The URL can be used to link to this page

91-2119 OR��aL �� Council Fi1e ,-'= ��-a�� ' Greer. Shee� ; _�[7� RESOLUTION CI OF SA1NT PAUL, MINNESOTA Presented By -- Referred To Committee: Date OLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul hereby certifies and approves the action of the Property Code " Enforcement Board of Appeals pertaining to the following listed property and as shown by the Excerpted Minutes of said Property Code Enforcement Board of Appeals and dated, October 8, 1991 and marked EXHIBIT A, and attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference: DATE OF BOARD . MINUTES CASE NO: PROPERTY APPEALED APPELLANT 10/8/91 52-91-H 2141 Dudley Ave Kent/Barb Lyford BOARD ACTION: Granted an extension of time for two years untii October 15, 1993 to complete the wiring. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Auditor's Subdivision No. 63 St. Paui , Minn. S 163 15/100 Ft of Lot 17 ---------------------------------- 10/8/91 55-91-F 1842 Ashland Ave. Craig Miller BOARD ACTION: Granted an extension of time until June 30, 1992 to complete the scraping and repaint the exterior of the building and garage. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Merriam Park Third Addition to the City of St�. Paul E 5 Ft of Lot l and all of �ot 2 Blk 7 ---------------------------------- - 1 - , � 9/'��✓ 10/8/91 54-91-F 421 Ashland Ave. Steve Johnson BOARD ACTION: An extension of time was granted until June 30, 1992 to complete the painting on the trim of the house. An extension of time was granted until January 8, 1992 to move the sprinkler heads. An extension of time was granted until June 1 , 1992 to provide the basement window with a step to meet the sill height requirement. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Woodland Park Addition to St. Paul Lot 8 Blk 12 ---------------------------------- 10/8/91 57-91-R 1107 Osceola Ave. James Ree BOARD ACTION: Granted an extension of time until June 1 , 1992 to raise the eastern half of the northern gutter to drain to the east to the northeast corner to a new downspout and out over the grass. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: St. Clair St. 8 Short Line Addition to the City of St. Paul , Minn. E 10 Ft of Lot 11 and all of ' Lot 12 Blk 4 ---------------------------------- -2- , �'�c�y'l��!�9 10/8/91 43-91-R 661 Woodlawn �4ve. Herbert J. Garelick BOARD ACTION: An extension of time was granted until June 1 , 1991 to disconnect the rainleaders. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Riverwood addition Subj to Sewer esmt and Ex S 10 Ft Lots 11 and � Lot 12 BLk 1 ------------------------------------------ 10/8/91 59-91-H 873 Marshall Ave. Fred Schlomka Sunita 5tanestow BOARD ACTION: Granted a partiai waiver of the vacant building fee in the amount of $570.00 oniy. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Stone 8 Rogers Additior► to St. Paul , Minn. E 10 Ft of Lot 11 and all of Lot 12 Blk 4 Ye� Nays Absent Requested by Department of: oswitz' �— �' / '� f on . —� G�6 � i?/ l i /C�2S� Macca ee li ettman v une �— i son v By: �, _..-- �_� �, �,r� NOV 21 1991 Form Approved by City Attorney Adopted by Council: Date �� Adoption Certified by Council Secretary gy - �.� �'_y' By: � / U Approved by Mayor for Submission to �0� 2 �g�1 Council Approve by Mayor: Date � � By. �,��'��" By: P1�11St€Ea D�� `'91 — 3 — (�yr�i��,r �ommu�`y�O�ervice �ATE iNmareo GREEN SH�ET No. 019 3 CONTA PERSON 3 PHONE 1 IAU OATE INITIAUDATE 292-7775 �"R'�"E"Ta��— ^ r i on ' ��n cm�rro��r cm C MUBT BE ON COUNqI.AfdENOA BY(DATE) ROUTMIO BUDOET DIRECTOR .d�MOT.SERVICES DIR. Q MAYOR(OR ASSISTANT) J] TOTAL N OF SIGNATUFiE PAGES � (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATUR� J ACTION REt]UESTEC: Resolution approving the action of the Property Code Enforcement Board of Appeals RECOMMENDATIONS:MW�(�o►�1�(Rl COUNqL COMM i�PORT _PUINNINO COMMI8810N _GVIL SERVI�WMMISSION ��Y� PF�NE N0. —c�B co�M� — N - 1 COMMENT8: _STAFF _ _DISTHIC'i COURT _ �� SUPPORTS WHICH OOUNqL OBJECTIVE9 r� ��xn�►nrua PAOB�M.188UE��OPPORTUNITN(Who.�Nh�q WMn.WMro.Whyj. . Approving the action of the Property Code Enforcement Board of Appeals ` for the meeting of October 8, 1991 . (See attaGhed minutes) RECEIVED Nov 13 �991 ADVANTAOEB IF APPROVED: �. • �'�LLY� Extensions of time to the property will be ratified. 5 - extension of time �'�V � �991 1 - waiver of fee �f:,;, ,�� C..S OFr10E aSADVANTAOEB IF APPROVED: None DISADVANTAOES IF NOT APPROVED: The action taken by the Property �ode Enforcement Board of Appeals will be returned to the Board by the City Council for further review. TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRAN8ACTION : n/a CO�T/REYEN!!E BUDGETED(CNiCLE ONE) YES NO X ��o sou� n�a �crnmr Nu�R �3 2 6 3 FINANGAL INFOFiMAT10N:(EXPWN) dw � � (�. . � NOTE: COMPLETE DIRECTIONS ARE IN(�UDED IN THE CiREEN 8HEET IN8TRUCTIONAL � MANUAL AVAILABLE IN THE PURCHA3INO OFFICE(PHONE NO.288-4225). ' ROUTINCI ORDEH: Below are preferred routings for the Nve nwu irequsnt typ�s of documsMa: COMTRACT'S (aesumss autl�ized OOUNqL RESOLUTiON (Artbnd, Bdgt�./ budgst sxi�s) Accept.(iranta) 1. Outaide Agsncy 1. Departrtrent Director 2. Initiatir�D�partmerit 2. Budpet Director 3. City Attomey 3. Cky Attorney 4. Ma�ror 4. May�cx/As�atM . 5. Finetnos d Mqmt 8vc�. Dirsctor 6. (�ty Coundl 6. Flnance Accoundnp 6. Chief AccouMant, Fln d�Mgmt Svcs. ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER (BudQst C:OIING'IL RESOLUTION (eH others) Flsvfstat) and ORDINANCE 1. �ICtfvity Meniipsr 1. IMtlaUnp DepYrtment DireCtor 3. Dsp�pirrctor 3• �Ya� 4. Budpst Director 4. Cfty Couhcil 5. City(:Isrk 6. Chief AxouMaM� Fln 8 Mgmt Svca. ADMINIBTRATiVE ORDERS (aH othsrm) 1. Initiadng Dep�rtmsnt 2. City Attomsy 3. MayoNAaistant 4. dty Cbrk TpTAL NUMBER OF SICiNATURE PACiE3 Indicate the#�of pagss on whbh signatures aro roqWrod end�fCll e�ch�these pe��. ACTION REOUESTED D�cribe�thb proj�cfltiquwt ss�ks to s000mpli�fn eitNsr chrorabgi- cal ordsr or adsr of fmportanos,whichswr fs rrast�ppropriats for the iesus. Do not w►ite�mplsts ssntericss. Bspin each kem in your list with a verb. RECO�AMENOATIONS ComplMe ff ths issw(n qusqion has bssn P�'��Y�Y.P�b�� or p►ivata. SUPPORTS WHICH OOUNdL 08JECTIVE? Indicete wh�h Coundl oblscdve(s)Yow�d/recluest s�pports bY Ii�rq N�s ksy word(s)(HOUSINa,RECREATION. NEIQHBORHOOD3, EOONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, BUD(3ET,SEWER 8EPARATION).(SEE COAAPLETE U8T IN INSTHUCTIONAL MANUAL.) COUNqL OOMMITTEE/RESEAR(��1 REPORT-OPTIONAL AS REOUESTED BY COUNGL INITIATINO PROBLEM, 133UE,OPPORTUNITY Explain ths skuatbn c�r conditi�ons that crseted a need for your proJect or requsst. ADVANTA(iES IF APPROVED Indicate whether this ts simply an anmial budgst procedure nqufred by law/ charter or whsther then an spscMic wa in wh�h the qty of Saint Paul ; end its c�tizens will bensflt hom this�acNon. DISADVANTA(3ES IF APPROVED What nspative efMcts or major ch�npss to sxistin�or past proc�ees might this projectlrequsst produ�N ft is paa�sd(e.g.,tratfic dslaya. noise, tax increas�or asessemsnU)?To Whom4 Whsn�For how long? DISADVANTAOES IF NOT APPROVED . UVhat will bs ths nepsHve oons�qusnoss if ths promised action is not approved9 Inability to dslivsr servbs?CoMinusd hiph trefHc, noiae, accident rats?Lo�s of r�wnw? FlNANCIAL IMPACT Althouph you must tdlor ths intormatio�you provide here to the issus you ero addreain�, in p�nsnl you mwt answer Mw queations: Haa much is it �oirq W oat?YYho b�Oin9�WY? � ��'��qf PROPERTY CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD OF APPEALS ��r� 555 CEDAR STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 MINUTES, MEETING OF OCTOBER 8, 1991 MEMBERS PRESENT: Ron Glassman, Chairrnan Ron Ankeny William L. Tilton Don Weida MEMBERS ABSENT: Stephanie Chester James Laughlin Joan Pearson OTHER PRESENT: Pat Fish, Department of Fire & Safety Lisa Hammer, Legal Aide - Public Health Steve Herbert, Rainleader Division Dick Owen, BIDD Beth Bartz, PED - 1100 City Hall Annex Sylvia Frank John Monge Dorothy Lyons Val P. Davis Fred Schlomka Craig Miller 5teve Johnson John Lindeke Toni Leach Bill Blomquist James Ree Herb Garelick Kent Lyford Staff: Josephine P. Bongiovanni The meeting was called to order by Chairman Glassman, at 1 :40 p.m. Chairman Glassman informed the Appellants that the Property Code Enforcement Board of Appeals is a Board of citizens, none of the mernbers work for the City. The Board is made up of citizens who are here to hear appeals , as to whether a variance or an extension of time should be granted on the various code enforcements. There is a representative from the City present also pertaining to each case. l . Approval of the minutes for the meeting of the September 10, 1991 as submitted in writing. Motion was made by Don Weida to approve the minutes of the September 10 , 1991 . Seconded by Ron Ankeny. MOTION CARRTED UNANIMOUSLY. 1 � �y��i� � 2. CASE HEARINGS: CASE N0: PROPERTY APPEALED APPELLANT 52-91-H 2141 Dudley Ave. Kent/Barb Lyford ( 1 unit) APPEARANCE : Kent Lyford SUBJECT: Appellant is requesting an extension of time to install two duplex outtets in three rooms , because of financial hardship. PROCEEDINGS: The Appellant requested a variance on having to install two duplex outlets , as the rooms in question are not being used at the present time. The Appellant installed 100 amp service for safety reasons . The plan is to remodel the house within the next two years. At that time, the wiring would be brought up to code. Dick Owens Senior Electric 5upervisor, from Building Tnspection, Design Department stated that whenever Electrical Service is updated all wiring must meet the code. Presently, the Building Division cannot grant a variance, as it is considered substandard housing. BOARD ACTION: Motion was made by william Tilton to deny the request for a variance on the installation of two duplex outlets in three rooms , instead the Appellant was given as extension of time for two years, until OCTOBER 15z 1993 to complete the wiring, bringing it into code compliance. Seconded by Ron Anken,y. MOTION CARRTED UNANIMOUSLY. ---------------------------------- 45-91-H 1812 Reaney Ave. Dorothy Lyons (vacant building) APPEARANCE : Val P. Davis Attorney, representing Dorothy Lyons SUBJECT: Appellant is requesting a waiver of the vacant building fees in the amount of $ 1 ,270.00, because of financial hardship. PROCEEDINGS Val Davis stated that she is requesting that the fee of $1 ,270. 00 be waived, as it would cause an extreme financial hardship, her clients are the not the present owners , and should not have to pay this fee. The Appellant's inherited this debt from their father and aunt. Probate for the father and aunt has as yet, not been completed. Eventually the clients will inherit the house. 2 ��+a�i9 `� They have been try9ng to renovate the place, ta hav� to pay these additional fees would probabty stop or slow down the work. Lisa Hammer, from the Division of Public Health, Vacant Building 5ection stated that the Ordinance is set up and does require that the new owners can also be held responsible for the vacant building registration fees. This bui1ding has been monitored since 1987. The City has issued nine Summary Abatements ordered on the property for various reasons. The owners have complied with most of the orders that were issued against the property. Currently the fees that are due to the city are $1 ,410.00. Because of the time length and the number of times the city has had to monitor the building, along with the blight the neighbors have had to put up with, that these fees are owed to the City. Val Davis again stated that her clients are not the present owners . She stated that District 2, Community Council , that it is their recommendation that they would like to see the Board abate these fees . Ron Glassman stated that it cost the city a lot of time and money to monitor and maintain all the vacant buildings in the city. There are numerous complaints from neighbors and citizen that these should not be allowed to remain vacant, therefore decreasing the property values. BOARD ACTION: Motion was made by William Tilton to deny the request for a waiver of the vacant building fees. Seconded by Don Weida. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ---------------------------------- 59-91-H 873 Marshall Ave. Sunita Staneslow (vacant building) APPEARANCE: Fred Schlomka, Husband SUBJECT: Appellant is requesting a waiver of the vacant building fees in the amount of $1 , 140. 00, because of financial hardship. PROCEEDINGS: Mr. Schtomka stated that he lives at 877 Marshall . His wife purchased the house at 873 Marshall Ave. The house was boarded up, it has been for a number of years. Mr. Schlomka negotiated with the bank (Norwest) which foreclosed on the house. After prolonged negotiations the bank sold the house to Mrs. Staneslow for the amount of $1 ,000. 00. TaxES in the amount of $7,500.00 were due on the property, which have been paid. Structurally it is a very sound building. 3 �,c-Q�_a?�� ✓ Mr. Schlomka stated that he has reliable construction estimates for $81 ,600. 00. All the figures , come to a total of $90, 100. 00. The assessed value of the building is �72, 000. 00. Mr. �chiomka stated that a team of inspectors were in the building to do a Code Compliance Inspection. Lisa Hammer, from the Division of Public Health. Vacant Building Section, stated that currently the fees are $ 1 , 140. 00. The City has been monitoring the building since August 1989. Ms. Hammer stated she spoke with a Ms . Berdt, Norwest Mortgage, and she stated that the way the purchase agreement was written was, that the buyer was responsible everything. Mr. Schlomka stated that there was a quit claim deed, which basically was, that the new buyer is responsible for all or any encumbrances BOARD ACTION: Motion was made by to waive one-half of the vacant building fees, which will be the amount of $570.00. The Appellant must pay the other half of the fees in the amount of $570.00. Seconded by Ron Ankeny. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ---------------------------------- 55-91-F 1842 Ashland Ave. Craig/Robert Miller (4 units) APPEARANCE: Craig Miller SUBJECT: Appellant is requesting an extension of time to scrap� and paint trim of building and garage; Also requesting a variance from code requirement, having to replace present deadbolt locks to a one ( 1 ) inch throw. PROCEEDINGS: Mr. Miller stated because of the time of the year he would tike time until early spring to do the scraping and painting. Also the present deadbolts are not the one inch as code requires . BOARD ACTION: Motion made by Don Weida to grant an extension of time until June 30, 1992 to scrape and repaint the exterior of the building and the garage. Seconded by Ron Ankeny. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. FURTHER ACTION: Motion made Ron Ankeny to grant a variance on the present deabbolt locks, with the provision, that when repairs or replacement is necessary, at which time, they must be replaced with the one ( 1 ) inch deadbolts , as per code. Seconded by Don Weida. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOULSY. ---------------------------------- 4 ��`�/�� ✓ 56-91-F 682-688 Holiy Ave. Car-Nav II ( 14 units) St. Anthony Mgt, Inc. Louis C. Sudheimer APPEARANCE : NONE SUBJECT: Appeilant is requesting a variance from Code requirement, having to replace transluscent glass in all unit doors to hallway, because of the guideline of the Heritage Preservation Commission. PROCEEDINGS: Pat Fish from Department of Fire & Safety stated that Fire Department cannot support a variance on the present glass on the doors in the building. It was suggested that the Appellant could install fire rated glass on the room side of the door, without damaging the existing translucent glass. BOARD ACTION: Motion was made by William Tilton to deny the request for a variance on providing fire rated glass on the apartment doors in the building. Seconded by Don Weida. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ---------------------------------- 53-91-F 1137-39 University Ave. The Cherokee Co. (6 units) John Lindeke APPEARANCE : John Lindeke SUBJECT: Appellant is requesting a variance from code requirement regarding, overcrowding in Apt. #3 and Apt. ##6; also requesting a variance from code requirement regarding, having to provide fire escape to ground. PROCEEDINGS The Appellant stated that he had three items on the agenda that needed to be addressed. Two of these' have been resolved - 1 . overcrowding in Apartment ##6, the tenants have moved, it has been rented to a couple with one child; and 2. having to provide a the fire escape to the ground floor, this has been done. The item to be addressed is overcrowding in Apartment #3. The apartment has two adults and four children living there. The bedrooms measure 8'6" x 12" . The living room measures 11x12. The tenants have the two young boys sleeping in the living room. Pat Fish, from the Department of Fire 8 Safety stated that there are two different issues from the housing code; one is the room size and the other is privacy. The Fire Department can not grant a variance on the issue. 5 . �_a,,9 ,� �=� BOARD ACTION: Motion was made by Ron Glassman granting a variance to allow the present tenants in apartment #3 to remain, with the provision, that when the unit is re-rented. there must be a limited on the occupancy, four or less. Seconded by William Tilton. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ---------------------------------- 58-91-F 2026 Brewster St. Unit #4 Channell Brazelton SUBJECT: Appellant is the condemnation of her rental unit. PROCEEDINGS: Ron Glassman referred to a letter from Geraid G. Kaluzny, Attorney for the Appellant, wherein, he stated that the Appellant has moved from the above address and the circumstances surrounding the appeat is moot. She requested the board -refund the f i l i ng fee of $25. 00. BOARO ACTIONz Motion made by Dan Weida to deny the request to refund the filing fee of $25.00. Second by Ron Glassman. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ---------------------------------- 54-91-F 421 Ashland Ave. Steve Johnson ( 11 units) APPEARANCE Steve Johnson SUBJECT: Appellant is requesting an extension of time to paint trim; also having to move the sprinkler heads in boiler area. PROCEEDINGS The Appellant stated that the reason that an extension of time for the paint, because there is a tree that has to be removed, before the painting can be done, needs more time at least until June 1992. BOARD ACTION Motion made by William Tilton to grant an extension of time until June 30, 1992 to complete the painting of the trim. Seconded by Ron Ankeny. MOTION CARRIED UNANTMOUSLY. ADDITIONAL PROCEEDINGS The Appellant stated that the sprinkler heads are five feet from the boiler. Appellant stated that no one wants to grant a perrnit to move the sprinkler heads, as they feei it is not necessary for them to be moved. Pat Fish, from the Department of Fire and Safety stated that the sprinkler heads do not cover the area that need to be covered, and a permit is required, she would call the permit department to confirm this information, if need be. 6 �y,_��9 � The Appellant requesting that the issue on escape windows be addressed also. The window is on the east side of the building and in a one room efficiency. Ron Glassman stated that if the room is a sleeping room then it must have a proper size escape window. Pat Fish, from the Department of Fire 8� Safety stated that proper escape windows in each sleeping room must be enforced. Light and ventilation has to equal 8% of the room size. Window sill must be 48" or less , or a platform must be installed below the window for escape. BOARD ACTION Motion made by William Tilton to grant an extension of time for 90 days until January 8, 1992 to move the sprinkler heads. Seconded by Ron Ankeny. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ADDITIONAL BOARD ACTION Motion was made by Ron Glassman to deny the request for a variance on the basement escape window in the sleeping room, instead granted an extension of time until June 1 , 1992 to provide the basement window with a step to meet the sill height requirernent, as per code. Seconded by Ron Anekny. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ---------------------------------- 04-91-R 1327 Lafond Ave. Church of St. Columba Ms. Toni Leach APPEARANCE: Ms. Toni Leach, Administrator - St. Columba John Monge, Custodian SUBJECT: Appellant is requesting a variance from code requirement, having to disconnect the rainleaders . PROCEEDINGS: Ms. Leach stated that the issue on the rainleader is very complex. The ma,jority of the water is on the main roof. The water drains go together to four drain spouts on the top of the roo�, these come together, and go down thru the middle of concrete pillars, ali the way thru the church. Steve Herbert , from the Rainleader Division stated that there was a bid for $ 13 ,543. 00 to go to ground, with exterior scuppers and downspouts. Ms. Leach stated that the parishioners are very unhappy abaut installing the downspouts on the outside of the church, as they feel it will spoil the architecture of the outside. 7 (��-Q�a/�9 � Chairman Glassman referred to a letter, fram the Heritaqe Preservation Commission regarding the issue of disconnection on the rainleaders , which states that the project wouid be extremely difficult and very costly. The letter states, in part, "Based on preliminary study, the Candidates and Education Committee of the Saint Paul Heritage Preservation Commission believes the Church is eligible for local historic designation and will do additional research to confirm this. Saint Columba' s is noted in national and international architectural guides as an inportant work of modern church architecture. It shows the influence of German expressionism as well as international and modern styles. " Ron Ankeny stated that he felt that the a variance should be granted in this case because it would create undue hardship. After much discussion, William L. Tilton suggested that. he would like to make a decision regarding the issue of rainleader disconnection for St. Columba Church. Mr. Tilton advised the Board that he would like to grant a variance for six months, and would like the Board to write a letter to the Mr. Don Nygaard from the Sewer Division, requesting that they work with the Appellants to try help remedy this issue. John Monge Custodian, stated that when the city requested the rainleaders on the school and the rectory were to be disconnected, there were done so as to comply with code. The parish wants to preserve the unique and enduring architecture of St. Columba's church and should not be marred with scuppers and downspouts or other elements out of character with its original design. BOARD ACTION: Motion was made by Don Weida to grant a variance for six (6) months . Seconded by Bill Tilton with a friendly amendment, that the motion would include, that a letter be written to the Sewer Division, from the Boardmembers requesting that an Engineer from the Sewer Division work with the Appellants to try to help remedy or resolve the issue on the rainleader disconnection. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ---------------------------------- 8 � � ��%��'� ,/ 57-y1-R 11 �7 Osceola Ave. James kee ( 1 unit ) AFPEARANCE James Ree SUBJECT: Ap�ellant is requesting a variance from code requirement, having to disconnect rainleaders . PROCEEDINGS : Appellant feels if they have to disconnect rainleaders it wi11 definite�ly create a prob1em with water in the basement. Sometime ago, the Appellant met with someone from the Rainleader Division, at that time, a variance was granted. The Appellant assumed that the issue on the rainleaders were resolved. On July 23, 1991 the Appellant received a letter from the Rain ) eader Division, wherein, it informed the Appellant that the variance was a limited variance. Ron Glassman suggested that rainleader #2 on the south side of the house could be diverted to the east of the house toward the front at least half-way to the retaining wall . Mr. Ree stated that if that were to be done, it would require an extension of 25 to 30 feet and could cause some problems such as freezing pipes and back-up of ice. Mr. Ree stated that he has put in lots of money into landscaping, (trees and perennials) and he stated that there is a chance of ruining the landscaping. The Appellant stated that Steve Herbert, from Rainleader Division suggested that rainleader #3 could be on the east end of the house. Presently the rainleader is in the middle of the house on that side. The suggestion is to slope the gutter from east to west and have it run to the back yard. BOARD ACTION: Motion was made by William Tilton to deny the request for a variance on rainleaders, with the exception of the west half of the northern gutter to remain connected to downspout #3. An extension of time was granted until June 1 , 1992 to raise the eastern half of the northern gutter to drain to the east , to the northeast corner, to a new downspout and out over the grass. Seconded by Don Weida. MUTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ---------------------------- 9 , , � �j/��//y - - ° 1� 43-91-R 661 Woodlawn Ave. Herbert J. Garelick ( 1 unit) APPEARANCE : Herbert J. Garelick SUBJECT: Appellant is requesting a variance from code requirement, having to disconnect rainleaders. PROCEEDINGS The Appellant stated that two (2) of the six (6) rainleaders have been disconnected. The whole area is built on a natural spring. The Appellant was before the Board two years ago, at that time the Board granted a variance for this property, until a storm sewer was installed in the area, or in front of the house, at that time, the Appellant would disconnect the rainleaders. The storm sewer is on River Road, and the cost would be about $18,000.00. The Appellant is requesting that he be allowed to disconnect the rainleaders in stages, rather than all at one time. BOARD ACTION: Motion made by Don Weida to deny the request for a variance on disconnection of rainleaders. The Appellant was granted a extension of time until June 1 , 1992 to disconnect the rainleaders . Seconded by William Tilton. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. --------------- The rneeting adjourned at 3:40 p.m. 10