91-1932 � �
CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FI�NO.
q � - ��3z
} 4.
FINAL ORDER ,, i .., ° y
By -(�,__...���;r�•s_
��-
- File Na 18S8S
_ __.-,--'' _ _ ,
Voting In the Matter of
Ward
1
For Lhe op�ration of tbe above staadard atreet ligbting syst�m for tAe
Selby Avea�e Re�italisatioa Pro�ect �io. 2, the folloring streets :
Both sides Selb� Areaue from� Victoria Street to Lezington Parkxsy; Soath
side of Selby Avenae to S5 faet east of Victoria Street and Both sides
Victoria Street ta SS feet aorth af Selby Avenue and to SS tset soutb of
Salhy Avenue for the tioatt�s of Jauunary thru Dece�ber, 1992.
a
�
� �j��.� �'- d�-�r'/ �
under Preliminary Order approved
, �
The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice
thereof having been given as prescribed by the���r�� State Statue; and
WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improve-
ment and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement
be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate
all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapte
429 of Minnesota State Statue.
COUNCIL PERSON Adopted by the Council: Date OCT i � 1991
Yeas� Nays
��ts Certified P by C uncil Secretar J
� `
MaCCabaa �_ In Favor By
Rsttata �—
15 1
� U Against
y�pa Mayor
P�IISNED OCT ?�'9 fi
. . ,
. _ . ���-�9��
` ' ' RE 8/22/91
DEPARTMENT/OFFIC P OUNCIL DATE INITIATED G R E E N S H E ET NO 1618 9
Finance De artment/Real Estate 8/15/91
CONTACT PERSON&P O INITIAUDATE INITIAUDATE
�DEPAFTMENT DIRECTOR �CITY COUNCI�
Kathy Ries 298-5125 ASSIGN �CITYATTORNEY �CITYCLERK
NUMBERFOR
MUST BE ON COUNCIL AGENDA BY DATE ROUTING �BUDOET DIRECTOR �FIN.&MGT.SERVICES DIR.
Must be in City C�.er�. s 0 fice no ORDER
MAYOR(OR ASSISTAN� Council Research
la er than noon Wednesda 8 28 91 �
TOTAL#OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE)
ACTION REQUESTED:
Setting date of hearing for the Selby Avenue Revitalization Pro�ect No. 2 lighting system
Approve the estimated assessment costs for the 1992 operation of the Selby Avenue
Revitalization No. 2 Above Standard Street Lighting System File 4�18588
RECOMMENDATIONS:Approve(A)or Reject(R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MU8T ANSWER TME FOLLOWIN(3�UE8TIONS:
_PLANNING COMMISSION _CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION 1• Has this person/firm ever worked under e contract for this depertment?
_CIB COMMITTEE _ YES NO
2. Has this person/firm ever been a city employee?
�3TAFF — YES NO
_D13TRICT COURT _ 3. Does this pBrsonlfirm
possess a skill not normally possessed by any current city employee?
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE4 Ward 1 YES NO
Safer & better neighborhoods Explaln all yes answers on ssparets shest and attach to green sheet
�A�public�liearirig was�he�ld for eac�ire'o���the above standard street l ighting systems. In each
case, after hearing from various neighborhood district councils, business associations,
property owners, and staff, the Council approved both the construction of these systems and
their operation by the City on an assessment basis. It is required that a public hearing
be held each year for both the estimated operating costs and then the actual operating
costs. The first above standard lighting system began in 1983. These systems have
increased at a rate of about two systems per year since then.
ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED:
This has become an annual procedure. The assessment policy originiated to allow the
direct benefitting parties to pay for the additional operating costs and provice for
uniform maintenance of the system.
DISADVANTA(iES IF APPROVED:
None
RE�E��ED
;=:.�� 2 2 1991
�ITY ����K
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED:
The City, as a whole, would bear the added expense to operate these systems instead of
the direct benefitting parties that requested them.
Council Research Center
AUG 2 2 1991
TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION S 6�122.OO COST/REVENUE BUDGETED(CIRCLE ONE) YES NO
FUNDINCi SOURCE Assessments OIIly ACTIVITY NUMBER
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) _j�
a
� ' �
� , . "� � ,
NOTE: COMPLETE DIRECTIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THE GREEN SHEET INSTRUCT�ONAL
MANUAL AVAILABLE IN THE PURCHASING OFFICE(PHONE NO. 298-4225).
ROUTING ORDER:
Below are correct routings for the five most frequent rypes of documents:
CONTRACTS(assumes authorized budget exists) COUNCiI RESOLUTION (Amend Budgets/Accept. Grants)
1. Outside Agency 1. Department Director
2. Department Director 2. City Attorney
3. Ciry Attorney 3. Budget Director
4. Mayor(for contracts over$15,000) 4. Mayor/Assistant
5. Human Rights(for contracts over$50,000) 5. City Council
6. Finance and Management Services Director 6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services
7. Finance Accounting
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(Budget Revision) COUNCIL RESOLUTION(all others, and Ordinances)
1. Activity Manager 1. Department Director
2. Department Accountant 2. Ciry Attorney
3. Department Director 3. Mayor Assistant
4. Budget Oirector 4. City Council
5. City Clerk
6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(all others)
1. Department Director
2. City Attorney
3. Finance and Management Services Director
4. City Clerk
TOTAL NUMBER OF SIGNATURE PAGES
Indicate the�of pages on which signatures are required and papercUp or flag
each of these pages.
ACTION REQUESTED
Describe what the projecVrequest seeks to accomplish in either chronologi-
cal order or order of importance,whichever is most appropriate for the
issue. Do not write complete sentences. Begin each item in your list with
a verb.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Complete if the issue in question has been presented before any body, public
or private.
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE?
Indicate which Council objective(s)your project/request supports by listing
the key word(s)(HOUSING, RECREATIOFV, NEIGHBORHOODS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT,
BUDGET,SEWER SEPARATION). (SEE COMPLETE LIST IN INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL.)
PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS:
This information will be used to determine the city's liability for workers compensation claims,taxes and proper civil service hiring rules.
INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE,OPPORTUNITY
Explain the situation or conditions that created a need for your project
orrequest
ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED
Indicate whether this is simply an annual budget procedure required by law/
charter or whether there are specific ways in which the Ciry of Saint Paul
and its citizens will benefit from this project/action.
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED
What negative effects or major changes to existing or past processes might
this projecUrequest produce if it is passed(e.g.,traffic delays, noise,
tex increases or assessments)?To Whom?When?For how long?
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED
What will be the negative consequences if the promised action is not
approved? Inabiliry to deliver service?Continued high traffic, noise,
accident rate?Loss of revenue?
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Although you must tailor the information you provide here to the issue you
are addressing, in general you must answer two questions: How much is it
going to cost?Who is going to pay?
y� - �9�3�
_-----. . _ -- . _
. .. _�
. `_ ;� . , , ' PRELIMIIVARY ORDER ..>. , . ��'- . . . :
. _ .. . .: ._._. . ,
� i
_Council FYIe No.91-1586=By William L.Wilson- " `
, In the Matter pf for the operatton of the above standard street lighting system for ��
the Selb}r Avenue Revltallzatton Pro]ect No.2�yonng wara i �:
Both sldes Selby Ave.from Victoria St.to Le7dngtodPkwy; :' �� i�:, �-ry �;
� South side of Selby Ave.to 55 feet east of Victoria S�;and x '.;i '�x�r x - �- .�
Both sides Victoria St.to 55 feet north of Selby Ave:and to 55 feef south of Seiby,Ave.`.-� %;
for the raonths of January thru December, i992:• ,, ,-i F - �a
,. _ .;� '; t-. •'I
• - The Councll of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon . -j
the above improvement;,and having con§idered`said repoit,-heretry iesolves �;� - j
' ' _ 1.''fhat the said report'and tFie same is hezeby'ap�roved wltli rio alteinarives,-and':'�'j
' , that the estlraated co§t thereof is$6,122.00 flnanced by assessments '�`
2.That a public hearirig be had on said improveirient ori the lOth day:of October, !
1991,at 9:00 o'clock a.m. the Councff Chambers of the City H an ourt House " !
Bu g in the City of Saint Pau1.- ::'s' ' �1` ' .'l'± '' ;:�, i,, :>;� ': ;.
� ` 3.-Thaf notice of said publlc hearing be given to the persons-�nd in�the manner. � �
rovlded _ . .
, p by'the Charter, stating the time "and place of hearing`-the nature of.the , , �
'- improvement and the total cost thereof as esrimated "!, � ,;," >s•<� 3r� , - : �•
File No. T8588 • w t„>,.� �-{{� =f�� �.,y;�
'',, Adopted by Council August 29, 1991 `'- -,.-- _ r `�% -�_. �_ _ �._��
' ::'Approved by Mayor August 30,.1991 �,�t'ti �r f� i;,'� '!
°' •� (September.7,`1991) ;t ' ��*-�,� r; �.
. - — �_. f��,. r ,_ . -_ _...._.na.d._�_...--.�.�. _�_�_=�_.z�k�?_�. _