D00672„ . a
C I T Y O F S A I N T P A U L
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
�proved Copies to:
- City qerk (Origic�aq
- Fnance Dept's Accounting Division
- Reques[ing Dept.
a � uihl : a Y\/ • ; � ;
BUDGET REVISION
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER, Consistent with the authority granied to the Mayor in Section 10.07.4 of the
City Charter and based on the request of the Chief of the St. Paul Poiice Departmeni to amend the 1995
budget of the General Fund, the Direc[or of the Department of Rnance and Management Services is
authorized to amend said budget in the folfowing manner:
FROM:
001 - General Fund
04200 - Administration Division
0111 - Full Time Permanent
04301 - Records & Identification
0111 - Fuli Time Permanent
04303 - Training Unit
0111 - Full Time Permanent
• TO:
001 - Generat Fund
04201 - Park Rangers
0111 - Full Time Permanent
CURRENT APPROVED AMENDm
BUDGEf CHANGES BUDGEf
4,930,771
991,463
No: �.iL,1,Jli1��
Date: ��
(60,000} 4,870,771
(80,000) 911,463
501,702 (30,000) 471,702
6,423,936 (170,000) 6,253,936
o y �o,000 no,000
o no,000 »o,000
NetChange
�
/�� � `� ���7���
aved by: Budget Director Date
A091295A
Approved by: Finance Director Date
__ __.
� . _ 'iYY\i_rt7 �
DEPAFiTMENLOFfICE/COUNCIL DATE INITIATED w �� ��^ N_ - 3 3 39 8
GREEN SHEE __ _ . -=- --
' CAM PE SON&PHONE DEPAq"fMENTDIRECTOR �CITYCAUNCIL �NITIAUDATE
lJ1LLG1 WilatNil F7ffi 292-3588 ��GN CITY ATTORNEY CIT1' CLERK
NUYBENFOR
UST BE ON CAUNCILAGENDA BY (DATE) ROVfING BUDGETDIRECTOfl� FlN. & MGT. SEflVICES OIR.
ORDEN O MAVOR (OR ASSIST
TOTpL # OF SICaNATURE PAGES (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE)
ACTION RE�UESTED:
Appzoval ofthe attached Administrarive Ordei
RECAMMENDATIONS: Approve (A) or Rejeci (fi) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTIiACT'S MUST ANSWER TNE FOLLOWING UUESTIONS:
_ PLANNING COMMISSION _ QVIL SERVICE COMMISSION �� Has this perso�rm gver worked under a coniract for this tlepartment? -
_ CIB COMMRTEE _ YES �NO
, ��� 2. Has this perso�rm ever been a city employee?
— YES NO
_ �I5iFi�CT cqURT _ 3. Does ihis personttirm
possess a skill not noRnaily possessed by arry curteM ciry empioyee?
SUPPOflTS WMICN COUNC�L O&IECTIVE? YES NO
Explain all yes answers on se4arate sheei and attaeh W gree� aheet
INITIATMO PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNRV (WF�o, What When, Where, Why).
The Saint Paul Police Department desires to estahlish spending authority in the Pazk Rangers activity for full time salaries
OVANTAGES IF APPROVED:
The Saint Paul Police Deparhne� spending plan in the Pazk Rangers activity will properly reflect the anticipated 1995
salary expenditures.
DISADVANTAGES IFAPPROVED: RECEIVED
None. • OCT - 21995
CITY CLERK
DISADVANTAGES IF NOTAPPROVE�:
The 1995 Park Rangers salary budget will not properly reflect the 1995 salazy e�penditures incurred.
OTAL AMOUNT OF TqANSACTION $ COST/REVENUE BUDGETEU (CIRCLE ONE) YES NO
FUNDIHG SOURCE CTeneral Fund (001) pC71VITY NUMBER �42�0� �Z�l �3�1 (1h303
FINANCIAL INFOflMATION. (EXPLAIN) ..` �
�