Loading...
D00672„ . a C I T Y O F S A I N T P A U L OFFICE OF THE MAYOR �proved Copies to: - City qerk (Origic�aq - Fnance Dept's Accounting Division - Reques[ing Dept. a � uihl : a Y\/ • ; � ; BUDGET REVISION ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER, Consistent with the authority granied to the Mayor in Section 10.07.4 of the City Charter and based on the request of the Chief of the St. Paul Poiice Departmeni to amend the 1995 budget of the General Fund, the Direc[or of the Department of Rnance and Management Services is authorized to amend said budget in the folfowing manner: FROM: 001 - General Fund 04200 - Administration Division 0111 - Full Time Permanent 04301 - Records & Identification 0111 - Fuli Time Permanent 04303 - Training Unit 0111 - Full Time Permanent • TO: 001 - Generat Fund 04201 - Park Rangers 0111 - Full Time Permanent CURRENT APPROVED AMENDm BUDGEf CHANGES BUDGEf 4,930,771 991,463 No: �.iL,1,Jli1�� Date: �� (60,000} 4,870,771 (80,000) 911,463 501,702 (30,000) 471,702 6,423,936 (170,000) 6,253,936 o y �o,000 no,000 o no,000 »o,000 NetChange � /�� � `� ���7��� aved by: Budget Director Date A091295A Approved by: Finance Director Date __ __. � . _ 'iYY\i_rt7 � DEPAFiTMENLOFfICE/COUNCIL DATE INITIATED w �� ��^ N_ - 3 3 39 8 GREEN SHEE __ _ . -=- -- ' CAM PE SON&PHONE DEPAq"fMENTDIRECTOR �CITYCAUNCIL �NITIAUDATE lJ1LLG1 WilatNil F7ffi 292-3588 ��GN CITY ATTORNEY CIT1' CLERK NUYBENFOR UST BE ON CAUNCILAGENDA BY (DATE) ROVfING BUDGETDIRECTOfl� FlN. & MGT. SEflVICES OIR. ORDEN O MAVOR (OR ASSIST TOTpL # OF SICaNATURE PAGES (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) ACTION RE�UESTED: Appzoval ofthe attached Administrarive Ordei RECAMMENDATIONS: Approve (A) or Rejeci (fi) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTIiACT'S MUST ANSWER TNE FOLLOWING UUESTIONS: _ PLANNING COMMISSION _ QVIL SERVICE COMMISSION �� Has this perso�rm gver worked under a coniract for this tlepartment? - _ CIB COMMRTEE _ YES �NO , ��� 2. Has this perso�rm ever been a city employee? — YES NO _ �I5iFi�CT cqURT _ 3. Does ihis personttirm possess a skill not noRnaily possessed by arry curteM ciry empioyee? SUPPOflTS WMICN COUNC�L O&IECTIVE? YES NO Explain all yes answers on se4arate sheei and attaeh W gree� aheet INITIATMO PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNRV (WF�o, What When, Where, Why). The Saint Paul Police Department desires to estahlish spending authority in the Pazk Rangers activity for full time salaries OVANTAGES IF APPROVED: The Saint Paul Police Deparhne� spending plan in the Pazk Rangers activity will properly reflect the anticipated 1995 salary expenditures. DISADVANTAGES IFAPPROVED: RECEIVED None. • OCT - 21995 CITY CLERK DISADVANTAGES IF NOTAPPROVE�: The 1995 Park Rangers salary budget will not properly reflect the 1995 salazy e�penditures incurred. OTAL AMOUNT OF TqANSACTION $ COST/REVENUE BUDGETEU (CIRCLE ONE) YES NO FUNDIHG SOURCE CTeneral Fund (001) pC71VITY NUMBER �42�0� �Z�l �3�1 (1h303 FINANCIAL INFOflMATION. (EXPLAIN) ..` � �