The URL can be used to link to this page

91-1709 LAID OVER TO NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES COMMITTEE 10/2/91 ��-_- LAID OVER BY COUNCIL UNTIL 10/3/91 � � `• City of St.Paul COUN F�LE`�0. /� " � �� RESOLUTION RATIFYING ASSESSMENT `� By �'��,p�� ,File N 9101T4 Voting Assessment No: 9031 Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for 2 Diseased Trees, Logs and Brush Removal for the 1990-1991 Dutch Elm Season for the following property: PIN 20-29-22-22-0018 Property Address: 1659 Clark legally described as: Clarke's 2nd Addition Lots 1 thru 7 & 13 thru 20, Block 3 Preliminary Order -- approve�' Final Order -- approve� A public hearing having been had upon the assessment for the above improvement, and said assessment having been further considered by the Council, and having been considered finally satisfactory, therefore,by it RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respecta ratitted. RESOLVED FURTHER,That the said assessment be and it is hereby determined to be payable in f ive (5) equal installments. as per Section 64.04 of the Saint Paul Administrative Code. COUNCILPERSON Adopted by the Council: Date �CT 3 1991 Yeas Dimond Nays -p Goswitz Certified Passed by Council Secreta � �`'� Long Maccabee �In Favor By Rettman ^� Thune �J Against Wilson D�T 7 199Mayor �� . �� LAID O�R TO NBIG�iBORH00D SERVICBS GOI�ITTEE 10/2/91 ,._,-- �-- �'-� � , LAID QVSR BY COUNCIL UNTIL 10/3/91 ! � � City of St.Paul COUNCI ' ILE O. " � �� Office of The Director of Finance � REPORT OF COMPLETION OF ASSESSMENT ,�`�Y r `��,File No ��9101T4 ��,� Voting Assessment No. �031 Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for 2 Dise�aed Treea, Logs and Brush Rcmoval for the 1990-1991 Dutcb Eln SeaBOn for the folloving praperty: PIN 20-29-22-22-0418 Property Address: 1659 Clark Iegally described as: Clarke'e 2nd Addition Lots 1 thru 7 � I3 thru 20, Block 3 Preliminary Order ° approve� �'— FinalOrder —" approve�l � To the Council of the City of St. Paul: The Director of Finance hereby reports to the Council the following as a statement of the expenditures necessarily incurred for and in connection with the making of the above improvement, viz: Total construction costs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5�7_fi� Engineering and Inspection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Valuation and Assessment Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Process Setving Charge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Abatement Service Charge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ ' TOTAL EXPENDITURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 547_ 1� ChargeTo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . $ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Net Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 547_ 1(1 Said Director further reports that he has assessed and levied the total amount as above ascertained, to-wit: the sum of $ upon each and every lot, part or parcel of land deemed benefited by the said improve- ment, and in the case of each lot, part or parcel of land in accordance with the benefits conferred thereon; that the said assessment has been completed, and that hereto attached, identified by the signature of the said Director, and made a part hereof, is the said assessrr,ent as completed by him, and which is herewith submitted to the Council for such action thereon as may be considered proper. Dated Director of Finance i � � � � a Q 7 ' a � � �i i � w � a � ' I g � " � � d ; � ' I' , w � � � y ; doro i ' ' � , f- i ,oaN -+ � ' ! � � � � �� ; I � ' � � � � ; � � I � ! ; ; I � ' i a � � ', � ' � � ; � ! ' i � � � � � ; iI , � , � � � � ; ►�- ioo � : � ; ! ' � i c� I z = �i8 ! ` � , I ' , I I � ' � �.; i { ; i i ;' ! I x � i � � I � ,I , r- i ' � ; ( I � , i � � ' E � i ; I i i ; ; , i , � , w i �p ' � i � � � i � � � , F- � O i � � � � � ! i � � I a 1 o n ; I i � ! � , .t � 1 . I , ; � � I i i I j � � ; � °� _ � ; � j I ' � ' � I o � � � � � � � ; � i ! � ! ; ' I W IS , i � i � � 'o � � ; � i � �� ' ; � �� a ! � � i �1 � � i ' I ' ' I�i. W 1 �� i 1 I ' � I I N � _ �" � '' ; ' .� W y� � i � J � �w � � a � �� j l � LL. 1 t-Ul I j i j I 1 � � � � � ' ' � � � � w � i , ' � Q� .� � � '� i � � g��` �" , i tp - ffl E 1� W O� C . . �.� v W r�J •0 � i �, 1� q � m Y 1 �oO�JWa � fn'1M � I d rc � ��Fm�i p' � � R a I a � Y V}�Ory W N 1 p , I � i O °� a V�� * � , ' � � � � I � � _ � � ' , i � a � ! p I a � i ' � 1 Z Wp ' N � � J, W � I ~ I � ! Q~- K 1 O f7 ' O ' 1 Q� M I W I I ( I 1 W 1 1- .+ j 1 >� N x . I � I ! N Q 1 Ul ON� ; V I W � � � � Z n , o �W � o i , � , I � � I O Y Z¢Q ' � W> M d � ' ; ' � ; ' I 1 QCLJ ' I W� I F� f!1 ' � I m � I L Q t�(! I 1 K W N I J ! � � �� m O 1 J J Z i 1 I-Uf N F+� W I I n � � �V��O � 1 N � V I � � ! I N 1 �d�Z ! 1 �� N � � ' � �i I I YJ ` N � � ��OF-Od � � Dp � � I i I .a O 1 7�+M # # ' 1 F-~ 11 C. �+ � . � : . � � I _._ .,i • �l�° � � � I _ ii ' I �I ! _ /�� _ � _ �� . . _ ?�WlID pF� F�U� July 30 to Septe�ber 12, 1991 .� �° �7� City of St.Paul --- L �� N0. f � � Of�ce of The Director of Finance �� . REPORT OF COMPLETION OF ASSESSMENT �(BY � , , 9141Tt Voting � Assessment No. g�29 Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses fo 2 Diseased Trees. Loga and Brush Rea�or for the 1990—I991 Dutch BLa Season. (See Attached fo propertiea) �� • �� • �-�- �a/�/�i , �� -yi Preliminary Order ~ approve� M Final Order � approve� � To the Council of the City of St. Paul: The Director of Finance hereby reports to the Council the following as a statement of the expenditures necessarily incurred for and in connection with e making of the above improvement, viz: Total construction costs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1�887•78 Engineering and Inspection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Valuation and Assessment S ices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ ProcessServing Charge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Abatement Service Charge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 38-�� TOTAL EXPENDITURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ l,s25_7R ChargeTo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . $ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Net Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,92 5_7R Said Director further reports that he has assessed and levied the total amount as above ascertained, to-wit: the sum of $ upon each and every lot, part or parcel of land deemed benefited by the said improve- ment, and in the case of each lot, part or parcel of land in accordance with the benefits conferred thereon; that the said assessment has been completed, and that hereto attached, identified by the signature of the said Director, and made a part hereof, is the said assessrr�ent as completed by him, and which is herewith submitted to the Council for such action thereon as may be considered proper. Dated Director of Finance ;� : �.; , . , , T. . . _ � , � . _.,.: �, � � �r,�� L�tB � !!�'J�17 �!,;,� 3sP�`'IY, 1!!1 . .� �` � .�� °� ,� , � �4q_ ,��:�.:. , � :�- �-City of�t.�i� . � . L'. Nf3. 'w`.'' � ,..�, �:��.... � ; M . I ` T I Y I A M E fY-T -. B _ R,ESO T QN RA F I�G SSE3'S ' '�� "" �.... , I.0 , . Y: �,� :.,W., Y ' , lIO2�"r ,, �_. . . , . � . I � :yotin8 �' . A aat�ent l�o: � ;�� :� �� In-the maiter of �e assess�nent of benefits, cust and expenses'for � �; 2 .�� i�asr. Loss a�wi � �t3: 3o�r tiw !�-2!!1 �" . Autoh-Rts �aa�►. (�s �treir►i tos p , . - � , � _ � , . : .��< ... 1 . �` . : � _ ;y,: } • .. . . .�� . I �w . - Pteliminary Order aPprov '� � � . . . ' �� ". �� . , . .. FuW Order approv �,,,F, :,� - . ' , , ..�..-^-c°' . . - � _..,............--� _ � '�f/ � .'!S '.' �,}, •� ' _ . _,_,... .. , A public hearing having been had upon the assessment for the above impro�ement, and said aasesa�nent having been further cousidered by the Cauncil, and having been considered finally aatisfactar�, therefor�,by it RFSOLVED, That the said assesa�nent be and the same is hereby in sll resps�te eWried. - � RESOLNED FURTHER,That the said assessment bo and it is hereby determined be payable in f ive (5) equal installments. as per Section 64.04 of the Saint Paul Admini�trative Code. � j I �� COUNCI�LPERSON Adopted by the Coun�: n�� SEP 1 � _ Yeas Dfroad Naya Gos�its Certified P�useed by Cou�cil Secntary I.�$ 3lsC�abte �In Favor By B�etEatn � The�te Againat Wilson Mayor RETURN COPY T� R�OM 21 S OSSESSMENT e�v�s�e1� . . . . . c�l _. . .. ... . _ „ _ - �,,:� - � � - . . �. , _ . . .. . . ... . . _ .. {�__ _ . .. . i • > , i �... ��. . '.- ...v. v . �r r./ .. .�! J U.� . .' u� � ' 1 � � 1 - . .. . ., . . _ ., . . .. ....... ^�n . I �.' ��., ..� ..�.. . .'.�., . �:I � , i_•. , r ��_ (_ � �_� .. . ��, .. . . . , � �;:s � . �, , .i., i . . ., ,'. � ' . ! � . I � � ' ' I � � � i j _- , �,, � �� i .:i N � � � � � � � � i �., � � � e I � ,in � i _ � IW .. � � I I I �'' 6 Q!� I � � � I � J �:� I I i I i � °- �i� � f � ; "� i � I � j i I WII ' �� I ,� �, `' I � � i ' � � � ; i ro : d �, ` j j , � I , �i� a I� i � �� a �,� a f i ' � I � \ 1 I � I n. n i � v � ,� n ��, J i n I I � I �ia ry � iro � cv i i � ! ' ' i m'.i o' o � norn i �on •+ itvo'NN i i ,� 1 $n .. I .o n -� � ao m � c� n n �v 1 i ''� i � � � ��1 hQ�I 1� � ) CR p � PR g OP � p.?'� O� 1 i , I O I C1M'. d' CN «+ .+M lll fYN' C7 1 , V �� ~ � I N N I' N p � � N 'Y N ' � I i � � � O � � ~ p 1~ �� 8 1 i� � � i � � I i � � �� '� � � � , ,t � '� ,� � ' � � � I �il oo; � bo " � �� oo �� oo) j i i i ; i '; � ' �;i o i = oo i o� �� ' � ; I ! j � I � � � � n Z;i $�� I� �o� � �� ; ; � � �� ';1 �.:! � � .: !� �:.:', ;1 ��I I s � � ! �� I � j �i� n I ' i � I� '" � ; I � � � I � � v!� f � ;� ' I I , � I' I � � ! ' '� I ' � i 1 ' i i ¢ W'I OOI 1 IDO � 1 00� 1 oO i � , F-:I 00, I 00 I �I 00 I QO � i i � � a:l O�i I �Om 1 On! I v� 1 � , i � � F',; .:0�i i '-'�' I ' '"Q' I .:p� i , { I ! I I � O ►+��1 I � i ��1 �, ;� i � � � � � i �i; i S i ; I� i !! i i ! � �', ' F- 1 I ; i I i I I i i i W � ; I j I �� ' i i � i I � � j i o !� � ( ; ! � ,S I ��i i� � ' i i ` � , i � ! pa� �� I � � �� '� �� , � ' ' � O � JK� i Li� I JK �� JK � i ' I u. w�� aa� i aa �� aa i aal � � i ! � � 1 '�' � i 'pd� � I '� i �; ; i ' , ; i -� a ; ��. i "M ' � �� , ; : , , O F',1 W>j 1 j 1 �> I �11>' i! �S� I i � �� 2 U 1 W K � I lti I W� tr I � i �. ¢ 1 KW � I �W � 1 �41 f KW� ! 1 � � j ~� � � ~� ' i ~�' ~`� � j ,; � ; , i � � IQ ' � ' I , �� ' Z I s � , ' i i i rc j i r-o, iz io i I E z't z � 1 i I o I .+ I & oio� � I `� iA ' $ ' , I , � M � M�!: H '�� _ I F�1 � Q � �n Q ' ..� Q. I I � � � � QF a� �,cv � w�'; �N'� a �� I � , N N h WW 1 e1iWi WW F WW 1 ' 1 000 � � I ! m � l ��o�� i �� e� � ��e� � �Y' ; �� ' � ,, , � F- 1 NYt�F��f W 1 �I W t OfUJN y NJI 1 flDM � � ' a � I • F� Ul0 I 410 � N0� 1 K wN�O' m� 1 . tl �. , W 1 W�+Y�+OW fV I CDF W� I a� W-+ 1 Z � I +� M � �, a 1 YvtU Ntp � ¢ eF�UW 1 [7fA I Wn� ; M Nr O 1 K td fQ!- 1 70 ro(AF I ON NI- 1 N � i , � K g 1p-Hpa# � �j�j-+�Q# M ��Q* -Uli MpF� � I � �� C��JJ# J � i.7NZ:J # J � C1JJ �k Ji� F-J I � i �� J� , � � , � '',1 I I' � Z I I �i J � � , M I lt!'� ' , I i i o, i � a i o 'i H I a i ' � i Q � � I i � i a � � i i i u b i! M a � i W � a, � ��°�� I c�0ii i f H ��vH�i i � � � a .-� I Z O N� I �tl O f'7 N 1 K h N 1 Q lU N h1 J� B ( � Q� � 1 D C7 O I ►+t�P Z O I W �t O 1 0. N V� l� � Q Q p W 1 W I t- •+ � I 1- no 1 Y � i K b00I i OV N W I`�') Q I N �Nli' I �O�C~91i I a r+1-4. s 7 0�+031�. I h x �� n Yo' + °�O3 nH� � �1- r�iN� 1 Z �nJ� � �cwi � � � O ¢ I •+ �t!f' 1 Qf W C If) I �f11 w fq 1 O y,� W� I � N 1- F- I KY QQ ' I ' C92KQ 1 I- Z W Q 1 t� WZNQ I �!> A O I Q��J � I '�t]EQ 1 rllm�0 1 t0 n�FQ 1 Wrc / F M (7 � 1 L Q Vp! I W �.O I W J C9 I �+ Q 2 O I aW 1 J �+ O I J rl` Z' I '�3 JI Z 1 W O J Z I U �J Z I F-Ul N W . 1 wfvD l,'►+ I �I�►+ I J�d►+ 1 ZI C7►+ 1 0 C7 h K I a G I 1 �1atQt'')Q 1 W an0 l Z O l'I�.rKI t JJ 0 C ' i i N W I Z P I t.�O 1 W l�a!7 Z 1 ►.e t a O Z I ►�W a m I �t¢ N ¢ � t s�o �w i �n ..w �a► �ii i I-w r b a ;: s i o��o � i aa� d i ao�oo. ,� �►. �� i �o e rc ' i I � � o ;i �-. * i �o�n* * i c.. * � ; .,n , �n * i r- x a a I i � I i � i � I i � l ! i i , � � �, � l.: „ �,'�__;� <,, _�� , .. . ' i '; � ., i: ;: j, ;� 1- „� �; � , ;; ; �;I:; ,.• � � � � � K - . _ ' ;� , . �,cc�i-'�j r,ITY O� �a.int Paul City �ouncil ` ��oq �� `� �'u�b�ic H�aring Notice , o � � � ��i��i ; �atitf itcation of Assessment � ^r �as• OWNER OR TAXPAYER COUNCIL DISTRICT # RECEIVED PLANNING COUNCIL # FILE � 9`KJ`�'t`"�'':<�::;;':>:<:>;: MARIE E STROHMAYER AUG 2 3 1991 ASSESSMENT � ::9�2� 1054 LOEB ST CITY CLERK PROPERTY ADDRESS �3.�4.L�B..3T...<. . :<, ST PAUL MN 55117-4726 PARCEL ID ........................_ __..... .... _. �................:i.�..rI.;.r....�/.''.►........../..�..ry.�{..�. ��fi�I�L�W�V V V' PROPERTY TAX DESCRIPTION COMO PROSPECT ADDITION LOTS 1 2 AND LOT 3 BLK 11 ASSESSED LEGAL: LIST 16, PAGE 5 NEIGHBORHOOD TIME: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 1991 AT 2:00 P.M. SERVICES PLACE: CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 3RD FLOOR, CITY HALL/COURT HOUSE COMMITTEE This is where problems shouid be discussed so they can be MEETING resolved before the public hearing. THE TIME: THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1991 AT 9:00 A.M. PUBLIC PLACE: City Council Chambers, 3rd Floor City Hall-Court House HEARING Written or oral statements by any owrter wiil be considered by the Councii at this hearing. PURPOSE To consider approval of the assessment for: DISEASED TREE3, LOGS, AND BRU3H REMOVAL FOR TF� 1990-1991 DUTCH ELM 3EASON ASSESSMENT The proposed assessment for the above property is $29.31 INFORMATION If the City Council approves the assessment you wiil have 30 days to pay without interest. Any �aid balance will be collected with your property taxes over 1 year(s) at 9.00096 interest. The proposed assessment roA for this project is available for review in the Finance Department, Room 218� City Hall. ASSESSMENT TREE REMOVAL 19.81 X $1.0000 = $19.81 CALCULATION SERVICE CHARGE 1.00 X $9.5000 = $9.50 NOTE: THIS IS NOT YOUR BILL. YOU WILL RECEIVE AN INVOICE AFTER THE HEARING SPECIFYING THE AMOUNT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL WITH COMPLETE INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO PAY THIS ASSESSMENT. CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE NOTIFICATION DATE 8/23/9� RE 6/6/91 . �/��/�O 9 DEPAR ENT/OFFIC p OUN IL OATE INITIATED G R E E N S H E ET N° 15 3 3 4 Finance De artmen /Real Estate 5/31/91 C NTA PER 3 PNON INtTIAUDATE NHflAWATE �OEPARiMENT DtRECTOR CITY COUNC� °oxanna Flink �292-7028 �ss� �CIT`f/�RNEY ciTVC��c (' ►Hw�en Fon � iT B ON COU Il Al3ENDA BY DA pp�ry� �BUOGET OIRECTOR �FIN,d MO7 SERVIGES Dlfl. � .�ust be in City Cl�erk's ice no o�n ��Ypp�pqA3SISTANI� � Council Rese rc lat�ar tha n� W TOTAL#OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 (CUP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) �� ACT1pN REQUESTED: Setting date of public hearing Approve assessments for the removal of diseased Elm trees, logs, brush and stump remflval for the 1990/1991 Dutch Elm Season Files 9101T and 9102T Assessments 9028 and 9027 fiECOMMENOATiON3:Approw(A)or R�et(fi) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING GUESTIONS: �PLANNIPK�COMMISSION �CIVII SERVICE CWMAISSION �• ��Nfk111 N!�WOfkld Und9f 8 COfltfact fOf thiS d6pettrtlsflt? _Cte COMMITTEE _ YES NO 2 Has 1Ns pxaoNBnn evar been a cily emplayee� �-'��F — YES NO _o1STRiCT COUiaT A Fo Y e s t 1_7 3. Doea tlds PersoMim posssas a skiil not nwmally poasssssd by arry cumsM city smplo�r�s? • SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCiI 08JECTIVE7 Ward 2 r�s wo Neighborhoods ExP�ain aN yes answas on s�p�rate sh�et and ettach to gnen sheet INITIATINC�PROBLEM.ISSUE.OPPORTUNITY(Wfro,What VN�an.Whero.Why►: Forestry determines which trees are diseased and aeed to be removed throughout the entire City. Property owner is given the option of removing the tree themselves, have a private � contractor remove it or let the City do it. ANTAGE3 IF APPqOVED: � Cost recovery program to recover expenses incurred by the City for removal of diseased trees. Safer and nicer looking neighborhoods DtSADVANTA(3E5 IF APPROVED: If Council does not approve these charges, General Fund would be required to pay the assessment Assessment is spread between one thru five years and can be collected with the property taxes OISAOVANTAdES IF NOT APPfiOVED: Disease will spread to healt�► trees and soon run rampant throughout the City. l TOTAL AMOUNT OFTRAN8ACTION S 8S'�6Z.'39 C06T/REVENUH BUDGETEO(CiRCLE ON� Y8S NO FUNOIN�i SOURCE �8essments only acrnmr NuMeer� Finance PIR 802-60002-6001-64002 flNANCIAL INWRMATION:(D(PlAIN1 331 property owners will receive notice of the public hearing and the charges. v Q/- �� - • RE 8/8/91 � �� DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATE INITIATED / � Finance Departmen /Real Estate 7/30/91 GREEN SHEET ° 15370 CONTACT PER30N&PHONE � �DEPARTMENT DIRECTORNITIAL/DATE �CITY COUNCIL INITIAUDATE Roxanna Flink 292-702g pgg�aN �CITYATTORNEY �CITYCLERK � NUMBER FOR M'f�ST BE QN� CO NCIL ENDA (DATF�)� 91 �BUDGET DIRECTOR �FIN.&MGT.SERVICES DIR. P1118t. D2 �n �ity �lerK�S8 �� Ce 110 ORDERp MAYOfi(OR ASSISTANT) Crnm c i 1 R later than noon Wednesda 8/14/91 ❑ Q TOTAL#OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) ACTION REQUESTED: At councils request the attached properties with removal of diseased trees, logs and Brush for the 1990-1991 Dutch Elm Season be laid over until 9/12/91 fo� further discussion. Approve the assessments for the attached properties. File 9101T�" Assessment 9029 RECOMMENDATIONS:Approve(A)w R�ect(R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER TME FOLLOWING�UESTIONS: _PLANNINO COMMI3SION _CIVII SERVICE COMMISSION 1• Has this person/firm ever worked under a contr&ct for this department? _CIB COMMITTEE _ YES NO 2. Has this personlfirm ever been a city employee? �STAFF — YES NO _DISTRIC7 COUR7 _ 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current city employee? SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE7 Ward 2 YES NO Explain all yes answers on saparate shest and attach to gresn sheet Neighborhoods INITIATINCa PROBLEM,ISSUE,OPPORTUNITY(Who,What,Wlren,Where,Why): See original Green Sheet �1�15334 ADVANTACiES IF APPROVED: DISADVANTAOE3 IF APPROVED: RECEIVED AUG 2 3 1991 CITY CLERK DISADVANTAQES IF NOT APPROVED: Gouncil Resear�h CP�+�r AUG p 9 10�° TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION s 1 s 925.�H COST/REVENUE BUDGETED(CIRCLE ONE) YES NO FUNDING SOURCE �Sessments Orily ACTIVITY NUMBER FINANCIAL INFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) 4 property owners will receive notice of the public hearings and charges d(u ,� r . - NOTE: GOMPLETE.L?IRECTIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THE GREEN SHEET INSTRUCTIONAL MAN[lAL AVAILABLE IN THE PURCHASING OFFICE(PHONE NO.298-4225). ROUTING ORDER: Below are correct routings for the five most frequent types of documents: CONTRACTS(assumes authorized budget exists) COUNCIL RESOLUTION (Amend Budgets/Accept. Grants) 1. Outside Agency 1. Department Director 2. Department Director 2. City Attorney 3. City Attorney 3. Budget Director � 4. Mayor(for contracts over$15,000) 4. Mayor/Assistant � 5. Human Rights(for contracts over$50,000) 5. Clty Council 6. Finance and Management Services Director 6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services 7. Finance Accounting ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(Budget Revision) COUNCIL RESOLUTION (all others, and Ordinances) 1. Activity Manager 1. Department Director 2. Department Accountant 2. City Attorney 3. Department Director 3. Mayor Assistant 4. Budget Director 4. City Council 5. City Clerk 6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services AOMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(all others) 1. Department Director 2. City Attorney 3. Finance and Management Services Director 4. City Clerk TOTAL NUMBER OF SIGNATURE PAGES Indicate the#of pages on which signatures are required and paperclip or flag each of these pages. ACTION REQUESTED Describe what the projecUrequest seeks to accomplish in either chronologi- cal order or order of importance,whichever is most appropriate for the issue. Do not write complete sentences. Begin each item in your list with a verb. RECOMMENDATIONS Complete if the issue in question has been presented before any body, public or private. SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? Indicate which Council objective(s)your project/request supports by listing the key word(s)(HOUSING, RECREATION, NEIGHBORHOODS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, BUDGET,SEWER SEPARATION). (SEE COMPLETE LIST IN INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL.) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS: This information will be used to determine the ciry's liability for workers compensation claims,taxes and proper civil service hiring rules. INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY Explain the situation or conditions that created a need for your project or request. ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED Indicate whether this is simply an annual budget procedure required by law/ charter or whether there are specific ways in which the City of Saint Paul and its citizens will benefit from this projecUaction. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED What negative effects or major changes to existing or past processes might this projecUrequest produce if it is passed (e.g.,traffic delays,noise, tax increases or assessments)?To Whom?When? For how long? DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED What will be the negative consequences if the promised action is not approved7 Inabiliry to deliver service?Continued high traffic, noise, accident rate?Loss of revenue? FINANCIAL IMPACT Although you must tailor the information you provide here to the issue you are addressing, in general you must answer two questions: How much is it going to cost?Who is going to pay? /? y. ,a -,3 __y f� °� 9/19/91 ��_ i�a _ DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATE INITIATED N� 16 212 Finance Depart nt eal Estate 9��2�9� GREEN SHE�T CONTACT PERSON&PHONE INITIAUDATE INITIAUDATE �DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR �CITY COUNCIL Roxanna Flink � '� 292-7�28 ASSIGN �CITYATTOHNEY �CITYCLERK NUMBERFOR MUST BE ON COUNCIL AOENDA BY(DATE) ROUTING �BUDGET DIRECTOR �FIN.&MGT.SERVICES DIR. laterbthan noon Wednesda0ff �� Q ORDER �MAYOR(ORASSISTANT) � ,ptln -i R � 1 TOTAL#OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) ACTION REQUEST D: At counci�ls request the attached properties with removal of diseased trees, logs and brush for the 1990-1991 Dutch Elm Season be laid over until 10/3/91 fo� further discussion. Approve the assessment for the attached property. File 9101T4 Assessment ��9031 RECOMMENDATIONS:Approve(A)or ReJect(R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSYVER THE FOLLOWIN�GUESTIONS: _PLANNINO COMMISSION _ CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION 1• Has this person/firm ever worked under e ContrBCt fOr this department? _CIB COMMITTEE _ YES NO A 2. Has this person/firm ever been a city employee? _STAFF — YES NO _DISTRICTCOURT _ 3. DOeSthIS erson/firm p possess a skill not normally possessed by any current city employee? SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE7 Ward 2 YES NO Neighborhoods Explain all yes answers on separate�heet end attach to green sheet INITIATING PROBLEM,ISSUE,OPPORTUNITY(Who,What,When,Where,Why): See original green sheet 4�15334 and 15370 ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Coun�s� ^_�� .�, A_ .,� SEP 18 1991 DISADVANTAOES IF NOT APPROVED: RECEIVED SEP 2 0 1991 CITY CLERK ' TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION S S4�.lO COST/REVENUE BUDGETEp(�IRCLE ONE) YES NO FUNDING SOURCE Assessments Orily ACTIVITY NUMBER FINANCIAL INFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) �� NOTE: COMPLETE DIRECTIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THE GREEN SHEET INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL AVAILABLE IN THE PURCHASING OFFICE(PHONE NO.298-4225). ROUTING ORDER: Below are correct routings for the five most frequent rypes of documents: CONTRACTS(assumes authorized budget exists) COUNCIL RESOLUTION (Amend Budgets/Accept. Grants) 1. Outside Agency 1. Department Director 2. Department Director 2. City Attorney 3. City Attorney 3. Budget Director 4. Mayor(for contracts over$15,000) 4. Mayor/Assistant 5. Human Rights(for contracts over$50,000) 5. City Council 6. Finance and Management Services Director 6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services 7. Finance Accounti�g ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(Budget Revision) COUNCIL RESOLUTION (all others, and Ordinances) 1. Activity Manager 1. Department Director 2. Department Accountant 2. City Attorney 3. Department Director 3. Mayor Assistant 4. Budget Director 4. City Council 5. Ciry Clerk 6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(all others) 1. Department Director 2. Ciry Attorney 3. Finance and Management Services Director 4. Ciry Clerk TOTAL NUMBER OF SIGNATURE PAGES Indicate the#of pages on which signatures are required and paperclip or flag each of these pages. ACTION REQUESTED Describe what the projecVrequest seeks to accomplish in either chronologi- cal order or order of importance,whichever is most appropriate for the issue. Do not write complete sentences. Begin each item in your list with a verb. RECOMMENDATIONS Complete if the issue in question has been presented before any body, pubtic or private. SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? Indicate which Council objective(s)your projecVrequest supports by listing the key word(s)(HOUSING, RECREATION, NEIGHBORHOODS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, BUDGET,SEWER SEPARATION). (SEE COMPLETE LIST IN INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL.) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS: This information will be used to determine the city's liability for workers compensation claims,taxes and proper civil service hiring rules. INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY Explain the situation or conditions that created a need for your project or request. ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED Indicate whether this is simply an annual budget procedure required by law/ charter or whether there are specitic ways in which the Ciy of Saint Paul and its citizens will benefit from this projecUaction. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED What negative effects or major changes to existing or past processes might this projecUrequest produce if it is passed (e.g.,traffic delays, noise, tax increases or assessments)?To Whom?When? For how iong? DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED What will be the negative consequences if the promised action is not approved?inability to deliver service?Continued high traffic, noise, accident rate?Loss of revenue? FINANCIAL IMPACT Although you must tailor the information you provide here to the issue you are addressing, in general you must answer two questions:How much is it going to cost?Who is going to pay? . RE 8/8/91 9� - �� y DEPA NT/0 •C NC0. INITIA �T� �C��/O Finance Department/Real Estate 7/30/91 GRE�N SHEET lr `j � Roxan a Flink E 292-7028 �°�"�TD1R�� [j ar��o��ca �Nm�ww� xsaw�+ �cm�rror+Ner Q�cm ct,F»u . N NCIL DA Y DA � p�py�pf� �8UOf3ET O�iECTOR �FIN.3 Mf3T.SERViCE3 DIR. �.st e n � ty �l�er s � � no �„ ��,�� ater than noon Wednesda 8 14/91 ❑ (� ('nimril R TOTAL#OF S1�iNATURE PAGES 1 (CUP ALL LOC�TIONS FOii SiGNATURq ACTION REGUESTED: At councils request the attached properties vith removal of diseased trees, logs and Brush for the 1990-1991 Dutch Elm Season be laid over until 9/12/91 for further discussion. Approve the assessments for the attached properties. File 9101TT Assessmeat 9029 RECOMMENOATION$:Appov�(A)a H�j�Ct(R) PEA80N11L SERVICE CONTRAC7S MUST ANStiUER THE FOLLOWINd CUESTtONB: _aura�wo coMM�B�N _crv�L sERV�CE c,darsslON �. Hes ads p.nonmrm ewr worlc.a una.r a conaact tor mis d.p�ransral __Ct8 COMMIITEE _ YES NO �.�� — 2 Has ths p�rsorUflrm ever besn a dly empbyN? YES NO _o�7R�cr c�Ar .._ 3, ooes u�is asraonnhm aoaasss a aaa na normeW a��essw b�►�+Y«+rr�t at5+emplow.� suaAOars wE+�c►+cour�cn.oe,�c�nve� Ward 2 YES wo Explafn aN y�s answKS on s�pvat�si�t aod att�eh to g�e shNt Neighborhoods INITIATINO PFl08LEM.ISSUE.OPPORTUNITY(VYho.Whe4 WhM�.1M�n.Whyj: See original Green Sheet f�15334 ''VANTAOEB IF APPqOVEO: � . D13AOVANTAC3ES IF APPROVED: DISAOVANTAOES�F NdT APPROVED: �. TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION S 1,925.�S CpgT/pEyENUH BUOGETED(CIRCLE Ot� YES NO FUNOIN(i SOURCB �sessments OIIl.y ACTIVITY NUMBER FINANCIAI I NFORMATpN:(�%�IN) 4 property owaers will receive notice of the public hearings and charges . �� ' ' � RE 6/6/91 �'� _ DEPARTM /O CFJCOU IL DA E INITIA � � 5 3 Finance Departmen /Real Estate S/31/91 G R E EN SH E ET N• 1 3 4 CONTA PER 3 PHONE �DHPARTIMENT OIRE�� CITY COUNCfL �NITIAUOATE Doxanna Flink '292-7028 �$$�+N �CIT`1NTORNEY g cmc�rac NurrEn ra� iT BE ON C UNCiI A ENOA BY Ap�ryNp �BUOGET OIFiECTOR �FIN.3 M(�L SERVICE3 WR. r�ust be in Citq Cl�erk's ice no onoEn �,,�,,,��„�,�,� (� Council Resear lat�� th n W TOTAL#OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 (CUP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SiGNATURE) • -. ACTtON REQUESTED: Setting date of public hearing Approve assessments for the removal of diseased Elm trees, lags, brush and stump removal for the 1990/1991 Dutch Elm Season Files 9101T and 9102T Assessments 9028 and 9027 RECOMMENCATIONS:Approw(A)a fie�et lR) PEASONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS IlplST ANSMIER THE FOLLOWIN(i GUESTIONB: : �PLANNINQ COMMISSION �CNII SERVICE COMRNSSIOM 1. Ha thit peraon/fUm evsr Marksd uod�r a oaitraa fa tl�is deparun�nt? �Ci8 COMM�TiEE _ YES NO 2. Hes tNs person/Ikio ewr bsen a cih�aipicy�e? �$TAFF YES NO ._o�srR�crcouRr A Forestrv s. ooes n�ss aeraon�wm oase.,.a�eae no►m.N oosesss.d�y am��v•maayee� su�r+oars wH�,couNC��oe,recrnei Ward 2 Yes ra Explain all y�s answus on s�para�q�t and stfaefi to gnsn shest Neighborhoods INITIATINa PR08lEM.ISSUE.OPPORTUNITY(Who,What.WMn.WMn,NRW►: Forestry determines which trees are diseased and need to be removed throughout the entire City. Property owner is given the option of removing the tree themselves, have a private � contractor remove it or let the City do it. ! ANTAOES IF APPqOVED: • Cost recovery program to recover expenses iacurred by the City for removal of diseased trees. Safer and nicer looking neighborhoods DISADVANTA(iES IF APPROVEO: If Council does not approve these charges, General Fund would be required to pay the assessment Assessment is spread between one thru five years aad can be collected with the propertq taxes Ot9AOVANTAGES IF NOT APPRO�/ED: Disease will spread to healt�► trees and soon run rampant thzougitout the Citq. � TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ 85'�62.39 Cp�/p�y�HV��p(�ypag pN� YES NO FUNDING SOURCE �Sessments only ��tvmr Nuwe�t Finaace PIR 802-b0002-6001-60002 FINANCUI�INFOFlMATION:(EXPIAIN) 331 property owners wi11 receive notice of the public hearing and the charges. � � � � Saint Paul City Council � ��- ��U� �tTt ow �$$ � � Public Hearing Notice 4 � � ;;;;��« ; Ratif ication of Assessment � Ar Jss• OWNER OR TAXPAYER COUNCIL DISTRICT t PLANNING COUNCIL � ....................................... RECEIVED FILE # ::&�:`E�'�"�?%.:�_>:;.<<>�:>:>:>::�: JOHN � MARION STONE ASSESSMENT' � ::�3� 1859 CIARK ST p 17 1g91 PROPERTY ADDRESS 5 E �<..:>:;>,:.:<>>:<>;;x.`o°'x.,::::°"�•,;�.:;>:::::<;:.:::.::.::::::::::::::>:<<:>;;;::::>:<;:�:<?;>�;;;:;;:::;:';::�:;>«:i;:;�:;�;:;;;; ST PAUL MN 55101-30T8 ��? CITY CLERK pARCEL ID ........................................... .................................. ... ....... ..................................... ��►��.��:��:; - PROPERTY TAX DESCRIPTION CLARKES 2ND ADDITION TO THE CITY OF ST. PAUL, RAMSEY CO., MINN. IOTS 1 TF�iU 7 8� 13 THRU LOT 20 BLK 3 ASSESSED LEGAL: LIST 20, PAGE 2 NEIGHHORHOOD TIME: WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 2, 1991 •AT 2:00 P.M. . SERVICES PLACE: CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 3RD FI.00R, C1TY HALL/GOURT HOUSE COMMITTEE This is where problems should be discussed so they can be MEETING resolved before the pubiic hearing. THE TIME: THURSDAY, OCTOBER 3, 1991 AT 9:00 A.M. PUBLIC PLACE: City Councii Chambers, 3rd Floor City Ha8-Caut House HEARING Written or oral statements by any owner wiil be considered by the Council at this hearing. PURPOSE To consider approval of the assessment for: DI3EASED TREE3, LOG3 A(� BRUSH REMOVAL FOR THE 1990-1991 DUTCF! EL�A SEASON ASSESSMENT The proposed assessment for the above property is �547.10 • INFORMATION If the City Council approves the assessment you wiN have 30 days to pay without interest. Any unpaid balance wi� be collected with your property taxes over 5 year(s) at 9.00096 interest. The proposed assessment roll for tMis project is available for review in the Finance Department, Room 218, City Han. ASSESSMENT TREE REMOVAL 537.60 X $1 .0000 = $537.60 CALCULATION SERVICE CHARGE 1 .00 X $9.5000 = $9.50 NOTE: THIS IS NOT YOUR BILL. YOU WILL RECEIYE AN INVOICE AFTER T$E HEARING SPECIFYING THE AMOUNT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL WITH GOMPLETE INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW T0 PAY THIS ASSESSMENT. CONTINUED ON REYERSE SIDE NOTIFICATION DATE 9/13/91