D002260. ,, CITY OF SAINT PAUL i
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR No.: �D� o�oZ [OI�
ADNIINISTR.ATIVE ORDEft Date: �—� q—�
• BUDGET REVISION GS #: 106404
?�DN�AZIVE ORDIIt, Consistent with the authority granted to the Mayor in Section 10.07.4 of the
City Charter and based on the request of the Director of the Department of Public Works to amend the
2002 budget of the Public Works General Fund, the Director of the Department of FSnance and
Management Services is authorized to amend said budget in the following manner.
Current Amended
Budget Change Budget
1 001 - 02155 - 011l Fu117Yme Permanent $444,431.00 $45.71 $444,476.71
2 001 - 02155 - 0246 FilmProcessing $180.00 ($113.95) $66.02
3 001 - 02155 - 0439 Fringe Benefits $143,200.00 $6527 $143,26827
4 001 - 02280 - 0371 Electricity $1,259,763.00 $26,46529 $1,286,23129
5 001 - 02282 - 0279 Other-Repair & Maintenance $546,149.00 $1,867.40 $548,016.40
6 001 - 02283 - 0279 Other-Repair & Maintenance $1,990,241.00 ($28,335.69) $1,961,905.31
Totals $4,353,964.00 $0.00 $4,383,964.00
.
F
Date
Requested by: Department Director
CEPAf1TMEM/OFFICE/COUNCIL
Public Works Administration
Dick Rupert
COVNCIL AGENDA BY (DAT�
DATEIWTIATED
3/10/03
� DEPARTMENT DIRECT�R�
ASSIGN
NUMBFA FOR � CT1' AITORNEV
flOVf1NG
Q�� �FINANCIALSEqVICESDIFi
� MF.YOR (OR ASSISTAi��
�SEWORMCR
�oo aa� p
No 106404
�CITYCWNCIL _
� CITY CIERK _
�FlN. SEflVICES�ACCT.
� ACTIVITY MGR
� DICK FUPERTIACCT�
TOTAL R OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE}
Approval of attached Administrative Order amending the spending plans for Public Works Generai Fund activities.
ftECOMMENDATIONS: Approve (A) or Reject (R)
PLANNfNG COMMISSION
CB COMMIITEE
CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION
PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE
FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:
1. Has this persoNfirtn ever worked under a contract for this
department?
YES NO
2. Has this personJfirm ever been a city empfoyee?
YES NO
3. Does this personlfirm possess a skili not normalty possessed by any
current city employee?
YES NO
Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green
sheet
ISSUE, OPPORTUNITV (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHY):
5pending for budget year 2002 was not above the total appropriation. A few individual line items displayc: � sn?�ii o�; �srages -
under 1% of Public Works General Fund total appropriations.
ADVAN7AGES {F APPROVED
This adjustment moves under spending to those small overages, balancing Public Works General Fund actuai spending
against adjusted budgets. , n �,�,� �>.^, ?° ;"�; ��f?f
(a`fi�`11�e: i�.;.�.�„"ti>
'` �; r. e � .����
; �..
DISADVANTAGESIPAPPROVED:
None.
s
DISADVANFAGESIFNOTAPPROVED
Public Works General Fund budget wouid remain unadjusted.
�OTALAMOUNTOFTRANSACTION$ N@S $O
FUN�ING S�URCE
C0.S7/qEVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCI.E ONE) YES No
ACITiiTYNUMBER OZ�SS, OZZSO, OZZH2, OZZH3
FINANCIALINFOflMATION: (EXPWN)