Loading...
91-1555 8 City of St.Paul I E NO "� RESOLUTION APPROVING ASSESSMENT AND By FIXING TIME OF HEARING THEREON ' e Na -91 _.. Voting Assessment No. 0050 Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for - 2 the level of operation and maintenance for the Town Sq�are "Public Spaces" located within the following streets: 'Cedar Street, Seventh Street, Minnesota Street and Sixth Street for the period of July 1, 1991 to June 30, 1992. , I i , Preliminary Order 91-1019 approve June 4, 1991 FinalOrder 91-1191 approve�l une 27, 1991 I The assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for and in connection with the above improvement having been submitted to the Council, and the Council having considered same and found the said asse�sment satisfactory,therefore,be it RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects approved. RESOLVED FURTHER, That a public hearing be had on said assessment on the lOth day of October, 1991, at the hour of nine , o'clock A.I�1., in the Council Chamber of the Court House and City Hall Building, in the City of St. Paul; that the Director of Finahce give notice of said meetings,as required by the Charter, stating in said notice the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement, and the amount assessed against the lot or lots of the particular owner to whom the notice is directed. i I I COUNCILPERSON Adopted by the Council: Date AUG 2 7 199� Yeas Dimond Nays �-6esrait� � Certified s y Cou cil Secretary Long Ma.ccabee In Favor By Rettman ������ Thune � Against w�lson AUG 2 9 1991 Mayor PUBLISHED $�P -�'9� . , . T , -. �i!� i�ss' �� RE 8/15/91 � DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATE INITIATED � *� Finance Departmen /Real Estate 8/13/91 GREEN SHE T l�� 16184 CONTACT PERSON&PHONE INITIAUD E INITIAUDATE �DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR �CITY COUNCIL Roxanna Flink � 292-7028 ASSION �CITYATTORNEY �CITYCLERK MUST BE ON COUNCIL NDA B (pATE NUMBER FOR 2P�t �+Ler�t ROUTINCa BUDGET DIRECTOR FIN.&MQT.SERVICES DIR. MUSt be in y e n0 ORDER MAYOR(OR ASSISTANT) O n Wednesda 8/21/91 ❑ � Council Research TOTAL#OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) ACTION REQUESTED: Set hearing date for ratification of Town Square Service Charge Ratification of Town Square Charges for July 1, 1991 thru June 0, f992 File No. 18113-91 Assessment 4�0050 RECOMMENDATIONS:Approve(A)or Re)ect(R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANS ER THE FOLLOWING�UESTIONS: _PLANNING COMMISSION _CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION 1• Has this person/firm ever worked under e contr ct for this department? _CIB COMMITTEE _ YES NO 2. Has this person/firm ever been a city employe 7 �STAFF — YES NO _DiSTRICT COURT 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not norm U SUPPOR7S WHICH COUNCIL OB,IECTIVE? Ward 2 YES NO Y Possessed by any current city employee? Explaln ell yes answers on separete shaet an�ettach to green sheet i INITIATING PROBIEM,ISSUE,OPPORTUNITY(Wlw,YVhat,When,Where,Why): , Since 1982, surrounding property owners have shared the operati�g expense of the loft area in Town Square Park. I ADVANTA(iES IF APPROVED: Because the loft or park area draws visitors and shoppers to th Town Square Mall, surrounding property owners benefit from the increased traffic low. This has been a routine procedure since 1982 and has the approval of the Down own Building Owners and Managers Association (BOMA) DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: � Property owners could appeal this charge i RECEIVED i AUG 2 0 1991 II CITY CLERK DI3ADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: The City would bear the added expense to operate the loft area hru the General Fund cti Research Center AUG 15 1991 TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION S 1�O 1��2 S�.OO COST/REVENUE BUDGETED(CIRCLE ONE) � YES� NO FUNDING SOURCE TOWri Square ACTIVITY NUMBER 43 80 FINANCIAL INFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) Service Charge collected with property taxes �.n 1992 a(,(� � '/ ! ! � � • a . . NOTE: COMPLETE DiRECTIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THE GREEN SHEET INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL AVAILABLE IN THE PURCHASING OFFICE(PHONE NO.298-4225). ROUTING ORDER: Below are correct routings for the five most frequent rypes of dxuments: CONTRACTS(assumes authorized budget exists) COUNCIL RESOLUTION(Amend Budgets/Accept.Grants) 1. Outside Agency 1. Department Director 2. Department Director 2. City Attorney 3. City Attorney 3. Budget Director 4. Mayor(for contracts over$15,000) 4. Mayor/Assistant 5. Human Rights(for contracts over$50,000) 5. Ciry Council 6. Finance and Management Services Director 6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services 7. Finance Accountlng ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(Budget Revision) COUNCIL RESOWTION(all others, and Ordinances) 1. Activity Manager 1. Department Director 2. Department Accountant 2. City Attorney 3. Department Director 3. Mayor Assistant 4. Budget Director 4. Ciry Council 5. City Clerk 6. Chief Acxountant, Finance and Management Services ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(all others) 1. Department Director 2. City Attorney 3. Finance and Management Services Director 4. City Clerk TOTAL NUMBER OF SIC�NATURE PAGES Indicate the�of pages on which signatures are required and papercllp orHag eech of these pages. ACTION REQUESTED Describe what the projecUrequest seeks to accomplish in either chronologi- cal order or order of importance,whichever is most appropriate for the issue. Do not write complete sentences. Begin each item in your list with a verb. RECOMMENDATIONS Complete if the issue in question has been presented before any body, public or private. ' SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? Indicate which Council objective(s)your projecUrequest supports by listing the key word(s)(HOUSING, RECREATION, NEIGHBORHOODS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, BUDGET,SEWER SEPARATION). (SEE COMPLETE LIST IN INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL.) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS: This information will be used to determine the ciry's liability for workers compensation claims,taxes and proper civil service hiring rules. INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE,OPPORTUNITY Explain the situation or conditions that created a need for your project or request. ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED Indicate whether this is simply an annual budget procedure required by law/ charter or whether there are specific ways in which the Ciry of Saint Paul and its citizens will benefit from this projecUaction. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED What negative effects or major changes to existing or past processes might thls projecUrequest produce if it is passed(e.g.,traffic delays, noise, tax increases or assessments)?To Whoa67 When? For how long? DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED What wiil be the nepativa consequences if the promised action is not approved?Inability 3q deliver service?Continued high traffic, noise, accident rate7 Loss of revenue? FINANCIAL IMPACT Although you must tailor the fnformation you provide here to the issue you are addressing, in general you must answer two questions: How much is it going to cost?Who is going to pay?