D00276VJhite — City Clerk
Pink — Finan
Canary — De ,�o�}eeoun g ��
Slue — E eer�
Green — �tractor p
� 5�,� 1
• � Ft
� Q���Nc
L
� � �.i � � �
� •
�. - a�i.ta�p�Z: -� �" .
�;
v w CITY OF SAII3T PAUL — OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
/ ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER
for '
CONTRACT CHANGE AGREEMENT N0. 1
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER, Whereas, additions which proved to be necessary to the Improvement described
as Edgcimibe-St. Dennis Sewer Separation $ Str I mprovement
known as tivlt # - -
� 29174 , City Pcojeet No, q3_p_ RtlF,q Pa1 da F ons , InC
Contracta, is eomposed of the following: '
Fxtra Work Items Listed on the Attactmtent.
.
ORDERED, That the City of Saint Paul, through its Mayor, approves the foregoing additiotts made in ac-
cordanae with the specifications in the sum of �_ 99.710.27 , said amount to be added to the lump sum con-
Activity # 29174�
sideration named in the contract. ]mown as � , and which amount is to be financed from:
1993 CSSP Funding Availabie In The Contract
$57,155.45 - Reimbursement From Water Utility
$42,554.82 - Sewer Revenue Bonds
� ��r3-aT�a6-o7Xx a9�7�
�
�" 2� is �s
9 aa is�
� is �
4 is��
— f — —
0
��.d� �' �o�� /.�c
Public WorksConstrucflon �� �
Lazry Lueth 266-6083
ASSIGN
NUMBEfl
# OF SIGNATURE PAGES
GREEN SHEET ��?1`�0
INITIAUDATE -
:PARTMENTDIRECT6R S�
TV ATTOflNEY
lDGEf DIRECTOfl
6 (CUP ALL LOCA7i0115 FOR SIGNATUR� �2
C(TYfAUNCIL
&
�
15722
— iNrrwvoarE—
:ES DIR.
ACCOUNT y�
Approval of Administtalive Order for Contrxt Change Agreement #1
ED(iCUMBE-ST. DENNIS SEWER SEPARATION AND STREET IMPROVEMIIVT
City Project No: 93-S-8092 & 93-5-8069 Contractor. Palda & Sons, Inc.
AECOMMEtiDpT70NS7.pprwe (fq m flaject (P)
PlANNMGGOMMi$SION CNIL:
CB CAMMITTEE
A STAFF
_ DISTRICTCAUNGIL _ _
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCILOBJECTNE?
Sewer Separation
PEflSONAL SERVICE COMHACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING qUESTIONS:
�. Has thi5 personJfirm ever woAced under a convact tor ihis department?
YES NO
2. Has ihis personmrm ever been a dry employee?
YES NO
3. Does ihis persoiVfirm possess a skill not nmmally possessed by any current city employee?
YES NO
Explain all yes answers on sepa2te sheet and attach to graen sheet
INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE. OPPOR7UNITY (WHO. WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHY):
Afrer contract award, the Water Uriliry found the existing water mains to be in poor condirion. A price was negoHated with the Contractor
ro excava[e the trench for ihe Water Utility (Item 1.5)
Other extra work items found to be necessary during the course of construcaon.
�����31 ��
SEP w'� 1994
ADVANTAGE6IFAPPROVED: , y , r �
Quthorization w compensate the Coniractor for work performed at the d'uection of the Engineer. �.�' ����� ��� �4 �� ��
.
RECfiVED
OCT - 5 1994
OISqQVANTAGES IF
None
����°'���
r7��, � � �� � �
3R�'c3....�'. �1f 7r.rr ..
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED:
Payment of monies due Contractoc would be complicated.
� �a�tiGF�ffVT ER CES
� LAMOUNT OFTRANSACTION S 99 710 27 COST/pEVENUE BUDGETED (CIpCLE ONE) YES No
DINGSOURCE Fun&ng available in [he con¢act. ACTNITV NUMBER 24174
FINANCVALINFORMATfON:(E%PLAVN} e�?�. �p���
$42,554.82 Sewer Revemie Bonds, and $57,155.45 Water Uxility � ��� �� � 9 � '
�V�