D00746� 4
CITY OF SAINT PAUL
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
�pproved Copies to: ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER:
- City Clerk (Original) BUDGET REVtSION
- Finance Dept's Accounting Division
- Requesting Dept.
CURRENT
BUDGET
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER, Consistent wiffi the autl�oriry granted to the Mayor in Section 10.07d of the City Charter
and based on the request oi the Director of the Department of Finance and Management Services
to amend the 1995 Budget of the Finance Special Projeetsi Fund, the Director of the Departrnent of Finance and Management Services
is authorized W amend said 6udget in the folbwing manrter:
DEPARTMENT 8� DIVISION:
FUND , ACTNITY AND OBJECT:
Finance Special Projects
Parking Meter Collections
GL 165-31155-0111 Futl Time Permanent
GL 1 65-31 7 55-0822 Trucks and Vans
n
LJ
Treasury Special Fiscal 5 Services
GL 165-31154-0299 Other Misc Services
85,070
0
No: " -�7�
Date: /�2 - I - 9S
APPROVED
CHANGES
(27,000)
24,000
AMENDED
BUDGET
64,070
24,000
68,000 (3,000) 65,000
153,070 0 153,070
nn t2Q-�.�? Iz-1- �jS
roved by; Mayor Date
�
,; _
-D -007��
' GREEN SHEE N° 3 2 3 9 0
-95 INRIAVDATE - � " " ' _ INITIAL/DATE
ODEPARTMENTDIRECfOR �C�7'YCAUNdL
O CRY ATTOflNEY CITY CLERK
FOR � BUDGET DIPECTOR � FIN. & MGT. SERVICES DIR.
� � MAVOR (OR /SSISTANn � Department Accounta
TOTAI # OF SIGNATURE PAGES (CUP ALl LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATUR� —
This Administrative Order amends the 1995 Budget to provide funds for the purchase of a
vehicle for the Parking Meter Collection Function. There is no net increase to spending as
a result of this revision.
_ PLANNING CqMMISSION _ dVIL SERVICE COMMISSION
_ CIB COMMITTEE _
_ STAFF __
_ DISTHICTCAUHT �
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNpL O&IECTIVE4
PERSONAL SERVICE CONTflACTS MUST ANSWEN THE FOLLOWINCa QUESTIONS:
1. Has ihis pereoNfirm ever worked u�tler a coMract far ihis tlepartmeM?
YES NO
2. Has this personlfirm ever been a aty employee?
YES NO
3. Does this personHittn possess a skill not normally possessetl by arry curtent edy empioyee?
YES NO
Explain ali yes answen on separete sheet antl ettaeh to green sheet
f1ATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNIN (Who, Whet, When, Where. Why):
The vehicle provides ergonomic features necessary for the safety of City employees,
technology necessary to meet future needs, and increased security and safety of public
employees and public funds. The funds are available because of a cutback of 1 FTE in the
activity. We axe, in essence, usi�ig?, technology to fulfill the needs of the activity.
ANTAGESIFAPPROVED: �
This expenditure would fit into one of the Mayor's priorities, reinventing government.
Benefits would be the capability to adapt to future changes in technology, the ability to
assist Finance and other departments with their work, and the flexibility necessary for
future reorganization.
None
City standards for safety of both public employees and public funds will not be met. The
City is not adequately planning for future technological advances.
The funds are currently available for this expenditure. This purchase, if not made now,
will have to be hudgeted for in the future.
fAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION S —� COST/HEVENUE BUOGETED (CIHCLE ONE) YES NO
FUNDIfdG SOURCE ACTIVITY NUMBEP
FttJANC1AL MFORMATION. �EXPlA1N)