91-2226 , � � • City of St.Paul COUNCIL FILE NO.� � RESOLUTION APPROVING ASSESSMENT AND B ' FIXING TIME OF HEARING THEREON File No. 18630—A Voting Assessment No. 0200 Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for 6 Supplement to the Hoyt Avenue Area Sewer Project. Preliminary Order 91-360 approve� �rch 5, 1991 FinalOrder 91-628 approve� April 23, 1991 The assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for and in connection with the above improvement having been ' submitted to the Council,and the Council having considered same and found the said assessment satisfactory,therefore,be it RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects approved. RESOLVED FURTHER, That a public hearing be had on said assessment on the 21st day of January, 1992, at the hour of nine , o'clock A.M., in the Council Chamber of the Court House and City Hall Building, in the City of St. Paul; that the Director of Finance give notice of said meetings,as required by the Charter, stating in said notice the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement, and the amount assessed against the lot or lots of the particular owner to whom the notice is directed. COUNCILPERSON Adopted by the Council: Date �� � ��� 1� Yeas Dimond Nays Goswitz Certified P s b ouncil S retary �bee -i In Favor By Rettman /� EC T}y,,,,o �` Against Wilson Mayor PUStiSHED DEC 21'91 TO PUBLIC WORKS, GOMMITTEE MEETING - January 15, 1992 / Public Hearing - January 21, 1992 �� ' v��.a,�+ / RE 11/27/91 V DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATE INITIATED NO 16 2 4 2 Finance De t/R al Estate Division 11/19/91 G R E EN SH E ET CONTACT PERSON&PHO INITIAUDATE INITIAUDATE �DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR �CITY COUNCIL John Saumwe 298-5317 A�IGN �CITYATTORNEY �CITYCLERK NUMBER FOR MUST BE ON COUNCIL A NDA BY(DATE) pOUTING �BUDGET DIRECTOR �FIN.6 MGT.SERVICES DIR. M118t be in City Clerk's Off�� 4 $1 ORDER �MAYOR(ORASSISTAN� � Council Research later than noon Wednesda TOTAL#OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) ACTION REQUESTED: Setting hearing date for the ratification of assessments for the HOYT AVENUE AREA STORM SEWER PROJECT - SUPPLEMENT. File No. 18630-A Assessment No. 0200 RECOMMENDATIONS:Approve(A)or Reject(R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: _PLANNING COMMISSION _ CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION 1• Has this person/firm ever worked under e contrect for this department? _CIB COMMITTEE _ YES NO A s7AFF _ 2. Has this person/firm ever been a city employee? — YES NO _DISTRICT COUR7 _ 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current city employee? SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? YES NO Explain all yes answers on seperate sheet and attach to green sheet Neighborhoods Ward 6 INITIATINO PROBLEM,ISSUE,OPPORTUNITY(Who,What,When,Where,Why): One parcel was missed on the original roll, File No. 18630 for ratification of assessments. Ra.tification is necessary in order to collect the assessment. ADVANTAGESIF APPROVED: Same as above. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Benefitted property owner will have assessment payable via property taxes. �tECEIVED �EC 0 41g91 DISADVANTAQESIFNOTAPPROVED: �ITY ��ERK To not assess the benefit would be inconsistent with City policy. C������ �e.�s�,�-::,�.?; �r:�'•;- ��1�-� ��9i TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION s 22S.36 COST/REVENUE BUDGETEO(CIRCLE ONE) YES NO FUNDING SOURCE Assessments ACTIVITV NUMBER FINANCIAL INFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) �� NOTE: COMPLETE DIRECTIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THE GREEN SHEET INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL AVAILABLE IN THE PURCHASING OFFICE(PHONE NO.298-4225). ROUTING ORDER: Below are correct routings for the five most frequent types of dxuments _ CONTRACTS(assumes authorized budget exists) COUNCIL RESOLUTION (Amend Budgets/Accept. Grents) L Outside Agency 1. Department Director 2. Department Director 2. City Attorney 3. City Attorney 3. Budget Director 4. Mayor(for contracts over$15,000) 4. Mayor/Assistant 5. Human Rights(for contracts over$50,000) 5. City Council 6. Finance and Management Services Director 6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services 7. Finance Accounting ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(Budget Revision) COUNCIL RESOLUTION (all others,and Ordinances) 1. Activity Manager 1. Department Director 2. Department Accountant 2. Ciry Attorney 3. Department Director 3. Mayor Assistant 4. Budget Director 4. Ciry Council 5. City Clerk 6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(all others) 1. Department Director 2. Ciry Attorney 3. Finance and Management Services Director 4. City Clerk TOTAL NUMBER OF SIGNATURE PAGES Indicate the#of pages on which signatures are required and paperclip or flag sach of these pages. ACTION REQUESTED Describe what the projecUrequest seeks to accomplish in either chronologi- cal order or order of importance,whichever is most appropriate for the issue. Do not write complete sentences. Begin each item in your list with a verb. - - ' - - _ , RECOMMENDATIONS Complete ff the issue in question has been presented before any body, public or private. SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? Indicate which Council objective(s)your projecUrequest supports by listing the key word(s) (HOUSING, RECREATION, NEIGHBORHOODS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, BUDGET, SEWER SEPARATION). (SEE COMPLETE LIST IN INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL.) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS: This information will be used to determine the city's liability for workers compensation claims,taxes and proper civil service hiring rules. INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE,OPPORTUNITY Explain the situation or conditions that created a need for your project or request. ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED Indicate whether this is simply an annual budget procedure required by law/ charter or whether there are specific ways in which the City of Saint Paul and its citizens will benefit from this projecUaction. DISADVANTAGES tF APPROVED What negative effects or major changes to existing or past processes might this projecUrequest produce if it is passed (e.g.,traffic delays, noise, tax increases or assessments)?To Whom?When?For how long? DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED What will be the negative consequences if the promised action is not approved? Inability to deliver service?Continued high traffic, noise, accident rate?Loss of revenue? FINANCIAL IMPACT Although you must tailor the information you provide here to the issue you are addressing, in general you must answer two questions: How much is it going to cost?Who is going to pay? �'i - � �a � r, RESOLUTION APPROVII�iG ASSESSMENT AND ` �P7I�IG TiME OF HEARIIV(i TfIEREON �Councll File No.91-2226—By Roger J.Goswltz=- i In the matter of the assessment of benefits,cost and expenses for Supplement to,,._. the Hoyt Avenue Area Sewer ProJect in Votlng Ward 6. ��� ` Preliminary Order 91-360 approved March 5. 1991; Final Orda 91-628 apprwed` " Aprll23. 1991. � _ � The assessmart of beneflts,cost and expenseafor and in connecrion with the above ._:. -_ _ improvemerit having been submitted to the Council,and the CouncII having considered same and found the said assessment�atisfactory.'therefore,be It - i RESOLVED,That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects aPProved. ,:_ . , . ., . � .. RESOLVED FURTF�R,That a public hearing be had on said assessment on the 21 st dav of January, 1992,at the hour of 9:00 o'clock A.M.,in the Council Chamber of �Fie Court ouse an ry Hau Buu�ng.'in the City of St. Paul; that the Director of Finance give norice of said meetings,as required by the Charter,statlng in said noUce the time and place of hearing,the nature of the improvement,and the amount assessed against the lot or lots of the particular owner to whom the notice is dlrected. File No. 18630-A Assessment No. 0200. Adopted by Council December 10, 1991.` - Approved by Mayor December 12, 199L � : (December 21. 1991) ti