Loading...
91-1661 ORIGN 9 � - �' `��' Council File � � . Green Sheet ,� RESOLUTION _ _ CITY OF S NT PAUL, MINNESOTA Q � , U Preaented By Referred To Committee: Date RESOLVED, that the Sairit Paul City Council consents to and approves of the reappointments, made by the Mayor, of the following people to serve on the SAINT PAUL HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION: Reappointments• Roberto Avina Frank Chiodi - Karen Gray Each shall serve a three-year term which will expire on October 9, 1994. __� Navs Absent Requeated by Department of: mon swi • n G' p .�'� �e CC8 @ @t llld une z son BY� Adopted by Council: Date SEp 1 `� 1991 Fo�► A ed by ity Atto ney Adoption Certified by Counci Secretary By: ` �- Z� /� �� � . B : �G��"` Y Approved by Mayor for Submission to Approved by; yor: Date S�P 2 � �g Council , B ,�����%"�" By: Y- Pib�IISNEa ��� ��'91 � , . ��,� ��� . , . � . DEPARTWIENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL � DATE INITIATED �� 16 5 01 Mayor' s Office s�aa�9i GREEN SHEET CONTACT PERSON 8 PHONE INITIAUDATE INITIAUDATE DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR �CITY COUNCIL Molly O'Rourke ASSIGN ATTORNEY �CITYCLERK MUST BE ON COUNCIL AGENDA BY(DATE) NUMBER FOR gUDGET DIRECTOR �FIN.&MGT.SERVICES DIR. ROUTING ORDER MAYOR(OR ASSISTAN� � TOTAL#OF SIGNATURE PAGES (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) ACTION REQUESTED: Sign the attached Council Resolution reappointing Roberto Avina, Frank Chiodi, and Karen Gray to the St. Paul Human Rights Commission. RECOMMENDATIONS:Approve(A)or Reject(R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING� _PLANNING COMMISSION _ CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION �• Has this person/firm ever worked under e contrect for this depertment? `1���E��E _CIB COMMITTEE _ YES NO 2. Has this person/firm ever been a city employee? _STAFF — YES No AUG �7 1991 _DIS7RICT COURT _ 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normall y possessed by any current city employee? SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OB,IECTIVE7 YES No �I TY ATTO RN E Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to gresn sh INITIATINQ PROBLEM,ISSUE,OPPORTUNITY(Who,What,When,Where,Why,: RECEIVED None. RE�EIVED 3 �991 A UG z 9 1991 SEp ~ �AYOR'S OFFIC� CITY C�ERI� ADVANTA�ES IF APPROVED: � The Mayor has recommended the reappointment of the above people to serve a three-year term which will expire on October 9, 1994. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: ^A t,�: r�.,��•:^-",t1 U�i11L� �I\J��'; S�P � .3 1991 TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION S COST/REVENUE BUDGETEp(CIRCLE ONE) YES NO FUNDINO SOURCE ACTIVITY NUMBER FINANCIAL INFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) ,J� (,1 . � NOTE: COMPLETE DIRECTIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THE GREEN SHEET INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL AVAILABLE IN THE PURCHASING OFFICE(PHONE NO. 298-4225). ROUTING ORDER: Below are correct routings for the five most frequent rypes of documents: CONTRACTS(assumes authorized budget exists) COUNCIL RESOLUTION (Amend Budgets/Accept.Grants) 1. Outside Agency 1. Department Director 2. Department Director 2. Ciry Attorney 3. City Attorney 3. Budget Director 4. Mayor(for contracts over$15,000) 4. Mayor/Assistant 5. Human Rights(for contracts over$50,000) 5. City Council 6. Finance and Management Services Director 6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services 7. Finance Acxounting ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(Budget Revision) COUNCIL RESOLUTION (all others,and Ordinances) 1. Activity Manager 1. Department Director 2. Department Acxountant 2. City Attorney 3. Department Director 3. Mayor Assistant 4. Budget Director 4. City Council 5. City Clerk 6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(all others) 1. Department Director 2. City Attorney 3. Finance and Management Services Director 4. Ciry Clerk TOTAL NUMBER OF SIGNATURE PAGES Indicate the#of pages on which signatures are required and paperclip or flag each of thsae pages. ACTION REQUESTED Describe what the projecUrequest seeks to accomplish in either chronologi- cal order or order of importance,whfchever is most appropriate for the issue. Do not write complete sentences. Begin each item in your list with a verb. RECOMMENDATIONS Complete if the issue in question has been presented before any body, public or private. SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? Indicate which Council objective(s)your projecUrequest supports by listing the key word(s)(HOUSING, RECREATION, NEIGHBORHOODS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, BUD(�ET,SEWER SEPARATION). (SEE COMPLETE LIST IN INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL.) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS: This information will be used to determine the citys liability for workers compensation claims,taxes and proper civil service hiring rules. INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE,OPPORTUNITY Explain the situation or conditions that created a need for your project or request. ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED indicate whether this is simply an annual budget procedure required by law/ charter or whether there are specific ways in which the City of Saint Paul and its citizens wfll benefit from this projecUaction. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED What negative effects or major changes to existing or past processes might this projecVrequest produce if it is passed(e.g.,traffic delays, noise, tax increases or assessments)?To Whom?When?For how long? DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED What will be the negative consequences if the promised action is not approved? Inabiliry to deliver service?Continued high traffic, noise, accident rate? Loss of revenue? FINANCIAL IMPACT • Although you must tailOr the information you provide here to the issue you are addressing, in gene'rat yoai`efiast aryswer two questions: How much is it going to cost?Who is going to pay?