91-1869 �'��
� � �2���"j p
City of St.Paul �'"��(�INCIL �'ILE�NO. / �` �a ��
j�,, � f,.--�------.__..,_ _ .
RESOLUTION RATIFYING ASSESSMENT Ey � '�- _a� �
-� ;�
`File No. ���t?2
Voting Assessment No. g�3S
Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for
2
Repair flf Snvar Service Co�tueetions for 1994.
p
Preliminary Order '"" approve�' �
Final Order "'"' approve�i
A public hearing having been had upon the assessment for the above improvement, and said assessment having
been further considered by the Council, and having been considered finally satisfactory, therefore,by it
RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects ratiried.
RESOLVED FURTHER,That the said assessment be and it is hereby determined to be payable in �en _(1 U)
equal installments. As per Section 64.04 of the Saint Paul Administrative Code.
COUNCILPERSON Adopted by the Council: Date �Cj 3 1991
Yeasp��� Nays �
Certified Passed by Council Secreta ¢��
6oavits �
� In Favor By
��� �Against ''���`/'�
B�ettatst Q CT � �99� Mayor
� �u�EO ocr 12�9�
. . l s . . . G /--����
` � RE 8/15/91
DEPARTMENT/OFF E/COUN IL DATE INITIATED �T� ♦ 6�Q�
Finance Department/Real Estate 8/13/91 G R E E N SH E ET l� ��. v
INITIAL/DATE INITIAUDATE
CONTACT PERSON&PHONE �DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR a CITY COUNCIL
Roxanna Flink 292-7�28 ASSIGN �CITYATTORNEY �CITYCLERK
NUMBEN FOR
_IdUST BE N CQUNCI�/�GEND (DAZE� ROUTING �BUDGET DIRECTOR �FIN.&MOT.SERVICES DIR.
Must ge in ity �erK. S C2 IIO ORDER �MAYOR(OR ASSISTANT) �Council Research
h n noon Wednesda 8 21 91
TOTAL#OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE)
ACTION REQUESTED:
Setting date of public hearing
pprove assessments for demolition of vacant buildings thru the month of August, 1991.
File J9110C Assessment 4�9437
RECOMMENDATIONS:Approve(A)or Reject(R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWINO QUESTIONS:
_PLANNING COMMISSION _ CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION �• Has this person/firm ever worked under a contract for this department7
_CIB COMMITTEE YES NO
A A Health Dept. 2• Has this personlfirm ever been a city employee?
_S7AFF YES NO
_DISTRICT COURT A VSCSrit B1dgS. 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current city employee?
SUPPOHTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE9 Ward 2 ves NO
Neighborhoods, HOU81rig Explain all yes anawsrs on separats shset end attach to green sheet
INITIATINQ PROBLEM,ISSUE,OPPORTUNITY(Who,What,When,Where,Why):
Property owners or renters create a health hazard at various times throughout the City of
Saint Paul when their property is not kept up
ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED:
Cost recovery program to recover expenses incurred by City of Saint Paul for demolition of
vacant buildings
DISADVANTA(iES IF APPROVED:
If Council does not approve these charges, General Fund would be required to pay the
assessments
Assessments payable until certification and then collected with property taxes if not paid
DISADVANTAOES IF NOT APPROVED:
Nobody would take care of their property, especially vacant or rental properties
Neighborhoods would become an eye sore and property would be allowed to deteriorate
RECEIVED ����� Research Center
AUG 2 0 1991 AUG 15 1991
TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION S 8'4O4.S4 COST/REVENUE BUDGETED(CIRCLE ONE) YES NO
FUNDING SOURCE Assessments OIIly ACTIVITY NUMBER
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:(EXPLAIN)
2 property owners will receive notice of public hearings and charges ��
!° �
NOTE: COMPLETE biRECTiONS ARE INCLUDED IN THE GREEN SHEET INSTRUCTIONAL
MANUAL AVAILABLE IN THE PURCHASING OFFICE(PHONE NO.298-4225).
ROUTING ORDER:
Below are correct routings for the five most frequent rypes of documents:
CONTRACTS(assumes authorized budget exists) COUNCIL RESOLUTION (Amend Budgets/Accept. Grants)
1. Outside Agency 1. Department Director
2. Department Director 2. City Attorney
3. City Attorney 3. Budget Director
4. Mayor(for contracts over$15,000) 4. Mayor/Assistant
5. Human Rights(for contracts over$50,000) 5. City Council
6. Finance and Management Services Director 6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services
7. Finance Accounting
ALIMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(Budget Revision) COUNCIL RESOLUTION (all others, and Ordinances)
1. Activity Manager 1. Department Director
2. Department Accountant 2. Ciry Attorney
3. Department Director 3. Mayor Assistant
4. Budget Director 4. Ciry Council
5. City Clerk
6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(all others)
1. Department Director
2. Ciry Attorney
3. Finance and Management Services Director
4. City Clerk
TOTAL NUMBER OF SIGNATURE PAGES
Indicate the#of pages on which signatures are required and paperclip or flag
eaCh of these pages.
ACTION REQUESTED
Describe what the projecUrequest seeks to accomplish in either chronologi-
cal order or order of importance,whichever is most appropriate for the
issue. Do not write complete sentences. Begin each item in your list with
a verb.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Complete if the issue in question has been presented before any body, public
or private.
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE?
Indicate which Council objective(s)your projecUrequest supports by listing
the key word(s)(HOUSING, RECREATION, NEIGHBORHOODS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT,
BUDGET,SEWER SEPARATION). (SEE COMPLETE LIST IN INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL.)
PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS:
This information will be used to determine the city's liability for workers compensation claims,taxes and proper civil service hiring rules.
INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY
Explain the situation or condltions that created a need for your project
or request.
ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED
Indicate whether this is simply an annual budget procedure required by law/
charter or whether there are specific ways in which the Ciry of Saint Paul
and its citizens will benefit from this proJecUaction.
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED
What negative effects or major changes to existing or past processes might
this projecUrequest produce if it is passed (e.g.,traffic delays, noise,
tax increases or assessments)?To Whom?When? For how long?
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED
What will be the negative consequences if the promised action is not
approved? Inabiliry to deliver service?Continued high traffic, noise,
accident rate?Loss of revenue?
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Although you must tailor the information you provide here to the issue you
are addressing, in general you must answer two questions: How much is it
going to cost?Who is going to pay?
.. . .I .. . . , . . . . � . . .. ��.:. . . . .. �� . i:���'.. � ,� . . . � , �.i�; . .
.,, . , I . i I. � ' � ' .
. . i I , I i �. i I i
� � N !{ a � ' , � �
� � 1 � � I� 4 � ��� : � ���� � ' � ' '
� �i � � � � � ! ; ! � ' ' �
� Io �IS 1 '�, i � '' ' i
d N � � � i ' � I
I '
� n '� � I '
� � i
� on � n oo ° o �� � � � �. ;
! i � �
� I i
�n a� �� � ' ;
t�,7 �M � �M � �� . , '� I � . . � ,.
W O M M M � � I ' ;
i i
� � � '� � �� � ��� � � ' �
W � O O �I O O � i I
; Z � �� �� �� _ ; i ' ; ,
; i , :
a � R^i �, �n � i ; I � i , i
� � n � I ! ' j , I '
F-. r� ! I � ' :
I � �;� j �_ � ( � i � � � , ' i ' ,;
� , �i ' ( !
` ��6 ��' �I �� 's ' ; ; ; ;
� , ►
� � �,� .:.:,�� �� .:.:��� ,� � i � i ; i � ��� �
j p�. N � I i� ' ;1 I I I � � 1 ! . .
1 I I
i ,F �,� I� � ' � 1 i j I
! � �I ( � I I i I � � '' � �
� � �,� � � i I�� I ' I I � �, I� �� .
' � � Y� I Y � i � 1 I ; � �
� � �� �� �� �� � � � � ; i , I
.. ! �° !f �°. � ; � i � i
M � M
J t�' � V �
, p I i ( I i ;
� � ` 1 ��' �t �� I , � ' � ; ; �
� aSoc' �' oa � i i ; I , j
i ! � � � i � ; i
' � . � i � ;
� F ' , , I I � � I '.
I
Z � O W � I 1 � � �
� � �� F I � � , �
M Q � !
�" � j M i �� �I !
� �i ....; � q � i I �
�(� » � � F I ' � I I
~ W O .r ' W~It lY 1 p Y' � �' ' ,
81ff Q' ! i I '; � I
' � > � °�°�� I �Z°� � �� � �' , ; � ; �
� ►- wy�m ..ZZ�.m = ..n .r, , ;
Y i
� � � K�1<M � C��� 1 �M � M i , , i
; � F'J � i ' � ; � � ,
i
� � �'' ��f� I ����� i � I I �. � � � I �.
�',� .�� ��� I , . .
�, . i , �., � J I I � I I I j ; �.
� � � ' I i ' �
_ � �, , �;, � � � � ,
, � � �
' ; �'! i � � I �,�,�_ ; ;
' � �i o i = c�v a i j� � i � ; � i i
� I � � i
;. '� M al( �x��'� _� ' � �
� � _ �� ..� F�$ "!� ° I W i � j '
� �� �� � � � � � �i ° ; I � j ;
' � � � � ��; �� ��� o ' , ; ' �
i n �: �����' >�����! � • � � � I ' ' ( �
i ! I v I � ' � '
i � � xn��� � ����g�i �� � �I 4 � � ' i '
; � � i �S� ��I � �$�'i ° d � , ' ; i
• . il .. . ; � I . � � . . I � ' � , � �'.
... ^ _ , _ , _ _ _ � ,., i �� . 1�. I: _ �. -_ -. ` -- - , �` `
�-f �r_�,/
. . . .�y'"-! i. .,/_,�/ =7F•�.1/�iE°'i--."T
� ...�-�`'��'" r,� �'
City of St.Paul COiJNCIL FILE N0. �� " �"���
Of�ce of The Director of Finance
By
REPORT OF COMPLETION OF ASSESSMENT '
File No. ��'�i�g
Voting Assessment No. �♦3S
Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for
2
�►aiF o€ S�x S+�sa�.c: Ca�sc�tic+�s tas I9�tl.
�
Preliminary Order "' approved.. ""
Final Order ""' approve�i "'—
To the Council of the City of St. Paul:
The Director of Finance hereby reports to the Council the following as a statement of the expenditures necessarily
incurred for and in connection with the making of the above improvement, viz:
Total construction costs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,030.78
Engineering and Inspection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Valuation and Assessment Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
ProcessSetving Charge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Abatement Service Charge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 19.00
TOTAL EXPENDITURES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,049.78
ChargeTo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Net Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3,049.78
Said Director further reports that he has assessed and levied the total amount as above ascertained, to-wit: the sum
of $ upon each and every lot, part or parcel of land deemed benefited by the said improve-
ment, and in the case of each lot, part or parcel of land in accordance with the benefits conferred thereon; that the said
assessment has been completed, and that hereto attached, identified by the signature of the said Director, and made a part
hereof, is the said assessrnent as completed by him, and which is herewith submitted to the Council for such action
thereon as may be considered proper.
Dated ��
Director of Finance
. , . , , �/_ /g�9��''�
RE 8/8/91
DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL r DATE INITIATED �O 15 3 7 2
Finance De artm n Real Estate 8/5/91 G R E E N SH E ET
CON7ACT PERSON 8 PHONE �DEPARTMENT DIRECTORNITIAUDATE �CITY COUNCIL INITIAUDATE
Roxanna Flink �2-7OZ8 pgSIGN �CITYATfORNEY �CITYCLERK
NUMBER FOR
MUST BE ON COUNCIL NDA B�((�ATE� BUDGET DIRECTOR FIN.6 MGT.SERVICES DIR.
M118t be in �ty lilerK�3 C2 110 ORDERG
MAYOR(OR ASSISTANn
later than noon Wednesda 8/14/91 Crnincil h
TOTAL#OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE)
ACTION REQUESTED:
Setting date of public hearing
Approvein the assessment of Summary Abatements - Repair of Sanitary Sewer Connections -
Rodent Control for work completed in 1990. File SSA9102 Assessment 4�9435
RECOMMENOATIONS:Approve(A)or Reject(R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACT8 MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING�UESTIONS:
_ PLANNINa COMMISSION _CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION �• Has this personffirm ever worked under a contrad for this department?
_CIB COMMITTEE YES NO
�_�AFF A Health Dept 2• Has this person/firm ever been a city employee?
A P.�11. Sewers YES NO
_ DISTRICT COURT — 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normall
y possessed by any current city employee?
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVEI Ward 2 YES NO
Neighborhoods Explaln all yes answers on separste sheet and attach to groen ahsst
INITIATINO PROBLEM,ISSUE,OPPORTUNITY(Who,What,When,Where,Why):
Community Services, Health Department was notified of rodent problems at properties on
attached order. Property owners requested Public Works to repair sanitary sewer service
connections.
ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED:
The work is completed and the health hazard is eliminated. Ratification of charges is
necessary in order to begin collecting assessments to pay for the project.
DISADVANTAOES IFAPPROVED:
Assessments payable from oce thru ten years via the property taxes
DISADVANTA(iES IF NOT APPROVED:
Property will keep charge as a pending assessment until council approves assessment
RECEIVED �u��i� R�search CentP�
AUG 2 3 1991 pUG 0 9 1991
CITY CLERK
TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION S 3�O�F9.JH COST/REVENUE BUDGETEp(CIRCIE ONE) YES NO
FUNDING SOURCE �sessments Orily ACTIVITY NUMBER
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) ��
2 pro ert owners will receive notice of the ublic hearin s and char es
- . �
NOtE: COMPLETE DIRECTIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THE GflEEN SHEET INSTRUCTIONAL
MANUAL AVAILABLE IN THE PURCHASING OFFICE (PHONE NO.298-4225).
ROUTING ORDER:
Below are correct routings for the five most frequent types of documents:
CONTRACTS(assumes authorized budget exists) COUNCIL RESOLUTION (Amend Budgets/Accept. Grants)
1. Outside Agency 1. Department Director
2. Department Director 2. Ciry Attorney
3. City Attorney 3. Budget Director
4. Mayor(for contracts over$15,000) 4. Mayor/Assistant
5. Human Rights(for contracts over$50,000) 5. Ciry Council . ,
6. Finance and Management Services Director 6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services
7. Finance Accounting
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(Budget Revision) COUNCIL RESOLUTION (all others, and Ordinances)
1. Activity Manager 1. Department Director
2. Department Accountant 2. City Attorney
3. Department Director 3. Mayor Assistant
4. Budget Director 4. City Council
5. City Clerk
6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(all others)
1. Department Director
2. City Attorney
3. Finance and Management Services Director
4. City Clerk
TOTAL NUMBER OF SIGNATURE PAGES
Indicate the#of pages on which signatures are required and paperclip or flag
each of these pages.
ACTION REQUESTED
Describe what the projecUrequest seeks to accomplish in either chronologi-
cal order or order of importance,whichever is most appropriate for the
issue. Do not write complete sentences. Begin each item irt your list with
a verb.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Complete if the issue in question has been presented before any body, public
or private.
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE?
Indicate which Council objective(s)your projecUrequest supports by listing
the key word(s)(HOUSING, RECREATION, NEIGHBORHOODS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT,
BUDGET, SEWER SEPARATION). (SEE COMPLETE LIST IN INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL.)
PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS:
This information will be used to determine the ciry's liability for workers compensation claims,taxes and proper civil service hiring rules.
INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY
Explain the situation or conditions that created a need for your project
or request.
ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED
Indicate whether this is simply an annual budget procedure required by law/
charter or whether there are specific ways in which the City of Saint Paul
and its citizens will benefit from this projecUaction.
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED
What negative effects or major changes to existing or past processes might
this project/request produce if it is passed(e.g.,traffic delays, noise,
tax increases or assessments)?To Whom?When? For how long?
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED
What wili be the negative consequences if the promised action is not
approved? Inability to deliver service?Continued high traffic, noise,
accident rate?Loss of revenue?
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Although you must tailor the information you provide here to the issue you
are addressing, in general you must answer two questions: How much is it
going to cost?Who is going to pay?
i'. i ,
I ,
.+ .p
, � " 1 � � ° I ' , '
a � " r��i I � � � �
� � a ; � n i ; i
� � ry i � i � �
� � � � I '
u� c�owc� i nora
U � �n ao i va � a �
M~ � � ~M � � '
� � � � � i
� � � � � � : ,
< LL I �
n .~, �! d$ � n$ �
a � ; �io � •o � , � ', �
ri.+ ri.. �
* � � m M . �
i � � !
�
d � � I ' ' j , ' I � ;
�y a � �� 3 �� � , ; ; ,
O f 1 ~P i � ~P i I I I ; � I I '
� �,� i � i ! , j �
1- 1 � � � I � I i
' � ;� ' � � � ' ' ' I '
� rc i rc ! ', j �
a � a"�' ' f ��' � ' ,
� i
� � � �� ;1 � �� � � � �
v � ' i I
� ! � I
� � s �; ! f �; _ � ! �
Z LL � �� � N� 1 � ' �
� � �
� Z'� , I �
E O
� �! ;
� N� � I , �. � � , ', .
� � �� � 0 H� . I . , , , I .
� ��°g �°
OJD F}- �( < �� �OJ0� ! O N �y O �
, a w i u��r��� � �r��o 1 c� �7 c�
� � ' a.n �o �.. .� � � r i � � , ,
�
��' �NJ�3'' IaLJ�Z I � i � i I � �
� � � � N' ' � ' �
, � � i . �, . i � i i
,� � I � � �H � ��I i � � . i .
, � �� I t � �I i
� a0 0� 1 ' ,0 I�y� I � 4.I � ' I
�/��!f �/!„� � 1 K' �+ ry � � I � � , i
p ( � , � ii i � � t �o � ; ai i �
, �!I � � �W� = � .. ; � � xi �
N a � > �o`�.. i ..; �� i u ; w� !,
' � 4t' � a� � i ��z�1O l ��' � °� �
� � ~I� Y ����� ' ��_�� ! � � � `� ' ' � '
i n �'i W}�Jn� = am� � I � tl t'�
�
o �,i � ���� _ ����� 1 �� � � �� � i � ; '
� � � � ��o��.� = d���� � �� � d �� I i • ' ; . ', �
' . . , ; i � � ( ' ' � ' , • ' � _
� ..
� � , �� . . . �. . � ,� . �
,, _ , �. .. � � _ _
�, _ _ , _. _ .
�sTro � Saint Paul City Council � �
$ �
o� � �� Public Hearing Notice �/ � �
� ;;;;�;;��; ; l�atif ication of Assessment
,� Ar
�ss♦ RECEIVED
OWNER OR TAXPAYER SEP 171991 COUNCIL UISTRICT #
CITY CLERK PLANAtING COUNCIL #
FILE � S`'��9':�J�<<;;;:<;;;::;:;>;
LESLIE K CARNEY SARAH B DELANEY ASSESSMENT # ;9:?�35
1386 GRAND AVE PROPERTY ADDRESS
_:
1�"s.�'l�fil�. ,4��.. :::> ;: <
ST PAUL MN 55106-2204
PARCEL ID
__. .. ..._.._._.. . ___..
�28����'1�t�(�'14�`::i
PROPERTY TAX DESCRIPTION
WANNS ADDITON TO ST. PAUL LOT 23 BLK 1
ASSESSED LEGAL: W.0.6439
�
NEIGHBORHOOD TIME: WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 2, 1991 .AT 2:00 P.M.
SERVICES PLACE: ClTY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 3RD FLOOR, CITY HALL/COURT HOUSE
COMMITTEE This is where problems should be discussed so they can be
MEETING resolved before the public hearing.
THE TIME: THURSDAY, OCTOBER 3, 1991 AT 9:00 A.M.
PUBLIC PLACE: City Council Chambers, 3rd Floor City Hail-Court House
HEARING Written or orai statements by any owner wili be considered by
the Council at this hearing.
PURPOSE To consider app�oval of the assessment for:
REPA�t OF SEINER SERVICE CONNECTIONS FOR 1990
ASSESSMENT The proposed assessment for the above property is $884.83
� INFORMATION If the City Councii approves the assessment you will have 30
days to pay without interest. Any unpaid baiance wilt be
collected with your property taxes over 10 year(s) at 9.00096
interest. The proposed assessment roN for this project is available
for review in the Finance Department. Room 218, City Hall.
ASSESSMENT SWR SERV REPAIR 875.33 X �1.0000 = $876.33
CALCULATION SERVICE CHARGE 1 .00 X �9.5000 — $9.50
NOTE: THIS IS NOT YOUR BILL. YOU WILL RECEIVE AN INYOICE AFTER THE HEARING
SPECIFYING THE AMOUNT APPROYED BY THE CITY COUNCIL WITH COMPLETE
INSTRUCTIONS 4N HOW TO PAY THIS ASSESSMENT.
CONTINUED ON REYERSE SIDE NOTIFICATION DATE 9/13/91