D00486CITY OF SAINT PAUL
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
�J
ApProved Copies �:
— City Clerk (Original)
— Fnance DepYs Accounting Division
— Requesting Dept
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER:
BUDGET REVISION
No: �i �0�86
Date: -�? - _�
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER, ConsisteM with the authoriry granted to the Mayor in Section 10.07.4 of the Ciry Charter and based on
the request of the Director of Fnance & Managemerrt Services
to amend the 1994 budgei of ihe Cab Communications fund, the Director of the
Fnance and Management Services Departrnent is authorized to amend said budget in the following manner.
DEPARTMENT & DIVISIOiJ:
LEDGER, FUND, ACTIVITY, OBJECT, PROJECT
Cable Communications
Cable N Legislative Operations
GL-166 31120-0359 Other — Special Materials
GL-166 31120-0852 Video Tape Equipment
•
CURRENT APPROVED AMENDED
BUDGEf CHANGES BUDGET
5,135 6,000 11,135
87,119 (6,000) 81,119
92,254 0 92,254
Date
3 -2-stS~
Date
��3�15�
Date
o .�. , ,.. ..x.�.
Approved 6y: Bud Director
�48b
DEPARThIENVOFFICFICOUNCIL DATE INITIATED N_ � 2 6 9 3 6
crty coun�;� ��Q c�} �-z-9s GREEN N ET INRIALlOATE
CONTACf PEASON 8 PHONE � DEPAHTMENT DIRE � CITY CAUNCIL
Gerry Strathman 6-8575 ASSIGN � CITV ATTORNEY � CITY CLEFK
NIIYBER FOR
ST BE ON CqUNCILAGENDA BY(DATE) pO�N� Q BUDGET DIqECTOR � FlN. & MGT. SEflVICES DIR.
OflDEN � MAYOR (OR ASSI5TANT�
TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES (CLIP AlL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATUR�
ACTION REQUESTED: .
Revise 1994 Council vdeo budgetto correspond with actual expeadihues
RECOMMENDATIONS: Appmve (A) or Rejec[ (Rj pERSONAI SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER TNE FOILOWIN6 QUES7IONS:
_ PLANNING CAMMISSION _ CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION 1. Has this personRirtn ever worketl under a cont2ct for this department?
_ CIB COMMITTEE _ YES NO
2. Has Nis person/firm ever been a city employee?
_ STAFF — YES P10
_ DISiRICT CoURi _ 3. Does this personRirm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current c'rty employee?
SUPPORTS WNICH COUNCIL O&IECTIVE'+ YES NO
Explafn ell yes answers on separate sheet antl attach to green sheet
INITfATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (Who, Whet, When, Where, Why�:
The 1994 Council Video expenditures do not conespond with the adopted budget
VANTAGES IFAPPROVE�.
The 1994 Council Video budget will correspond with actual expenditures
RECEIVED
MAR - 61995
CITY CLERK
DISADVANTAGES IFAPPROVED�
None
OISADVANTAGES IF NOTAPPROVED'
The 1994 Council Video budget will not correspond with actual e�cpenditures
TOiAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACiION $ COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIHCLE ONE) VES NO
FUNDIfdG SOURCE ACTIVITY NUMBER
FINANCIAL INFOflMAT10N (EXPLAIN) !�O �O�i • � �, �` �