The URL can be used to link to this page

91-2295 � ✓ CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FILE'�IO. r I r� + � FINAL ORDER ` �` _., By ) File No. 183!!OA Voting In the Matter of Ward � �— For the operation af the abo�e staadard atreet lighting syste■ for the FdBD—' CLSVELA�tD AxbA, the follo�iag strestst �iorth side Ford Parkway fro• Missiesippi Aioer Bl�d. to 713.02 feet east of; [enneth Stre�t ; South side Pord Partvay fro■ Miasissippi Hiver Blvd to 587. 13 feet eaat of�' Kenneth 5treet; West side Cle�eland Avenne fron 95.65 f�et north of Scheffer Aveaus to Z6S; feet south oi Ford Pa�kva�; -; East side Cleveland Avenue fro� 240 fe�t north of Eleanor Avenue to 222 feet' south of Ford tark�►ar for the �►onths of January tbrn Dece�rber, 1992. k � , � � �f -:� under Prelirt�inary Order �� DZ.°2 approved ,J 7 `�� ''� The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the �A7�K;�� State Statue; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improve- ment and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 429 of Minnesota State Statue. DE C i '7 1991' COUNCIL PERSON Adopted by the Council: Date � �- — � 7 � / � , Yeas Maarnd Nays GoMts Certified Passed Council Secretary �' �/, MaCCabee � In Favor By 0� � R�tf�sli Tl�una _� Against Vilasn Mayor DEC 19 i991 �IIeIISNE� JA�� '� '92 Public Heaxi,ng - December 17, 1991 �/ �� / No refe�al to •any committee RE 10/29/91 ,/ D A TMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATE INITIATED �T Finance Department/Real Estate 10/25/91 GREEN SHEET 1�� 16230 CONTACT PERSON&PHONE; INITIAUDATE INITIAUDATE �DEPARTMENT DIHECTOR �CITY COUNCIL Roxanna Flink 292-7028 ASSIGN �CITYATTORNEY �CITV CLERK NUMBERFOR MUST BE ON COUNCIL END �Y(DAT � ROUTING �BUDGET DIRECTOR �FIN.&MGT.SERVICES DIR. Ml1St be lII t�e city �lerk sl�/5/91 ORDER �MAYOR(ORASSISTANT) � CpttriCi� jt Monday, -- TOTAL#OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 of 2 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) ACTION REQUESTED: Setting date of hearing for one property omitted from the Ford-Cleveland Area Above Standard Street Lighting Project. Approve the estimated assessment costs for the 1992 operation of the Ford-Cleveland Area (1 property) Above Standard Street Lighting Pro�ect File 18390A RECOMMENDATIONS:Approve(A)or Reject(R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: _PLANNINO COMMISSION _CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION �• Has this person/firm ever worked under a contract for this department? _CIB COMMITTEE _ YES NO 2. Has this person/firm ever been a city employee? .�STAFF _ YES NO _ DISTRiCT COURT — 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current city employee4 SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE7 Ward 3 YES NO Saf er and Better Neighborhoods Explain all yes answara on separata sheet and attach to yreen shest INITIATINO PROBLEM,ISSUE,OPPORTUNITY(Who,What,When,Where,Why): A public hearing was held for each of the above standard lighting systems. In each case, after the hearing from the various neighborhood districts, business associations, property owners and staff, the Council approved both the construction of these systems and their operation by the City on an assessment basis. It is required that a public hearing be held each year for both the estimated operating costs and then the actual operating costs. The first above standard lighting system began in 1983. These systems ahve increased at a rate of about 2 per year since then. ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: This has become an annual budget procedure. The assessment policy originated to allow the direct benefitting parties to pay for the additional operating costs and provide for uniform maintenance of the system. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: None RECEIVEa OCT 3 0 � �lTY C�ERK DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: The City, as a whole, would bear the added expense to operate these systems instead of the direct benefitting parties that requested them. Councif Research �ente� OCT 2 9 1991 T s property nc u e n t e , ina r ere on , TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION s COST/REVENUE BUDGETED(CIRCLE ONE) YES NO FUNDING SOURCE Assessments only ACTIVITY NUMBER FINANCIAL INFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) dw . a NOTE: COMPLETE DIRECTIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THE GREEN SHEET INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL AVAILABLE IN THE PURCHASING OFFICE (PHONE NO.298-4225). ROUTING ORDER: Below are correct routings for the five most frequent types of documents: CONTRACTS(assumes suthorized budget exists) COUNCIL RESOLUTION (Amend Budgets/Accept.Grants) 1. Outside Agency 1. Department Director 2. Department Director 2. City Attorney 3. Ciry Attorney 3. Budget Director 4. Mayor(for contracts over$15,000) 4. Mayor/Assistant 5. Human Rights(for contracts over$50,000) 5. City Council 6. Finance and Management Services Director 6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services 7. Finance Acxounting ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(Budget Revision) COUNCIL RESOLUTION (all others, and Ordinances) 1. Activity Manager 1. Department Director 2. Department Accountant 2., City Attorney 3. Department Director 3. Mayor Assistant 4. Budget Director 4. City Council 5. City Clerk 6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(all others) 1. Department Director 2. City Attorney 3. Finance and Management Services Director 4. City Clerk TOTAL NUMBER OF SIGNATURE PAGES Indicate the#of pages on which signatures are required and peperclip or flag sach of these pages. ACTION REQUESTED Describe what the project/request seeks to accomplish in either chronologi- cal order or order of importance,whichever is most appropriate for the issue. Do not write complete sentences. Begin each item in your list with a verb. RECOMMENDATIONS Complete if the issue in question has been presented before any body, public or private. SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? Indicate which Council objective(s)your project/request supports by listing the key word(s) (HOUSING, RECREATION, NEIGHBORHOODS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, BUDGET,SEWER SEPARATION). (SEE COMPLETE IIST IN INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL.) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS: This information will be used to determine the ciry's liability for workers compensation claims,taxes and proper civil service hiring rules. INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE,OPPORTUNITY Explain the situation or conditions that created a need for your project or request. ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED Indicate whether this is simply an annual budget procedure required by Iaw/ charter or whether there are specific ways in which the Ciry of Saint Paul and its citizens will benefit from this projecUaction. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED What negative effects or major changes to existing or past processes might this projecUrequest produce if it is passed (e.g.,traffic delays, noise, tax increases or assessments)?To Whom?When?For how long? DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED What will be the negative consequences if the promised action is not approved?Inabiliry to deliver service?Continued high traffic, noise, accident rate?Loss of revenue? FINANCIAL IMPACT Although you must tailor the information you provide here to the issue you are addressing, in general you must answer two questions: How much is it going to cost?Who is going to pay?