.SERVICES DIR. ROUTING ORDER �MAYOR(ORASSISTANT) � Y. Kastens Rlll. LZH TOTAL#OF SIGNATURE PAGES (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) ACTION REQUESTED: (� �f Approve resolution to transfer ownership of Ames School Site to Independent School District 625. JUN 24 1991 RECOMMENDATIONS:Approve(A)or Re)ect(R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLO E 'qU� Y _ PLANNINO COMMISSION _CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION 1• Has this person/firm ever worked under a contract for this department? ��` `�r _CIB COMMITTEE _ YES NO A STAFF _ 2• Has this person/firm ever been a city employee? YES NO _ DIS7RICT COURT _ 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normall y possessed by any current city employee? SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? YES NO Explain ell yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet 1.. INITIATINO PROBLEM,IS3UE,OPPORTUNITY(Who,Whet,When,Where,Why): The Independent School District 625 has become separated from the City of Saint Paul. The property acquired for school sites before the separation names the City of Saint Paul as f��p �ECEIVEp JUN 2 6 1991 �UN 2 7 1991 OFFICf OF THE DIR �r��fIC ADVANTAOES IFAPPROVED: OF FINAI�CE �!��D MA. � �� q The ownership wi11 transfer to�n��n��fifi61 District 625. The deeds and abstracts will be transferred to Independent Sch�o1 District 625. Documents regarding these properties will go directly to the school district. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: None. DISADVANTAQE3 IF NOT APPROVED: The City will continue to store deeds and abstracts and receive documents regarding the properties and forward them to the school district. Co��°�'� ��^�°�~� Center RECEIVED �UL 0 8 1991 JUL 01 199� CITY CLERK TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION S N�A COST/REVENUE BUDGETEp(CIRCLE ONE) YES NO FUNDING SOURCE ACTIVITY NUMBER FINANCIAL INFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) i � l! .. - �. NOTE: COMPLETE DIRECTIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THE GREEN SHEET INSTRUCTIONAL <.� MANUAL AVAILABLE IN THE PURCHAS�NG OFFICE(PHONE NO.298-4225). �--� ROUTING ORDER: Below are correct routings for the five most frequent rypes of documents: CONTRACTS(assumes authorized budget exists) COUNCIL RESOLUTION (Amend Budgets/Accept.Grants) • 1. Outside Agency 1. Department Director 2. Department Director 2. Ciry Attorney 3. City Attorney 3. Budget Director 4. Mayor(for contracts over$15,000) 4. Mayor/Assistant 5. Human Rights(for contracts over$50,000) 5. Ciry Council 6. Finance and Management Services Director 6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services 7. Finance Accounting ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(Budget Revision) COUNCIL RESOLUTION (all others,and Ordinances) 1. Activity Manager 1. Department Director 2. Department Accountant 2. Ciry Attorney 3. Department Director 3. Mayor Assistant 4. Budget Dlrector 4. Ciry Council 5. City Clerk 6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(all others) 1. Department Director 2. City Attorney 3. Finance and Management Services Director 4. Ciry Clerk TOTAL NUMBER OF SIGNATURE PAGES � � � Indicate the#of pages on which signatures are required and paperclip or flag each of thess pages. ACTION REQUESTED Describe what the projecUrequest seeks to accomplish in either chronologi- cal order or order of importance,whichever is most approprlate for the issue. Do not write complete sentences. Begin each item in your list with a verb. _ RECOMMENDATIONS Complete if the issue in question has been presented before any body, public or private. SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? Indicate which Council objective(s)your projecUrequest supports by listing the key word(s)(HOUSING, RECREATION, NEiGHBORHOODS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, BUDGET, SEWER SEPARATION). (SEE COMPLETE LIST IN INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL.) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS: This information will be used to determine the ciry's liability for workers compensation claims,taxes and proper civil service hiring rules. INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY Explain the situation or conditions that created a need ibr your project or request. ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED Indicate whether this is simply an annual budget procedure required by law/ charter or whether there are specific ways in which the City of Saint Paul and its citizens will benefit from this projecUaction. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED What negative effects or major changes to existing or past processes might this projecUrequest produce if it is passed(e.g.,traffic delays, noise, tax increases or assessments)?To Whom?When? For how long? DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED What will be the negative consequences if the promised action is not approved?Inability to deliver service?Continued high traffic, noise, accident rate?Loss of revenue? FINANCIAL IMPACT Although you must tailor the information you provide here to the issue you are addressing, in general you must answer two questions: How much is it going to cost?Who is going to pay?