Loading...
91-1927 . � CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCI 'FIL�E NO. `"I I �I'"► �� ; , FINAL ORDER �1 ; By / Fii"e�. 18i25 �, �_� �.__ Voting In the Matter of Ward 1 Por thd operatios of tbe abo�e suudard �treet lighting syste■ for the `,' GSAWD—BAST II A��A, the folloving stre�ts: Both aides of Craad Avsnne froa abont 360 feet xest af Qictorfa (180 � feet north side . 26Q feet soutl� sfde ) ta abont 210 fset ��at of ' Leziagto� Parkvay (210 feet north side, t30 feet •onth side); noth sides of Lesingtoa Parkvay fro� the alle� north af Graad Aveane Lc � the alley sonth of Grand Avenue; ; Both sides of O:ford Street fron Grand Avenue to t�s alle� north of ';� Grand A��nue; West side of Oxford Stre�t fro� Graad A�enae to the alley so�th of Gr:nd Avenoe; Eoth sid�s of ChataMOrth Street froa Grand Areane to the alle� aorth of 6ra�d A��ane; sad Dotb sides of Milton Street fro■ Craad A�ss�e to the alley nortb of Grand Avenne for the �onths of Jaanary thra Deae�ber 1992. ,-w:. 6 G � under Preliminary Order �/'��� approved a !� 7 7/ The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the��i3�rX�r��t�� State Statue; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard ail persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improve- ment and has fuily considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 429 of Minnesota State Statue. OCT � 0 1991 COUNCIL PERSON Adopted by the Council: Date " Yeas �p�' Nays � (*,p�ts Certified Pas y Co cil Secretary � � � ��� � In Favor By �� v Against 0 CT 1 5 1991 �1i� Mayor ����� C�rj �';9�� . � � s . �n�. O/22/71 / l /��� [ � DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATE INITIATED �fio 16 5 8 2 Finance/Real Estate Division 8/15/91 GREEN SHEET INITIAL/DATE INITIAUDATE CONTACT PERSON&PHO �DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR �CITY COUNCIL Kathy Ries �� 298-5125 pSSIGN �CITYATfORNEY �CITYCLERK NUMBER FOR MUST BE ON COUNCIL A(iENDA BY(DATE) g�2 9/91 ROUTING �BUDGET DIRECTOR �FIN.8 MGT.SERVICES DIR. ML1St be lIl City Clerk's Off C2 n,0 ORDER �MAVOR(ORASSISTANT) 0 Council Research TOTAL#OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) ACTION REQUESTED: Setting hearing date for Grand-East II Area above standard street lighting system. Approve the estima.ted assessment costs for the 1992 operation of the Grand-East II Area above standard street lighting system. File ��'18425 RECOMMENDATIONS:Approve(A)or Rejerx(R) pERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUEBTIONS: _PLANNING COMMISSION _ CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION 1• Has this person/firm ever worked under a contract for this department? _CIB COMMITTEE _ YES NO 2. Has this person/firm ever been a city employee? �STAFF — YES NO _ DISTRiCT COURT _ 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normall y possessed by any burrent city employee? SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? Ward 1 YES NO Safer and Better Neighborhoods Explaln ell yes anawsn on sepants shset end ettech to grosn shset INITIATINCi PROBLEM,ISSUE,OPPORTUNITY(Who,Whet,When,Where,Why): A public hearing was held for each of the above standard lighting systems. In each case, after hearing from the various neighborhood district councils, business associations, property owners and staff, the Council approved both the construction of these systems and their operation by the City on an assessment basis. It is required that a public hearing be held each year for both the estimated operating costs and then the actual operating costs. The first above standard lighting system began in 1983. These systems have increased at a rate of about two systems per year since then. ADVANTAOES IF APPROVED: This has become an annual budget procedure. The assessment policy originated to allow the direct benefitting parties to pay for the additional operating costs and provide for uniform ma.intenance of the system. DISADVANTAOES IFAPPROVED: None. RE�E1v�� JG�� �gg1 F' C��� ��ERK DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: The City, as a whole, would bear the added expense to operate these systems instead of the direct benefitting parties that requested them. �'�„��s� '��sea�ch Center AUG 2 2 1991 TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION S 9�07`� COST/REVENUE BUDGETED(CIRCLE 9NE)_ KES NO �' FUNDING SOURCE AsseGSmPntG onl� ACTIVITY NUMBER FINANCIAL INFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) a� y e f • . � NOTE: COMRLETE DIF�ECTIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THE GREEN SHEET INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL AVAILABLE IN THE PURCHASING�FFICE(PHONE NO.298-4225). ROUTINQ ORDER: Below ere correct routings for the five most frequent rypes of documents: CONTRACTS(assumes authorized budget exists) COUNCIL RESOLUTION (Amend Budgets/Accept.Grants) 1. Outside Agency 1. Department Director 2. Department Director 2. Ciry Attorney 3. City Attorney 3. Budget Director 4. Mayoc(tor contracts over$15,000) 4. Mayor/Assistant 5. Human Righta(for contracts over$50.000) 5. City Council 8. Finance and Management Services Director 6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services 7. Finence Accounting ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(Budget Revision) COUNCIL RESOLUTION(all others,and Ordinances) 1. Activiry Manager 1. Department Director 2. Department Accountant 2. Ciry Attorney 3. Department Director 3. Mayor Assistant 4. Budget Director 4. Ciry Council 5. City Clerk 6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(all others) 1. Department Director 2. City Attorney 3. Finance and Management Services Director 4. Gty Clerk TOTAL NUMBER OF SIGNATURE PAGES � I�dicate the#�of pages on which signatures are required and paperclip.or flag s�ch of thess payes. ACTION REDUESTED Describe what the project/request seeks to accomplish in either chronologi- cal oMer or order of importance,whichever is most appropriate for the issue. Do not write complete sentences. Begin each item in your list with a verb. RECOMMENDATIONS Complete if the issue in question has been presented before any body,public - or private. SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? Indicate which Council obJective(s)your projecUrequest supports by listing the key word(s)(HOUSIN(3, RECREATION, NEIGHBORHOODS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, BUDCiET,SEWER SEPARATION). (SEE COMPLETE LIST IN INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL.) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS: This information will be used to determine the city"s liabiliry for workers compensation claims,taxes and proper civil service hfring rules. INITIATINCi PROBLEM, ISSUE,OPPORTUNITY Explaln the situation or conditions that created a need for your praject or request, ADVANTAf3ES IF APPROVED Indicate whether this is simply an annual budget procedure required by law/ charter or whether there are specific ways in which the City of Saint Paul and Its citizens will benefit from this projecUaction. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED " What negative effects or maJor changes to existing or past processes might this projecUrequest produce if it is passed(e.g.,traffic delays, noise, tax tncreases or assessments)?To Whom?When?For how long? DISADVANTAQES IF NOT APPROVED What will be the negative consequences if the promised action is not approved?Inability to deliver service?Continued high traffic, noise, accident rate?Loss of revenue? FINANCIAL IMPACT Although you must tailor the information you provide here to the issue you are addressing, in general you must answer two questions: How much is it going to cost?Who is going to pay? �/- , �� � : ,�.. ,:_. _ , , . . , . .___ _ � :�� . _ , ; PRELIIYIII�TTARY ORDER :' .. .. ..�- �. . � ., ; :. . Council File No.91-1582—BY William L.VWson - a,. �_. ... -;t .> ._.-. :� _ In the Matter of for the operarion of the'above standard street Hghting system for -j the Grand-East II Area,the following streets in Vottng Ward .1 � :�. , - __ � • Both sides Grand Ave.from about 260 feet west of Victorla(180 feet north side,260 feet•.�+ -south side)to about 210 feet west of LeJdngton Pkwy.(210 feet north side,'130 feet south .:� ��side); � .� i i.� �-� -'� Both sides Leldngton Pkwy.from the alley northvf Grand Ave to the aliry south of Grand .�;, - Ave.: . .. ,,� ;,•:< r_ ,:. ° r.".; ; i�,, ' 'Both sides bf O�dord St.frora Grand Ave.to thc alley north of Grand�Ave {"' 3 �+ West side of Oxford St.from Gr�nd Ave.to the alley south of Grand Ave "_�` i Both sid'es'of Chatsworth St.from Grand Ave:tb the alley noith of Grand Ave.;and ; ��i BotA sides of Milton St.from Grand Ave.to the alley north of Grand Ave:for the months i' J of January thru December 1992. �:' �_ `".' _ }' . • The Councii of the City ofSaint Paul having received the�report of the Mayor upon ; the above improvement,and having considered said report,�hereby resolves:, ' 1.That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no altematives,and ! that the estunated cost thereof is$9,078.00 Siianced by°assessments '�� �� ' ` � 2.That a publie hearing be had on said improvement on the lOth da o€Octo er.'.� 1991,at 9.00 o clock a m.,in the Council Chambers of the City all and Corut House "� � u in e City o aint Paul '- t 4..--t�e .�t.,y t ir �;. w= �.�:,� .:� �:,: �3.That notice qf said pubflc hearing be given to fihe persons and in the manner providedaby th4 Charter, stating the tlme'and piace of hearing the nature of the �� . improvement�and the total�cost thereof as estimated.'�'� ' ' �. f; , _ ..r F11e NO 18425 ' ' •` r � �.r i a _ . "•�t r� ` � _� i S Adopted by!Council_August 29 1991: � "�'�� �'�' ' ` {" '�' s " .i . App'roved by`Mayor August 30, 1991. ``•`` � `'r " i " � z;6�"�`�` `,-' `�` � � ' (Septembei 7 1991) - �� � � .� , :_. .,,. w, -, . . _..�._,<_ ,,� _�,r�-��_'... .. � { 'j � . . _". _� 1 ..._.- .. . . _,.. �a1i.i.