Loading...
91-1937 � CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNC.'yI F �I I�v� � i FINAL ORDER '�. ' _ � ``-�- " BY. - ". No 18b:12 , , . . e ``�....._� Voting In the Matter of ' Ward 1 For ti�e opezation of h� above staadard rtr�et lishtiag s�ste� for t�e Dniversit�/Western/Ma�nbin Area, the tolloviag strt�t: Both sides Uai�erait�► Avenua froti Western to Kackubin for the �onths af Jannary thru December, 1992. ,; � � under Preliminary Order `���`'�� approved �'�7 �� '� � The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the ��XX3�CX State Statue; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improve- ment and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate ali expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter r. 429 of Minnesota State Statue. COUNCIL PERSON Adopted by the Council: Date 0 Cj 1 0 1991 Yeas� Nays fsoeYits Certified Pas y Council Secretary MaCCSbe! � In Favor By �t`'�`� r 0 CT 15 1991 �r! _�Z Against _ Wilsos Mayor PtiALISNED OCT ?,..�'91 � � . . . . . . . 1�- �Q3� RE 8 22 91 � DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATE INITIATED N� 1619 0 Finance De artment/Real Estate 8/15/91 G R E E N SH E ET CONTACT PERSON 8 PHON INITIAL/DATE INITIAUOATE K3tIl Ries ` 298-5125 �DEPARTMENTDIRECTOR CITYCOUNCIL Y • � ASSIGN �CITY ATTORNEY g CITY CLERK NUMBER FOR MUST BE ON COUNCIL AQENDA BY(DATE) ROUTINQ �BUDOET DIRECTOR �FIN.&MGT.SERVICES DIR. M11St be in City Clerk's C2 T10 ORDER MAYOR(ORASSISTANn h n W dn d 8 28 81 � 0 Council Research TOTAL#OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) ION QUE ED: ett ng�iearing date for the University/Western/Mackubin Area Above Standard Street Lighting System Approve the estimated assessment costs for 1992 University/Western/Mackubin Area Above Standard Street Lighting System File ��18612 RECOMMENDATIONS:Approve(A)a Reject(R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWINti�UESTIONS: _PLANNING COMMISSION _ CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION 1• Has this person/firm ever worked under a contract for this department? _CIB COMMITfEE _ YES NO A SrAFF 2. Has this person/firm ever been a city employee7 — YES NO _DISTRICT COUar _ 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normall y possessed by any current city employee? SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? Ward 1 YES NO Safer and better neighborhoods Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet INITIATING PROBLEM,ISSUE,OPPORTUNITY(Who,What,When,Where,Why): A public hearing was held for each of the above standard lighting systems. In each case, after the hearing from the various neighborhood district councils, business associations, property owners, and staff, the Council approved both the construction of these systems and their operation by the City on an assessment basis. It �s required that a public hearing be held each year for both the estimated operating costs and then the actual operating costs. The first above standard lighting system began with the Lowertown system in 1983. These �� systems have increased at a rate of about two systems per year since then. ADVANTAOES IF APPROVED: This has become an annual budget procedure. . The assessment policy originated to a1Tow the direct benefitting parties to pay for the additional operating costs and provide for uniform maintenance of the system. DISADVANTAOES IF APPROVED: None RECEIVED AUG � 2 1991 DI3ADVANTAOE3 IF NOT APPROVED: The City, as a whole, would bear the added expense to operate these systems instead of the direct benefitting parties that requested them. Council ff�se��h C�rtt�r AUG 2 2 1991 TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION S 4,753_00 COST/REVENUE BUDGETEp(CIRCLE ONE) YES NO FUNDINGSOURCE AssessmentG onl� ACTIVITYNUMBER FINANCIAL INFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) �� . - . . . . . NOTE: COMPLETE DIRECTIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THE GREEN SHEET INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL AVAILABLE IN THE PURCHASING OFFICE(PHONE NO.298-4225). ROUTING ORDER: Below are correct routings for the five most frequent rypes of documents: CONTRACTS(assumes authorized budget exists) COUNCIL RESOLUTION (Amend Budgets/Accept. Grants) L Outside Agency 1. Department Director 2. Department Di�ector 2. City Attorney 3. Ciry Attorney 3. Budget Director 4. Mayor(for contracts over$15,000) 4. Mayor/Assistant 5. Human Rights(for contracts over$50,000) 5. City Council 6. Finance and Management Services Director 6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services 7. Finance Accounting ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(Budget Revision) COUNCIL RESOLUTION (all others,and Ordinances) 1. Activity Manager 1. Department Director 2. Department Accountant 2. Ciry Attorney 3. Department Director 3. Mayor Assistant 4. Budget Director 4. City Council 5. City Clerk 6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(all others) 1. Department Director 2. City Attorney 3. Finance and Management Services Director 4. City Clerk TOTAL NUMBER OF SIGNATURE PAGES Indicate the#of pages on which signatures are required and paperclip or flag each of these pagas. ACTION REQUESTED Describe what the projecUrequest seeks to accomplish in either chronologi- cal order or order of importance,whichever is most appropriate for the issue. Do not write complete sentences. Begin each item in your list with a verb. RECOMMENDATIONS Complete if the issue in question has been presented before any body, public or private. SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? Indicate which Council objective(s)your projecUrequest supports by listing the key word(s)(HOUSING, RECREATION, NEIGHBORHOODS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, BUDGET, SEWER SEPARATION). (SEE COMPLETE LIST IN INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL.) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS: This information will be used to determine the ciry's liability for workers compensation claims,taxes and proper civil service hiring rules. INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY Explain the situation or conditions that created a need for your project or request. ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED Indicate whether this is simply an annual budget procedure required by law/ charter or whether there are specific ways in which the Ciry of Saint Paul and its citizens will benefit from this projecUaction. DISADVANTACiES IF APPROVED What negative effects or major changes to existing or past processes might this projecUrequest produce if it is passed (e.g.,traffic delays, noise, tax increases or assessments)?To Whom?When? For how long? DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED What will be the negative consequences if the promised action is not approved? Inabiliry to deliver service?Continued high traffic, noise, accident rate?Loss of revenue? FINANCIAL IMPACT Although you must tailor the information you provide here to the issue you are addressing, in general you must answer two questions: How much is it going to cost?Who is going to pay? �f( - � ��'�� - PRELIIVIINARY ORDER J Council Fil.e No. 91-1587—By Wi::�am L.Wllson— In the Matter of for the operarion of the above standard street lighting system for the University/Western/Maekubin Area,the following street in Voting Wazd 1: Both sides University Ave.from Westem to Maekubin for the months of January thnz December, 1992., The Councff of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and liaving considered said report,hereby resolves: 1.1'hat the said report and the same is hereby approved with no altematives,and that the estimated cost thereof is S4,753.00 tinanced by assessments. 2.That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the l Oth dav of October, 1991 at 9:00 o clock a.m.,in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and C3urt House Building in the City of Saint Paul. . . 3.That notice of 5aid public•hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. FAe No. 18612 Adopted by Council August 29, 1991. Approved by Mayor August 30, 1991. (September 7, 1991)