Loading...
91-1856 � � ' Council File � 9/ --y /8�,6 ���i7��� � �� / • �� - Green Sheet � � ��o O � RESO�UT(ON CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA Presented By j -� _ ReferYed To Committee: Date WHEREAS, The Council of the City of St. Paul did pass Ordinance No. 17321, on January 7, 1986, wherein a fund to administer and distribute the proceeds contributed by charitable gambling in o�-sale liquor establishments was established; and WHEREAS, The Youth Programs Fund Board established �by said ordinance has reviewed and recommended for approval the attached applications for grants from the above mentioned fund; now therefore, be it RESOLVED, �hat the Council of the City of Saint Paul .hereby approves , � � � the attached applications for funding from the following organizations for the following amount: East View Booster Club $1, 000. 00 Friends of Kids Park 1, 000. 00 Highland Park Little League 750. 00 Highwood Hills Booster Club 1, 000. 00 Homecroft Booster Club 875. 00 Jimmy Lee Booster Club 1, 000. 00 � Margaret Booster .Club 1, 000. 00 Saint Paul Rookies 1, 000.00 South St. Anthony Booster Club 1, 000. 00 Summit-University Athletic Association 1, 000. 00 West District Support Team 1,000. 00 and does hereby authorize the appropriate City officials to . execute agreements as necessary to disburse the approved funds. Funding Code: P-3-399-0545-33000 - Yeaa- Navs Absent Reqveated by Depa.stment of: smon �/ O SZ.►1 2 on �7` COMMUNITY RVICES acc ee r/ e�� —�- � � �: � �:. . . ....--. . . . . . -. = _ . , � G,Q,�z� Adopted by Councils Date �CT 3 1991 � Fo� A roved by City At orney Adoption Certified Dy Council Secretary � �Y= /, f �,��y BY _ Approved by Hayor for Submiasion to � y Hayort ate � " �uncil , ' . . . / , - _. . . �,�� . By= ���,G.-�r�1 . BY: � PI�III��iEO • GC�' 1 ?'91 - � �-� 9, -��s-� DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATE INITIATED COMMUNITY SERVICES s/2�/91 GREEN SHEET N° 15603 CONTACT PERSON 8 PHONE DEPARTMENT DIRECTORN IAU ATE � �CITY COUNCIL �NITIAL/DATE Pat Moynagh 292-7430 NUM'B RFOR CITYATTORNEY �CITYCLERK MUST BE ON COUNCIL AGENDA BY(DATE) ROUTIN6 BUDGET DIRECTOR 3 b FIN.&MOT.SERVICES DIR. September 24, 1991 ORDER MAYOR(ORASSISTANT)"N TOTAL#OF SIGNATURE PAGES (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) 8 Parks PSt Moynag ACTION REQUESTED: � Disbursement of Youth Programs Fund $�P ° � 199i SEP 5 1991 RECOMMENDATIONS:Approve(A)or ReJect(R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRAC 8 AI� .�ICk�UING iiUEST10NS: _PLANNINO COMMISSION _ CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION �• Has this person/firm ever worked under a contract for this department? _CIB COMMITTEE _ YES NO 2. Has this person/firm ever been a city employee? _STAFF — YES NO _DISTRiCT COURT — 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current city employee? 3UPPOqTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE7 YES NO Explaln all ye�answers on separete aheet and attach to groen shest INRIATINO PROBLEM,ISSUE,OPPORTUNITY(Who,What,When,Where.Why): The fund was set up to disburse proceeds from Charitable Gambling to eligible community based non-profit youth serving organizations. These organizations have been screened by the Youth Programs Fund Advisory Board. ADVANTAOE3 IF APPROVED: Improved programs for Eastview Booster Club, Friends of Kids Park, Highland Park Little League, Highwood Hills Booster Club, Homecroft Booster Club, Jimmy Lee Booster Club, Margaret Booster Club, Saint Paul Rookies , South St . Anthony Booster Club, Summit-University Athletic Association, and West District Support Team. DISADVANTAGE3 IF APPROVED: None Council Research GR�ter S'EP�. 6 �q91 DI3ADVANTAOES IF NOT APPROVED: Poor quality youth programs . RECEIVED SEP 2 5 1991 CITY CLERK TOTAI AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION S 1 O�G Z S.OO COST/REVENUE BUDGETEp(CIRCLE ONE) YES NO FUNDINGSOURCE P-3-399-33179-545-33000 ACTIVITYNUMBER FINANCIAL INFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) �� . . NOTE: COMPLETE DIRECTIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THE GREEN SHEET INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL AVAILABLE IN THE PURCHASING OFFICE(PHONE NO.298-4225). ROUTING ORDER: Below are correct routings for the five most frequent types of documents: CONTRACTS(assumes suthorized budget exists) COUNCIL RESOLUTION (Amend Budgets/Accept.Grants) 1. Outside Agency 1. Department Director 2. Department Director 2. City Attorney 3. City Attomey 3. Budget Director 4. Mayor(for contracts over$15,000) 4. Mayor/Assistant 5. Human Rights(for contracts over$50,000) 5. City Council 6. Finance and Management Services Director 6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services 7. Finance Accounting ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(Budget Revision) COUNCIL RESOLUTION (all others,and Ordinances) 1. Activity Manager 1. Department Director 2. Department Accountant 2. City Attorney 3. Department Director 3. Mayor Assistant 4. Budget Director 4. City Council 5. City Clerk 6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Se�vices ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(all others) 1. Department Director 2. City Attorney 3. Finance and Management Services Director 4. City Clerk TOTAL NUMBER OF SIGNATURE PAGES indicate the#of pages on which signatures are required and paperclip or flag sach of these pages. ACTION REQUESTED Describe what the projecVrequest seeks to accomplish in either chronologi- cal order o�order of importance,whichever is most appropriate for the _ issue. Do not write complete sentences. Begin each item in your list with a verb. RECOMMENDATIONS Complete if the issue in question has been presented before any body, public or private. - SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? Indlcate which Council objective(s)your projecUrequest supports by listing the key word(s) (HOUSING, RECREATION, NEIGHBORHOODS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, BUDGET,SEWER SEPARATION). (SEE COMPLETE LIST IN INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL.) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS: This information will be used to determine the cirys liabiliry for workers compensation claims,taxes and proper civil service hiring rules. INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE,OPPORTUNITY — " Explain the situation or conditions that created a need for your project or request. ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED Indicate whether this is simply an annual budget procedure required by law/ charter or whether there are specific ways in which the Ciry of Saint Paul and its citizens witl benefit from this projecUaction. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED What negative effects or major changes to existing or past processes might this projecUrequest produce if it is passed(e.g.,traffic delays, noise, tax increases or assessments)?To Whom?When?For how long? DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED What will be the negative consequences if the promised action is not approved?inabiliry to deliver service?Continued high traffic, noise, accident rate?Loss of revenue? FINANCIAL IMPACT Although you must tailor the information you provide here to the issue you are addressing, in general you must answer two questions: How much is it going to cost?Who is going to pay?