91-1926 � 3�
__ . ;._.. Qi- i926
t.
CITY OF ST. PAUL C N FI E NO.
FINAL ORDER ; j
By
, r
� � � ` 18342
, ;,'�File o
L�
Voting In the Matter of
Ward
1
�
- For t�e operatioa of the above stand�rd atreet lighting ayste� for the
GRAIiD—BAST I ABEA. the following streets :
Both sides Graad Areaas fro� 260 faet Mest Af Victoria to 100 faet eaat
of Dale Street;
Botb sides Victoria Streat froa 1SA feet ncrth of Grand to 1S0 feet
sovth of Grand Avenue;
tiest side St. Albans Street fram Grand Aveane to 1S0 feet aorth of Grand
�� A�ense;
�` Eaat side Dale Street fro■ Grand Avenne to 150 feet north of Grsa�
Avenue for the ■oaths of J:anary thru Deca�ber 1992.
r
�'
r""
�'
� .. .._.
w; �,j� q
under Preliminary Order /J���! approved ��d �� ��
i
The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice
thereof having been given as prescribed by the I�X�F� State Statue; and
WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improve-
ment and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement
be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate
all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with
429 of Minnesota State Statue.
COUNCIL PERSON Adopted by the Council: Date 0 CT � 0 1991
Yea� Nays
�t= Certified Passe b C cil Secretary -)
La� �° � �
�c�� .� In Favor By
�t� (� Aga�st 0 CT i 5 1991
r� -
Wileos Mayor
�u�� Q�T ��'�?
. . . �. s � RE 8/2 2/91 l/ i r/�'�,1"
DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATE INITIATED �� 16 5 71
Finance Department/Real Estate 8/15/91 G R E EN SH E ET
CONTACT PERSON&PHON INITIAUDATE INITIAUDATE
Kathy Ries � 292-5125 �DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR �CITY COUNCIL
�, ASSIGN �CITY ATTORNEY �CITY CLERK
NUMBEpFOR
MUST BE ON COUNCIL AGENDA BY(DATE) ROUTING �BUDQET DIRECTOR FIN.&MQT.SERVICES DIR.
MLIS t be in City C1erk's of f i e O ORDER MAYOR(OR ASSISTANn Council Researc
r t an noon Wednesda 8 28 91 0
TOTAL#OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE)
ACTION REQUE3TED: ],
Setting hearing date for the Grand-East/Area Above Standard Street Lighting system.
Approve the estima.ted assessment costs for the1992 operating of the Grand-East 1 Area
Above Standard Street Lighting Pro�ect. File 4f18392
RECOMMENDATIONS:Approve(A)or Reject(R) pERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING�UESTIONS:
_PLANNING COMMISSION _ CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION 1• Has this person/firm ever worked under a contract for this department?
CIB COMMITfEE YES NO
� — 2. Has this person/firm ever been a city employee?
_STAFF — YES NO
_�iSTFliCr Coupr _ 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current city employee?
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? Ward 1 YES NO
Safer and Better Neighborhoods Explain all yes answers on ssparata shaet and attach to green shest
INITIATING PROBLEM,ISSUE,OPPORTUNITV(Who,What,When,Where,Why):
A public hearing was held for each of the above standard lighting systems.� In each case,
after hearing from the various neighborhood district councils, business associations,
property owners and staff, the Council approved both the construction of these systems and
their operation by the City on an assessment basis. It is required that a public hearing be
held each year for both the estimated operating costs and then the actual operating costs.
The first above standard lighting system began . in 1983. These systems have increased at a
rate of about two systems per year since then.
ADVANTAQES IF APPROVED:
This has become an annual budget procedure. The assessment policy originated to allow the
direct benefitting parties to pay for the additional operating costs and provide for
uniform maintenance of the system.
DISADVANTAGES IFAPPROVED: �C(`�
Lv
None. P�G�� �gg1
Ci�� ��ERK
DISADVANTAOES IF NOT APPROVED:
The City, as a whole, would bear the added expense to operate these systems instead
of the direct benefitting parties that requested them.
Council Research CPn�
�AU� 2� 1991
TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION S 6,4'6H COST/REVENUE BUDGETED(CIRCLE ONE) YES NO
FUNDIN(3 SOURCE Assessments Orily. pCTIViTY NUMBER
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:(EXPLAIN)
d�
. - . .
, .,
NOTE: COMPLETE DIRECTIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THE GREEN SHEET INSTRUCTIONAL
MANUAL AVAILABLE IN THE PURCHASING OFFICE(PHONE NO.298-4225).
AOUTING ORDER:
Below are correct routings for the five most frequent types of documents:
CONTRACTS(assumes authorized budget exists) COUNCIL RESOLUTION(Amend Budgets/Accept. Grants)
1. Outside Agency 1. Department Director
2. Department Director 2. City Attorney
3. City Attorney 3. Budget Director
4. Mayor(for contracts over$15,000) 4. Mayor/Assistant
5. Human Rights(for contracts over$50,000) 5. City Council
6. Finance and Management Services Director 6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services
7. Finance Accounting
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(Budget Revision) COUNCIL RESOLUTION(all others, and Ordinances)
1. Activity Manager 1. Depariment Director
2. Department Accountant 2. City Attomey
'3. Department Director 3. Mayor Assistant
4. Budget Director 4. Ciry Council
5. Ciry Clerk
6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Managem�nt Services
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(all others)
1. Department Director
2. City Attorney
3. Finance and Management Services Director -
4. Ciry Clerk
TOTAL NiJMBER OF SIGNATURE PAGES �
Indicate the�of pages on which signatures are required and paperclfp or flag
each of thess pagss. .
ACTION REQUESTED �
Describe what the project/request seeks to accomplish in either chronologi-
cal order or order of importance,whichever is most appropriate for the
issue. Do not write complete sentences.Begin each item in your list with
a verb.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Complete ff the issue in question has been presented before any body,public
or private.
SUPPOHTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE?
Indicate which Council objective(s)your projecbrequest supports by listing
the key word(s)(HOUSING, RECREATION, NEIGHBORHOODS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT,
BUDGET,SEWER SEPARATION). (SEE COMPLETE LIST IN INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL.)
PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS:
This information will be used to determine the city's liability for workers compensation claims,taxes and proper civil service hiring rules.
INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE,OPPORTUNITY
Explain the situation or conditions that created a need for your project
or request.
ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED
Indicate whether this is simply an annual budget procedure required by law/ �
charter or whether there are specific ways in which the City ot Saint Paul ,
and its cltizens will benefit from this projecVaction.
DISADVANTAQES IF APPROVED
What negative effects or major changes to existing or past processes might
this projecVrequest produce if it is passed(e.g.,traffic delays, noise,
tax increases or assessments)?To WhDm?�Nhen? For how long?
__ _•.t
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED
What will be the negative consequences if the promised action is not
approved? Inability�CO deliver servise?Continued high traffic, noise,
accident rate?Loss of revenue? `
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Although you must tailor the information you provide here to the issue you
are addressing, in general you must answer two questions: How much is it
going to cost?Who is going to pay?
c�� � � q��
/ � PRELIIV�7ARY ORDER 1 ; ' ;
- :, ;. ;
, -: , . ., -, �: � . ,� i
Coundl Flle No. 91-1581-By William L.Wilson-'. '. . ` r�"'_ ' '
" In the Matter of for the operation of the above_�standard street iighting system for ,'
� the.Grand-East I.Area.the following streets in Vottng Ward 1_ '�.:., �" , ; � ' ,i
. - . . .. ........ _'._. " . .' -_ ,1 '^.1 :.:.i^.�. -:� . : i.
Both sides Grand Ave.from 260 feet west of Victorla to�100 feet east of Dale SL �
Both sides Victoria SL from 150 feet north of Grand Ave.to 150 fect south of Giand Ave. �'
' West side St.Albans St.from Grand Ave.to 150 feet north of Grand Ave
East side Dale St:from Grand Ave.to 150 feet north of Grand Ave.for the montli's of i
January thru December 1992. ,
The Council of the.City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon ,`
the above impravement,and having considered said report,�hereby resolves: - ;a
,1.That the said report and the same is hereby apprwed with no alternatives,and T
that the esttmated cost thereof is 56,468.00 8nanced by assessments.,- .
" 2.That a public hearing be had on said lmprovement on the Y h���r n_ ,.±nt+'�,�
1991, t 9:00 o'clock a.m.,in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House :
Building in the City of aint aul. : , :r� . ,
3.That notlee of said pubHc hearing be given to the pe=sons and in the manner �
provlded by the Charter, stating the time and piace of hearing, ihe nature of the F
-_ improvement and the total cost thereof as esUmated ;, „ :�a,_ ;r . .;, ;{
File No. 18392 r . .; ��� �.,. a � ,
s � �
� Adoptea by.council August 2s. 1991.' � _,s;� 7'� t� ;; r ., : t ��� . .:..:i
Approved by Mayor August 80. 1991. �`; 7: ;
. : ^ - - . (September 7. 1991) �,, �r � �i ,�
,_. . • '
, , . �
�- . . .�. �-. .: �.,�°_rt?s1,:_.:•L-
1