The URL can be used to link to this page

05-99�u6S i iTUT� Council Fi1e # �j� 9g Ordinance � ORDiNANCE �reen sheet k 3025�a� SA1NS PAUL, MiNNESOTA Presented Referred To Committee: Date 33 1 An ordinance amending Chapter 60 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code 2 pertaining to zoning for the City of Saint Paul 3 with changes to the zoning maps for the Fort Road area 4 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 l8 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ?g 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 VTHEREAS, the CiTy Council is authorized under Minnesota Statutes Section 462357 and Section 64.400 of the Legislative Code to adopt the Fort Road Development Plan sumniary as an addendum to the Comprehensive Plan and to adopt zone changes implementing tY�e plan summary; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission inatiated the Zoning Study on November 22, 2002, for the purpose of considering amendments to the Saint Paul Legislative Code pertaining to the Fort Road azea of the City (Wesi Seventh Street); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the Forr Road Development Plan summary and the Zoning Study on January 14, 2005, notice of which was mailed to al] property owners in the study area and was published in the Saint Paul Pioneer Press on December 27, 2004, January 3, 2005, and January 10, 2005; and WHEREAS, the consideration of public testimony and the recommendations of City staff, the Planning Commission on 3anuary 28, 2005, recommended approval of the rezonings as proposed; and WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing before the City Council on the Fort Road zoning proposals was dul}� mailed to all properry owners in the study area and duly published in the official newspaper of the City on February 6, 2005; and WHEREAS, a public hearing before the City Council having been conducted on February 16, 2005, at which all interested parties were given an opportunity to be heazd, the Council having considered all the facts and recommendations concerning zoning for the Fort Road area of the City; now therefore THE COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL DOES ORDAIN: Section 1 The Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby amend the Saint Paul Zoning Ordinance by amending the zoning ciassifications for the following properties on the zoning maps of the City of Saint Paul, Sheets No. 27, 28 and 35, as incorporated by reference in Section 60.303 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code: That the following lots of record are hereby rezoned as noted: ,..�.�„�� i.3� _ ; ,� � �� ds- �� 41 42 Section 2 ��_� 43 44 This ordinan� shall become effective thirty (30) days after its passage, approval and publication. � 46 !w�'.�w:n� i'. res..,...� �..� �..�l �+.. Fo.{ 2..A l�<vol.P...�..4 1�1�5 G.S.'# 342're?�i ba'_ 47 48 By: Approved by By: xequested by Department o£: Plannincr & Economic Develooment By: �. Approved by Financial Services By: Foxm Approved by City Attorney by �� 3 Adopted by Council: Date ¢�%f/i//J1�73. � ddS Adoption Certified by Council 5ec�tary !�[�,!/M4+�. ! Z?—oT � Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green SheefGreen Sheet � OS�� pE - Planning & Ecanomic Development Contact Person & pbone: Penny Simison 6-6654 Must Se on Council Agenda f�� z. z�s 26-JAN-0S � Assign Number For Routing Order Totaf # of Signature Pages, (Clip All Locatiora for Signature) Green Sheet NO: 3025039 lannio & Economic Develo De artment Director � i � � a or's Rce Mavor/A i tant �_��, nci i lerk i I rk Action Requestetl: Approval of Zoning Study (Zone Changes) for the nodes in Fort Road azea of the Ciry. Rewmmendations: Approve (A) or R � Pla�ning Commission Cl6 Committee _ _ _ _ _ Givil Service Commission (R): 0 i 2 3 4 5 1 j t. Has this personffrm ever worked under a contrect for this department? Yes No 2. Has this personfffrtn ever been a city empbyee? Yes No 3. Does this persoNflrm possess a skill not normalry possessed by any current city empbyee? Yes No Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet initlating Problem, issues, Opportunity (Who, What, When, Where, Why): Planning Commission initiated zoning study of Fort Road nodes to implement Fort Road Development Plan 5umcnary. AdvantapeslfApproved: � Implementation of plan amendment can go forward Disadvantapes If Approved: none DisadvanWAes If Not App�oved: Implementation cannot go forwazd. Tota1 Amount of Transaction: Fundinp Source: CosURevenue 8udgeted: ActivitV Number: Financial information: (Explain) DS-r'ay city of saint paul pfanning commission resolution file number o=°-o2a date Sanuary 28, 2005 RESOLUTIO�T ADOPTI�TG THE FORT ROAD DEVELOPMENT PLfIN ZONIlVG STUDY WIIEREAS,the Planning Commission is authorized under Minnesota Statutes Section 462.357 (5) and Section 64.4Q0 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code to initiate a 40-Acre Study for the purpose of amending the Zoning Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission on November 22, 2002, initiated the preparation of a Zoning Study for the Fort Road (West Seventh Street) area; and WHEREAS, the Ptanning Commission held a public hearing on the Fort Road Deve�opment Ptan Summary and Zoning Study on 7anuary 14, 2004, notice of which was duly given in the Saint Paul Pioneer P:ess oa December 27, 2fl04; ;anaary 3, 2J�5; a��d January 10, 2��5; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, in accordance with state statutes, has determined that: The stud� area is at least 40 acres in size. The number of real estate descriptions affected by the amendments renders obtaining of written consent impractical. The proposed amendmems are related to the overall needs of the communiry, to existing land use or to plans for future land use, as laid out in the Fort Road Devetopment Plan 3ummary. tiOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission here6y recommends adoption of the Zoning Code amendments attached hereto and directs the PlanningAdministratorto forwazd the study and this resolution to the Mayar and City Council for their review and adoption. moved by Kramer seconded by in favor Un�nzmous against FE6 lb GbbS 1�:1C rK rH�YHn�K❑ �Hw riKri oic ��o �o�r i� oo�.��o��.� �.o�� FABYANSKE, WES7'RA Sc HART js_ ��' a� A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIn710N M.7.FABYANSKE MMK W.�YFS7M JEfiFlJOANl, KEqHNEy OFNNI$ J. TROOIEN CNqi6TOPtfER P. CI STEVEN C. COX dUl1EA �OHEH7Y MPONn. DEAN SCOTT A.10HN56N SUiTE 1900 eoo u+su.� av�ue MINNEAPOLIS,MINNESO7A55402 TELEPHOPIE 812.938A156 FAX 612?383857 WW W.FlYHLAW.COM �ebzuary 16, 2005 �IA FACSIMILE: (651) 228-33X4 Ms. Penny Simison City Planner City of St, Pau! 100 City Hall Annex 25 West 4�` Street St. Paul, MN 55162 12e: 533 Randolph i George Fulford, 3r. Property Ford Road Area Reznning Our F41e No.: 31012-060 TJeaz Ms. Simison: 1'lease present this lettex to ihe City Council at today's meeting. C1r�xNn L ssPEE7 PATPIGCJ, LEF+O'MULOFwV FNEDEfUCK N. LAONER NATHAii F, M'� Tl1ER�+.A PETERSON 7NEO�OREV,ROBEHTS N+1Tf}tEw T. CAlUN9 9RrLtNEY40QlkRT' OM+IELJ. GILCMHIST OAMELL A9ELNH ROFiY O. WGGNt OFCOUNSEI: GOACONP HEINSON KATH�EF,r.t S. hwia' REN£E K 21PBE6 FETiPEC: e.a wu* 'NOf UCENSED IN MINNE$OTA EMlJL DTR001£N9fwNU`M.COM 0�5E0T (812I36B�]822 We represent George Fulfoxd, 3r. in connection with property which he owns at 533 Randolph, which is in the vicinity of the Schmidt Brewery. It has recently come to his attention that Council Member Thune is proposing a rezoning of thac propeny to TN-3, rather than the I-1 which the Planning Commission recommended. Y am also enclosing a letter which Mr, Pulford sent ta the Planning Commission urging tl�at property ad}acent to 533 RandoIph likewise be rezoned to I-1. 'The Planning Commission agreed with 1�1i. Fulfo�d. The property at 533 Randolph is cuzrently used by ehe School District as its bus garage. It is at a different elevation than other property proposed ta be rezaned to TN in connection with the redevelopment of the Schmidt Brewery. It is in a geographically dif�ezent area. It is an area of railroad tracks. We saongly urge the St. Paul City Council to reZOne the property at 533 Randolph to I-1, rather than TN-3, The City Council should follow the recommendation of the Planning Commission and take into consideration the cunent use of the propetty, as well as ics foraseeable N:�PLWIh39p666,doc FEB 16 2005 13:16 FK FHbYHNbKt LHw rtrtri oac �ao �o�i �v ��.��.� ,.�� -. � pS• !9 February 16, 2005 Page 2 use, which is not TN-3 uses. Mr. Fulford strongly objects to the rezoning of his property to T'N- 3, which simply is unreasonable and not supported by the record. We strongly urge the City Council to foltow the Planning Commission by rezoning 533 Randolph to I-Z rather than TI�'-3. For medicai reasons, Mr. Fulford is unabie to auend today's meeting. Very irui urs, Dennis 7, Trooien D7T:kjm cc: George Fulford, Jr, (via fax) N:�PL�D)Il' 90666. doc FEB 16 Gdbb l��ld hK hHbYHrv7Kt �Hw riKri oic �oo 000r iv DOJIGGOJJIY r.�«.m. )udd �ulford Properties es- � . 33�70 A'tatsiue'hl lodd Fulford Cashin� MN 56443 T"nonc320-S9A�SId3 - wwwjuddtralry.com Faz 320.59d-7099 F,mail jutldC jvddrealry.cam January 10, 20a5 St. paul Planning Commission 25 YJest Fourth Street Suite 1400 Saint Paul, MN 55102 Re: Fort Road Developxnent Plan/Northeast Corridor Development Ptan bear Planning Commission: T am the owner of the pxoperty known as 533 Randolph, This property is currantly accupied by the St. Paul School Dist. 625 for stonge of buses and police cazs. This property is one of four properties on the north side of Randoiph between Auke on the east and Drake on the west. They are a11 cunently zoned I2 including the properties east of Auke. Please refer to your map provided to Qroperty owners� The propenies between Drake & Duke are now included zn ihe proposed re-zoning to TI from T2 with the glaring exception of the parcel owned by the same folks that own the brewery property. This parcel is proposed for r� zoning t0 "Z'N3. This is inconsistent with your overall planning. 3ust because the main brewery property is pmposed to bc TN3 do you viotate good planning just because a pazcel is owned by the same brewery property owners? 'Your zoning should be znore consastent along the nozth szde of Randolph with all properties that are boundary properties be zezoned to Zl rather co have oae inserted with different zoning. Please reconsider your proposaI for this ona pa�ei. If you drive on James you see that all the properties that boundary on Randolph are ac a different lower elevarion than che properties nonh of James. Zn addition I have a purchase a�eement submitted to the brewery owners for part of their property that is south and east of che railroad tracks for the beneft of the School bist. 625 bus garage needs. TN3 2oning would most likely not fzt with the proposed Ti zoning of our property. The school district transponacion people would certainly appreciate youz cooperation. Sincerely, 3udd Fulford Sent via Emaii: Penelope.simisonC�ci.stpaul.mn.us COMManCUt»nvsiRw. REAI. �STAT] ** TOTAL PAGE.04 �� DEPARTMEIJT OF PLANNWG & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMEPIT Susan Kimberly, Drrecior CITY OF SAIN'f PAUL Randy C. Ketty, Mayor 25 West Fourtfi Sbee[ Saint Paut, MN 55702 Brief Description of Zoning Ciassifications d5- �19 � :�.� � a� Telephone: 651-266-66.i5 Facsimile: 6�7-228-3314 The intent of the Zoning Study is to adopt zoning districts that will implement the policies in the Fort Road Development Pfan summary. Explanation of non-conforming use status, or better known as "grandfather rights": When a zoning classification is changed on a property, and the new zoning classification does not permit the current use, the current use (house, business, industry, for exampfe) is not affected unfess or until that use is vacant for one year or is demolished. The existing use is "grandfathered in." (This is also called "having non-conforming rights" to the previous zoning classification.) When an existing use is vacant for one year or is demolished, then the new use would have to conform to the new zoning. If the owner of a property wlth a"non-conforming use" wishes to change or expand that use, he/she will have to apply to the Planning Commission for either a"change of non-conforming use" permit or an "enlargement of non-conforming use" permit. These are the zoning classifications proposed for the Albion, Otto and Randolph nodes: • TN2 TN means Traditional Neighborhood. Permits mixed-use, including residentfal and commercial (both retail and office). It is designed for use in existing or potentiaf pedestrian nodes. • TN3 • 12 • 11 • 62 • B3 Mixed-use development on large sites. Medium industry. General manufacturing, including produciion and processing of materials. Light industry Light manufacturing and assembly from previously prepared materials. Community business. Generally characterized by a cluster of establishments with relatively large vehicular and pedestrian activity. General business. This is intended for a diversity of types of businesses and is generally located along major tra�c streets or adjacent to B-2 districts. G'�Shared�PE4\Simison�comdocs and dovmtown�SPLiT PLANkouMi4�t�WE�'d��ryHa�asheet-pub heaz-R road-2-16-05.wpd ' I � � ---� ; � i �� Z � �� o , � e , �. �o ; � ! i� _� , J � \�' __� ,—__J'! ; �s __ H1S1A y� �_ � - � � B ;; � . %" ; " , '• . -. . j ,�`..� , ' , ,'\ ., �� n 3� ; dS- �9 �� 5 � � ', 4 , , � ,-�� \ ', � - -- _ � N Z F- / � � /^� . � I 1 �J � �� i \ '��—I I ?�/ � N � I �� t'�-_ ? 1'�, � I \�/ � i I� i --- - J � ' �� l�� \\ \ \ '6 � � ~ \ _ � \ � , M � 1 � N � V � �. � � � \ �� V � < �\ �, � �� \;�� i'�� ` o u u w J � � � vls � m � r� � N .0 � �� - �� i� • • �� • � �- �t� � . � C K W a � � M � � g q � � :1 �' J . F7 Q_H � �� \ = .. � �� m a � � � ��\-\� �� m z�m V 3 � � O � OS- 9�1 � � � O W Z�UJ 3 � � � • ` � � � ► w �: �. ' - �.. � �irr w � � . w �. � � �� ', MI Y � � =' � � � � � � : .� �� !� r-r � r r� r--�c�7n ,--�.a`�`� as� SO �� d�+ i.d O � 0 � r__ � � � � � .,,,� �� o� �ti��,� . .� = I ��' !�� . IE� .�.� nu�u � l�IN _. � - m � � �� a � � � -- y � � � � � �. � � . � . Council File # //..1 ��9 ordinance # Green Sheet # 3�2��,� OF 'F�Ti ORDINANCE PAUL, MINNESOTA Committee: Date 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 ordinance amending Chapter 60 of the Saint Paul Legislafive Code pertaining to zoning for the City of Saint Paul with changes to tbe zoning maps for the Fort Rosd area WHEREAS, the City Coun is authorized under Minnesota Statutes Section 462357 and Section 64.400 of the Legislative Code to adopt Fort Road I?evelopment Plart summary as an addendum to the Comprehensive Plan and to ado one changes implementing the plan summary; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commissi mihated the Zoning Study on November 22, 2002, for the purpose of considering amendments to the Saint P Legisiative Code pertaining to the Fort Road azea of the City (West Seventh Street); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a blic hearing on the Fort Road Development Plan summary and the Zoning Study on January 14, 2005, notic f which was mailed to all properry owners in the study area and was published in the Saint Paul Pioneer Pr s on December 27, 2004, January 3, 2005, and January 10, 2005; and WHEREAS, the consideration of public testimony and th� Commission on January 28, 2005, recommended approval of City staff, the Planning rezonings as proposed;and WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing before the City Council o e Fort Road zoning proposals was duly mailed to a11 property owners in the studp area and duly published i e o�cial newspaper of the City on February 6, 2005; and WHEREAS, a public hearing before the City Council having been conducte n February 16, 2005, at which all interested parties were given an opportunity to be heard, the Council having nsidered all the facts and recommendations concerning zoning for the Fort Road area of the City; now there re THE COUNCTL OF THE CTTY OF SAINT PAUL DOES ORDAIN: Section 1 The Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby amend the Saint Paul Zoning Ordinance by a�10 zoning classifications for the following properties on the zoning maps of the City of Saint Paul, � 27, 28 and 35, as incorporated by reference in Section 60303 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code: That the following lots of record are hereby rezoned as noted: a 1�1e No. �s- 9�