The URL can be used to link to this page

91-1918 "^��'��y, �C'� \:Counci l Fi le # ��-�� " 2� " Green Sheet # �� RESOLUTION OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA � �� P esented By Referred To `' c• . c �� -� �. Camnittee: Date �, �� " �y Whereas, A proposed amendment to the Zoning Code to provide new regulations governing the parking of vehicles on zoning lots with single and two family dwellings has been introduced before the Saint Paul City Council; and Whereas, Minnesota Statutes, section 462.357, subdivision 4, provides that amendments to the Zoning code may be initiated by the City Council provided that the Planning Commission is provided with an opportunity to study and report to the Council its recommendations on the proposed amendments; now therefore be it Resolved, That the Planning Commission of the City of Saint Paul is hereby requested to review the attached proposed amendment to the Zoning Code and report its recommendations back to the City Council within 60 days of the adoption of this resolution. T� Navs Absent R ested p�� equ by Department of: Goswltz - Lon V" , Macca ee �� , Rettman �� ,. T une v' Wi son � BY� _._ Adopted by Council: Date N OV 2 � 1991 form Appr by Cit��A�e� Adoption Certified by Council Secretary BY: -�/� � f��K� � , n � �' By: �, � , / — �, � ° ��2�,J �,ua Mayor r �S�ission to Approved by Mayor: �� D�e NQ� 2 � I�J� �'l 4 �i '.F.�,�,,F < t - BY. By: �� F�l6S�BE� ��L 7 '91 f i ` i• ' •I _�� V DEPART3ENTlOFFICE/COUNCIL DATEINITIATED GREEN SHEET NO. ��O 1 � Cit Council INITIAUDATE INITIAUDATE CONTACT PERSON&PHONE �DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR �CITY COUNCIL Dave Thune 298-5679 ASSION �CITYATTOHNEY �CITYCLERK NUMBERFOH MUST BE ON COUNCIL AGENDA BY(DATE) ROUTING �BUDGET DIRECTOR �FIN.8 MGT.SERVICES DIR. ORDER �MAYOR(OR ASSISTANT) � TOTAL#OF SIGNATURE PAGES (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) ACTION REQUESTED: The Planning Commission of the City of St. Paul is requested to review a proposed amendment to the Zoning Code and report its recommendations back to the City Council in 60 days. RECOMMENDATIONS:Approve(A)or Reject(R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWIN�3�UESTIONS: _PLANNING COMMISSION _ CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION �• Has this person/firm ever worked under a contract for this depertment7 _CIB COMMITfEE _ YES NO 2. Has this person/firm ever been a city employee? _STAFF — YES NO _ DISTRICT COURT _ 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current city employee? SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? YES NO Explaln all yes answers on separete shest and attaoh to green sheet INITIATINO PROBLEM,ISSUE,OPPORTUNITY(Who,What,When,Where,Why): Section 462.357 of the Minnesota Statutes gives the City Council the ability to initiate amendments to the Zoning Code and provided the Planning Commission has the opportunity to review this amendment. ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: The proposed amendments are brought before the Planning Commission for its review and the Commission's recommendations. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: None RECEIVED O C T 0 2 1991 CITY CLERK DISADVANTACiES IF NOT APPROVED: The proposed amendments to the zoning code are not brought before the Planning Commission therefore halting the review of the zoning code amendment. �'` �,��' ° �tia��—�� °° H. z ��.a ,se�"�.F ��al�'� OCT 0 u 1991 TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION S COST/REVENUE BUDGETED(CIRCLE ONE) YES NO FUNDING SOURCE ACTIVITY NUMBER FINANCIAL INFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) �� . � • „ NOTE: COMPLETE DIRECTIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THE GREEN SHEET INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL AVAILABLE IN THE PURCHASING OFFICE(PHONE NO.298-4225). ROUTING ORDER: Below are correct routings for the five most frequent types of documents: CONTRACTS(assumes suthorized budget exists) COUNCIL RESOLUTION (Amend Budgets/Accept. Grants) 1. Outside Agency 1. Department Director 2. Department Director 2. City Attorney 3. City Attorney 3. Budget Director 4. Mayor(for contracts over$15,000) 4. Mayor/Assistant 5. Human Rights(for contracts over$50,000) 5. City Council 6. Finance and Management Services Director 6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services 7. Finance Accounting ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(Budget Revision) COUNCIL RESOLUTION (all others,and Ordinances) 1. Activity Manager 1. Department Director 2. Department Accountant 2. City Attomey 3. Department Director 3. Mayor Assistant 4. Budget Director 4. Ciry Council 5. City Clerk 6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(all others) 1. Department Director 2. City Attorney 3. Finance and Management Services Director 4. City Clerk TOTAL NUMBER OF SIGNATURE PAGES Indicate the#of pages on which signatures are required and paperclip or flag eaCh of these pages. ACTION REQUESTED Describe what the projecUrequest seeks to accomplish in either chronologi- cal order or order of importance,whichever is most appropriate for the issue. Do not write complete sentences. Begin each item in your list with a verb. RECOMMENDATIONS Complete If the issue in question has been presented before any body, public or private. SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? Indicate which Council objective(s)your projecUrequest supports by listing the key word(s)(HOUSINQ, RECREATION, NEIGHBORHOODS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, BUDGET,SEWER SEPARATION). (SEE COMPLETE LIST IN INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL.) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS: This information will be used to determine the ciry's liability for workers compensation claims,taxes and proper cfvil service hiring rules. INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE,OPPORTUNITY Explain the situation or conditions that created a need for your project or request. ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED Indicate whether this is simply an annual budget procedure required by law/ charter or whether there are specific ways in which the City of Saint Paul and its citizens will benefit from this projecUaction. DISADVANTACiES IF APPROVED What negative effects or major changes to existing or past processes might this project/request produce if it is passed(e.g.,traffic delays, noise, tax increases or assessments)?To Whom?When?For how long? DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED What will be the negative consequences if the promised action is not approved?Inability to deliver service?Continued high traffic, noise, accident rate? Loss of revenue? FINANCIAL IMPACT Although you must tailor the information you provide here to the issue you are addressing, in ge�eral you must answer two questions: How much is it going to cost?Who is going to pay? . ; __.___._ .- . �/ /J /• l�U 17'Y F � F� 7 � a� CITY OF SAINT PAUL ; ��';��'�� c m � OFFICE OF THE CITY COUNCIL ,,,. CITY HALL-7th FLOOR-SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102 612-298-5506 TOM DIMOND COUNCILMEMBER Members: Tam Dimond. Chair Paula Maccabee Dave Thune Date: November 13, 1991 COMMITTEE REPORT HOUSING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE 1. Approval of the minutes of the October 9, 1991, Housing and Economic Development Committee meeting. COMMITTEE APPROVED, 3-0 i;��2. Resolution 91-1859 - approving the Wheelock Bluff/Rice Street Small Area Plan and 40 Acre Study (Referred from Council 10-3-91) . THIS ISSUE WAS APPROVED IN THE NOVEMBER 12, 1991, CITY COUNCIL MEETING 3 Resolution 91-1880 - an Ordinance amending Chapter 60 of the Legislative Code pertaining to zoning to implement the recommendations of the Wheelock Bluff/Rice Street 40-acre study (Referred from Council 10-3-91) . THIS ISSUE WAS APPROVED IN THE NOVEMBER 12, 1991, CITY COUNCIL MEETING 4. � Resolution 91-1918 - approving review of amendments pertaining to assessory buildings to the Zoning Code and reporting its recommendations back to the City Council within 60 days of the adoption of the resolution (Referred from Council 10-10-91) . COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED APPROVAL, 3-0 5. / Resolution 91-1921 - an Ordinance amending Section 62.106 of the Legislative Code pertaining to the Zoning Code and Accessory Buildings and Uses (Referred from Council 10-10-91) . COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED APPROVAL, 3-0 CHAIR: Housing and Redevelopment Authority& Housing and Economic Development Committee - COMMITTEES: Public Works & Intergovernmental Relations Printed on Recycled Paper <s��s