The URL can be used to link to this page

91-2146 RETUKN COP�Y TO REAL ESTATE DIVISION _,__ / ROOM 218 ASSESSMENT SECTION � Council File � 9/�/��C! �� /� �j ��'G�N/'1�, Green Sheet � a RESOLUTION CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA __ _. � , Presented By z� ��y �� / 1�i g JReferred To `� i�+ � � ; ( �)�,, �ti�� i�;,,r��,�� Committee: Date '� l,� L '�� r � �v � j A t i —� WHEREAS, To comply with the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission's (MWCC's) method of charging local governing bodies for Reserve Capacity Charges, the Saint Paul City Council, pursuant to Section 77.07 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code, adopted Resolution C.F. 260524 on January 23, 1973 (Chapter A-7 Administrative Code) as amended, which establishes Service Availability Charges (SAC) ; and WHEREAS, The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission has increased the unit charges for the year 1992 from $650.00 to $700.00 per unit; now therefore be it RESOLVED, That Council Resolution C.F. 260524, adopted January 23, 1973, as amended, be and the same is hereby further amended so as to increase the SAC unit charge from $650.00 to read $700.00 per unit; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, ,That this amending resolution shall take effect, be in force from and after its passage, approval and publication. Yeas Navs Absent Requested by Department of: Goswitz / Finance and Management Services Lon ./' Macca ee f Rettman .G Wi son �-- BY� ,.,, 991 Director i Adopted by Council: Date � � -�� - �j� Form Approved by City Attorney Adoption Certified by Coun ' 1 ecretary By: �� j�/�M'w� j!-12-9( f c' _�� B L�-, t y' Approved by Mayor for Submission to ' i"� Council Approved by M��r: Date ' � �� gy; ,��-p�'�� By' ��iis�� _;�J � -:� °�� Public Hearing Date - December 17, 1991 �j'-�/ ��(� G��. To Publi� Works Committee - December 4, 1991 G� � J 1/91 _ DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATE INITIATED N.� 16 2 3 6 Finance Departme t/Real Estate 10/30/91 G R E E N SH E ET INITIAUDATE INITIAUDATE CONTACT PERSON 8 PHONE DEPARTMENT DIRECT �j CITY COUNCIL Roxanna Flink 292-7�28 ASSIQN �TYATTORNEY .. 'R( �CITYCLERK NUMBER FOR MUST BE ON COUNCIL AGENDA Y(DATE) ROUTING �BUDGET DIRECTOR �FIN.&MCiT.SERVICES DIR. ORDER �MAYOR(OR ASSISTAN� � TOTAL#OF SIGNATURE PAGES 2 of 2 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) ACTION REQUESTED: Approve increase for Sewer Service Availability Charge (SAC) from $650.00 to $700.00 beginni g January 1, 1992. (Refer to Green Sheet 16237 to set hearing date to ratif SAC char e RECOMMENDATIONS:Approve(A)or Reject(R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSMIER TNE FOLLOWING GUESTIONS: _PLANNING COMMISSION _ CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION �• Has this person/firm ever worked under a cont�act for this department? _CIB COMMITTEE _ YES NO 2. Has this person/firm ever been a city employee? _A STAFF _ YES NO _DISTRiCT COURT _ 3. Does this personHirm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current city employee? SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OB,IECTIVE? Ward 6 YES NO Explain ell yes answers on seperate sheet snd ettach to green sheet INITIATING PROBLEM,ISSUE,OPPORTUNITY(Who,Whet,When,Where,Why): Letter from Metropolitan Waste Control Commission informing Government Agencies of new SAC Charge from $650.00 to $700.00 for 1992. The full SAC is paid by the builder or property owner. Therefore, passing the increased charge to them would not be a change in the City's policy. (Letter from MWCC is attached) ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: The increase in SAC Unit Charges for the new year is not a new procedure and should be expected by the builder or property owner. However, if the City of Saint Paul paid the increase, it would cost the City $19,000.00 in 1992 if the same 'number of SAC charges are made as in 1991. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: � � � Increase of $50.00 to property owner or builder from rate in pr�e'irio ear. � �� ,. RECEIVED � � � o � c^ Nov 2 01g91 2 `�' � � CITY CLERK �c. DISADVANTACiES IF NOT APPROVED: City absorbs the increase - additional cost to City of $19,OOO.00 RECc1VED C�u�ctl ��e��ch Center ��'� �� 1991, c��r�;�. o�r��rR��ro� NOV 15 1991 a�o M��7 a� ��ANCE MF.Iyr g TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION S COST/REVENUE BUDGETEp(CIRCLE ONE) YES NO Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) 610-50018-0521 SAC FUNDING SOURCE ACTIVITY NUMBER FINANCIAL INFOHMATION:(EXPLAIN) �� i NOTE: COMPLETE DIRECTIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THE GREEN SHEET INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL AVAILABLE IN THE PURCHASING OFFICE (PHONE NO.298-4225). ROUTING ORDER: Below are correct routings for the five most frequent rypes of documents: CONTRACTS(assumes authorized budget exists) COUNCIL RESOLUTION (Amend Budgets/Accept. Grants) 1. Outside Agency 1. Department Director 2. Department Director 2. City Attorney 3. Ciry Attorney 3. Budget Director 4. Mayor(for contracts over$15,000) 4. Mayor/Assistant 5. Human Rights(for contracts over$50,000) 5. City Council 8. Finance and Management Services Director 6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services 7. Finance Acxounting ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(Budget Revision) COUNCIL RESOLUTION (all others,and Ordinances) 1. Activity Manager 1. Department Director 2. Department Accountant 2. City Attorney 3. Department Director 3. Mayor Assistant 4. Budget Director 4. City Council 5. City Clerk 6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(all others) 1. Department Director 2. Ciry Attorney 3. Finance and Management Services Director 4. City Clerk TOTAL NUMBER OF SIGNATURE PAGES Indicate the#of pages on which signatures are required and paperclip or flag each of these pages. ACTION REQUESTED Describe what the proJecUrequest seeks to accomplish in either chronologi- cal order or order of importance,whichever is most appropriate for the issue. Do not write complete sentences. Begin each item in your list with a verb. RECOMMENDATIONS Complete if the issue in question has been presented before any body, public or private. SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? Indicate which Council objective(s)your projecUrequest supports by listing the key word(s) (HOUSING, RECREATION, NEIGHBORHOODS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, BUDGET,SEWER SEPARATION). (SEE COMPLETE LIST IN INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL.) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS: This information will be used to determine the ciry's liability for workers compensation claims,taxes and proper civil service hiring rules. INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY Explain the situation or conditions that created a need for your project or request. ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED Indicate whether this is simply an annual budget procedure required by law/ charter or whether there are specific ways in which the City of Saint Paul and its citizens will benefit from this projecUaction. DISADVA�+JTAGES,IF APPROVED What negalive eff9cts or major changes to existing or past processes might this projecUrequest produce if it is passed (e.g.,traffic delays, noise, tax increases.or assessme�hts)?To Whom?When? For how long? �.,� � DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED What wiil be the negative consequences if the promised action is not approved?.Irrability to delivar service?Continued high traffic, noise, accident�ate?Loss of"revenue.7 � FINANCIAL iTUIPACT Although you must tailor the information you provide here to the issue you are addressing, in general you must answer two questions: How much is it going to cost?Who is going to pay? , �.�1�,�� '� construction on the North side of Case � Avenue from Johnson Parkway to Kennard Street. All to be known as the Hazelwood/Case Area Street Paving and Lighting Project. 6. 12/17/91 FINAL ORDER: Construction of the APPROVED 4-0 Hazelwood/Case Area Storm Sewer Separation Project, bounded on the north by the Railroad, on the south by Reaney, on the west by Johnson Parkway and Clarence, on the east by Kennard and Flandrau. 7. 12/17/91 FINAL ORDER: Installation of sanitary, APPROVED 4-0 storm and water service connections, if requested by property owner, for the Hazelwood/Case Area Storm Sewer and � � Street Paving and Lighting Project. 8. 12/17/91 RESOLUTION - 91-2145 - To consider APPROVED 3-0 increasing the Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) from $650.00 to �700.00 beginning January, 1992. 9. RESOLUTION - 91-2090 - Amending the 1991 APPROVED 3-0 Budget by transferring $28,000 from Contingency Reserve to the Financing & Spending Plans of PED for transportation � planning services relating to neighborhood portion of City's Transportation Policy Plan. 10. � RESOLUTION - 91-2148 - Approving proposed APPROVED 3-0 District Energy rates for 1992. 11. ORDINANCE - 91-2149 - An ordinance amending APPROVED 3-0 f the legislative ordinance granting to �/ District Neating Development Company a non-exclusive franchise to use public streets and property to construct and operate a district heating system. 12. RESOLUTION - 91-1414 - Establishing a APPROVED AS comprehensive bicycle transportation AMENDED 3-0 policy for the City of Saint Paul . � � �� -�,��c�cu�-G ��c, - i�-�s� �� ~ (�c�G— t�i�l � . � . ' i�, -- r-> � �,..�/ / /' i�J � (_�� ..�� i%� '' ��in r� `-� � � Metropolitan Waste Control Comm�ssion ✓ �� Mea�s park Centre_230 Easc Fifth Street_St_ Paul_Minnesota_55101 - — 6l2 222-8423 To: Mayors City Managers or Administrators Finance Officers Buildinq Inspectors � From: Charles R. Weaver, Actinq Chair, MWCC� . o� Voss Chief Administrator �� Gordon 0. , Subject: SAC Policy Changes - Effective 1992 Since the most recent correspondence from our office dated August 19, 1991 reqarding� SAC, the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) has approved several changes to the curren aS�AC�a=licin Briefly, MWCC staff began the biennial SAC stwdy Y addition to reviewing S�ai aissues�e committee also reviewed several policy and proced . With reqard to SAC rates, the Commission approved a rate increase to $7a�p��-��°�'=��1^ �g�for most municipalities. The SAC rate for municipalities wathoit i99��C��itiesnw thout to $560 per unit effective Janu ry , interceptors are: Chaska, Cottaqe Grove, Hastinqs and Stillwater. �,s r�±�f;e� ,n�u�i..��pa�ities of nroposed chanqes earlier this year. After a few chanqes resulting from your commo�ents, the following is a summary ef the final chanQes th$t have been approved by �e Commission. This summary does not include all rationale og �e changes or other alternatives reviewed. A final copy est. complete� study includinq this information is available on requ 1, Leachate/Contaminated Groundwater - 8fgective 1992 IInder the original policy, connected users discharqinq groundwater and leachate were qranted a three year exemption from SAC. After this period SAC was to be collected. Equa1 oppoRUnih�i'►ff�mat"'°Act'°^ emptoyer '�'� ri,