The URL can be used to link to this page

91-1516 �RIGINAI � r � , � - � � Council File # r y � �� " .;�� Green`�S�heet # �s1� r f RESOLUTION r`� �� CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOT�A �' �� v �'� l r �� : e; �� 5.�':.°d. Presented B � �� f '"�'� ~'�r�� Y y ,. ; .y, Referred To Comm,�ttee� '� .D�te 1 WHEREAS, on February 24, 1983, the City Council of the City of Saint Paul apgroved the 2 Neighborhood Partnership Program (NPP), C.F. 270893; and 3 4 WHEREAS, the purpose of the NPP is to improve the economic, physical, and environmental conditions 5 in Saint Paul's neighborhoods by allowing neighborhood residents, businesses, and property owners to 6 develop neighborhood programs and projects to meet their needs; and 7 8 WHEREAS, the Department of Planning and Economic Development (P'ED) has received nineteen NPP 9 applications for the sixteenth cycle of the NPP; and � � 10 "` �u 11 WHEREAS, PED, the Planning Commission, Capital Improvement Budget Committe �d�the Mayor 12have evaluated the nineteen applications and forwarded their recommendations to tlie" �� ouncil; and 13 �:: 14WHEREAS, approval of projects at this point means the projects have five months to se "�� rivate 15match commitments and work with PED and other involved City departments to develop!(.� � ailed 16funding and implementation agreements; 17 18NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council approves the funding priorities and 19budgets for six projects as shown on Attachment B subject to compliance with the Program Development 20and Implementation requirements of the Neighborhood Partnership Program Guidelines; and 21 22BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council approves the stipulations on Attachment C; and 23 24BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council a�.proves the projects and funding sources lisfed'4�� 25in Attachment D in addition to the six projects included in Attachment B: and ` '"' 26 27BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council wishes to extend its appreciation to all applica:�'� 28for their time and effort in developing proposals for the sixteenth cycle of the Neighborhood Partne�sh�' . : �1 , 29Program. ' � ;��: ,��;::. _� Navs Absent Requested by Department of: r{ Dimon / �` Goswitz �— Lon � Macca ee � Ret man T une By: Wi son / SEP - 5 1991 Form Approved ,by City Attorney , � Adopted by Council: Date � r� Adoption Certifie by Cou ci Secretary gy: � �.� �,� BY� A roved b Ma or for Submission to � � PP Y Y ^��#� 1991 Council Approved by M or: Date S�P ' 9 �;�-�� n i ' / ��,� G:�a z; �r.;<<� �RIC�NAL ,-� Couacil File # �.�� ' . ' a Grean Sheet # f RESOLUTION CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MI TAf..�} �' � } ` �� ;,,� resented By '�" ° ' Referred To � � C ittee: Date � �J �/ WHEREAS, on February 24, 1983, the City Council of the City of Saint Paul approved the Neighborhood Partnership Program (NPP) , C.F. 270893; and WHEREAS, th urpose of the NPP is to improve the economic, physical, and environmental onditions in Saint Paul's neighborhoods by allowing neighborhood re "dents, businesses, and property owners to develop neighborhood prog ms and projects to meet their needs; and WHEREAS, the Departme t of Planning and Economic Development (PED) has received nineteen NPP a lications for the sixteenth cycle of the`NPP; and <� �•,- WHEREAS, PED, the Planning ommission, Capital Improvement Budget, CoXnmittee, ' b4t,►'�rfi,' and the Mayor have evaluate the nineteen applications and forwardeds�he'�r., recommendations to the City Co ncil; and � t-�� ,��.+ � ��< CS .f h WHEREAS, approval of projects at is point means the projects have fivg�� months to secure private match co 'tments and work with PED and other `'"` ' ' involved City departments to develop etailed funding and implementation agreements; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City uncil approves the funding priorities and budgets for six projects as hown on Attachment B subject to compliance with the Program Development and plementation requirements of the Neighborhood Partnership Program Guidelines; a d BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City Council approves the stipulations on Attachment C; and . =i BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council wished extend its ��, appreciation to all applicants for their time and effo in developing Y:` ( �s:, proposals for the sixteenth cycle of the Neighborhood Pa tnership Program, ka ,...b'`.'�' Yeas Navs Absent Requested by Dep ment of: �•� unon oswstz a Pla ing a Econ ic Development acca ee ettmen un e ,�/ z son By: P Adopted by Council: Date Form Approve by City orney Adoption Certified by Council Secretary gy; � BY� Approv by Mayor for Submiss n to '� Council � " Approved by Mayor: Date '1 � < ' � � Ci�.��iG�/ ;� Q... BY° :��'', � t ti; . � � i _ - .. ,: , , :�� fi,�.:. _ :, _ , ,z a � - ;, � , , �`� �,. �tt�` � �'s"� ��_ ;��u �� 1 ' _ �w�.i,� �1�''1�,'F^�, x� '=j"� � ` M ;. ; �`t �,r i� � � _ � � e ., r-{�y(��+�r�� . _ . .�° r�,` .. — , , 4� � ' — TO CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE: '��{ _ _ ,jx,t�K� - ' .. . - �M st. �`�,� _ ❑ FINANCE,MANAGEMENT&PERSONNEL• - , HOUSING 8�ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 1 HOUSING 8�REDEVELOPM!ENTAUTHORITY - — � — �;r — - - ❑ HUMAN SERVICES,REGULATED INDUSTRIES, 4 � �'- AND RULES AND POLICY - - -,; ❑ INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS � � - ❑ NEIGHBORHOODSERVICES ;;, .- _ - - ❑ PUBLIC WORKS, UTILITIES&TRANSPORTATION �f��. - - ❑ ACTION } �`{° $.� - . ❑ OTHER - - DATE '' _ ,.. . , ; .., ; ,_ , ... _: , - _ � . - , t .. - 3.;-, _ FROM �'' �: - - _ _ .�; _ _ _ -s, ;- _ _ } � _ ' __ .. . - - _ 3..- � �� - . _ ._ � ' - , l�.` � - _ •S�1i � . � ' - � . - . . ._ � ' - . �: � S�"'�� — - ��rm� � � � ��f� DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/CO'UNCIL DATE INITIATED G R E E N E`T N° _ 14 7 5 4 PED 7 30 91 CONTACT PERSON&PHONE U TE INITIAIJDATE— DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR CITY COUNCIL Joan Trulsen 3321 ASSIGN CINATTORNEY �CITYCLERK NUMBER FOFi MUST BE ON COUNCIL AGENDA BY(DATE) ROUTING �DGET DIRECTOR �FIN.&MGT.SERVICES DIR. ORDER MAYOR(OR ASSISTANT) .� July 30� 1991 �Wil l iam p TOTAL#OF SIGNATURE PAGES One (1) (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) ACTION REQUESTED: Selection of Neighborhood Partnership Program sixteenth Cycle Projects. RECOMMENDATIONS:Approve(a)or Reject(R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLL I _ �I�� PLANNING COMMISSION _ CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION �• Has this person/firm ever worked under a contract for this department? _ CIB COMMITfEE _ YES NO fl 2. Has this person/firm ever been a ciry employee? fi�G 2 1g9� _STAFF — YES NO _ DIS7RIC7 COURT _ 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normally possess�b��cqt�tselt��ploy��, SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE7 YES NO g d� � � �e� Explain all yes a�swers on separete sheet and lattach to green sheet Neighborhoods INITIATING PROBLEM,ISSUE,OPPORTUNITY(Who,What,When,Where,Why): 16th funding cycle of the Neighborhood Partnership Program. ADVANTAGES IF APPFOVED: Neiqhborhood needs are addressed. �ECE1V�� AUG � 6 1991 DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: �'V��'��,�t,€�.�' ��'��°� ,` None DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: RECEIVED 6 , Fe��•� ��.r� r� . Neighborhood needs not addressed. ��G O 9 ,�g9,� Ar�`� J�, �� CITY CLERK �?�� 7 �� .�' �� TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ 575,OOO COST/REVENUE BUDGETED(CIRCLE ONE) YES NO 1. Community Development Bl.ock Grant $350,000 t��- � ,,. , � iiia�� s CITY OF SAINT PAUL OFFICE OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY HALL-7th FLOOR-SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102 612-298-5506 TOM DIMOND COUNCILMEMBER Members: Tan Dimond, Chair Paula Maccabee Dave Thune Date: August 28, 1991 COMMITTEE REPORT HOUSING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMI7TEE .,��.�:: 1. Approval of the minutes from the Housing and Economic Development�`;�Committee meetings for: August 13, 1991, and August 14, 1991. COMMITTEE APPROVED, 3-0 2. Minnesota Housing Finance Agency Application for Funding Deferred Loan Program - Phase VI (Referred from HRA 7-23-91; Layd Over in Committee 8-14-91).. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED APPROVAL, 3-0 (HRA) •''3. Public Nearing on Midway Corridor Light Rail Transit Preliminary Design �,(Referred from Council 7-16-91) . 'COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION AS' AMENDED, 3-0. AMENDMENT IS�� `-TO��—MftD THE SEPTEMBER 5, , NG. � ,:� . Resolution 91-1516 - approving funding priorities and budgets for six projects of the Neighborhood Partnership Program �6th Cycle projects (Referred from Council 8-13-91) . COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED APPROVAL, WITH THE STIPULATION THAT ANY OTHER PROPOSALS FOR NPP COULD BE REVIEWED AT THE FULL CITY C - � � ��.� � .: ` 5. Preliminary approval and authorization to schedule a public hearing for th�'�-. Episcopal Church Home Elderly Housing Revenue Bond Project, District 11 ��;.-��'� (Referred from HRA 8-27-91) . ' ,�� . ��' =s COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED APPROVAL, 3-0 (HRA) `� Y ^ �c;. � xs\ar:'::�� i}, CHAIR: Housing and Redevelopment Authority&Housing and Economic Development Committee +� �,��:: COMMIT'TEES: Public Works&Intergovernmental Relations = ��..: �� CITY OF SAINT PAUL `C\iY O� "o '� OFFICE OF THE MAYOR . � _� � wuum �e � nll I II it �E @� 347 CITY HALL JAbIEB SCHEIBEL SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102 bIAYOR (612) 298-4323 July 30, 1991 William Wilson, Council President Members of the City Council 719 City Hall Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 Dear President Wilson and Members of the City Council: RE: Neighborhood Partnership Program (NPP) Funding Recom�nendations It is my pleasure to forward for your review and consideration a proposed Council resolution which identifies funding recommendations for the 16th Cycle of the NPP program. The proposals recommended this cycle are diverse, _and activities to be undertaken include housing rehabilitation, economic �`�' ��; development, parks, public improvements and human services. '�rt As you are aware, NPP funding recommendations are based upon a rating and ranking process that includes review by the Long Range Capital Improvement Budget Committee, affected neighborhood District Councils, and the Department of Planning and Economic Development. This NPP cycle included a total of nineteen (19) final proposals. The culmination of the review process came on July 26, 1991, when the Planning Commission passed a resolution recommending the following six (6) projects for financing: Project Name Recommended Fundine E. 7th Economic Revitalization, Phase II $ 75,000 Lyton Park Revitalization 100,000 North End Industrial Development 90,000 Western Hazel Park Rehabilitation Area 125,000 Living at Home/Block Nurse Educational Modules 16,000 - Concord/Congress/Wabasha Bus. Reinvt. 161,000 ,� Overall, I am pleased with the quality of the NPP applications this cycle, and concur with the Planning Commission Resolution; rating recommendations (Attachment A) ; financing recommendations (Attachment B) ; and finally recommended project stipulations (Attachment C) . If you have any questions about the 16th NPP Cycle process or would like '"'�'=�r additional information on any of the proposals, please contact Joan Trulsen at `�' 228-3321. � f, s Sincerely, ` .��Gs�,.�/, ,,� J es Scheibel Mayo r ��;'`�_ `�t�%' �" y_ J S:j mt ;.�� Enc 1 o s ure s a,.�:� � "'`R, CITY OF SAINT PAUL ��JVJ�\TT Opr•:i '�r� ' ':'. LONG-RANGE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET COMMITTEE '- ,. _; eo �� i�i��nun := �"�a,,; "='��i!J� �= OFFICE OF THE MAYOR — BUDGET SECTIQN ��'�'• 367 City Hall,Saint Paul,Minnesota 55102 o,,, .,.. lC,,[R'.\'.\\1C"``~ 612-298-4140 JAMES SCHEIBEL MAYOR `� �� , d"'` �`�r�~ ,�' �. �UN ;? 11°�1 June 14, 1991 . -!;`! ',;tv:.i.�r=".�.`` C�,i:vi�vt::;+ A,y�,J;� ,^;�'. T0: Saint Paul Planning Commission Members Mayor James Scheibel . . Members of City Council ' FROM: David G. McDonell, Chair r..��=<i�4 �=i ��:;.-:_c.c Saint Paul Long Range Capital Improvement Budget Committee RE: Report of the Saint Paul Long Range Capital Improvement Budget (CIB) Committee on Cycle XVI Neighborhood Partnership Program Applications The Saint Paul Long Range Capital Improvement Budget Committee met on June 13, 1991, to review applications for Cycle XVI of the Neighborhood Pa�tnership Program. The specific charge of the CIB Committee is to review proposals for conformance with City Council adopted Capital Allocation Policies. In addition, the Committee considers each proposal in light of its appropriateness for use of capital improvement dollars. �_.:;.�, The CIB Committee does not rate proposals which request financing for human�service programs. An "NR" rating is used for these proposals. The rating given by the CIB Committee to each proposal, based on a �ange of 0 points for low priority to 3 points for high priority, is as follows: PROPOSAL RATING LIBERTY PLAZA STORM DOORS 0 LIBERTY PLAZA PLAYGROUND LIBERTY PLAZA PLAYGROUND II These proposals do not leverage private investment financially or in terms of sweat equity. SWEDE HOLLOW LANTERN LIGHTING � WESTERN HAZEL PARK REHAB AREA� J 3 � WEST 7TH/FORT ROAD HOMEOWNER ENERGY RETROFIT 0 - There are a number of programs and a/ternatives which are availab/e to provide these or ve�y similar services. UNIVERSITYIRAYMOND AVENUE GATEWAY PROJECT - � ��$'a`: The proposal does not provide significant leveraging. Construction of a single building �� accounts for 5880,000 of the identified match and it is not clear that the building would no�u;; be constructed without the�NPP appropriation. � r�+f�Y LIVING AT HOME/BLOCK NURSE PROGRAM NR # � �� NORTH ST. ANTHONY PARK COMMERCIAL CRIME WATCH NR � F'± ,,.� .�� _ � � . � __ ______. . ��'i-��'��. Saint Paul Planning Commission June 14, 1991 Page two CONCORD/CONGRESS/WABASHA BUSINESS REINVESTMENT 1 We understand and commend the efforts the various groups on the West Side made to coordinate interests and to submit a single proposals. The e%m�nts of this request and their �elationship to existing capital improvement budget financed improvements and its URAP and other NPP projects are not clear. EAST SEVENTH ECONOMIC REVITALIZATION PROGRAM 3 HISTORIC DAYTON'S BLUFF SIGNS � Thrs proposal is not approp�iate to the NPP process. Staff time spent processing the � p�oposal alone exceeds the amount requested. � HARRIET BISHOP COMMUNITY PLAYGROUND � The current site has p/ay equipment. While the rntent is commendable, it duplicates some service. ln addition, the NPP is not designed to subsidize school playgiounds, even though the equipment may be available times when the school is not using it. Specific policy should be in place before the City begins to participate in this type of proposal. UNIVERSITY AVENUE STREETSCAPE � We question the app�opriateness of the request given the amount required and the indicated match. We suggest the business owne�s buy.the brackets as well. LYTON PARK REVITAUZATION 3 SUMMER YOUTH MUSIC SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM NR _ � _ COMMERCIAL REVITALIZATION PROJECT � This is a request for staff support, not for a capital improvement or for the 10% of CDBG financing which can be used for human service programs. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR/PART-TIME � This is a request for staff support, not for a capital improvement or for the 10% of CDBG financing which can be used for human service programs. NORTH END INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT 3 cc: J. Trulson � , �,; E , � � a:_ : � :�x: �:t.� =':t:rr, '�4.�.��..._. .µ?i i.:i�L _ �'�- i�� ` ��,,,,. CITY OF SAIl\TT PAUL �.�,r,o;<:.. =. ;% OFFICE OF THE MAYOR �e ��'-' ;`'� L.i 1111'1 II il' �_< •�l� ..s '.� o ��::,�',;,<.-°` s�+� ci��i r�a.�.L .1��\fES SCIIEIBEL S�I\T Y�l'L, \ll\\ESOTA S51U. \I:\1'OR <(i12) _98--�3s33 July 30, 1991 William Wilson, Council President Members of the City Council 719 City Hall Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 Dear President Wilson and Members of the City Council: RE: Neighborhood Partnership Program (NPP) Funding Recommendations It is my pleasure to forward for your review and considerat�on a proposed Council resolution which identifies funding recommendationsifor the 16th Cycle of the NPP program. The proposals recommended this cycle a�e diverse, and activities to be undertaken include housing rehabilitation, economic - development, parks, public improvements and hwnan services. As you are aware, NPP funding recommendations are based upon a rating and ranking process that includes review by the Long Range Capital Improvement Budget Committee, affected neighborhood District Councils, and the Department of Planning and Economic Development. This NPP cycle included a total of nineteen (19) final proposals. The culmination of the review process came on July 26, 1991, when the Planning Commission passed a resolution recommending the following six (6) projects for financing: , Proiect Name Recommended Fundin� E. 7th Economic Revitalization, Phase II $ 75,000 Lyton Park Revitalization 100,000 North End Industrial Development 90,000 Western Hazel Park Rehabilitation Area 125,000 Living at Home/Block Nurse Educational Modules ' 161,000 Concord/Congress/Wabasha Bus. Reinvt. Overall, I am pleased with the quality of the NPP applicat�ons this cycle, and concur with the Planning Commission Resolution; rating recpmmendations (Attachment A) ; financing recommendations (Attachment B) ; and finally recommended project stipulations (Attachment C) . If you have any questions about the 16th NPP Cycle process or would like �additional information on any of the proposals, please contact Joan Trulsen at 4� 228-3321. �`::' , ,�:, f� Sincerely, , ;'�k � ��`� z� �x::,;� J es Scheibel ,'►�, Mayor ��. *a �:�� JS:jmt <' Enclosures �`g •:<'.; I , � �� city of saint paul planning commission resolution � file number 9� -�s . date Julv 26 . 1991 NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM Sixteenth Cycle Funding Recommendations WHEREAS, the Neighborhood Partnership Program (N.P.P. ) guidelines stipulate the Saint Paul Planning Commission will evaluate N.P.p. applications and transmit funding recommendations to the Mayor. and City Council; WIiEREAS, the Department of Planning and Economib Development has received nineteen N.P.P. applications for the sixteenth program cycle; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has evaluated the nineteen applications in terms of the Comprehensive Citywide and District Plans, Capital Allocation Policies, and N.P.P. selection criteria (Attachment A) ; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the recommendation it has received from the Saint P�ul Long Range � Capital Improvement Budget Committee; NOW, TIiEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission recommends the funding priorities identified in Attachment B and the funding stipulations in Attachment C; BE IT FIIRTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commiss,ion's recommendation be transmitted to the Mayor and City Council for their consideration and action. :.: � . ;: :, moved by H I RTE seconded by � �s GEISSER �; in favor Unanimous � against_ . �� r NPP FUNDING RECOMMEND�ATIONS ' i�''��"�� 16TH CYCLE Attachment B Funding Rating NPP RECOMMENDED FUNDING ::;:;::::;:;::>:<;:;`:::;::;:`::::; ;; District Project Request Points CDBC CIB HRA ;:.TOTAL.:;: _... ....._.._. ;;:::::::::i:::::*;:'sEi:::::::::::;:::::'t;::;'E`::::::':E::;?:>::EEEi:?�t:';�: ::>.::.:>DB.`:.'<::�>:>::::>:<>:�. .P: �� . . G:.::::::G.:::::.un�ed.:::::��.:;::.>:.>;:<.;;:;>:::;>::::::::>::::::;::::<>::>:<:::<<:: : ..................................................1..................................................... >::;:>:: >:.;;>;;:.>:::>;::>: 6 Lyton Park Revitalization 100,000 38.4 100,000 $1O,Q;;Oqa::: 2 Western Hazel Park Rehabilitation Area 180,000 37.4 125,000 ;$;1'25;:OQ0'!! " Living at Home/Block Nurse Program 6,12,15 Educational Modules 16,000 36.2 16,OQ0 ':;;:;$`;1;6;Q0�< 9 W 7th/Fort Rd Homeowner Energy Retrofit 90,956 30.4 :�:°::;g`p;` 8 Liberty Plaza Playground I 16,233 Inelig 8 Liberty Plaza Playground II 6,467 • Inelig 8 Liberty Plaza Storm Doors 6,703 Inelig 8 Summer Youth Music Scholarship 10,000 Inelig 12 Executive Director- Part-time, Phase I 9,250 Inelig North St Anthony Park Commercial 12 Crime Watch Phase II 9,000 Inelig ?>;��:::<::<:�<�::;<::»�:>::<:�:::::>::>::.<:::::::::::::::>::>::::>:::<€:::::::::>:::::>:::::>:: ..<..p!� > :�<.;� �'��1�::`'�:::�`'`��... ..�e�>f�'::>::«><:::::::::::::::::>�:::::::;:::::<:>::::>::::>::::::::�:>:::`:::>:::: :: :. _ ::::.::;;::;;::::.: �� ..�:ia(. .�. .�....... <:.:.:1:......::.::.::...:..::::::::::<::::::::.::::::::::.�:.�::::: 4 E 7th Economic Revitalization Phase II 81,000 39.7 75,000 ;:>:;:$75lQ00:':.:;: _.. .__..__.... _...................... ..................... ..................... .. .......... .............. ...................... 4 Swede Hollow Lantern Lighting 28,500 28.5 ::;:;:$Q:; Harriet Bishop/Treasure Island 15 Community- Built Playground 32,000 28 ;<:>::;$Q:<; 4 Historic Dayton's Bluff Signs 350 16 ;;<>;�::`:$Q:<. 7,8,11 ;, 12,13 University Avenue Streetscape 3,600 15.2 ;:::;.$0;:., :;{�';;; ``�'ii:::<::i::?2•`.�;::'i�5�2tc'�::ii:::S�5::�:i::::o::2't .. :l�{l�/�:<:�EYI`lt�'�:;.;:.::::<�Y4~:�:� •?;•x.:::o::•::::•::::•: .:::::.. >:;:<:::::>:::::::::':::::::::::::::>:::::<:>:' .:�...,......... .:5::::><>::><�:��>�:'<.::::;:::�>::><:.::.;>;;;::.;,;>:.;>::.: .....:::..:::..1.::.:,.:.. ..... .. . .::::....,,,.,..,.::,... 6 North End Industrial Development 150,000 38.2 90,000 `::;:$;90�000;:: 7,8 University UNITED Commercial Revitaliztn 75,000 31 J ;::!;:::;$4:= `ii?i�:3:i.'•;;::+'t�'%�t;�i:'::::;r•'•;:�;:'•3:::.y`�%.'•.i,'+.;i:;.'•y�:�;;�#::;:::;y?;:;::?}:?'y?�•.':;:#?;:i:`•:ii'i:;i::::�'?;i ::::::::.�::::. ;;:��:::.;.::: ........ ;Yx:iiti::i[i#ii:ii:�. ...:..:. ..: .... .:.. .:.. ..:.:� ::.:.. .::.::.::::>::::::.5:::::::::::.> •:...�.::1:::;>i.':::::::� ;�r�m� :. .�:;.:::;.;>:.r:.;>:.o-;:.>'�;;.:'�:;.;: �rne.�i:::Func�.�c�:>P�r:Q e�cts:>:.>:::::.;:<.::::.:::.:::>:>:.::.::.: :...:.1..:.::::.:.::::.::::.:.::::.:...:..:�.:... 3 Concord/Congress/VVabasha Bus. Reinvt. 211,735 35.4 103,000 50,000 8,000 ;;$1:;61�QQO;:; 12 University/Raymond Gateway Project 670,000 Inelig »::»:�t�:>:::>::> �:�;:�;:�;:�;:�;:�i:�;:�i:�;;;:�;ss;s;:�;:;�i;;;;:�;<:�;;i;;;s;:�;:;:;::�'.;:;;:�;;:�;>;:�;:�;;:�;;;::R:;;i:;4s;s;>;;>:�>:=;i;;:�;;:ti:�::i;::;s:;s;;s;::;.�;;:�;sisi:�;:�;:�;si-;::;:�i'::;;4:;>..;�s:>�;s;:;:�;s;:�:;:i::i�>:�:::�i�:�:s;:�i:;<s;:�;:».z;�;:;;:i�:4:�;s;>;s;:�;::s;::i';G;:4s;i>;:4;;>;s;:;s:a:�s;:;;s;:�;;:<....r........ .. _ ;.:' .::::::`::::r.>::::'.:r.:::.:i:>::::::::::::::::::::;::;::::i:;':::::..'.: ^ � .:: �:.::.::.>:.:..>::;.:: T ..�: . � ... .:::.�:::::::::::::Ci..:'`):C',iG:.''`.�' ' �- � ' : . . . , , .,.,: ., ....:�:: :.>::..:::.::'.::::.::::::.>::::>:.>:.::.:r;> .'...`::.:: ;:..:Pro ect Fundin > ,;:::::::::;:::::::::::::;::,>.;: :;::::>:::>::::>;.::<::::: �344 QOQ �125,OOQ; ..::�98;OQ..O...;$567,�;Q.: ; ,1,_.:.. <.. ..9 ... ,.;: .. �.::.. ,..: ,,. .. ;.::.;..:. ... � .:.::. >;; ... ....: ;;>;::.; : ...:...::.:.:.::... ;:. ....: .,.. .:.. . :..::.:::::::.>:::...... _. ..... ..:.::.::. .. : :..:.::..... . .:::..::..;.; ,....:;.. :.;::..: .:. .::.;:;: >::.. :...::. >:;::>:>�>::>::;:<<��::>;<:»: __ , . .:. . _ <.: . ; > Devefo ment Phas�:�uncis : .: . :::.. .:..:. ..:. .:: .:.::. s:o.o�:::<::<:::::::::»:::>:`>::� o':: z o00 : �floo: .�::.:.:::..........:......:...................:...............,......_.............:............_.:...::..:::..::.::..::::...:::..:..:?.�::.::..,.:.:.:.::..:.....:.....::....::.:.:,�....1.:::::::.:::::::::::.:::::..�:�...::.:::::::�.:::�....�:::...:::::::::�.:::4.:.,..:::::: P........................................................................ ......................................... . . ...... - ;.. :.., ..: .... :.:::::..:.::::::<:::::; :.:: : . :. TOTAL.I6TN.CYCLE;NP.P.F:UNDI..N..G "" ' '' `` � . ,. ... _ ..:.:':`::`:::: ::;:>:;.; . $35U,00. $125,OOQ: $1 OO;;OOQ $575,aQ�:; " Human Service Project- 10�/v of total funds may be used for H.S. Projects � Council File � �;�; •� ��t.: . ' .. *` Green Sheet � RESOLUTION CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA Presented By Referred To Committee: Date 1 WHEREAS, on February 24, 1983, the City Council of the City of Saint Paul approved the 2 Neighborhood Partnership Program (NPP), C.F. 270893; and 3 4 WHEREAS, the purpose of the NPP is to improve the economic, physical, and environmental conditions 5 in Saint Paul's neighborhoods by allowing neighborhood residents, busin�sses, and property owners to 6 develop neighborhood programs and projects to meet their needs; and 7 8 WHEREAS, the Department of Planning and Economic Development (PED) has received nineteen NPP 9 applications for the sixteenth cycle of the NPP; and - 10 �- ll WHEREAS, PED, the Planning Commission, Capital Improvement Budget Committee,_and the Mayor 12have evaluated the nineteen applications and forwarded their recommendations to the'City Council; and 13 14WHEREAS, approval of projects at this point means the projects have five months to secure private l�match commitments and work with PED and other involved City departments to develop detailed 16funding and implementation agreements; 17 18NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council approves the funding priorities and 19budgets for six projects as shown on Attachment B subject to compliance with the Program Development 20and Implementation requirements of the Neighborhood Partnership Program Guidelines; and 21 22BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council approves the stipulations on Attachment C; and 23 24BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Cit� Council anvroves the prbjects and fundine sources listed 25in Attachment D in addition to the six pro�ects included in Attachment B; and 26 27BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council wishes to extend its appreciation to all applicants 28for their time and effort in developing proposals for the sixteenth cycle of the Neighborhood Partnership 29Program. Yeas Navs Absent Requested by Department of: imon Goswitz ::� on ' Macc� ee �,� ettman = � une gy; + � _ i son Form Approved by City Attorney ' � �� Adopted by Council: Date =' Adoption Certified by Council Secretary gy; '"� � �' By: Approved by Mayor for Submission to 1. : Council ,� Approved by Mayor: Date Bv: �� , � CITY OF SAII�TT PAL L ''�;::�o;;. °�� `� OFFICE OF THE MAY012 _• '�'<. e� ,� iiii�iiiii +� ;, . •�� ^ - ..._�:.s•"��`^ 34i Cl7'�" H111.1. ,I:\\1F:S SCIIF�I}iLl. SAI\'1' P:\l�l.. �ll\\FSO'I�A :xil(13 \L�l'OR ((i13) '—'48-;3•'_3 July 30, 1991 William Wilson, Council President Members of the City Council , 719 City Hall Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 Dear President Wilson and Members of the City Council: � RE: Neighborhood Partnership Program (NPP) Funding Recommendations It is my pleasure to forward for your review and consideration a proposed Council resolution which identifies funding recommendations for the:"16th Cycle of the NPP program. The proposals recommended this cycle are diverse, and activities to be undertaken include housing rehabilitation, economic �` development, parks, public improvements and human services. As you are aware, NPP funding recommendations ar.e based upon a rating and ranking process that includes review by the Long Range Capital Improvement Budget Committee, affected neighborhood District Councils, and the Department of Planning and Economic Development. This NPP cycle included a total of nineteen (19) final proposals. The culmination of the review process came on July 26, 1991, when the Planning Commission passed a reso7�ution recommending �he following sia (6) projects for financing: Proiect I�ame Recommended Fundine E. 7th Economic Revitalization, Phase II $ 75,000 Lyton Park Revitalization 100,Q00 North End Industrial Development 90,000 Western Hazel Park Rehabilitation Area 125,000 Living at Home/Block Nurse Educational Modules 16 ,000 Concord/Congress/Wabasha Bus. Reinvt. 161,000 Overall, I am pleased with the quality of the NPP applications this cycle, and concur with the Planning Commission Resolution; rating re�ommendations (Attachment A) ; financing recommendations (Attachment B) ; and finally recommended project stipulations (Attachment C) . If you have any questions about the 16th NPP Cycle process or would like � ,; ,,j additional information on any of the proposals, please contact Joan Trulsen at x#�-:-f� 228-3321. Sincerely, '` ��4�� { ., � Ja es Scheibel � Mayor JS:jmt �� Enclosures � ;�—_ � NPP FUNDING RECOMMENaATIONS �� 16TH CYCLE Attachment B Funding Rating NPP RECOMMENDED FUNDING :::: Dis:rict Project Request Points CDBG � CIB � HRA TOTAL I ' ..: CDBG Funded Pro�ects .. . . ... .: : 6 ILyton Park Revitalization 100,000 38.4 100,000 S100,000 I 2 Western Hazel Park Rehabilitation Area 180,000 37.4 125,000 ( $125,000 ' Living at Home/Block Nurse Program 6,12,15 Educational Modules 16,000 36.2 16,000 ' ;516,000 9 W 7th/Fort Rd Homeowner Energy Retrofit 90,956 30.4 I I ' S0 8 Liberty P12za Playground I 16,233 Irrelig i 8 Liberty Piaza Piayground II 6,467 � Inelig `: 8 ILiberty Plaza Storm Doors 6,703 I Inelig ( I 8 �Summer Youth Music Scholarship I 10,000 ( Inelig �,� I I 12 Executive Director- Part-time, Phase I I 9,250 Inelig North St Anthcny Park Commercial I 12 Crime Watch Phase II 9,000 Inelig I � IB F` �.P:r �` >:;::;.::>:;.::::::>;:<:>>:::.»>;»::;:;::;::.:::.::.:�>::.>:>::.::::; ::».<>;>;:::<:::>::>::>::>:<:::::»:::>::;:::»::�::;:;><::>:;;:::»:.:»: ::>;::::::>::::<:>::::>::<:::<>::>�::::;:;::>,:::<:::;<:::::<;::>;><:>�«;:; ; .:......:.::�::::::::.::.::::::::.:.;.::::,:.:.:�:::.::.:;.: - . c ..��,aea .. o e�ts::::::<:::::;:::::>�::>>:>::>::::::::;;:::::::::::::�::::::::::::::�:::: � : � _ .::. ::. :, ,,, :.. :.: ::: .. : . , 4 I E 7th Economic Revitalization Phas2 II 81,000 I 39.7 I 75,000 57�;000 4 .Swede Hollow Lantern Lighting 28,500 28.5 ( `S0 15 IHarriet Bishop/Treasure Island Community- Built P12yground I 32,000 28 I `; SO 4 Historic Dayton's Bluff Signs I 350 16 ( _:�SO 7,8,11 12,13 University Avenue Streetscape 3,600 15.2 SO I I ��:<:,:..,.:>:..:>:;>:;, . .� Pr .°��..»>��<s:::::: .. _ : I ; ; HRA Funded_ ,,o�ect ,:; � 6 North End Industrial Development 150,000 38.2 90,000 ;:':<"�90;000 7,8 University UNITED Commerciat Revitaliztn 75,000 31.7 I ..:...S.O `Combin d Funde' ro'ects.<�:;:�::::::::::<::::::`�:>.::::�:;;�:::: , : ;.. . :. e :...::.:. . ..... �.:P::.:..1 .::.:. ...;:...:::::;.;::::........... :: ; 3 Concord/Congress/Wabasha Bus. Reinvt. 211,735 I 35.4 103,000 50,000 8,000 �161;OOQ ."J 12 University/Raymond Gateway Project 670,000 Inelig :;;:<�j:?.` ;� :.;;;:�:: ,: ;- ; _. < . . Pro�ect Funding , ; � : _I :. ` ;: S344,:000 S125,000 �98,000; �56 �(�t. Development Phase Funds ::: .:: ss;000 so: ,`S2,000;: .� � <: : < ;� .:; : �,. �C :� T�TAL 16TH CYCLE;NPP F.UNDING > s35o;o0o si25,000: 51;00,000.' S S;�Oc _ _ ��,�:, ' Human Service Project- 10% of total funds may be used for H.S. Projects �� " NPP FUNDING RECOMMENDA"�(ONS �j/��,b 16TH CYCLE Attachment B Funding Rating NPP RECCbMMENDED FUNDING ; District Project Re uest Points CDBG CIB HRA TOTAL ` q ` D C B F . . n �� ................................:.. G u d d.P ' ;;»>::»>:::::>:::><:<.>::>::::::::>::»::>;:::::::::>::>:::.::<:::>:::::: , > �.. ...:;ro ects :::::: :;:;::.::.;:;::.::.;:;::.::.::::>::.::.;: :::;:::>::<:>�<:;:>:::::::;:::::>;:>:;::>::;:::;: 6 Lyton Park Revitalization 100,000 38.4 100,000 $100;000 2 Westem Hazel Park Rehabilitation Area 180,000 37.4 125,000 $125,000 ' ` Living at Home/Block Nurse Program 6,12,15 Educational Modules 16,000 36.2 16,000 $16,000 9 W 7th/Fort Rd Homeowner Energy Retrofit 90,956 30.4 ��<. 8 Liberty Plaza Playground I 16,233 Inelig 8 Liberty Plaza Playground II 6,467 � Inelig ' 8 Liberty Plaza Storm Doors 6,703 Inelig 8 Summer Youth Music Scholarship 10,000 Inetig 12 Executive Director- Part-time, Phase I 9,250 Inelig North St Anthony Park Commercial 12 Crime Watch Phase II 9,000 Inelig � ��:.:�.>.�.:::;::>::>::>::>:>:::>::::::::::.<:�.:..:: CB .. n � a ..� ::::::>::>:::::::::::::>:::::>::::::>:::::::>:>::::::::>:::<:::::;::::::::<:: _ . .._ ..F ed ...r ::::_.,.>'<:::>::><:<:::<:::::::::::::>:<>::�::::::::>:<::::<:::>:::>�::<:: .....:.:.:.::.:.:.::.::.:..:::.:...>.:.::::.��ects.... ._.. < 4 E 7th Economic Revitalization Phase II 81,000 39.7 75,000 $75,000 4 Swede Hollow Lantern Lighting 28,500 28.5 S0'` Harriet Bishop/Treasure Island ;:,. 15 Community- Built Playground 32,000 28 gg : ; 4 Historic Dayton's Bluff Signs 350 7 6 �p.. 7,8,11 12,13 University Avenue Streetscape 3,600 15.2 ;:,;$p _ ':::':`:::;':::?y::':':i::i:?'''�'';'::ii':'':'':;::i;:::'`��'''ir:::::::::::.:::::.:::::: .:::i:::::r::;::'y:%.r,. ,� �,. �..;-._ HRA F�rnded I�ro�ects::::.::::.�.::.................. ........::: 6 North End Industrial Development 150,000 38.2 90,000 $90,.000; . ;< , niversity UNITED Commercial Revitaliztn 75,000 31.7 ,; $p;;; C " om b� �� n dF � e un :.......::..........:........�:::::............. ............. :.:�:::..::::::::::.:..�:::::::::::...:::�::::::.�. , ::.�::..�:.�::::::::........................... ; ...::.:..:....ded.::P..,;ro'ects:<;�>��>��><»>:::::::::`:::::<>:':<:::: ::, .: .... .................................:: ::::.:::<:.::.:�:.::1:::.:::::::;.<.:.;;<;:.:::::;.;:.;:<.:>::.:;;::; <:>:>:;<>:: >:::_�<:. . r 3 Concord/Congress/Wabasha Bus. Reinvt. 211,735 35.4 103,000 50,000 8,000 $161,000; ` •`� _ �t� 12 Univers�ty/Raymond Gateway Project 670,000 Inelig : �-�,� �� ; ,, _: ,. � ` Pro'ect Fundin' _ < ... 1 g .. .� � ;:; ;! $344;000 ;$�25,000 �98,000_ $5fi7,000�. a �y:: .�� > Development P:hase;Funds $s;0oo ' ;So =�2,000 $8,000; > TOTAL 1`6TH CYCLE NPP FUNDING � . .:. ; ; ;; �sso;000 $125;000 ��oa,000 �s7s,000' _ _ _ __ _ " Human Service Project- 10% of total funds may be used for H.S. Projecls �� M:/JMT/NPPFUND3 RESOURCE ALLOCATION COMMITTEE FUNDING RECOMM�NDATIONS JULY 17. 1991 ,.. R 'v� cn-� � ',R�.. � � , � A � p c o �C O• n. �1,+ �, � P � I ' o ti a c�' c� � � (��{�( � r:. i�-'' � `J� ` V y C' � r . . � � c' v�i• �! Q .�'t`; ..� . , . j � A•h n. r�S ~' ' p,�.t, �' _ a y�" c; �' ��' tp K � '�. :i�. `�!' (O p � , %� : . R, A N 'C S.� : � • { y r''A L ; O rn � � n. �... 6 '�,: � �d r-r► � � � i w � � U�1 o I :r � m ° �� . � � ^. �c �? � :`� � :`� � 3 . � 1 V ' � :� � = O•, .. � . .' � ' t� � N V�: ' � �� ' z; �. v � : � a � c� : t�=' tn I ; . b 9 i : . : v _ !.fl a' i � ce i � ;�O� G7 i , 3-': � A A � #-+i . ; �--�i � � � i i q � �( � �. i � � �`+q�� M MMV1M.�n7+ � � . � � _ � �. . ' �`g�w` : � R � � � l. I`�_�.. ^��• 7 CC � j i � i Z . . .. . ... ^ ` .� 7 �y� � � , . , h.. P � � ��c << $ � � � � � #� � � . ` ;, � ` �y 00 � "i ��m n �'Cf �c`e ' I c� L r. a.p ��/�� f . . � VIC�o . c� �, � _ _� j - . � ��z f U� F—' '�l � � S° o rt �l O ti� � � ( � � ~ � � O0� � �� z `° ' � " D s � ba`� = Y a vvvWYVW� I t W LTJ Q� O E � • � N o � !—' �, r � � �Q, ... � N. �, �C r;�• x , � � � � �n� . r� �► c' w ! � • � cn � i i�� rt �• w �� ` p Y . �C d C i¢. � p� Ftiy �i..tF* -OO t: i Vt'�' F�• fD , � ;E. �3 Q F-� � N ht� �tD VJ k w � t'�� N � �w �i �� a�m � � q � � �� . Q r�' H i � �r~�f-o � rt'� '.7 ' (D C) ` � �QQ� _ � � R' �v' �w f . i j o i j b i ; b � \ i j� i o �p� r. � � t�'e F, . . . . , c.� �n U� I� . � . . • / � � : � ' 2 � A : h, N n. } ' • N iJ'.. r�,. Y . Q W t . ' �£��:��'K : e � ; . , . _ i c�n � �� - � •- - i �-7 ►w �. . - � � � � (7 m v°-� r,z (7 z � = mz -+ = � � 77 = -i � � s,,: rn � � � m m < � m m m � m D � � n � z mODZ � 00 `r D 1 1 1 C� �' z � o, s+ c�n -0. 'aV� co � � m � � � � � � -�im � �-Zj � � c� c 2 x cn c � � � v � o � vaoZ cZr� °z Cm/) p < -cni �'o m � � � Z n r "Ci � OT -DC-i � = p O 1 � 0 � � � -i = � �1 � z O � o = c z = c � = cmn D � p Z � � � ° � � C� z � '-rv° D O � � ° w D '' m Z D < = o C /� m m • D � m � y+ � � r m O � � � O z ` J r 0 � Z Z p . N p ^ n � � t1� Z n r R1 a � '� m NZT � cn � O < �J/ 0 � TI � m O Z � � r �' rnm Z mcc� � m � tn z Z m C � -� c� _ .. � o ' ° ZV ° � ° m � � n � � c � � � p � � � T� ymZZ � m Z 07 z C) n y Z r m � � Z � c� m � � mz � 9 � Z � z � � n z O � v Z c � m -i � = z � m N c � � � cn w �!' ma � cci> � � r= z � � T � � mo „ � o C Z '� � -9 � � m . � � �' m rn - c T m a '{ c>: O � ^J iD � = o � � p cu'i� � � � � '� %� v' � mzo � � � m O m �c =� � � z C f� o � � � � � � = v � �, = < Z z o z ormv_' � m � -�'i (7 v m � i o r Z � = z � � N rn � �, o � a z 5 'DOp � mv► � -° ' � c � v � Oz m ? � tn 7] p n °o � o w N Nrn cVi, o C 0 � � O = O C o v�i :+ A rn w o in o cc m z � � mmZ °o � � c�''" O rn °o o °o °o °o o�'i � � m � a � � � mZC�nD � po � C r � D � mma0 -�in ;:;'�::::::::: _ � � � � z m Z � � ;:>�?::`::.?; ::?:;::::?`: z � — m cn v n �o -� m �:�:>:s>::; � � ?j:::»> � o � .� '�", Z � � m = .. .,:�;::. rn :v+;;;::; w n� w cn � c o m ° -� <:j.<;;; w n> w � o nr Z .� � n D :::;CO:»»: � N < n � � m z � �':�3::::;;; °o O 'u::•`.>::: o cwr, °o 0 0 °o p � m �i � � m � � pm0� �.::;:...:: o � ;o:><:::: o 0 0 0 0 o n c � ozv -i � ;- � w Z m � 2 m x m m^ ... ro ro i c.� O D .r �1 � a' p � nnOt'n � Z 0 ` / cn rn m o0 o Z -i � ?' (��1 w � = Q '� n � v m � --� iv o o in :i :P � � � v.� < 0 '!'�, < nCm .� � m � (n � T 'J► o Z p ° � o C -i m ��' v, � � G� a �' � m � ° � . z c � mmrcmj � a w ° � � � � r r � � Z � D � Z � °o 0 0° � o y .,,ft � � ZNm � zoo � o � m r � � � k .. .x� � -C p n Z m � �;.� --, rn �,��,:.:C x o �o c� ,; D � � ° � � � ^ Z � c�o � ` � m � � ZZnm � � � 0 0 m w rn �w � + : � � � momyv � uNi cAi, � rn cAi, o cQ7i, o o •� 0 D m � � mD � O o 0 0 0 � o 0 0 0 0 7 N L w � -�io = mZ o � � � c" cc) � � � mcc �t_.. C� = 0 2 cD Z � rn r � ..*�`.x O ! c = = m (� D � W � o � = �i' y � z m O c c1i �, j� #�; �? n �" C -� c �p 00 w c co v .�i ^ c � = (n U1 'A � �.D. Za D O � m ta 7�_D � O O o o °o � °o °o � "�� Z 0 G 7 0 (i l N �q � ,.�? � O m c N tCi� � _°o O � � m ?'°"'",�a+°°k � C vDO � °o o� a � c .. � Z Z m � � g z p v � Z O � � Op � � �' cn vC � 'n 111 � � � � � $ o � � 37 0 o Z � c > m Z m O o 0 0 � � z m m n ? � n � � � Z ;9 a oc � o � Z m G) � r- m J ;o c�» O � m � � � � � Z � �� = � mn � c O ° ° � om c�on' � � p !T� -c{ = O o °o °o � � Z � b -�i p a � � � ' _ � � Z ;G rn m � �,. D � � � NCZ � �e? Z m +n � ... Z � 2 r.?n L� � p � � � � ' a o D o 0 0 � _� v � a � n � o �Z- ►�t� � � n p � = m < � m m m � m = O 1 � rn — m a aac � aDm � —�I � � z < Z —� n� � "'C Z m � azmOO `��° D m f!1 w � w �a c�n �. �oVO co ! ,..f % _ ? z+ � � � � � � -�ima Z O � . a � vmp � vap � � N � m D ? � a � z � � �� Z z (� v � � � Z � Cc��°opZDc�°�c � m � � � � � � m� m y � ,� � ' � O -1 � � �t C � = p "� � � '� f/) -i � T 1T1 m � �7�o � oOO � y � � O �j Q Z � a � � � 77p � ^Z *� � � NDr � amn � O a D = O c � "� •- Z 0o m . o � rv . �„ z m � � 'zzv � � v z n � 'll r "' Z � � � o � m cnm � r�r � � om I� O m � c� � o o t� � z � ? c� m � n � m � c�i� Z � m � � 3 n 2 r ; ��i�/.51� NPP RECOMMENDED RATINGS 16TH CYCLE Attachment A Funding Selection District Project Request Criteria DC CIB PC PED TOTAL .;:<.;:.>:.:<.::<:.::.:::.;:::,:«:»;:.::::.;::.:::>::>::;:;>;::::.::.::.>:.>::>:.»:>:>:>::::::>::»�:>;:: ::.:<.::::::::::::::::::::::::.:............::.... .............. ::��::::>:;�:�`::::`::::::::>::»�:>::;:::�:»:s>:::::::<::>:<::>:��>�::.:>:>::;.;<:::;:;>::>:,.: ::.�:.:::::::: . ::.�:::.,.:.;.:: ...................... ... :::>.;: �:::::�::::<:>•::>:::::<::<;::::>::>:::>:;.;:::;.;>;»::::>::>:::s:>�:::::::>::»:::::>:>:.;;:::: :.�..::::::.., ..s:.:::.......:..... �•��::::::::;:<:::>:::::::::.>.:::::<:>:«::;::.>:>.:::>::>::::;::.::<:>: 5:>.<:>:::<:::>::»:;::::::::::>::::::>:::::::>:<;::::>::;:::::::::>::::;:: .::.�:::::::::. .... ::::::::::.::::;>:,.:;.:r::>:;::<.,;:.:;,.� .....�::::::.::. ... ...:� .;:. :. ..:.::� ;<� : ,. ;�:�?��:'::�Ul`t�'.�...::.:::f?T€�. . 6 Lyton Park Revitalization 100,000 27 3 3 2.4 3 38 4: 2 Western Hazel Park Rehabilitation Area 180,000 26 3 3 2.4 3 37 4:. * Living at Home/Block Nurse Program 6,12,15 Educational Modules 16,000 26 2.7 2.7 2.8 2 36 2' 9 W 7th/Fort Rd Homeowner Energy Retrofit 90,956 24 3 0 1.4 2 30 4 8 Liberty Plaza Playground I 16,233 Inelig 8 Liberty Plaza Playground II 6,467 Inelig 8 Liberty Plaza Storm Doors 6,703 Inelig 8 Summer Youth Music Scholarship Prog. 10,000 Inelig 12 Executive Director- Part-time, Phase I 9,250 Inelig North St Anthony Park Commercial 12 Crime Watch Phase II 9,000 Inelig �:»::::::::;::::::.:;�: ��::}::>ri'i ,.:.;> +i�ti•iti`: ................... .........r.w:.; :.: :iiiiiii:C. ni•i4:Jii: ti::�f.•Y?L::�iiii.'•ii}:•;•�ii ��j\�ii`:•::iii: .;.�i:;:�i;::ri;i�:.::?>,.:ia,•;':i;:;`:;:;:;;i.i: ..,� �;•j;':�:�i:;':�•i:•:... .t:l.••:.v:./.�.'..: $i4•~:�.'•:�i:<L�i:•:•r:::::iiii}ii �:{i�ti i�:�i:�i�:�:'{v:�'ii:ti?•:{•i'�i::•ii:•:?•:?•:;i:•i:•i:�Cii•.�: ^ii:{:i4i ........ .;,.. n:5:::::n........f,..:::•:i:•:{:}�:'i:�;��:x��.;;�:.,::::}::::w:::. •i::i�:::::.:r. :.i�i:•i'r'4:�'4ii:4ii}i}i+}iiii:{.��{:n:iiiiti•'.•:•$:'ti4ii}:-:•i:• �ii�::�:c•`:�i:;`�::•`:�::-i::�f:;;:::::<;::�:;:':�:i::;:::rS�:�:::'�:�::�:�:: :.�:::.:::..::,,,:......:::......:.: . :: �IB::;�E�fICf�`;�C�1J��...�.�ac.....;:.:.:.::::.;:.:.:.:.:.:.;:.::.::;«.:.::.::::<.;�<.:.:::.:.::::.;:..;:...::. . 4 E 7th Economic Revitalization Phase II 81,000 28 3 3 2.7 3 39 7 4 Swede Hollow Lantem Lighting 28,500 24 2 1 0.5 1 28 5 Harriet Bishop/Treasure Island 15 Community- Built Playground 32,000 22 3 0 1 2 28: 4 Historic Dayton's Bluff Signs 350 15 1 0 0 0 >;'::;;i:1'_6<`; 7,8�11 ';:::::<;:;;;;; 12,13 University Avenue Streetscape 3,600 13 0.8 0 0.4 1 ;;:i::;:1;5.t2;;: .... ............ .... ..... .... �:.::,:>::,«:::::::>:;::<;::<:»::>:::::>:::::>:;:<::>:<:;:<:::::>:<:::::>�:::> .>::>;::>::: .... ;:::<:::::�::::>::>:«::>::,<:::....... . �`'��J:`:::«::':<::;`::::;::�:;::;;:;��:`:::'::::�;;::{:::::>`:>;::::::;:::�:�:'::::;<�:: � < .::::::::::::.:..,.. ..:.......:.::.<._:::,:.;•.�:::<:::::::::............... .>:.:.;;:<.:.:>.;:....>,.r:;;<...>:::;::>:.::>:::;:a:;;;..•::x:::;::>::ss::;::: HR�4�und�c�.:Prol�:.::::::::::::::.�::::::::::::::::..:::.::.::...::....::. ` : 6 North End Industrial Development 150,000 29 2 3 2.2 2 <<;3�;. __. 7,8 University UNITED Commercial Revitalization 75,000 25.5 2.4 0 1.8 2 :::<;31..7, s:�° .. :.::>::�>:�:;.>::'y:; .. ...... ::::::::::::. .�;'.. i:.�:; . t� :i�t:. :ita`.:;::�t?:;:;i:`:r:S3'�:`?:k:t�:::;::::;:f::4't;::::5:;<i:'::<:'::r>'�>:'i::::fy:?::;�:�•'t't::•`::;:;i:`:3t:::+:i;'•;i:':::i :'<::::::::':j:::i:;:::::: .;n:;:::v:::::;:i[^.::ii:::.:::>:..: ..::::.:t::.:...:. :.:: .:.....+.:::..:..:..y:::r;::::::::::i:::::;r::::::.ri::i:.:;:i:t: '>:i::iiiiiii':::i:�1�i�t� �� <::>�T�. . :�5.:::::>::>::�:::::<.::::>::::>:;<:<::>:::::::;>::::>::::: <�>::::>�:�:;; �:::»:. �O?i1��1�:::�.U:[1C�.::;:.::::.::::::::::�.:::.::::::.:::.:....................... ;>::>;,;:<:;:.;:;: 3 Concord/Congress/Wabasha Bus. Reinvest. 211,735 27 3 1 2.4 2 ;;:::::::35;4'> 12 University/Raymond Gateway Project 670,000 Inelig 4+� " Human Service Project- 10�/0 of tota/funds may be used for H.S. Projects '<� M:/JMT/NPPRATE3 RESOURCE ALLOCATION COMMITTEE RATINGS JULY 10, 1991 __ __ _ _ _ __ __ _ _-3;"�:.tY ' _ _. _ �,�,�.