91-1871 � �
City of St.Paul _ CO_UNC:IL�II� NO. �! -' �a ��
����
;• ��� ; ; •
RESOLUTION RATIFYING ASSESSMENT �y '��,�t "l` �[ �'•�'��,
.�.--�-__.__..�.._._�____. ..
{ '� \__._ / .
F�lel�kj":� 18540-W
Voting Assessment No: 4214
Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for
2
insCall�ttion of a e�atez service connactioa at 14$3 Palace Avenue�.
Preliminary Order �;�4� approve�l �CB�gr $s �958 'j
FinalOrder 8�81 approve� SpriZ l8, 1�$9
A public hearing having been had upon the assessment for the above improvement, and said assessment having
been further considered by the Council, and having been considered finally satisfactory, therefore,by it
RFSOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects ratitied.
RESOLVED FURTHER,That the said assessment be and it is hereby determined to be pa able in one thru twenty
equal installments. as per Section 64.04 of the Saint Paul Administra�ive Co e.
COUNCILPERSON Adopted by the Council: Date 007 3 �
Yeas��a� Nays ��
Certified Passed by Council Secretar `
Gas�►f tz
In Favor By
�g �
� Against
Asaccabae 0 CT 7 1991 Mayor
�u"� Pd��ti�H�D QCT 12'91
City of St.Paul �P' COi1NCIL FILE NO. � � ' �"� f�
Office of The Director of Finance
By
REPORT OF COMPLETION OF ASSESSMENT
File No. Y���"d
Voting Assessment No. '����
Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for
2
imstal3atisn af � rratsr asrrric+� ca�ection et ltli�3 Yslscae ��ar�ue.
Preliminary Order ��g� approve� �t��= �r 1�i88
Final Order 6'.�-$1 approve� � ��i1 j�• Z���
To the Council of the City of St. Paul:
The Director of Finance hereby reports to the Council the following as a statement of the expenditures necessarily
incurred for and in connection with the making of the above improvement, viz:
Total construction costs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 935.00
Engineering and Inspection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Valuation and Assessment Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ �►�-75
ProcessSetVing Charge . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Abatement Service Charge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
TOTAL EXPENDITURES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 981.75
ChargeTo. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . $
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Net Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 981.75
Said Director further reports that he has assessed and levied the total amount as above ascertained,
upon each and every lot, part or parcel of land deemed benefited by the said improve-
ment, and in the case of each lot, part or parcel of land in accordance with the benefits conferred thereon; that the said
assessment has been completed, and that hereto attached, identi�ed by the signature of the said Director, and made a part
hereof, is the said assessment as completed by him, and which is herewith submitt o the Council for such action
thereon as may be considered proper.
r
1
�/2��� ' '
Dated�—
��Director of Finance
' � . � RE 8/8/91 � /
. . i �'� �
DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL ' � DATE INITIATED N� 15 3 6 6
Finance/Real Estate Division s���9� G R E E N SH E ET
CONTACT PERSON&PHONE INITIAUDATE INITIAL/DATE
�DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR �CITY COUNCIL
Peter White �� 298-5317 ASSIGN �CITYATTORNEY CITYCLERK
NUMBER FOR
MUST BE ON COUNCIL ACaENDA BY(DATE) ROUTING �BUOQET DIRECTOR FIN.8 MCiT.SERVICES DIR.
M11St be in City Clerk's Office 110 ORDER �MAYOR(ORASSISTANT) � + � R
TOTAL#OF SIGNATURE PAGES 2 of 2 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE)
ACTION RE�UESTED:
Set hearing date for the ratification of assessment for a water service connection from the
temporary water main in Palace Avenue(Lexington Pkwy, to the east) at 1083 Palace Ave.
File No. 18540W Assessment No. 4214
RECOMMENDATIONS:Approve(A)or ReJect(R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACT8 MUST ANSWE'R THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:
_PLANNiNG COMMISSION _CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION �• Has this perSOnRirm eVer work9d ullder a COntraCt for thls department?
_CIB COMMITTEE _ YES NO
2. Has this personMirm ever been a city employee?
A STAFF — YES NO
_DisTRIC7 COURT _ 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current city employee7
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL 08,lECTIVE? YES NO
Explain all yes answers on saparets shsst and attach to groen sheet
Neighborhoods Ward 2
INITIATING PROBLEM,ISSUE,OPPORTUNITY(Who,What,When,Where,Why):
Pro�ect is complete. Ra.tification is necessary in order to begin collecting assessments to
help pay for the project.
AOVANTAGES IF APPROVED:
Same as above.
DISADVANTACiES IF APPROVED:
Benefitted property owners have assessments payable via property taxes.
RECEIVED
AUG 2 3 1991
CITY CLERK
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED:
To not assess the benefits would be inconsistent with City policy.
Council Research Cerrter
AUG 0 9 1991
TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION s981.�S COST/REVENUE BUD(iETED(CIRCLE ONE) YES NO
FUNDINCi SOURCE Assessments Orily� ACTIVITY NUMBER
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:(EXPLAIN)
1 property owner will receive notice of the public hearings and charges dw
� • _
NOTE: COMPLETE QIRECTIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THE GREEN SHEET INSTRUCTIONAL � �
MANUAL AVAILABLE IN THE PURCHASING OFFICE(PHONE NO.298-4225).
ROUTING ORDER:
Below are correct routings for the five most frequent types of documents:
CONTRACTS(assumes authorized budget exists) COUNCIL RESOLUTION (Amend Budgets/Accept. Grants)
1. Outside Agency 1. Department Director
2. Department Director 2. City Attorney
3. City Attorney 3. Budget Director
4. Mayor(for contracts over$15,000) 4. Mayor/Assistant
5. Human Rights(for contracts over$50,000) 5. City Council
6. Finance and Management Services Director 6. Chief Accountani, Finance and Management Services
7. Finance Accounting
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(Budget Revision) COUNCIL RESOLUTION (all others, and Ordinances)
1. Activity Manager 1. Department Director
2. Department Accountant 2. City Attorney
3. Department Director 3. Mayor Assistant
4. Budget Director 4. Ciry Council
5. City Cterk
6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(ail others)
1. Department Director
2. City Attorney
3. Finance and Management Services Director
4. Ciry Cierk
TOTAL NUMBER OF SIGNATURE PAGES
Indicate the#of pages on which signatures are required and paperclip or flag
each of these pages.
ACTION REQUESTED
Describe what the projecUrequest seeks to accomplish in either chronologi-
cal order or order of importance,whichever is most appropriate for the
issue. Do not write complete sentences. Begin each item in your list with
a verb.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Complete if the issue in question has been presented before any body, public
or private.
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE?
Indicate which Council obJective(s)your projecUrequest supports by listing
the key woM(s)(HOUSING, RECREATION, NEIGHBORHOODS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT,
BUDGET, SEWER SEPARATION). (SEE COMPLETE LIST IN INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL.)
PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS:
This information will be used to determine the city's liability for workers compensation claims,taxes and proper civil service hiring rules.
INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY
Explain the situation or conditions that created a need for your project
or request.
ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED
Indicate whether this is simply an annual budget procedure required by law/
charte�or whether there are specific ways in which the Ciry of Saint Paul
and its citizens will benefit from this projecUaction.
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED
What negative effects or major changes to existing or past processes might
this proJecUrequest produce if it is passed (e.g.,traffic delays, no(se,
tax increases or assessments)?To Whom?When? For how long?
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED
What will be the negative consequences if the promised action is not
approved7 Inabiliry to deliver service?Continued high traffic, noise,
accident rate? Loss of revenue?
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Although you must tailor the information you provide here to the issue you
are addressing, in general you must answer two questions: How much is it
going to cost?Who is going to pay?
' W .� �.. w ./ �. � J .1 w .�► J d
- �� - � . . ;- �:i � �i' � '�i� : - � � , .� +i�
� -. 1 ,0 � I � i I i i ' i ! I �
� �
s W a � g � ' i ' ' ' , ' _
� �i � /�
a Zi � I � i I � I II : ��
�i � � ; ` , � � ! � ', ,
a � � ' ' '� I i I ; ! j i I
°� iao ! ; i j � i , ' I
a' ro ', � ; ' � ;
� i i
.. � ; ; i i � i
N 1� IIh � � i �
� t- I h / h � ' � I i I . . �
� � I I �
� � ~ p m � 1 i �' '
' �� � N ! . I �. I '� I �' I
� o ! ; � i I , ! i
� `' I � ' i ; � � � � � ; �
� � � ; �
a � , i ,
� '` { � i i � ' � I ' i
mio � � � ,
i
►- i o � : i �
� iin ; i ; � �
I � �
s ��� �° , , i � � � ! �
� j
; j � , ' I
� � � ' i i . ; � ! ; ,
� ' � ' ! i � � � I �
a � � Q ! ; , , i
2S i f : � �
� ' � � I i ;
! ; I
I
m 2 I I j ' � i i I I i i :
" ' � ! � i , �
� � ; '; � ,
{ ! i �, I I
o i i � , !
K � j � �
a �
1 ! I ! �
O 1 � j i i I � '
' I
LL L 1 Z ! I 1 � I
t
1- Q 1 O I 1 �
� Z � F- ! 1 , �
J(� OIWZ � i �
Z U I Z ' j '
►, Q 1 O j 1 '
K LL I t� i � '
W �
2 I Y.L�3 = '
1 �Z� � , j
� z � ��. �ia i ' ' ! � ,
o � �a tpQ>� �� �
i �
L C � QU~1Z2�f�di � � ,
Z '
N � i ��=� ��p n � � , �' :
;
� > ! Q�o� ��Y , m : � � �
a � { �W��m�am � N � N I
o z n � �
i
� !_ ��� �� � � � � � I '
°_ ; �����u��� � � tn � , ,
i I
{ a I � � �i I '
i ' I j ;
i � mj i r a � ; I
i t� �� 1 p a � ; � (
{ � I �
.r 1 K h '?. 1 � � � !� j I � � . . � � � ;
� W I �Z>� 1 Z 9 X i I i i �
f�'1 Q � �c�LQ ; O � W I I � ,
�i �
+ i �
o aiiM�uQwj i wr � o I � ! �
1- 1 W tA2JQ : I Z 0 O , I �
h � I ~W taina.0! 1 O N ~ J II � ' I
O 1 W7 Z, I c� NF- W I i '
I �IO►+� 1 M v t7 i .i i �
.-� � 1 2P OQ � J / W K
o � � a$�gw! i o � � ;°" i I , j
.. i Y J f �� i ►- ,a a •+ � i � 'I� i � I
� � � ' j I � i �
,
; � �
, . � ; ;:i , , <�,I', ; �� . �, , �,1��- � �
. ,.; , ,
, ;. _. ,. , , , ,
- - _� ,
�i- %� 71
- - -
. �- - •`" .�.; ���. �.l
�.`Council File No. 91-1529 ,By Tom Dimond— .,_. ,;;�,t,,,.r�,� � ��,.;�_z _
.,- .� • ,�„zr In the matter.of the assessment�of beneflts,cost and�xpenses for installatlon of a ± -
, � �
: _ •: sanitary sewer in Clark Street from Minnehaha Avenue to 250 feet iiorth of]V11iuz"ehaha �� '
� ` v'-Avenue.Alsor ins�allaUOn of sanitary aewer sernce conecno�,u-vo _
.
' : ��'��reliminary Order 88-1268 approved August 2 1988 Final��88 1448��
��_��„
��;aPProved September 1,.1988. :.:i rk,,c�d-�; ...��o� ' ``� .�*' A', -'���
: ��-=--�Th°e assessment.of beneflts,cosf and pcpenses for and in rnnnection l�the above��
� �' " ' improvement having been submitted to the Council,and the Council havingconsidered
. .-. � '
' same and found the said assessment satisfactory,therefore,be it ' �.�` '
; _ ,
• . . . ' RESOLVED.That the said assessment be and the same 1s hereby`in all resP�cts � '
-aPProved. >:: _:'? , t-::; .>. � _ ;� .;� � �- - _%:.,�zak`�i; s�-� _ -
RESOLVED FLTR1`HER,That a public hearing be had on said assessment on the 3rd y
_ � da`of October, 1991, t the hour of 9:00 o'clock A.M.r in the Councll Chamber o?'[!ie—;
•Cou all Building,in the City of St.Paul;that the Director:of Financc �
_ -' give norice of said meetings,as required by the Charter,stating in said notice the time�
� - : _ and place of hearing,the nature of the im rovemen�and the amount assessed against
P �
. . '. : ' the lot or lots of the particulaz owner to whom the norice is directed �,�C�,w ;�,, Fp ;"�;�
- - FYIe No:18522 Assessment No:2244. �;t� , _ ` `��`��t.` � � 'f�?„''f`� >
_ •Adopted by Council August 20,:1991. ,.�i-� _ ,�� , Y ;"3���' �f }z�t.,
_ , Approved by Mayor August 22 1991. ��� '�.�'r�
.
- �.; (August 3T.'1991);� r �t ; �t��','Y S� .�.� �
_ : ;, - � -
._ . -.. ..- �.� :� '-. , .,-�'_ --.,-_ - -
.. , . ..._ ,:_ . . . ,. .•
..: .. . : . _: ... .. . -
. , ._„ . . . ,.._ .. , .
-.. -..
;.: .: . . • : . . ._.:.,. ;:: . . -
;_. : ....- : _;,. ,.:_ . .. . �: -
•:: .. :.. - • .�
.. . -
. .. .. .... .. _ . . ._ .., , . ..::. - - �..
�
t,+ � �� -
: :
,,. ; ,., ... , .:. -.� - � _ ,
< _ . - -
. ., .. . -
-. _ : ; -
,
. , , :.
;
_ ,. . .. . ., ..' _ . .. :.
, •
,. ��
. .
,, , _ ---: �. - -
_ . . . . :.:. ,- _
,. .. , . ,. .
.
, . �,.
_;.. ,.
� " � , -
�
4 i - __ � � �
... . _. .. ., _ _
�. . �
... .... ., .- 1 . - _ �
. �r' -. . .,�.
_ _ 1 �t"
_ - � � R $
-.
2 .,i
�.. �. ..; . - . _ '
..
�., y .. ..: �--. '- .'.:
'. �.-. � -•..-� Y... -.
. ... '_ ' ' .'�. .� .,-
. .. ._. _ . ` -�
- i
, � - �
•l
{�;. �
. ' . .`_ _ . . K . . " ' . . . -
. .
. ; . . .. _ _ .. . _
. . . . .- . . ' '• . . . .
' ��' ':.� ' ' _"' . ..>_ .,. . .. ':.' _ . ' _ _
�'� �
Q _ ��.�
City of St.Paul COUNCIL FILE NO. !� �
RESOLIJTION RATIFYING ASSESSMENT By �- '
File No. i8522
Voting Assessment No: �2'�
Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for
7 i�atallatiun c►f e eanitary s��►er in Clark Street fra� �Iiru�ehaha Aveane
to 250 fast gorth of Mi�n�haha bven�e. Aleo, i�ertall�►tior� of asnitary
s�wer serric� conaections.
Preliminary Order a�Z�6� approve�l� �u�st Z- ��8$
88-11►48 Sept�aber 1, 1988
Final Order approve�
A public hearing having been had upon the assessment for the above improvement, and said assessment having
been further considered by the Council, and having been considered finally satisfactory, therefore,by it
RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects tatitied.
RESOLVED FURTHER,That the said assessment be and it is hereby determined to be payable in one thru twenty
equal installments. as per Section 64.04 of the Saint Paul Administrative Code.
COUNCILPERSON Adopted by the Council: Date 3 1991
Yea���� Nays �
Gosrritz Certified Passed by Council Secreta
�� �
HsCt�sbee —�In Favor By
Rettaatt
,��e �Against
W�.i$� 0 CT 7 1991 MaY°r
P�BLI�N�D OCT 1 Z'91