Loading...
91-1509 ORfG�!l�1Al . �OUt1�+�.1 F�le : w � ° � Green Sheet f RESOLUTION CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINN�SOTA - - � � . �,, , Yr�sented By ��Z-i � ���, _r ' � � R�t�rrod To '�Committee: Dato RESOLUTION ADOP'TING 1991 COMMU1vITY �tESOURCES PROGRAM GUIDELINES WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota in 1989 created the Communityr Resources Progam to support efforts in Saint Paul, Minneapolis and Duluth which are desXgned to (1) increase community safety and reduce crime, (2) enhance family''stability including`sc�ool readiness, (3) provide opportunities for residents to become self supporting, and (4).bui�.=the . capacity of neighborhood-based organizations to create cohesiveness �nd stability in t� communities; and �. -` � �� r,-� WHEREAS, $6.23 million was appropriated to the program in 1991 fo'� the 1991-92 bi , approximately $2.1 million of which will be available to Saint Paul; and', , ``� WHEREAS, the law requires that an advisory committee with wide co�munity representatio� be established or designated to assist the City in developing and implem�enting the program•�£ . � ��: , �� � WHEREAS the Plannin Commission was desi ated as that committe� in 1989; and �'� '�� , g gn ��n,4��,�f�, *4 Y+` �.11 WHEREAS, with community input, the Commission has developed and i�ecomme�ded the * ,f , attached Community Resources Program Guidelines; ', S , NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council adopts th� attached 1991 Community Resources Program Guidelines and directs the Department of'',Planning and Economic Development to distribute them widely to neighborhood and co�munity based organizations, encouraging their participation in the program. � Yeas Navs Abaent Requested by Departmi�nt of: � o„ � Planning co m' development e � e � � ue � -...-, i son � By' �, � d Adopted by Council: Date AUG 1 5 1991 Form Approved by Cit ' ttorney \�,F �, � Adoption ertified by Council Secretary gy. � � :�<.. i � BY� A roved b Ma or for Submission to `��'";�� PP Y Y �w Approved by Hayor: Date AUG �. 9 1991 Council ' � ' ;, 1 Sy: By� P�II�EO AUG 2 4'91 � � �o � � r� ' ''�'�' ��?" -. DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATEINITIATED GREEN SHE T PED: Planning and Design 7/26/91 i�� _ �3�89 CONTACTPERSONBPHONE Nancy Homans-3372 EPARTMENTDIRECTO �CITYCOUNCIL INITtAUDATE Ann Co eland-3218 ASS1°" �CITYATTORNEY �CITYCLERK NUMBER FOR MUST BE ON COUNCIL AGENDA BY(DATE) ROUTING �BUDGET DIRECTOR �FIN.&MOT.SERVICES DIR. ORDER �p�qYOR(ORASSISTANn � Da11 Cornejo TOTAL#OF SIGNATURE PAGES 2 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATU E) ACTION REQUESTED: Please siqn letter and draft resolution transmit inq Community Resources Program (CQP) Guidelines to the City Council. � RECOMMENDATIONS:Approve(A)or Reject(R) PERSONAL 3ERVICE CONTRACTS MUS ANSWER THE FOLLO I A �.'s✓,� _ PLANNING COMMI3SION _ CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION 1. Has this personlfirm ever worked under contract fOr this dep8rtme�t?� _CIB COMMITTEE _ YES NO ��� � � }� �STAFF _ 2• Has this person/firm ever been a city em loyee? �,,. 7J9� YES NO _ DIS7RICT COURT _ 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not ormally possesse�Tir►�� � SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCiI OBJECTIVET YES NO r'�`, �������`'�a� / Explein all yes answers on ssparote shee and attach to grsen ah���. � d::.. Neighborhoods �k� ,f- � -{` INITIATING PROBLEM,ISSUE,OPPORTUNITY(Who,What,When,Where,Why): �'y� �`� _;�'. Program guidelines are necessary to govern the allo ation of $2.1 mi�.l"ion in Community Resources Program funds from the State of Minnesota. �CE�V�p _ AUG 01 � �� ��� 19g� , � , ;��- ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: ���� i Community based organizations will have access to St te funds fo human service programs. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: None apparent. REC IVED AUG 0 1g91 CITY C ERK DISADVANTAQES IF NOT APPROVED: The funds cannot be allocated and will remain with the S ate. • '���' o�ar��i! ���earch CentEr �:� AUG 0 2 1991 � TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION s None COST/REVENUE BUDGETEO(CIRCL ONE) YES NO FUNDING SOURCE ACTIVITY NUMBER FINANCIAL INFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) !Y��f �.3 v v $ $ �:� $ ;�� . _ . r����� � . ,�. �.#, , � NOTE: COM�'LETE DIRECTIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THE GREEN SHEET INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL AVAILABLE IN THE PURCHASING OFFICE(PHONE NO.298-4225). ROUTING ORDER: Below are correct routings for the five most frequent types of documents: CONTRACTS(assumes authorized budget exists) COUNCIL RESOLUTION (Amend Budgets/Accept.Grants) 1. Outside Agency 1. Department Director 2. Department Director 2. City Attorney 3. City Attorney 3. Budget Director 4. lulayor(for contracts over$15,000) 4. Mayor/Assistant 5. Human Rights(for contracts over$50,000) 5. City Council 6. Finance and Manager.�ent Services Director 6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services 7. Finance Accounting �, ADMINISTRATIVE f)RpERS(Budget Revision) COUNCIL RESOLUTION(all others,and Ordinances) 1. Activity:Mano,geTa,��° 1. Department Director 2. Departmerl#A�So�nt 2. Ciry Attomey 3. Departmer� 3. Mayor Assistant 4. Bud�e,t � ,4� ^ 4. City Council 5. Clty'�ler�it�.',Y� �:, 6. Chiet'. nce and Management Services .;i:, �c: ADMU�1$"F ��� � RS(all others) 1. De� or 2. Gi�l1 3. Finartcp�t�lanagement Services Director • 4. City Cterk TO�AL NUMB��OF SIGNATUFIE PAOES Indicate tkts�!pages on which signatures are required and paperclip or flag each o�, ,�es. ;�I� ACTIi�i'•` �STED �` Descri�' `the projecUrequest seeks to accomplish in either chronologi- cat o er of importance,whichever is most appropriate for the issue. � t write complete sentences. Begin each item ih your list with a verb: .�. RECOMMENDATIONS Complete if the issue in question has been presented before any body,public or private. SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? � Indicate which Council objective(s)your projecVrequest supports by listing the key word(s) (HOUSING, RECREATION,NEIGHBORHOODS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, . BUDGET,SEWER SEPARATION). (SEE COMPLETE LIST IN INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL.) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS: This information will be used to determine the city's liabiliry for workers compensation claims,taxes and proper civil service hiring rules. INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE,OPPORTUNITY Explairi the situation or conditions that created a need for your project or re�uest. /tDW1NTi0.GES IF APPROVED � .=tndlc�Ql►whether this is simply an annual budget procedure required by law/ ` � ,ti',��I'�dF•oF whether there are specific ways in which the Ciry of Saint Paul ���;;`;�A�j'its citizens will benefit from this projecUaction. k y DI�RVANTAGES IF APPROVED • Whsinegative effects or major changes to existing or past processes might :`'"',:,�'Mis proJecVrequest produce if it is passed(e.g.,traffic delays, noise, ,�;�;.�tax increases or assessments)?To Whom?When?For how long? rt - ': '.'QISA[�1/ANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED ; What'wiil be the negative consequences if the promised action is not �,approaed?Inability to deliver service?Continued high traffic, noise, :;,�ient rate? Loss of revenue? i311�ANCIAL IMPACT A�though yo�must tailor the information you provide here to the issue you ' are addressing,in general you must answer two questions:How much is it going to cost?Who is going to pay? I I , � ���� . ` CITY OF SAINT PA�7L G11Y OP 0"0� ',°� OFFICE OF THE MAYOR'�, � uwwu ,F r untln ^ m �ss 347 CITY HALL � JAMES SCHEIBEL BAINT PAUL, MINNE80TA 55102 I MAYOR (612) 298-4323 July 26, 1991 President William Wilson � ��� and Members of the City Council 7th floor r,.: City Hall �:', Saint Paul, MN 55102 ;� Dear President Wilson and Members of the City Council: � �} , X ;vi'.,:,,: As you know the Legislature approved -- and the Governor signed -- � biennial appropr � � $6.23 million for the Community Resources Program to be divided a�long Saint Paul, ''�.`r Minneapolis and Duluth. We expect that Saint Paul's share of the tot�l will be about $2.1'� �w :�, million to be divided between the two years. While each year's alloca�ion will amount to 1 ;��,� than one half of what the City received in 1989, the program still repr �sents a great opport and I think we can all look forward to the process of putting together strong program for Paul. �'�' / t,i't� The Community Resources Program is designed to support projects in �ligible areas of the city � a'�.'"',:.:: which (1) increase community safety and reduce crime, (2) enhance fa�ily stability, including �� school readiness, (3) provide opportunities for residents to become self�upporting, and (4) build � the capacity of neighborhood based organizations to create cohesiveness',and stability in their communities. ���:� �I : .��� Attached are a set of program guidelines recommended by the Planning �ommission. They are' ' � substantially the same as those which governed the 1989 allocation proce�s. I recommend their ' adoption. The changes, highlighted in the te�rt, are the following: 'i �I 1. Credit to existing projects. To the extent that previously f nded projects are moving toward their established goals, they will be given "e ra credit" in the ..�`�:;� � � selection process. � , ��i . r��`��,,, � �°' . �,���� �� 2. 1�vo Year Allocations. Unlike in 1989 when the Legislature l,appropriated fundmg ,: i.., � for a single year, the 1991 appropriation is approximately $ .1 million to be "' � ,.•>�� divided between two years. The Planning Commission reco mends that the �`t'-� ' «�` program be established as a two year program, but with ann al budgets and " ;_ `;`; contracts. The Commission and City Council, therefore, wo ld go through only a :'> '` '' very short process before the second year to adopt the budg d t which was . = `a tentatively adopted in the first year and reallocate funds frorri projects which did not make sufficient progress toward their stated goals during '�he first year. The 1 �, Commission and the Council will have access to project evalu�tions from the first �" � year to assist them in determining whether or not second yeat funding should , indeed be allocated. ' - �� Printed on Recycled Paper as s , , . � �^�'1 � � President William Wilson �I July 26, 1991 Page two 3. Uniform Funding Year. A policy is added to encouxage projects to be implemented at approximately the same time and assume the same funding year. The guidelines are sufficiently flelcible to allow for sqme differences between projects, but provide the opportunity for the Council�l to remove funding from a project which is not underway within a reasonable p�riod of time. �. 4. Explicit Expectations. In a number of instances, lan�uage is added to�itqaike an ��,: existing policy or e�ectation more clear. i In particul�r, policies have revised to clarify that a percentage of the CRP funds!,may be used to �� "" `' income housing needs -- through capital projects or human service pro ' x`w throughout the city, whether or not the low i�ome h¢using is assisted h�'� g. ti Since a number of strong programs were started with 1989 funds anc� may be among tho�e�''`. recommended for funding this year, we would like to make the funds',available as quickly as possible so that services to clients will not have to be interrupted. Aixything the Council can do to put the guidelines in place by mid August would be very helpful. �I ��-'u;';�;,.. .; :., Please feel free to call Ann Copeland or Nancy Homans of the PED �taff if you have any � " questions about the program or the proposed guidelines. ��� { �' 7 j� . Sincerely, ��'"` Y James Scheibel Mayor I . � �� � ,. , �I � � f�� I + ,� ' l� city of saint paul '' annin commission resolution � P� g � file number � date July 26, 1991 ' I'� . RESOLUTTON RECOMMENDING 1991 COMMUN!ITY RESOURCES PROGRAM GUIDELINES �� WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota in 1989 created the Com�nunity Resources �'rogram to support efforts in Saint Paul, Minneapolis and Duluth whicin were designed t� ;:: (1) increase community safety and reduce crime, (2) enhance �amily stability inci �ng school readiness, (3) provide opportunities for residents to be�,ome self supporti �and (4) build the capacity of neighborhood-based organizations to �reate cohesivene��nd stability in their communities; and � WHEREAS, $6.23 million was appropriated to the program inll�1991 for the 1991-92 ; biennium, approximately $2.1 million of which will be available to Saint Paul; and .,,� t �i � WHEREAS, the law requires that an advisory committee with �vide community � � :�� representation be established or designated to assist the City inl developing and ������ implementing the program; �� ��� WHEREAS, the Plarming Commission was, in 1989, designated�i to fulfill that role; and � WHEREAS, with the assistance of a neighborhood based task �iorce, the Commission, in : 1989, went through an extensive process to develop program gu�delines which were adopted by the City Council; and WHEREAS, the Resource Allocation Committee on June 20,19'�1 held an o en hearin P g on the adequacy of the guidelines adopted by the eity in 1989; �nd WHEREAS, minor revisions to the 1989 guidelines are recomml�nded to: (1) clarify policies and expectations, (2) reflect the change from a one year'� to a two year allocation; : and (3) address issues relative to refunding existing CRP project�; � moved b Hirte � v SeCOt'1C�C� �/ Geisser �� in favor Una- � �� a�ll'1St- � �, ,�'�..-.,��.�;��y NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends the attached 1991 Community Resources Program Guidelines to the Mayor and City Council for their approval; and BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that the Planning Commission suggests an expeditious consideration of the guidelines so that the application and allocation process can be underway as soon as possible. , � , � r. ,;�: . . ����� . �' � _ i i � - ��' 1�`A^. COMMUlvITY RESOURCES PI�OGRAM �: ' - City Council Review Draft - i � , � ;;:;; � , ;'���� i . 1991 Program Guidelines li City of Saint Paul Recommended by the Planning Commiss�on July 26, 1991 i � I � � � � I� �� , � ���:����' • ,i, r`� ' � � ,�1��-�-� I. PROGRAM DESCRIPTIO A. PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES Saint Paul's Community Resources Program (CRP) is a par nership effort of core neighborhoods, the City of Saint Paul and,the State of Min esota, along with a variety of participating public, non-profit and private agencies. Funde through a state legislative appropriation, the program aims to ensure a strong and im roving future for those neighborhoods in the city most threatened by social proble s, lack of economic opportunity and physical deterioration. Specifically, the legi lation lists four objectives: * Increasing community safety and reducing cr�"Irr�e; I * Enhancing family stability, including school readiness; ::r;, ,. * Providing opportunities for residents to become self-supporting; aixi * Building the capacity of neighborhood based prganizations to create cohesiveness and stability in their communiti�s. Relying heavily on neighborhood initiative and neighborhoo /agency partnerships for its success, the Community Resources Program stresses colla ation among agencies, �' coordination of activities and concentration of resources. G'ven the limited amount oP`•: funding relative to the needs of Saint Paul neighborhoods, i is the intention of the City�,_ � that funds will be concentrated in a few comprehensive pro ams to achieve significant impact in those areas. Overall administration of the Community Resources Progra will be the responsibility of the Department of Planning and Economic Development (P D). In most cases, however, PED will enter into purchase of services contracts , or program implementation with neighborhood-based non-pro�t organizations. B. FUNDING '' 1. Approximately $2.1 million was allocated for the 199,7-92 biennium. The funds are to be used to address the four legislative prioriti�s in a Targeted Neighborhood as defined in the law. (See Appendix�A for definitions.) 2. The City may use up to twenty percent of the total ocation to address low income housing and economic development needs, u to forty percent of which may be used to address low income housing needs o tside the Targeted Neighborhood. 1 I ���� � � .. .. . ::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::: ::::.:...::::::.::::. v:::.:.:.�::::.::::.:::..:...:�:.:..:::..:.: .:..::.:.::.:.:�::.:::.::..:�::..::::tv.::.:.:.:.. ::.. ::. .: ::::.:.::.::r:.:::::...:::.:..:.:.:.:.:..: ;:.�:.:;:::::.:.::..:.: :..:. .::...::::..:....::... .:...:::::::::.:.:.:... ::..:::: ..: .:..: ..: . ..:.: .. 3. ��:;: .�r�����.���>::�>:�:.. . ��s�r�-��.����;s��� ���:;�����..'t>�� :::::::::::.:. .::::..�::::::::::.�:..:........,....:.::::::::;�!�:::::::::.::::::::.:::::<.::.....................:.:.,,,,..................,...............:..................:....:.:....,......... ...:.::::::::�.�:,::::..:::::::.:,«.:::.:::.::::.,...... . ..:.....:.............. {.:.:::::::.::::::.:::::::..::.:::... :..�.x.;:<.;;:: .. :::::::::..:.,::.�:>�:..:::::..:v.::..:.�:..:::::..::::::.. ;;.:.:.;;:::�;;:;;;:<.:.::.:>:..::.;::::;.;::.:.��:>:::<:»�. .�:�:::::.<:.::. <:,....; ...... :.. ...:..: .. �:�.::.>:.. .::.::::,, � �: : nu�t ;::�`v,c��s��o-n::�v:�::::r�rn�a.end::��::>a::;�:�!;1:<ax�d:>a>:f���t�i�e:<���:::�I�:a�t�cxr ��a� .. .::.�:::::..;>:;::�::>:::.::.::.>;::.;�.>;;:.:::::.>:.::.;::.::::.;;:.;:><:.::.:::;;<>;;>:.,,.r..::::::::::...............:.........,... ::.:�:<.;>:.v.:�;.:::<.;:::.::.>::.;::.,:;<N.::.:::::::.:::.:>;:.:;:.v.K:.:.>:.:�.:�::<.::::::.. �. .,...,...::..::.::::::.�:,....:...............,.......:.:..... ..:::,:::....::.:.: ::...:;.>:.:;:.;:>�;:::;::::�::>:.>::>::�.::::..:.::>...: �:..t:�.:.�:;.;:,>;:. :<.::.:�:::,..,.. .. ...:.......,:::::::... .,::::::<:.�:. .�.�:.;�..:..:;.::..:... ...►..,:.:,..:. :<:�: �:��:>x�>::��:;��::��;���::�� ...: :::.. . :. ...::��ib�:::��:� ���i��:::,�''�'�� !�5:::��:.�;:;�e.:#�.......... ��::::��:� :��::::.......:.....::... . .::.�:::::::.....:.3�.......:..................::::::::::._:::.,..:::::::.:::.;�::.�::.:.:;�;.::<.;:.;:::::.::.::.;; ........................� ... . �?`:.>;....:.................,.:.:.:::...:..............................:.:::.:: ...... , .;>�.;:::.;f.::..:::::.;.:::. .::.:...::.:.:.::::::.:.�::::.;::.;:.:,::.:::;:<:::::.::>:::>�::;:::::.;:.;:.;::�:-:;:.::;.�:...::..::..:.:::.. ..:.:.:::.:::::::.:::::: ...:.�:L+.•{:.:::::ti:::..}::i:v i.T......:.v....:..}..i':.N::::.:::n::::tiNyi}:4:?ri:.::i::.: .�;S.i;.}i:':6iii:::4'.:i.:iiii}::r'.....?::.:�T.:.:}::::{:Y:x���}v.:n.:...::....�.�.:....v....... t��::>�e�:t::::�xf::arn�: enc�€.::..��:;:e�ni::��<:::. �.:c��€r��:tx�:::�;���ce:;�x�;vn�.�r:;�atvr� :.<....:::.::;<.;:.;;;:.::�:.::::>,:.!�.:.::.:.::�.::.::::...: .............................................:...,:::::.>::::::.:. :::.�::::............ . :.,.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.�:::::: ::.�:.::�>::::::;:;:;::;.>:;:>�::<�>:>�:>.::.<::.:.::::::::��:>:::::,.::::::>::>;��:;::::::::::::;.:;::::.;;:... ....�::................. n..:::._.... :::::::{:�:�. { .... ����..[.�}:���:::�..#��:::�>:��x��r��::,��;;.�<`��:���':;<::::: :i.�Ti:•i:•:::::::::::::�:v<•:}:�vvvw:::::•:..vnv4:nv:.....................w.:.r...M1�.•.�.v.�:..::::::::::::: ........,..;.... ... ...:::::�u:ix�:iii:�:::.::.:::::�� , �:::•�i,:•:.................:.:::::::..::::........f.:f•:�r;.:wx:ci:'�:::.::.-r^'f•iiS:�•'.:i"" �>::::.::;..:�:�:::::r::'. ...::..... .:. .:t;::.:..}.:;...;l;:::`;•:': ::�'.,:. :.:•:.:>::•.�:::::.:. ....::::::... . ..:...... ... ::<:.....:::::;���i� <::�.���s��i�«�It�..�. ..��...�.��`::��.�.:::: ��cc��::::::��:�:��:�}?������i�::;� �:�. :.:�.::....: .:.,...:::::.:..:!�.::.::.;: ...�:.�. �:.......�... ....:::,:::.::::::.;..;....... ..,.:,.:::::...�.�...,:::::,.:. ...��.... .:..:.. ::.: ...... ...�;:��>.��.::.>.....:... .:�,�r.:,,,.:..:.::.;;:<.:;r� .::>w.;.::;:::<;:<;.:>�,,.. �:}:x�:::.�.w::\4M1F<:}{n}iiiiiY::•:'r'��.iY:::n•:?w::::i.v'r:ii:i:iF:.i. .. r.w::. �ry.w:::�.•iii}ii:�i::;i:iiiiY•i:v:�:i�:•i:..v.n. ' .:.v: . ......, :v...:X:..:. ..�}.�..vvn..... ..... .........<..:::���:d:::::.,....:.<..`:::��i <;��:>d��rn��:;�i�t�:�`:ii�::��:>��r�::>..,:�� ���:::�. �t� .::.�:.:;;:.::.::.;;:.>;:;:.;;:.::.:;:.:;::.;:.::.:: ::::....�.:.:.:::::.:....:�:.:::::....,.:;....�:................... ....::::::.;:::::::.<:.>:.. �..:,... .........,.:...:. �... ..........,.r.,,..........:.,....::::.::.::.::,:::.::>:.;;:..::.:� .::::.n.x.. . ....................:....:.:......... �.:<:.:{�:<:>::;.:>�.;:.<:��•<:::;»: . .....:........:::: ..:.N::.:::.:.:..:..,:r:.:::::... ..............,......:.....:::::: :::{.::.<.:.:.r:•r.•>::.::::.�::::.:::::.: .. ......« ...t..,.:.:,.:.:,.;::<.:,.;r;:�<:v::;:>..>:::;s::<:>.�;;::;::::::;::�: .. . �:::::...::.:..:......:....:��:�..: �:'�t�`<��:�:��::' '��:::::::::�`������:�:�a.�y:��#`:::...:�....:� �::���:�::::.:±� :�::.:.. .:..�.:::::::::::::::.�::::.::::.::.::.:. .._.:�.:::�.::::::: r,..,...:.A.::..n::::::.,.:....:...::..:::�.'.!�:::�..:.::.::. .>.. .:....:,..:::.::...:. :.:...:::::::..........:::::: ..> . ..,.. ::<:.:: x•::c..:. ::..�.::.;:::::, .......,. .......,.....:. .....r-:• �����>..:,.... .•..•..........................,.,.�...... .........._:::.�. x:::..,:.,..< .::.:......::•:.::.:.�. .:;:�.;:::..,.:.,.:.�:. +?�.>::::..::::«..,.....:...: ::.:::::•>:.::.;:.:;.::.:.>:.::.::.;>:.::.:::.: ,?.. ,.... .:•:�:;;;.:;=;::;:.;:...:--.:.,,.;�::::::•:::::::::::�s:t:?:.::;:,.:::>::;:. �n: :.<::�:` ����s:::��r<:#h�::�:��n`�:::��ca���:::����::��o�.c�:::;��:::��:�� :;�:n� ::�..: . ::�:.:. .::::::: :.::..::::..::....::::..............::.:�.::::::::::..:...... ..::� ... .. v�,s > ..> . > > . .. . �,..,.,....�'.:::.::.:,:::::<.>::.::.:::....::::::..�...,:::.:>:.:::.::.�.:.:>::..«:,,::,:.::.r«:.:.::.�:.::<.>:«::;.:.:..............,......,.........:. ..................... ....... �;.;::..,.::fi : ..... ..... ................................................... . .......... ... .. . .. .. .... <g���:� �:::........... ... 4. There are no maximum or minimum amounts which applicants may request. However, CRP projects should be of suf�cient scale to allow for confidence that _ a significant and lasting impact can be realized over a short period of time. They should provide a comprehensive approach to human service needs and should draw on additional resources and supporting programs to ensure that related problems or opportunities are addressed. Experience has demonstrated that projects best suited for CRP funding are those which require at least $20,000. v.;.....:.,,�:::,.,.<:..;:�.�.:.>: ,.;,;:.,�;x..��:;>:::.;�....>:u:>::..�.:-�::..:;..v.,,,,.<..:..:..::..::::..:;�..;,.:......,...:...,.,.....,,.,,;>:::.::::...,.:�::.>:�:>;;.;>.>..;.:. :.:. :. .::..�:.:.:.:..: .. :. .:. : ..::.. v.. 5. � �:::��:>�?�:€�:::�:����r:�?i�:����':::��::::�i�:���'�::'��ita�:::�:::�::::��c�::`:': �::::a:����::�.. :>:�.:.::...::::::.... . ..:?� .. ::.......:.::...�.:. .: ::............................ .... ...�.:�.:.::::::::::::::::.::::::::.:.::::::::.:..:�::.::.::�:-...:.::::.::.::.::.:::.......:.::.......:....... K:...,...:::...>......,.... . .::::::::...:::::::.:........:.�......... �.:::::. .:..:::: ....... .::::.. .....................v.�.v�......... .:;: :.:::::..,,.,��,>.:: .::.:::.::<:::;:..::. .�r<r�>.. :.:;.K:s:z<:>:.s:.:; ........ . ....... .... �� a# :>:�a1i�:�ii��;::��;`�:::'�:�::>�����r��fs: ���.:;�'nr::��::::.::: � :d.in.....�.:...:.... :.:;P.::.>::�.;;::;:.;;:;: ..... . . . ..: ,:::::.:.. ..................... ,.....:.,:;.F:i..::«:.:,;>:w•.•::y.:.. ..f.:.:7.:::<..nc«;Gx.::.:.:.:..;.;:};k:`:::.�.�':s;::;:;'x:s»swa::.::::?.x«.:.:..:.:........................ 6. All applicants should be aware that program funds are available only for two years. Projects should, therefore, be designed to be completed within that time period or continued with alternative funding. C. ELIGIBLE AREAS 1. Core Area: The following census tracts in Saint Paul meet the eligibility criteria established for all CRP activities: 313, 314, 315, 325, 326, 327, 328, 329, 330, 331, 336, 338, 339, 340, 353, 359, 360, 361. The location is shown on the map on page four. The collection of these census tracts is known as the Core Area. It is expected that most program activity will be concentrated within the Core Area. 2. Discretionary Area: Under provisions of the legislation establishing CRP, areas outside these census tracts but within a half-mile (2,640 feet or about four blocks) of their boundaries are also eligible for CRP activity. T'his area is referred to in these guidelines as the Discretionary Area. Projects within the Discretionary Area may be funded if they convincingly address particularly serious needs. Discretionary Area program activity that completes or supports Core Area activity is, of course, appropriate. 3. Excluded Areas: The development and redevelopment areas established in the river conidor by the Riverfront Pre-Development Plan and the Capitol Mall Area, though within the Core Area, are identi�ied as inappropriate for CRP activity. The Capitol Mall Area is bounded by University Avenue on the north, Robert Street on the east, Interstate 94 on the south and Rice Street on the west. 2 . , :L� :''�� 4. Exceptions: The legislation provided for three exce tions to the requirement that CRP funds be used only for residents of the Core a�d Discretionary Areas. The three exceptions are as follows: a. Assisted Housine. T'he legislation allows ass ted housing in Saint Paul to receive CRP funds, even if it is outside of th�Core and Discretionary. Areas. Assisted housing is defined as housin units that are affordable to low income households, and are occupied or�eld for occupancy for low income occupants as a requirement of federa�l, state or local laws, regulations, or contract requirements. Assisted housing consists of: * All housing units owned and administered by public agencies, including the Public Housing Agency �nd all units receiving Section 8 federal rent subsidies; * Emergency shelters and transitional �ousing; * Housing owned by a neighborhood re�al estate trust; and * Housing units financed and meeting he requirements of the federal low income housing tax credi�program, and all other units that provide assisted housing meetin income and rent restrictions that do not exceed the tax credit pro�ram requirements. � A project area meeting the above requiremehts is eligible to use CRP funds if at least 51 percent of the units in th� project area are occupied or held for occupancy for low income occupants. _ b. Low Income Housin�. As discussed on page one, a limited amount of � CRP money may be used to address low inc�me housing needs outside the Targeted Neighborhood. Applicants will be required to provide evidence that households to be served are lo�v income households. c. Continuance of Services. Recipients of C� services continue to be eligible for services if they move from a resi�ience in the Core or Discretionary Area to another part of Saint Paul. However, such eligibility is lost if they move to a residence putside of Saint Paul. D. GEOGRAPHIC TARGETING CRP funds should address the most serious social deficien�ies and obstacles to sound neighborhoods in the eligible areas, so far as this can be done within the constraints of time, money and needs for measurable results. City and n ighborhood,experience with improvement efforts have demonstrated the value of geogr phic concentration. Proposals should identify their geographic boundaries and here should be a clear relationship between the needs of the area and the progra i proposed. 3 �� ����� , " (new map to be produced 4 . . ��,�� E. ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES 1. Eligible projects are those human service initiatives�vhich address the four legislative objectives: (a) increasing community safe$y and reducing crime, (b) enhancing family stability, including school readines , (c) providing opportunities for residents to become self supporting, and (d) bui�ding the capacity of neighborhood based organization to create cohesivehess and stability in their communities. 2. In accordance with the CRP legislation, the City will accept proposals for projects which address low income housing and economic de elopment needs throughout the city (i.e. both within and outside the Targeted l�eighborhood and without regard to whether the housing is assisted housing). These projects may eonsist of physical development or of services for a low incom population. The amount of CRP funding provided for such projects shall not ex eed twenty percent of the total allocation, only forty percent of which may be �pend outside the Targeted Neighborhood. 3. Low income households should benefit from servic�provided through CRP projects. The definition of low income is the feder definition: households with income at or below 80 percent of the Twin Cities SMSA median income adjusted for family size. 4. Administrative Costs: Administrative costs will be egotiated with PED staff, based on a detailed project administrative budget a�d the amount of work being done by the neighborhood group, and/or non-prof�t and private agencies involved in the project. Administrative costs may include ov rhead costs such as office space rental. Proposals should not include a fee fo�project evaluation because a coordinated evaluation of CRP projects shall be performed by a single evaluator. Normally, administrative costs should not exceed 10� percent of the total project cost. � :::.,,.:.,�.:::�.::.: <:�:.::.;:.>;:.;:>;>..;;:.:.:..;:.::.>:.::.;:.:::;:.::.;:.::.;;:.::.>;v:,:>;:.,.:::.: ;>:.>:.:;:::.:::.>:::»:�.x:::.: .:...:..::-.x..>:.;:.»:;<.»>:.--»:... :, ....::::::. . :<....�.�.... :::...:., :;:.>�....:�:�;:�:;.::.::.:<a.ti�d � <::��:::�C��:{:�: <::c�:>:���<::::sr�1���..:. 5. �e:<� ..� ��:;��:?�:.;:::::,::::::::.: .::.�::.>�:::.>:::...::::::::::::::, ..............:::. .::......:.::::�.:.�:::.. �. �::.::::<.;.:�:>:._:::::::::::.;;.:::::<.:>;:;:�:.:;�;:.;::::::�;::>:>.:::::::.:...::.. .:.::::::.:::.�:�?�`::,:::..:......:;:.:........::.::::,:::;:..�::::::..:>;�.»::..::::::::,::...>::::::;:�;:;:.;::;::.::>;:.::.;::.�::....::.:::.:::.... . ..:::, .r},.::�>;:.;;:...;.;........ .::...:.......:�,:>:� ..;..>......:..:::;:::::.:.:.:..:::. ,,.:.:......,.:.. :>:�:.,«. . ::.,:..... . ..���:��:::��:::�>::€'�t�::�':.:<:�:>...,..:���.�r:<::::��� ��:::���E���::�pE�ta:k?��:::�:::�t........:..,:.:..........::.....:.....................:.:...:.. :::�...:::......:::.�:...:::..:.:�.:.::::::: :::..::..,.:.:, r.:::�.�.::::...:..::::.:,:.:::::::::::::::::::::<.:;::;.;�.,,.:...:>::.:::.;:<.;:::.;::.::�.;::.;;;::::.;::.;::,:r.:::r:,.,.;:<:::;.:..:::,,.>..v.,.::::.......... .....,... �.:!f;.., .x�o�.:;: >::.:.::::. :»>:::::::>::. •::sw.:::::.:::;:,:•;:.:. •>:-:..�:::.::. :::r..rr:.; ....... ,:........ .....:.....:•....:.::: . . . .:,.. , . �'....� . �. .;::: � �� >:#�e��::.:.:.: ��:<::�1��:::�.�ii���u�.::;:��� �.s�<��c� .: :...:::>r?�....:;:.:;":;>< .:.�t ...:..:.:...:....... ��.c�............... ............. ... .........:.............. .�r:'a:�:::::::.::::::.:::::.�':.:_:., .................. :;::::::::::::::::::::.....::...:�::.�:::::::::::.;::.:;:.;::.:;:.;;;;:>;:::�..::::.�:::>::::._:::.�..:::.;:.;::;.:;;>: ..:,...... .... .�?�.:.::::.:r:::.�::.::::::::..:..................:...:....:::.::..:,,.............................::::::..:,::::::.�::::::.;:K.::.:.:.:r.:::...:�:,::.,:::.;:;:::::::.,.;;::.;:.r:: �r�»;::>:;:,.:.�..n:.::.:::�..<.:.::;r::.;;,:::;k:;<,..;::.;�.>:.>�.:--.;:;;::...;:.::::::>�;�.::;-.:::.<...:.,::;;:;<:;:<;:...:;;.:.;:;.;:...:..:..:�.;��:..;::::. ::... ..;::.:::.:..... :......:.<:;..:.: .:.:.. .. �. : . .: �:>: :::.�.:� ����::. .x;��:>�a�::::���:>��� .�:::�:::����:::��.:�<:�?:�:<������ .:�::�:�::: ::±� . :::;�:.:............:::�.:::::::::::.�:.::�::::::::::.�:::::::.:�:::.�::::::::.�::.:::...:::::::::.::::.::::�?'.:::::::::::::::,:::::::::::,::::::: <......:::�.::�>;;.:::::::::::::::.:........... . :>;::>:::»::::::>::>:>�.:;:::�:.;:.;::::;:::::::::::.�::.:.}..�::.:;.:.;::.::.;:.;::.:;�::..;;:.>;:.::.::::::»::��>�,;::::::::>::>:».<::::>;:;:»:��:>::>::>:::>:�<:::....,....................... or:>�ia�3�:;��i�s�:�i�::::��J;�a���:>�::;r:.c��rd:<th��;;s��:��.�`:: o.:;:::R :.\.:<.i:<.kd:.:ii.y:u8:i.i:ii.i:�S{:�.i'i.:i.y:Li:r.:::?.:i?{.;IF.;Lii.:.:�::;•:i.y:ti??LiiiLii.:{.:LL.:i.:.:.:..{.i:i:.:::?::::L::::::.::::..::�•:l::::::.: F. INELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES 1. Funds may not be used to provide a service or exe ise a function that is ordinaril rovided throu out the ci , unless an �creased level of the service is Y P � tY to be provided in a targeted neighborhood. ' 5 I ������ , . 2. Funds may not be used in a manner that would displace current funding for activities by agencies and neighborhood groups. However, funding may be considered for projects which reduce overall costs by consolidating existing services, if the money saved by consolidation is used to provide additional needed services. Funds also may be used for new programs and to expand existing programs in eligible neighborhood areas. G. ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS 1. District Planning Councils. 2. Non-profit organizations whose service areas are primarily Saint Paul neighborhoods and/or whose clientele are Saint Paul residents. 3. Residential block club organizations 4. Business associations and commercial clubs 5. Government departments and agencies. 6. Religious organizations other than houses of worship or organizations determined to be pervasively sectarian, provided that the project proposed for CRP funding has a clearly secular purpose, has a primary effect which neither advances nor inhibits religion, and the project and its administration do not involve the City in excessive governmental entanglement with religion. The eligibility determination under principles of constitutional law must be made on a case by case basis. H. INELIGIBLE APPLICANTS 1. Houses of worship (for example, churches and synagogues) and pervasively sectarian organizations. 2. Individuals , 3. Single businesses 4. For-profit corporations 5. Political parties, including their affiliated organizations. Note: It is anticipated that many entities not eligible as program applicants will be active participants in revitalization programs in a partnership role with other organizations. Religious organizations and private educational institutions may be CRP partners, provided that their partnership roles are nondenominational and nondiscriminatory. Houses of worship may not be partners in a CRP project. ........,{,, . . •`•f�`<v:•}tir•`.\`''•:��i�'�F�:��t��� 'R:}:::�:.`;i'r,.,^.:;:::::�;:::;::::::.::::'+;.��•.,•+:G:v:::::.:.:::::+.v.i::::::::::?::::;;::;; � :o:t.•r:•:?... .;K.r.:�:t•:ts:::•::.;.. ;r,ff•tit.,•:�r:•::•:;•?+:wc•:::•::...;r..;•.;:• tfir.<::..:�::.:•t?�•• :�:i::?•::•::, ,:.K:::..: .c , ;9••::< . ti;.;;..r...:;;:x.,,:.y,r...y{..a:...;;tr.:?•: '�te<: ��>:�iax��:::� � �:�; :���id:::��t�Icl`�� � :::a�::>:��:::#�:,��:��«.:�:fl' ... :.:���:>:�::�� �d � .::.�:: ......., .:..: ..� .::::................,.:..: .;:;.::::.:.:..::::::::::._:::,..�. ,.:.�:..: .:.::.:.�:.:::.�...:.:............... t....... ••��iiiYi � . Y �� .\........... ..Y.�... .�, ry:• ::.{v.<ii}i}>+1��'.�'�'.�.��.�.'-'�:•:+vi w.i•v::.;:.,n nv-., . .... .. . ''•.: k:�ii'�:`+�'Ci� '.}ti::n,' �•,v,y�'�?.}�i••'ti�.i:��%?ii::...r .........y..,�.n�i{�.'3.:..8•r:.?:�i:>Y:iii:�::�:�:'�i:•i'•:•.. •n.; •{{{.;.... ...}:.;.r.y.?�}y:..\.... /�%�..vr.`:i•}:•:'r':'...'h.....r. .r..3.... :... .;�t..y��p���; . .;..`a�,.}.�:;..+,`�.i��}.�y.�,-:t;.:.s...�+.�.f.!� y} .y��+.�:ct�r:.,�;#:?f..;;�'t}�.�•:;•:�;r::.:n>.`,.,•.;�>y.:�::s::::/ffif:..:....;>.:�.>,.•,,:::?:•::.�::� • :k•::::.. .�..�� 1!? :�..+Y.i.��:�>:•+k!4!•::FK!!�ti�?��i�wu���:�4F•:���:uk�7:.'Y.iC�:S:��:�i?.R.'.::�.�.+i�'.��J ,:,+._,�..,.-.. ....�;,�t. .:>.::,.:.::... ,:.��...:.. .::�.:::>.�'..::. :�.?A�<::�:::&y :<:��... �.;::.:::..:. . ..,...�..r. ,n.. .... .... ,...-:.�:., ::::::.�:.. �� (�!3 . ....... {Nft}}}i�.�::::i:w{n•.;..�.�.;;w;;.titih•iii:i:{•:7S'•ti+"}^.+�\\?:+i}:::i•:\{{::::... + +{.'S i•:..................Y:T.•:�w::n:i•:w::�.:.lF:?�F:'i.:':i:'•.•:r:: ..vfi..}?�:::vti:.•.•::..: v tii•:{•:'v:i:\? • R•:jtiv:::rn}•::::;N•::.i.. Y���b::i;'S:i:•i:w::.}. • :::ti ir'�v'F:ti>.ti?ti?:L:•:^;,}.�;....x,�i x;t:�r:n,-...� :v'•:�ri:•i:�ii: ��.��}�>�;'�`�r���:�n�.�::��:� : ....:��:�.:€:�:�a�������:�:::��>�fl� .::... . ::�...... .,.�i. .t�::�� �?.. ..>.�.:. .>..:,...: ::.�:::::;:.�::::::._ � .,v �:..�. �v,:�: ...�;::.>:.>::::;.::.>:->:;.;:.::<:.: , . .... . .........:.......,:: .�,,�`�..�...:::;::::::::.:::;;.:v:.:;....,.. , ..• r:,•.>.:<:;:�:;�#>...:...::;f<•<•• t::::>::.•..:�r,::.:•::•.;•�:.:.�.�:,:.k,,::.:........ . ............,...• ;�5;::;:�.f;C+;4tk??°H.::::. �:••�.:.•:+•:•.......}..7..... .i .....3cQ?;...�.y...:,...,. . .........,:+....a.:. •::::•:::::::::::::::::.::ax.;:+:;;,,,.r.;::...:t;%••?4'�;.'i;S::iiri;;:hd�.:y'i%:%..:t;:::..•::.•.::. �. ��"��'�i>�M1�.v • ..i����:�:��4����i.�7�.'y:�� .Sqlip' i .}{C.}...v.i.,-.,�....�}.... ^�,�y,,...'r�r�r{.t.,�,.,.7;�. �}� I}� +�� . . !i���.,1�,[f��{:ir+����i.T:�l!�i����riµ�..�.:� :i�':ti 'i�3.'vi'?. '+�v .�r�'tt�.'+:i�' .:vy„•:;.;r;.;:.+7.;:i1¢'�,�,J.�,.4�,..,�.,..,.t.f�k::? •:.4::•.w:::••::x '�`/. ';<.r) .�. .S .b:�S.'•:;•��;7�::�:.,•.;._;?.x•: ..;,w, . .>::..f..:...... :•::i.•::.,+:;. ..:.c..�J,.?.•ax: .•.,,a•.::.:;x...:::%:�.�r. .. ::::::.:: s.•,?t.'+�'...��i,`.Y:...Q �tw . ry ..::.::::•.. ... � ;.• .t......:........ .,.,•:::...:......... ::t�..,.,�;�r.. .::.�.'::�::•:,•: ''x•::\;�':"•,.;�•.�t.t,$.ti'`'�,c,'...'::?'�:.�"''•'q'r,'r)r.....,.::.:,•.c:. c�a€���:...:....�`:.::.�.:,:��:: v�::::�aES't�€:�:::��>>:".: :.,����.:::.Q�:>��::::��<�da.. ::��h�#h�::� .�a�i�ien� \•:w •i'•�vii�:::•:;:::v:•:._:::::.•::::::::::.�:. ...4�. ::.•3•.:::�:::::.�::::•. }vii�::�}T:iti+.L'?� n iHm'. .hr:t f>•i.;, :::nv,y� .v....... �} v:.�.v':��..t r........xrr...::. ..... ....... ........r..�:.,r. r..... . ..v ....-.. .�.�. .r. . .:r�.'�. r..v.•. �:.::•.:v:i:ti�:.ti.{.,.},,i:•::+•i:•ih�:•}i'•i:+•::•i:4:i:i:.:{�'tiv+n•.:>ti:r.}::::�i:i:;i:•i:;::jti{ii:.•ii'•i:+•:J \'•i ti:..:i:+:.;{.�.v:+r:rr•.�::•::::n� .;{ ;, r.�y},...}.•:..,. �:,, . .v,;.}{.;;..j...,.i::.:........n�.:y:I•�::v.....x.}r.v.•:v�:v:i/,.;.;...{....:>:..:;:.}.,;.,; , vv�.,+2,',.:;;,::;x,r 4..;�.v... a.:�:y;:};.}:•..;:.$titilr:y:::•:�.r :��>�?�� ��t . ::.a�..��.�::�:s�.���!�F���::�:::: �:{F:€`���:��a ��::�'���:;�:�� ����c���.��`iC� .• •�:.:: • • �:{�,;W.S:.,•:>.7YUP:.,•:>:>�i{•:Y•::::::::::::..•:...•::�!!•:Y?`.:>::•::•>:•Y•>:•::•:::•:::•;:�.............n.n:::{.::•::•;:•::•.�+4iv;Y.:;:;::•::�Y .-•::,•;:•;:•;:?: . �.."i��r.�.�:'Y:�R��i.,"�::;a.i.� . .t�,::�..}.h.,,�,.y'��.;'�• ::.��' ...... ....,.......,.. IC;.�:;�f+1�:J � .t:t�7t7at �. ..::::a'a.'i•:•:•.`.+:•:i'l.::w:::s::?::.:;:.k'>`:.:S;;t�"li•.`.::+.;{,,: . 6 i . �J�� I II. APPLICATION 'I � A. PROCESS I ,I I 1. Applicants submit a brief pre-application form for ea h proposal to the . Department of Planning and Economic Development.�, Pre-applications are due ' by (date). �, ; i i 2. PED representatives meet with all applicants in each p�anning district to review all the proposed activity in a given area. '� I A 3. Applicants desiring assistance with developing their fina�proposals may request it from PED staff. '� I 4. Final applications will be due for the Planning Commissi�n review process by 4:30 p.m. on (date). Applications should be sent or deliv�red to the Department of Planning and Economic Development, 1420 City Hall t�nnex, Saint Paul, MN 55102 I I B. PRE APPLICATION CONTENTS (Pre-application form will be p�ovided) 1. Brief project description '' 2. Explanation of how the project would meet the stated legisl tive goals 3. List of agencies/organizations collaborating on the project roposal 4. Discussion of how the neighborhood will be involved in the evelopment of the project proposal � i C. FINAL APPLICATION CONTENTS (Application form will be provi�led) � 1. Proposal description 2. Proposal justification 3. Anticipated accomplishments , 4. Measurable objectives to be used in evaluation of the project '' 5. Consistency with City and/or Countx, plans: Needs addressed'by the proposal which are identified in City or County plans 6. Letters from collaborating partners outlining and agreeing to th'+�ir parts of the implementation ' 7. Map of the area to be served � 8. Quali�ications of proposal implementors I 9. Detailed budget to include: a) Committed funding from other sources b) Job descriptions for any personnel to be hired c) Sample contract if sub-contracting is proposed among the plementing partners. d) Name of fiscal agent, if necessary. 7 , I �'ri�.»�.���� � � . r_ ..-�. —.._ . . ,,. �`;��t+..� : Rti � ! ;;�'�� APPENDIX C .�, , ''�'.� "�enta�ixe.Timeline '��t �. � Pre applications due September 1, 1991 r Final applications due October 1, 1991 City Council approves December 15, 1991 funding awards Review by Department of January 31, 1992 Trade and Economic Development Draft contract prepared Apri130, 1992 Contract approved and May 31, 1992 , signed ' Program implementation July 31, 1992 underway :;r �:?, �,�, ,�Ka . ...,q�._,_�;:�'�:::: Y a r��r . .�;.���':'T . �y p f ' . ..r..P',`��' '-�j,�:�k,.�. � �'�' 18 ,