91-1773 � ��o: �� Council File ,� �l .�
Real 'Estate Division �, ��
218 City Hall Green Sheet � � �p/�(�
(JS) (Portland) RESOLUTION
CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
Presented By ��lr�r�/���������,
Referred To Committee: Date
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Council File #91-1377 dated
July 30 , 1991 , said resolution being the ratification of
assessments for the storm sewer connections for the
Portland/Aldine Area Storm Sewer Project identified as Finance and
Management File No. 18569-2 . �
WHEREAS, the property at 1514 Portland Avenue being legally
described as :
Summit Avenue Addition to the City of St . Paul ,
Lot 12 , Block 9
with the property identification number of 03-28-23-23-0067 , was
assessed the amount of $656 .16 .
WHEREAS, storm sewer connections are constructed at the property
owner ' s request.
WHEREAS, property owner did not request said connection,
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED,that the assessment amount of
$656 .16 be deleted from the property identification number of 03-
28-23-23-0067 .
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the deletion of $656 .16 be funded by the
storm sewer charge funds .
� Navs Absent Requested by Department of:
inron
osw z
on � Finance & Manasement Services
cca ee �
e a
une
i son i By: �-=vire tor
� � �?ZG 9l
Form Appr ved by Ci y Attorney
Adopted by Council: Date SEP 2 4 1991 �
Adoption C tif'ed by Cou cil Secretary gy: �j. � p�—
. / i �
By' Approved by Mayor for Submission to
Approved by ayor: D te SEP 2 7 1991 Council
By:
,/4���G� By: ��
�IISHED C��'T � °91
. .
�.'�/—�7�3
DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATE INITIATED
Finance/Real Estate Division 8/16/91 GREEN SHEET N° 16186
CONTACT PERSON&PHONE INITIAUDATE INITIAUDATE
�DEPARTMENT DIREC �CITY COUNCIL
John Saumweber 298-5317 A$$�GN �YATTORNEY �CITYCLERK
NUMBERFOR
MUST BE ON COUNCII AGENDA BY(DATE) ROUTING UDGET DIRECTOR �FIN.&MOT.SERVICES DIR.
ORDER MAYOR(OR ASSISTANT) �
TOTA�#OF SIGNATURE PAGES (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE)
ACTION REQUESTED:
Approve the attached Council Resolution to delete the assessment amount. AUC.7 �2 1991
File No. 18569-2 Assessment No. 2234 CITY ATTO
RECOMMENDATIONS:Approve(A)or Reject(R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER TNE FOLLOWINf3�UESTIONS:
_PLANNING COMMISSION _ CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION �• Has this persoNfirm ever worked under a contract for this department?
_CIB COMMITTEE _ YES NO
2. Has this person/firm ever been e city employee4
A STAFF _
— YES NO
_ DISTRICT COURT _ 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current city employee?
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCII OBJECTIVE? YES NO
Explaln all yss answers on ssparets shest and attach to green aheet
Ward 4
� INITIATINO PROBLEM,ISSUE,OPPORTUNITY(Who,What,When,Where,Why):
i Property owner was assessed for construction of a storm sewer connection that she did not
�
request.
�
RE�zI�E�
AU� 16 199
OFpjC . 1
ADVANTAOES IFAPPROVED:
'�ND q�q ENT p�FR�CTpR
Property owner will not have to pay the assessment. CEMENT SERV C S
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED:
City will have to finance the assessment. RECEIVED
RECEIVED piir 2 9 1991
SEP 12 1991 �;��,���'� OFFIC'E
CITY CLERK
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED:
Property owner will have to pay the assessment for the connection that she did not
request.
Cota;r�it R�Sparch Cenfier
���' Q 3 1991
TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION s 656.16 COST/REVENUE BUDGETED(CIRCLE ONE) YES NO
FUNDING SOURCE $tOY'm Sewer Charge FL1ridS ACTIVITY NUMBER
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) /_�s�
U
. .
NOTE: COMPLETE DIRECTIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THE GREEN SHEET INSTRUCTIONAL
MANUAL AVAILABLE IN THE PURCHASING OFFICE(PHONE NO.298-4225).
ROUTING ORDER:
Below are correct routings for the five most frequent rypes of documents: .
CONTRACTS(assumes authorized budget exists) COUNCIL RESOLUTION (Amend Budgets/Accept. Grants)
1. Outsfde Agency 1. Department Director
2. Department Director 2. City Attorney
3. City Attorney 3. Budget Direcior
4. Mayor(for contracts over$15,000) 4. Mayor/Assistant
5. Human Rights(for contracts over$50,000) 5. City Council
6. Finance and Management Services Director 6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services
7. Finance Accounting
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(Budget Revision) COUNCIL RESOLUTION (all others, and Ordinances)
1. Activity Manager 1. Department Director
2. Department Accountant 2. City Attorney
3. Department Director 3. Mayor Assistant
4. Budget Director 4. City Council
5, Ciry Clerk
6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(all others)
1. Department Director
2. City Attorney
3. Finance and Management Services Director
4. City Clerk
TOTAL NUMBER OF SIGNATUR�PAGES
Indicate the#of pages on which signatures are required and paperclip or flag
each of these pages.
ACTION REQUESTED
Describe what the projecUrequest seeks to accomplish in either chronologi-
cal order or order of importance,whichever is most appropriate for the
issue. Do not write complete sentences. Begin each item in your list with
a verb.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Complete if the issue in question has been presented before any body, public
or private.
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE?
Indicate which Council objective(s)your project/request supports by listing
the key word(s)(HOUSING, RECREATION, NEIGHBORHOODS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT,
BUDGET,SEWER SEPARATION). (SEE COMPLETE LIST IN INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAI..)
PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS:
This information wfll be used to determine the city's liabiliry for workers compensation claims,taxes and proper civil service hiring rules.
INITIATING PROBLEM, iSSUE, OPPORTUNITY
Explain the situation or conditions that created a need for your project
or request.
ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED
indicate whether this is simply an annual budget procedure required by law/
charter or whether there are specific ways in which the City of Saint Paul
and its citizens will benefit from this projecUaction.
DISADVANTAQES IF APPROVED
What negative effects or major changes to existing or past processes might
this projecUrequest produce if it is passed (e.g.,traffic delays, noise,
tax increases or assessments)?To.Whom?When? For how long?
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED
What wfll be the negative consequences if the promised action is not
approved? Inability to deliver service?Continued high traffic, noise,
accident rate? Loss of revenue?
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Although you must tailor the information you provide here to the issue you
are addressing, in general you must answer two questions:How much is it
going to cost?Who is going to pay?
. �'� �'�y�7�3
CITY OF ST.PAUL
IN'l�RDEPARTMENrAL MENIORANDUM
R� �'�����3 - -
��-1� , d�'j
TO: Peter White Real Estate Di�-i;;��-;
John Saumweber �• ��� & :�,a,�a��rnent Ser�ic�.S
Real Estate Division
218 City Hall & Court House
FROM: Dan Haak '8R�
Public Works Construction
900 City Hall Annex
SUBJ�C'1� PORTLAND-ALDINE SEWER SEPARATION
City Project No. 90-5-8059&90-P-8044
Asseasment for Storna Sewer Service Stub at
1514 Portland Avenue, Mrs. Gladys Wilcox
DATE: August 14, 1991
On April 22, 1991 I sent you a liat of properties to be asseased for atorm sewer
service stubs. I inadvertently included a stub that I shouldn't have. The property
owner of 1514 Portland refused to sign the request. Please delete the assessment
to 1514 Portland for the amount as follows:
Storna Stub 21 L.F. � $25.30 = $531.30
Engineering & Inspec_ 'on (18.5%) - $9829
S EE�CC v/c� ,�� CS°1-� 2�,5'�
Grand Total �.�9
�5'b.16
Please call me if you have any questions. I am sorry for any inconvenience this
has caused you.
DAH:ap