91-2316 ����a��.� _
� � � ��� q � -z3i � >>
� Council File #�
Green sheet ,� ��f 1`1
RESOLUTION
. CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
Presented By
Referred To Committee: Date
OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL
APPROVING THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN, ENERGY PARK
WHEREAS:
A. By Resolution C.F. No. 276898, adopted May 26, 1981, the Council of the
City of Saint Paul, pursuant'to Minnesota Statues, Chapter 472A (recodified as
Sections 469.124 to 469.134) established Energy Park Development District for
the purposes stated in said statute and resolution and by Resolution C.F. No.
88-2008 adopted December 21, 1988 added the Twin City Testing Development Area
to the Energy Park Development District for the purposes stated in said
resolution (herein collectively referred to as the "Municipal Development
District") .
B. By Resolutions 1499, 1535, 1609, 1607 and 1827 the Port Authority of the
City of Saint Paul (the "Port Authority") pursuant to Minnesota Statutes
Chapters 458 (recodified as Sections 469.048 to 460.068) established
approximately the same geographic area as the Energy Park Development District
as Energy Park Economic/Industrial Development District and by Resolution 3028
created the Twin City Testing Industrial and Economic Development District
(herein collectively the "Industrial Development District") .
C. By Resolution C. F. No. 276900, the City Council, pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Sections 273.71 to 273.78 (recodified as Sections 469.124 to
469.134) designated the Municipal Development District as a tax increment
financing district (the "Tax Increment District") and adopted a Development
Program and Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "Tax Increment Financing Plan")
for the purpose of financing the capital and administrative costs of the
Municipal Development District, as amended by Resolution 89-1466.
D. By Resolution C.F. No. 276899, the City Council pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Section 472A.10 (recodified as Section 469.131) designated the Port
Authority as administrator of the Municipal Development District.
E. By Resolution C.F. No. 276900, the City Council and by Resolution 1876
the Port Authority approved a Joint Powers Agreement for the Administration,
Operation and Financing of the Energy Park Development and Tax Increment
Financing District, dated August 18, 1981, which was amended by the Restated
Joint Powers Agreement for the Administration, Operation and Financing of
Energy Park and Twin City Testing Area Developments and Tax Increment
�i���vll�l� 91-231b ✓
Financing Districts dated August 30, 1989, and approved by Resolution C. F.
89-1466 of the City Council and Resolution 3167 of the Port Authority (the
"Joint Powers Agreement") .
F. The City, Port Authority and Ryan St. Paul Limited Partnership (the
"Developer") entered into a Development Agreement dated November 13, 1991,
whereby the Developer undertook to acquire, rehabilitate and otherwise improve
and redevelop, certain property located in the District ("the Development") ,
and the Port Authority and City undertook to issue or, if necessary, to cause
the Housing and Redevelopment Authority to issue tax increment bonds in the
approximate maximum principal amount of $5,000,000 to provide funds to
reimburse the Developer for certain development costs. In order to issue
these tax increment bonds, it is necessary to also issue (i) tax increment
supported bonds in the approximate maximum principal amount of $1,800,000 to
refund, in part, the Port Authority's Industrial Park Revenue Bond; and (ii)
to issue revenue bonds in the approximate maximum principal amount of $900,000
to also refund, in part, the Industrial Park Revenue Bonds, and further
approved the use of District land sales and lease revenues to secure payment
of those bonds, and (the "Bor�ds") and the City and the Port Authority entered
into a Second Restated Joint Powers Agreement to implement the provision of
said Development Agreement.
G. The City and Port Authority have requested the Housing and Redevelopment
Authority to issue the Bonds and to enter into a Suppleraent to Second Amended
and Restated Joint Powers Agreement to implement its financial support of the
Development.
H. The issuance of the Bonds will (i) in part refund Port Authority Bonds
the proceeds of which were used to acquire and clear blighted property,
provide necessary public and site improvements and to prepare District
property to sell or lease for redevelopment, and (ii) in further part to
assist redevelopment of the Development property by private enterprise, all
within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes Section 469.002 Subd. 14.
I. There has been presented to and considered at this meeting of the City
Council a proposed Redevelopment Plan, Energy Park, which defines a
Redevelopment Project Area approximating the area of the Municipal Development
District, adopts the Development Program of the Energy Park Municipal
Development District as the Redevelopment Plan of the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority, spells out the implementation responsibilities of the
Authority, the Port Authority as more particularly detailed in the above
identified Joint Powers Agreements, and is supported by financial and
relocation plans.
J. The City Council has considered the reports of the Saint Paul Planning
Commission, File No. 81-20, adopted June 26, 1981 finding that the Development
Program for the Energy Park Development District, and File No. 88-80 adopted
November 4, 1988, finding that the Development Program for Twin City Testing
Area of the Energy Park Development District conform to the Saint Paul '
Comprehensive Plan, and Resolution No. 91-12/10 - � of the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority of the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota, adopted December
10, 1991 making certain findings and adopting the Redevelopment Plan, Energy
Park.
��������Id1�. 91- 23i6 ,/
K. The Redevelopment Plan, Energy Park, when approved by the City
Council,will provide a plan for the development or redevelopment of the
Redevelopment Project Area defined in said Plan sufficiently complete to
identify need for and statement of objectives .and program of the City and HRA
for carrying out of a redevelopment project including property to be acquired,
public improvements and facilities including open space to be provided, land
use controls including proposed reuse of land for private redevelopment and
other redevelopment project activities and operations consistent with the
Development Program for the Municipal Development District and the Saint Paul
Comprehensive Plan.
L. On December 17, 1991, the City Council conducted a public hearing upon
the Redevelopment Plan and project thereby proposed all after published notice
of hearing in the Saint Paul Ledger on December 7, 1991, at which hearing the
City Council heard testimony from all interested, and having considered the
findings and determinations of the Planning Commission and Housing and
Redevelopment Authority, and additional reasons and supporting facts, recited
herein and in said Redevelopment Plan.
• NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Saint Paul having reviewed and
considered the documents submitted and the recitals, representations and
provisions contained therein, and having wieghed and considered testimony
presented at the public hearing together with evidence developed in connection
with previous Council consideration of the adoption and implementation of the
Energy Park Municipal Development District, resolves
l. It is hereby found and determined as follows:
A) That the Redevelopment Plan, Energy Park (and Municipal
Development District Program adopted by reference
therein) and the Energy Park Redevelopment Project
proposed thereby constitute a Redevelopment Plan
within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes
Section 469.002 Subd. 16 and a Redevelopment Project
within the meaning of Section 469.002 Subd. 14.
B) That the Development Property would not be made available
without the financial assistance and bonding authorizations
sought by the City of Saint Paul and Port Authority.
C) That the Redevelopment Plan and development covered by
the Development Agreement affords maximum opportunity
consistent with the needs of the locality as a whole
for redevelopment of the Pro�ect and property by
private enterprise.
D) That the Redevelopment Plan conforms to the Saint Paul
Comprehensive Plan, the general plan for the community
as a whole.
�+K���1�11�►�. QI -Z31�✓
E) That the Redevelopment Project activities proposed by the Plan
will result in minimal, if any, additional displacement of
individuals, families or businesses to that effected by the
� implementation of the Municipal Development District to date and
feasible means exist for providing required relocation
assistance.
2. That the Redevelopment Plan, Energy Park is hereby approved and the
Housing and Redevelopment Authority is authorized to undertake said Project in
accordance with said Plan. '
ENPKRES
� Navs Absent Requested by partment of:
smon
03i✓SLZ
n l PLANNING AND ECO OMIC DEVELOPNIENT
scc ee � �
ettman i
s��
i son i BY� �
Z� 1991
Adopted by Council: Date �- � --
Form ved b C t torney
Adoption Certified by Coun 1 ecretary $y
By: �
Approved by Mayor for Submission to
�pproved by M . Dat
DEC � 9 ���; council
_ __ � �,�,C'���
By� 4���'�i'/ By:
��0��� ������ �'w °�7
4�-23�h ,/
�
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL, 1�ZINNESOTA
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
ENERGY PARK
Approved by Housing and Redevelopment Authority: , 1991
Approved by City of Saint Paul: , 1991
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes cha te� r 469
<
91-2316 ,/
PART I. REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA LEGAL DESCRIPT ION
All that part of the unplatted lands in Section 27, Township 29, Range 23 and Section
28, Township 29, Range 23; that part of Lot 1 Block 1 and Lot 1 Block 2 Kasota
Addition; that part of Blocks 23, 24, 25, and 31, St. Anthony Park; vacated Bartlett Court
and vacated Beard Court; all lying within the following described line:
Commencing at the intersection of the North line of Kasota Avenue with the
Westerly line, e�ended, of vacated Bartlett Court, thence Southerly along said
Westerly line a.nd its extension to the intersection of the North Right-of-Way line
of the joint Great Northern, and the Saint Paul, Minneapolis and Manitoba
Railway tracks; thence Southeasterly along said Northerly Right-of-Way line to its
intersection with the East line of Lexington Parkway; thence Northerly alona said
Easterly line to its intersection with the Southerly Right-of-Way line of the St.
Paul and Northern Pacific Railway tracks; thence Westerly along said Southerly
Right-of-Way line to its intersection with the Easterly line of Highway 51-125
(Snelling Avenue); thence Southerly and Southeasterly along said Right-of-Way
and interchange to its intersection with the Westerly line of Flynn Street; thence
Southerly along said Westerly line to its intersection with the Northerly line of
Rosen Road; thence Northwesterly along said Northerly line to its intersection
with the Northerly line of Kasota Avenue; thence continuing Northwesterly along
the Northerly line of Kasota Avenue to its intersection with the Westerly lot line
of Lot 1, Block 2, Kasota Addition; thence Northerly along said Westerly lot line
to its intersection with the North line of said Addition, also being the Southerly
Right-of-Way line of the St. Paul and Northem Paci�c Railway tracks; thence
Northwesterly along said Southerly Right-of-Way line of Gibbs Avenue; thence
Southwesterly along said Westerly line to its intersection with the Northerly line
of Kasota Avenue; thence Northwesterly along said Northerly line to the point of
beginning and there terminating.
and
Commencing af the intersection of the centerlines of Raymond Avenue and University
Avenue; thence Southerly along the centerline of Raymond Avenue to the Easterly
extension of the South line of Lot 6, Block 18, Baker's addition to the City of St. Paul,
Ramsey Co. Minn.; thence Westerly, along said extension and south line of said Lot to
the Northwest corner of Lot 7, said Block 18; thence Southerly to the Southwest corner
of said Lot 7; thence Westerly along the Southerly line of Lot 18, said Block 18 to the
Southwest corner of said Block 18; thence Southerly along the West line of said Block 18
to the Southwest corner of said Block; thence Easterly along the Southerly line of said
Block 18 to its intersection with the Northerly extension of the East line of Geo. H.
Watson's Re-Arrangement in Ford Place and in Blocks 19 and 20 Baker's Addition to St.
Paul Minnesota; thence Southerly along said extension and East line to its intersection
with the Northeasterly right-of-way line of I-94; thence Northwesterly along said
1
q�-z3�b
�
Northeasterly right-of-way line of I-94 to its intersection with the extended centerline of
Cromwell Avenue; thence Northerly along said extension and the centerline of Cromwell
Avenue, to its intersection with the centerline of University Avenue; thence
Southeasterly along said centerline of University Avenue to the point of beginning, and
there terminating.
II. REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
The Housing and Redevelopment Authority for the City of Saint Paul, Minnesota
(hereinafter referred to as the "Housing and Redevelopment Authority") acting
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 through 469.047, inclusive,
adopts as its Redevelopment Plan for the Energy Park Redevelopment Project the
Development Program for the Energy Park Development District adopted by the
Council of the City of Saint Paul pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 472A
(recodified as Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.124 through 469.134, inclusive) on
May 26, 1981 by Resolution, Council File No. 276898, as amended on December
20, 1988 by Resolution, Council File No. 88-2008.
III. IMPLEMENTATION RESPONSIBILITIES
The Area of the Energy Park Redevelopment Project and of the Energy Park
Development District is also the approximate Area of the Energy Park
Economic/Industrial Development District established by the�Port Authority of
the City of Saint Paul. Said Authority and the City of Saint Paul executed a Joint
Powers Agreement For The Administration, Operation and Financing Of The
Energy Park Development And Tan Increment Financing District, dated August
18, 1981, and a Restated Joint Powers Agreement for the Administration,
Operation and Financing of the Energy Park and Twin City Testing Area
Developments and Tax Increment Financing Districts, dated August 30, 1989. In
December 1991, the Port Authority and City of Saint Paul entered into a Second
Amended and Restated Joint Powers Agreement for the Administration,
Operation and Financing of the Energy Park and Twin City Testing Area
Developments and Tax Increment Financing Districts. These Joint Powers
Agreements (hereinafter referred to collectively as the "Joint Powers
Agreements") place the responsibility for the implementation of the Energy Park
Development District in the Port Authority.
In connection with the implementation of the Development District the Port
Authority and City of Saint Paul have requested the Housing and Redevelopment
Authority to undertake the Energy Park Redevelopment Project and to enter into
a Supplement To Second Amended And Restated Joint Powers Agreement with
. 2
�I- 2316 ✓
said Port Authority and City (hereinafter refened to as the "Joint Powers
Agreement Supplement") for the purpose of issuing certain conduit revenue bonds
more fully identified in the Joint Powers Agreement Supplement to assist the Port
Authority in its implementadon of the Development District and
Economic/Industrial Development District and for the purpose of delegating to
the Port Authority the responsibility for implementing the Energy Park
Redevelopment Project.
PART IV. FINANCING STATEMENT
Financing of the Energy Park Redevelopment Project, Development District and
Economic/Industrial Development District will be provided under the Energy
Park Tax Increment Financing District and Energy Park Financing Plan Budget as
amended and attached as Exhibit A and the Twin City Testing Tax Increment
Financing District and Twin City Testing Financing Plan adopted by the Council
of the City of Saint Paul on December 20, 1988 by Resolution, Council File No.
88-2008.
PART V. �2EPORT OF 1� PLANIVING COMMISSION
The City of Saint Paul Planning Commission (hereinafter referred to as the
"Planning Commission") reviewed the Development Program for the Energy Park
Development District in 1981 and in Planning Commission Resolution, File No.
81-20 found that it conforms to its general plans for the development and
redevelopment of the City of Saint Paul. In 1988 the Planning Commission
reviewed the Twin City Testing Development Program and in Planning
Commission Resolution, File No. 88-80 found that the Twi.n City Testing
Development Area Amendment to the Energy Park Development Plan and
District to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Saint Paul.
PART VI. RELOCATION PLAN
Relocation of displace persons and businesses has been carried out by the Port
Authority in accordance with the provisions and requirements of the Federal and
State relocation statutes and implementing regulations.
K:KSL:REDPLAN.EP
3
�1� 231b �/
ERHIBIT A
I. FINANCING PLAN
A. Estimated sources of revenue other than tax increment or bonded
indebtedness
1. Port Authority Revenues $14,083,133
(126,992)
2. Urban Development Action Grant 15,513,500
(15,513,500)
3. Economic Development Administration Grant 2,300,000
----------- $16,256,141
B. Energy Park Tax Increment Supported Revenue Bonds
Series 1988 29,500,000
Series 1989-B & 1984-K 3,420,000
Other Bonds 6,692,100
$39,612,100
C. Tax Increments 44,097,815
TIF Receipts to Repay UDAG's 15,513,500
$59,611,315
D. Total Financing Plan $115,479,556
II.SPENDING PLAN
A. Direct Costs Estimated
Costs
Description
Midway Athletic Facility $2,748,000
Land Acquisition 19,171,703
Rail Relocation 165,000 �
Site Preparation 2,644,226
Streets/Roads 4,883,177
Grading � 1,830,136
Gas Mains 50,000
Storm Sewers 6,328,090
Water Line 815,000
Sanitary Sewer 1,095,143
Energy System 20,327,298
ETA Winter Cooling 380,495
Reinj ection 0
Rental Housing Res. 700,000
Recreation 0
Concourse 600,000
Parking 6,575,745
ai'23�b �
Signal/Lights 475,000
Sidewalks/Misc. 297,100
Bike Trails 274,100
Administrative 9,521,797
Eng./Design (City) 85,000
Contingency 535,952
Other Development Costs 13,053,000
----------- $92,555,962
B. Indirect Costs
Capitalized Interest $20,474,297
Cost of Issuance 2,449,297
----------- $22,923,594
C. Total Direct and Indirect Program Costs $115,479,556
K:KSL:BUDGET.EP .
91-23ib �
DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATE INITIATED N� ' i A 7��
Planning & Economic Development 12/�/91
GREEN T '��
CONTACT PERSON 8 PHONE IN IA A INITIAUDATE
Q DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR �CITY COUNCIL
Katy Lindblad X3309 ASg�GN �CITYATfORNEY �CITYCLERK
NUMBERFOR
MUST BE ON COUNCIL AGENDA BY(DATE) ROUTING �BUDGET DIRECTOR n FIN.&MGT.SERVICES DIR.
i8_i
ORDER MAYOR(OR ASSISTANT)
12/17/91 Public Hearing � [�]�a..��t
TOTAL#OF SIGNATURE PAGES # (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) 2 Lisa Clemen�
ACTION REQUESTED:
1. Approval of Redevelopment Plan, Energy Park
f P
a cu a
�i of in ent n
RECOMMENDATIONS:Approve(A)or Reject(R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWINO QUESTIONS:
_PLANNINO COMMISSION _CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION �• Has this personlfirm ever worked under a contrect for this department7
_CIB COMMITTEE _ YES NO
2. Has this person/firm ever been a city employee?
_STAFF
— YES NO
_DIS7RICT COURT — 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current city employee?
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE7 YES NO
Explain all yes answers on separate afieet and attech to green sheet
INRIATINCa PROBLEM,ISSUE,OPPORTUN�TY(Who,Whet.When,Where,Why):
Final action necessary to allow for HRA issuance of revenue bonds in Energy Park District.
This will allow First Bank Systems to consolidate their data processing functions in a
-new Operations Center.
Se� OJrccn sl�-{� �os . I o3 I 3 + !03 I�.
ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED:
1. 855 jobs in Energy Park
2. 120,000 sctuare feet ETA Buildinc� renovated
3. 240,000 square feet new construction
DISADVANTACiES IFAPPROVED:
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED:
1. FBS project unable to proceed. RECEIVED C+OUI1Cl� f�?v���,.~�� �'n�h�?r
oEC 111g91 DEC 10 1991
CITY CLERK
TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION a 7�556�000 revenue bonds COST/REVENUE BUDGETED(CIRCLE ONE) YES NO
FUNDING SOURCE Energy Park tax increment and ACTIVITY NUMBER 140-36459
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) land rents
d(�
NOTE: COMPLETE DIRECTIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THE GREEN SHEET INSTRUCTIONAL
MANUAL AVAILABLE IN THE PURCHASING 4FFICE(PHONE NO.298-4225).
ROUTING ORDER:
Below are correct routings for the five most frequent types of documents:
CONTRACTS(assumes authorized budget exists) COUNCIL RESOLUTION (Amend Budgets/Axept.Grants)
1. Outside Agency � 1. Department Director �
2. Department Director 2. City Attorney
3. Ciry Attorney 3. Budget Director
4. Mayor(for contracts over$15,000) 4. MayodAssistant
5. Human Rights(for contracts over$50,000) 5. Ciry Council
6. Finance and Management Services Director 6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services
7. Finance Acxounting
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(Budget Revision) COUNCIL RESOLUTION(all others,and Ordinances)
1. Activity Manager 1. Department Director
2. Depertment Accou�tant 2. City Attorney
3. Department Director 3. Mayor Assistant
4. Budget Director 4. City Council
5. City Clerk
6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(all others)
1. Department Director
2. City Attomey
3. Finance and Management Services Director
4. City Clerk
TOTAI NUMBER OF SIGNATURE PAGES
Indicate the#of pages on which signatures are required and papercllp or flag
each of tlwse peges. . .
ACTION REQUESTED
Describe what the projecUrequest seeks to accomplish in either chronologi-
cal order or order of importance,whichever is most appropriate for the
issue. Do not write complete sentences. Begin each item in your list with
a verb.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Complete if the issue in question has been presented before any pody,public
or private.
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE?
Indicate which Council objective(s)your projecUrequest supports by listing
the key word(s)(HOUSING, RECREATION, NEICiHBORHOODS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT,
BUDGET,SEWER SEPARATION). (SEE COMPLETE LIST IN INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL.)
PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS:
This information will be used to determine the city's liability for workers compensation claims,taxes and proper civil service hiring rules.
INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY
Explain the situation or conditions that created a need for your project
or request.
ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED
Indicate whether this is simply an annual budget procedure required by law/
charter or whether there are specific ways in which the Ciry of Saint Paul
and its citizens will benefit from this projecUaction.
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED
What negative effects or major changes to existing or past processes might
this projecUrequest produce if it is passed(e.g.,traffic delays, noise,
tax increases or assessments)?To Whom?When? For how long?
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED
What will be the negative consequences if the promised action is not
approved?Inability to deliver service?Continued high traffic, noise,
accident rate?Loss of revenue?
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Although you must tailor the information you provide here to the issue you
are addressing, in general you must answer two questions: How much is it
going to cost?Who is going to pay?
q 1-Z,31b
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing before the Council of the
City of Saint Paul will be held in the City Council Chambers, City Hall,
15 West Kellogg Boulevard, Saint Paul, Minnesota, at 9:00 a.m. o�December 17,
1�99�,to consider proposals of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority o t e
Ci;ty of Saint Paul, Minnesota (HRA) to adopt a REDEVELOPMENT PLAN, ENERGY
PARK. Copies of the REDEVELOPMENT PLAN are on file with the City Clerk, Room
386 City Hall, and with the HRA, 13th Floor City Hall Annex, and are available
for inspection during regular business hours. Additional information may be
obtained from Katy Sears Lindblad (612) 228-3309.
Upon said public hearing all interested persons will be given opportunity to
be heard or submit written comment and the City Council will consider, among
other matters, (1) whether the Redevelopment Plan Amendment conforms to the
Saint Paul Comprehensive Plan, (2) whether the Redevelopment Plan will afford
maximum opportunity consistent with the sound needs of the City as. a whole for
the development of the Project in cooperation with the private enterprise, and
(3) whether the Redevelopment Plan should be approved.
Date�..> �'i✓0,'� 1°;f. , 1991
-��
� l � 1 \ -�
Mo11y F. 0'Rourke �
City Clerk
,C��-v - � %��(
��.y�.��'�
.. ������Q .
7
1VOTICE IS HEREBY C�IVLPI��publie he�rhag bd'ore t2fe Coundl of the Clty;ii�'°
Sa1nt Paul wlll be held fn the City Council Chambere. Gity Hall, 15 i�Vest Kello�
. Ba�etlevlu+d, �afnt Paul. Minne�ta, at 9:0(>a.m. oa December 17. 1991 bo �der
proposale of the Housing and Redevelopmart Authority e t Panl. �
Mlhnesota(HRAJ�o adopt a REDEVEt.OFlYe�A}T P}.l4fii.�@i'PARK.Copiee of ffie
REDEVELOPMEIVI'PLAN are on 81e wlth the Clty Cler$Room 386 C1ty�Na11.snd with `
the HRA. 13th F1oor CHy Hail Annex.and are avaflable for lns�pectlon d�r1nB regutar •.
buaineea houra.Additional information may be obtained fram Katy Sears Ltrsdbtad i612) '
2Z8-3309.
Upon aaid public hearing all lntereated persona wlll be giv�cn opporiunity bo Deheard .
or suba�it writben comment and thc Gity Coundl�vlll clmsider.among other ntatttra.f 1)
whettier the Redevelopmart Plan Amendment conforms to the Saint Paul Co�stprehen-
aive Plan. (2) whether the Redevelopment Plan wi21 attbrd maximum bpportuntty
conslatent with the sound needs of the GYty as a wlwle for tbe development of the FroJeM
in cooperarion wlth the prlvate arterprlse, acid.(3)afiethet the Rtdevelopmart Plan
should be apprrnrcd.
Dated December 4. 1991. '
MOLLY F.O'RO[IRKE.City Ckrk �
• (Decqnber 7. 1991)
r. , ,