91-2200 '!
���ti u���� , -
- . Council File # �� oZ�O
Green Sheet # _�!�_
RESOLUTION
n CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA ��
I (��L'�/
�__..-,r
Presented By �'1
� Referred To ~, 1 �, -� Committee: Date ��
, - �' , �.� - 3"- / �
WHEREAS, the City Council by its Resolution No. 91-40, dated February 9, 1991, ratified an
assessment in the amount of $14,011.62 for Selby Avenue Revitalization Project No. 1; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor recommends the following changes to the 1987 Capital Improvement
Budget:
Current Amended
Budget ChanQe . Budget
C87 Capital Project Led�
FINANCING PLAN
Selby Avenue Revitalization Project
C87-7T001-70022 NPP - CIB $160,000.00 $ -- $160,000.00
Assessment 0 14,011.62 14,011.62
5160,000.00 514,011.62 $174,011.62
SPENDING PLAN
Selby Avenue Revitalization Project
C87-7T001-0739-70022 �160,000.00 514,011.62 $174,011.62
Iv'ET INCREASE S14,011.62 •
RESOLVED, that the City Council approves these changes to the 1987 Capital Project Ledger
approved budget.
Yeas Navs Absent Requested by De artment of:
non �-
sws. z r � , ,�r �
on � r�=�; .� � rr �r�rv�c �!.�4 �-,Y
acc e � �
e ma �
une � �
i son ,� BY� �- "
Adopted by Council: Date �' - Form A oved by Cit Attorney
Adoption Cert' 'ed� Council S ret ry gy: �
/,,�` %
By� � Appr d by Mayor for Submission to
' �E� Council
Approved by Ma+�or• Dat� -
( ���/<l " gy; �w���
By: ����"
� �Cc��e^`�;�� u&��� x�. '�2
. � . ������
DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATE INITIATED �T
Planning & Economic Development GREEN EET 1�� _14694
CONTACT PERSON 8 PHONE IN TE INITIAL/DATE
�DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR �CITY COUNCII
Katie Lindblad 228-3309 A��GN �C�TYATTORNEY �CITYCLERK
MUST BE ON COUNCIL AGENDA BY(DATE) NUMBER FOR gUDGET DIRECTOR �FIN.&MGT.SEflVICES DIR.
ROUTING
ORDER �MAYOR(OR ASSISTANT) ' �
TOTAL#OF SIGNATURE PAGES � (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE)
ACTION REQUESTED:
Approval to increase the budget for the amount of assessments a��dac��'r�$�fied by the
Council File No. 91 40 for Selby Avenue Revitalization Pro����j ��� �
/
RECOMMENDATIONS:Approve(A)or Reject(R) pERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER TH I G GUESTIONS:
_PLANNINCi COMMISSION _CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION 1• Has this person/firm ever worked under a contract for this departmentl
_CIB COMMITfEE _ YES NO
_STAFF _ 2. Has this person/firm ever been a city employee?
YES NO
_D�STRiCT COUR7 _ 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current city employee?
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE7 YES NO
Explaln all yes answers on separate shest and attach to green sheet
INITIATING PROBLEM,ISSUE,OPPOHTUNITY(Who,What,When,Where,Why):
Original budget for NPP Selby Avenue Revitalization Pro�ect No. 1 did not i�t�'d�=` -.-
the property assessment in the financing and spending plan. ` - i„;.��
OC T -� ,
... � � ��
�����.;� � �_ '�
/�_ � �..����.y'���
a..
ADVANTAOES IF APPqOVED:
It will allow the incurred costs to be funded from property assessments.
DISADVANTAQES IF APPROVED: �
RECEIVED
None RECEIVED � � �/�°�
N 0�1 7 19� ��� �ip�1 ��
�ov 2 01991 �u�c�:, ������ ��N,T �9 �
C�TY CLERK �i,s°F`F�o`gl
o,� ,o�
DISADVANTAOES IF NOT APPROVED:
Project will not have sufficient authority to disburse funds required to complete
the project. (The project is already complete and assessments are r�,��,€��.�d;��, ;. � }
. _ e.:; il`,QFft� .
rlov 1 : ��g�
TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ 14�O 11.62 COBT/REVENUE BUDGETED(CIRCLE ONE) YES NO
FUNDING SOURCE Assessments ACTIVITY NUMBER C87-7T001-0739-70022
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) J y ' '
(J UV
NOTE: COMPLETE DIRECTIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THE GREEN SHEET INSTRUCTIONAL
MANUAL AVAILABLE IN THE PURCHASING OFFICE(PHONE NO.298-4225).
ROUTING ORDER:
Below are correct routings for the five most frequent types of documents:
CONTRACTS(assumes authorized budget exists) COUNCIL RESOLUTION (Amend Budgets/Accept. Grants)
1. Outside Agency 1. Department Director
2. Department Director 2. City Attorney
3. Ciry Attorney 3. Budget Director
4. Mayor(for contracts over$15,000) 4. Mayor/Assistant
5. Human Rights(for contracts over$50,000) 5. Ciry Council
6. Finance and Management Services Director 6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services
7. Finance Accounting
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(Budget Revision) COUNCIL RESOLUTION (all others, and Ordinances)
1. Activiry Manager 1. Department Director
2. Department Accountant 2. Ciry Attorney
3. Department Director 3. Mayor Assistant
4. Budget Director 4. City Council
5. City Clerk
6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(all others)
1. Department Director
2. Ciry Attorney
3. Finance and Management Services Director
4. City Clerk
TOTAL NUMBER OF SIGNATURE PAGES
Indicate the#of pages on which signatures are required and paperclip or flag
eaCh of these pages.
ACTION REQUESTED
Describe what the projecUrequest seeks to accomplish in either chronologi-
cal order or order of importance,whichever is most appropriate for the
issue. Do not write complete sentences. Begin each item in your list with
a verb.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Complete if the issue in question has been presented before any body, public
or private.
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE?
Indicate which Council objective(s)your project/request supports by listing
the key word(s)(HOUSING, RECREATION, NEIGHBORHOODS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT,
BUDGET,SEWER SEPARATION). (SEE COMPLETE LIST ININSTRUCTIONAL MANUALJ
PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS:
This information will be used to determine the city's liability for workers compensation claims,taxes and proper civil service hiring rules.
INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE,OPPORTUNITY
Explain the situation or conditions that created a need for your project
or request.
ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED
Indicate whether this is simpty an annual budget procedure required by law/
charter or whether there are specific ways in which the Ciry of Saint Paul
and its citizens will benefit from this projecUaction.
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED
What negative effects or major changes to existing or past processes might
this projecUrequest produce if it is passed (e.g.,traffic delays, noise,
tax increases or assessments)?To Whom?When?For how long?
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED
What will be the negative consequences if the promised action is not
approved?Inability to deliver service?Continued high traffic, noise,
accident rate?Loss of revenue?
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Although you must tailor the information you provide here to the issue you
are addressing, in general you must answer two questions: How much is it
going to cost?Who is going to pay?
.. . � . �9� �'� ��
� City of St.Paul COUN�IL FILE NO:, ����
/� l� -
� i•.t
RESOLtJTION RATI FYING ASSESSMENT By `'�'°°f%��=-����:��I.?;%�- ...
- `"fiIle No` �-1852�i
Voting • Assessment No: �530
Ward In �the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for
1 Selby Ava�ic�e RE�italizatio� Yro���t t�o. 1.
� ' Preliminary Order �����`�g approve�' ��pte�b8r 2a� Ig�$
.FinalOrder $�i��� approve� �ctober 25, 39$$
A public hearing having been had upon the assessment for the above improvement, and said assessment having
been further considered by the Council, and having been considered finally satisfactory, therefore,by it
RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects ratitied.
RESOLVED FURTHER,That the said assessment be and it is hereby determined to be payable in one thru twenty
equal installments. as per Section 64.04 of the Saint Paul Administrative Code.
�#��' 2 g 1�gi
COUNCILPERSON Adopted by the Council: Date ._ _
Yeas Dimoad Nays
��,ty � Certifie by Council Secretary
LOag
I►Yaccabes ^ In Favor By
v J
Thune Against : ,•
'�lilson r:c'7 � ;,� ;:.' ayor
ptl�tlS4�� FE3 -�� [��
. . � : C� �`o�.�
�
City of St.Paul ' COiJNCIL FILE NO. �� �L' ��
Office of The Director of Finance . -
� By . �
REPORT OF COMPLETION OF ASSESSMENT
- File No. 1�524
Voting . Assessment No. �53t}
Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for
��' Se2�y A�a�zus� �visa2izat3a�s �'ra�scC �F�. i. .
% .
Preliminary Ordei ���:a,��� approved Sax�t�h�r 2!?, I��$
Final Order '� ` $�17��' approve� �ctobgr 2S, 19g$
To the Council of the City of St. Paul:
The Director of Finance hereby reports to the Council the following as a statement of the expenditures necessarily
incurred for and in connection with the making of the above improvement, viz:
Total construction costs. . . . . . .. . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . ... . . . . . . .. .. . .... . $ 173.344.15
Engineering and Inspection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ... .. . . . . . . .. .. ... ..... S
Valuation and Assessment Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :. . . .. . . .. . . . .. ... .... . S 667.47
ProcessServing Charge.. . . . .. .. . . .. . . .. ... .. . .. . . ......... . .. . . ........... S
Abatement Service Charge . . . . . .. . . .. ... .. . . . . . . . .. . .. . ... . .. . . ..... . .... . $
TOTAL EXPENDITURES. .. . ... .. .. .. . . . .. .. . .. .. ..... ... . . . . ...... .... . $ 174.011.62
Charge To. .. .1989. Neighhorhoo�d .Par:tnersha g .�'rogxam.. . ..... ..... . $ 160.000.00
.. ... . . .. . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . .. . . .. . .. . . .. . .. . . ... ... . .. . .. . . .. ..... .. .... $
... . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . .. . ... . .. ... .. .. .. . . .. ........ $ '
. . . . . . .. .. . .. .. . .. . . . . . .. .. .. . .. . . .. . . . . . .. . . . ....... .. .. •- •- • ........ $
. . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . .. . . . . . .. ... .... ... . . .. . . .. .... .... . $
Net Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . ... . .... S 14.011.62
Said Director further reports that he has assessed and levied the total amount as above ascertained, to-wit: the sum
of $ upon each and every lot, part or parcel of land deemed benefited by the said improve-
ment, and in the case of each lot, part or parcel of land in accordance with the benefits conferred thereon; that the said
assessment has been completed, and that hereto attached, identified by the signature of the said Director, and made a part
hereof, is the said assessrnent as completed by him, and which is herewith submitted to the Council for such action
thereon as may be considered proper.
Dated
Director of Finance
. _ . � ��'-a�
aruu�u
0 0 0 0
ww° w° e.°
L `\\�
..Vi� .tlr.tlr O
� a a a w
A A N A _ .
N q M • tl
O N N M M 9 I I I -I I � I I��'1 � I I I �I � M \�
Y Y Y Y 'A
M M N M 7
< < < < y
1� 1. 1. t� M � o� � �b
ao�. aa. e°. � '"
O J'� � �, c�'� ` �-
� �
- � ,� �
� N f?N N f? V f f?t?N f I�N N V f V Y N N f?N N V Y K V► !j` ��
� � � 1 t 1 �� �� V
� t� � �
� M � s aC M �.h7 u � �
.�J 1 1{� A
1' y A 1f. 00 u 6Z.1 N O ~ � �
�A C t00 � � � �j C �
• w �`'
m
x ] vrn � a 'n < oy w (��
� H � F ' a +r u y' V/�
< F O o eue u °B cyg ``
� � C� � V N S �3 � m \� �
L' � � � ~ y y � y � �\ �
• .n° o d , ' u eee � a
Y � '� r7 � � ewe� � w. � '
a�+ Na.G � v {a�
� W rl i+ L Co y M G P� O � C �\�
M O ?C F N O .� 1 r
. C� V CI y N N .� V p V � b e V \ �./�
� �o u o d a r u � eMe� w 3 V"
v°i7i � �°n o u aai c°� t-°� a w > � c�.� � > � �
�� .� o a° � �l!
,,� � ,�,� � L A
< Z < � L � y .
O +� W
p,� g ►+ m o -
�iiZV� a w �
� s z td v}'i C 7 I O
�" �H �N � � " � � Q�
,1 iH z .�j aLO A'C � I ~ � � � _1 �i�
� t~i.> � M W EO n \ � _` �7.� Q .
f�, O �+ � \V Y N
CO F u a�7 'O ^' � t, r �` �� � �
� O � y � � � � � ` �
� � \ �
� � � � '
< � o � d � � �. � �. � � � o
w o x "' � °' � .-. t N.
p � ~ � .��+ a p � ,1C
+�,N.�-i 3 a` ' � � C
0 6 m � Q .�., '� � �
H om m �� . 0 1
� u
p w O N � � � �� � �
rl �.G 6�' . � ` p, y r^� �
. ... > � 0 O � �
M d C A1 � S 'p a O `00' 6 p � �8 �9 � .
Y A d y � ~ � V � Dd Y � � � � P' �
M .i W W a� '� N a-� p�
w cn w ° a e, � a, .°�� � a � � �r � �
O 0
a ao x .. c . 1
W M �J . .
� �o�u O � d u < O v' ,
f+ v�l.-a o) C � L O M F � W O` N
� �~ � J Z
d � o w ' ' ' � 1 � � � a �`
>. oww � w x I � �t
.c a w a w�l A � �
W C L� � Y I YI Y O Y Y v i � � W Q �
rn o w ^� L 7�e �.�i a d a x a u aa
W CO H O Y �0 M q ►1 Y w � �c.
.0 L+ a� u � Ir x M T � Y t! @g L � �"'' N � � \ 1
L l. fn ^ 'VO M Y w a N 'I� i� OY4 O M � ��
�.-'ii.i ,v -N+ o u x y° � � o 0o w N v � L � Z � W '
�yy C A Ol Q L � M a Y O O VI Y X 17 '�'� � p�J J � `
^y� N N l� � 'L �-1 'O u 'L . L L �-7 � 'S ..'t 00 `V � � U
VyJ L N 00 g v1 t+ �0 N
y W '� S �7 N M .-1 M , �.CI W a �.1 Y � 4' G � � � � `
p�.-1 W � L .-1 LI M � �0 {' Y M �( M 00 �-1 vi O
N w � Y q y G R p Y M !� � LI N - � =
y H M Y 'p M Y Y O o Y O N _ �O
e a a x e a. as x ri� � x a a a U �, �
���°���
Committee Report
Finance, Management, and Personnel Committee
December 16, 1991 - Page 2
Resolution 91-2265 - amending the 1991 Budget by adding $250,000 to the Financing
and Spending Plans for Merriam Park Branch Library Project. (Referred from
Council December 12. 1991�
Thi s resQ,l..u.�i o.�\s adopted at Counci 1 on 12/12/91
Resolution 91- 2-�1' - amending the 1991 Budget by adding �33,355 to the Financing
a -Spe g Plans of Community Services - Parks & Recreation Supply and
Maintenance. (Referred from Council 12/10/91}
Approved 3-0
5. lution 91-1787 - approving the merger of the Police and Fire Communication
Centers '�m-�-i-sta�--lF�ar 1992. lReferred from Council 9/24/91) (To be withdrawn�
Committee recommended withdrawal 3-0
e�olution 90-1155 - changing the rate of pay for property clerk. (Referred from
oursc�i-l—tFlaf99�-�d over in Committee 7/30/90) (To be withdrawn)
Committee recommended withdrawal 3-0 �
6. R s�ution 91-1895 amending the 1991 Budget by adding $10,000 to the Financing
a d Spendin�- s of Fire & Safety Services - General Fund. (Referred from
C_uncil 10/08/91)
Approved 3-0
7. Resolution 91-2203 - amending the 1991 Budget by transferring $500,000 to the
Financing and Spending Plans of Fire and Safety Services for paying and
training firefighter recruits. (Referred from Council 12/03/91�
This resolution was adopted at Council on 12/03/91
8. �solution _91-2 4Y1 - amending the 1991 Budget by adding $116,000 to the Financing
anc�T Spending�P1ans of the Police/Fire Equipment Services Motor Fuel Budget.
�(Referred from Council 12/03/91)
�Approved 3-0
.._ - _ _ ___�-----'�� G' - j�- ��--�/ �
�. Resolution 91-2200� amending the 1991 Budget by aC��14,011.62 to the
F-m a-�ci� _a.R �din Plans of Plannin and Economic Develo ment for the Selb _
9 d-�P 9 9 P Y
Avenue Revitalization Pro.iect. (Referred from Council 12/3/91) _
Approved 3-0
Q` ..