Loading...
91-2117 �REG�NAL ,, , � �� Council File # �'���� ��� ���J� Green Sheet ,� RESOLUTION CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA _- ------� � � �� Preeented By i � � Referred To Committee: Date Whereas, Section 62.102 (d) of the Saint Paul Zoning Code permits the continuance of an existing structure which does not comply with Zoning Code provisions relating to required area, lot coverage, height, yards and other characteristics of the structure or land (non-conforming structure with a use that conforms to the Zoning Code); and Whereas, Section 62.102 (d) places restrictions on the expansion or alteration of a non-conforming structure, reconstruction when the structure is damaged to an extent in excess of 60% of its replacement cost and moving of the structure to a different location; and Whereas, Section 62.102 (d) does not presently contain any provisions which would require that the structure be brought into compliance with the Code provisions in the event the use of the existing structure should be abandoned for a specified period of time; and Whereas, The City Council is interested in obtaining the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission as to whether the provisions of the Zoning Code should be amended so as to add some conditions or restrictions that would address the issue of non-conformity of the structure; now therefore be it Resolved, That the Council does hereby refer the above subject of a possible amendment to the Saint Paul Zoning Code to the Planning Commission and does hereby request that the Commission, with the assistance of staff of the Planning Division, consider this matter and submit to the Council its findings, conclusions and recommendations whether Zoning Code amendments should be enacted placing further r ctri tinnc nn the cnntinnance nf nnn-cnnf�rming ctn�ctnrec Y� Navs Absent Requested by Department of: .zmon � onwz z �_ acca ee � e man :..�' �— une i son � BY� � No� 2 � �C�rug Form Ap ved by City Attorney Adopted by Council: Date .a. ��+ Adoption Certified by Council Secretary g f Y= BY� ''����' 1 � u`�pprdve by Mayor for Submission to Ap roved b ,-.Mayor: Date NO 2 5 1991 counci !,��iily��r�-%F. BY' By: r � P4�!lSHED DEC '9� . � ���a���� �'ct* �'♦ �+ ., CITY OF SAINT PAUL o � � _�������y �,� OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY 0 • "`� JANE A. MC PEAK, CITY ATTORNEY 647 City Hall,Saint Paul,Minnesota 55102 612-298-5121 JAMES SCHEIBEL FAX 612-298-5619 MAYOR September 5, 1991 �', �..', Councilmember Tom Dimond i `" Office of City Council --� 7th Floor �� ` � City Hall �--°� \ Re: Resolution-Zoning Code Amendment �`�; Dear Councilmember Dimond: I have prepared and submit herewith the resolution requesting the Planning Commission to review the provisions of section 62. 102 (d) of the Zoning Code for the purpose of considering an amendment which would add restrictions on non-conforming structures in the event the structure should become abandoned for a specified period of time. The City Council may propose Zoning Code amendments, and the review and recommendation of the Planning Commission is a requirement of State law (Minnesota Statutes, section 462 .357) . Please advise if I can be of further assistance. Yo truly, � � : _�'�-;� ; , (� JERpME J. EGAL �'� \Asdistant City Attorney ,�,/ JJS:s Enc. � � � ��i-�/�? � DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATE INITIATED G R E E N S H E ET ��� • >'� � : City Council 11/13/91 CONTACT PERSON&PHONE INITIAUDATE ' INITIAU4AiE �DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR �CITY COUNCIL TOIII Dimond - 298-5506 ASS�aN �CITYATfORNEY �CITYCLERK NUMBERFOR MUST BE ON COUNCIL AGENDA BY(DATE) ROUTING �BUDGET DIRECTOR �FIN.&MOT.SERVICES DIR. ORDER MAYOR(OR ASSISTANT) ❑ ��.-_,--_,_�.' :".. TOTAL#OF SIGNATURE PAGES (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) • , ACTION REQUESTED: Requests Planning Commission to review provisions of the Zoning Code for the purpose of considering an amendment to add restrictions on non-conforming structures in the event the structure becomes abandoned. HECOMMENDATIONS:Approve(A)or Reject(R) pERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING�UESTIONS: _ PLANNINO COMMISSION _CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION �• Has this personlfirm ever worked under a contract for this department? _CIB COMMITfEE _ YES NO _STAFF _ 2. Has this person/firm ever been a city employee? _ YES NO • _ DISTRICT COURT _ 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current olt�i employee? SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE4 YES NO Explaln all yes answers on separats shsst end attach to green sheet INITIATING PR�LEM,ISSUE,OPPORTUNITY(WFw,What,When,Where,Why): Non-conforming structures fail to comply with the Zoning Code. ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: This would gradually bring vacant structures in compliance with the Code. DISADVANTAOES IF APPROVED: Abandoned structures would have to be brought up to Code. RECEIVED Nov 141591 �NTY CLERK DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: Abandoned structures would not be brought up to code. (��,�"'d"�' ,�=�_;�:•,t;3� ���ter NOV 14 1991 TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION S COST/REVENUE BUDGETED(CIRCLE ONE) YES NO FUNDING SOURCE ACTIVITY NUMBER FINANCIAL INFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) . /�1 a 1 ��V V NOTE: COMPLETE DIRECTIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THE GREEN SHEET INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL AVAILABLE IN THE PURCHASING OFFICE (PHONE NO. 298-4225). ROUTING ORDER: Below are correct routings for the five most frequent types of documents: CONTRACTS(assumes authorized budget exists) COUNCIL RESOLUTION (Amend Budgets/Accept. Grants) 1. Outside Agency 1. Department Director 2. Department Director 2. City Attorney 3. City Attorney 3. Budget Director 4. Mayor(for contracts over$15,000) 4. Mayor/Assistant 5. Human Rights(for contracts over$50,000) 5. City Council 6. Finance and Management Services Director 6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services 7. Finance Accounting ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(Budget Revision) COUNCiL RESOLUTION (all others, and Ordinances) 1. Activiry Manager 1. Department Director 2. Department Accountant 2. City Attorney 3. Department Director 3. Mayor Assistant 4. Budget Director 4. City Council 5. City Clerk 6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(all others) 1. Department Director 2. Ciry Attorney 3. Finance and Management Services Director 4. City Clerk TOTAL NUMBER OF SIGNATURE PAGES Indicate the#of pages on which signatures are required and papercllp.�or flag sach of these pages. ACTION REQUESTED Describe what the project/request seeks to accomplish in either chronologi- cal order or order of importance,whichever is most appropriate for the issue.Do not write complete sentences. Begin each item in your list with a verb. RECOMMENDATIONS Complete if the issue in question has been presented before any body, public or private. SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? Indicate which Council objective(s)your projecUrequest supports by listing the key woM(s)(HOUSING, RECREATION, NEIGHBORHOODS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, BUDGET,SEWER SEPARATION). (SEE COMPLETE LIST IN INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL.) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS: This information will be used to determine the citys liability for workers compensation claims,taxes and proper civil service hiring rules. INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE,OPPORTUNITY Explain the situation or conditions that created a need for your project or request. ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED Indicate whether this is simply an annual budget procedure required by law/ charter or whether there are specific ways in which the City of Saint Paul and its citizens will benefit from this projecUaction. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED What negative effects or major changes to existing or past processes might this projecUrequest produce if it is passed(e.g.,traffic delays, noise, tax increases or assessments)?To Whom?WhenT For how long? DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED What will be the negative consequences if the promised action is not approved?Inabiliry to deliver service?Continued high traffic, noise, accident rate?Loss of revenue? FINANCIAL IMPACT Although you must tailor the information you provide here to the issue you are addressing, in general you must answer two questions: How much is it going to cost?Who is going to pay?