91-1427 �
Return copy to: q I
Real Estate Division Col�ncil File � ��� %��`f
218 C�ty Ha�l.
(Hazelwood) (YK) G�een Sheet #
RESOLUTION 1
0 R I G I �I A L CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTAI
Presented By
Referred To � Committee: Date
WHEREAS , the City Council adopted City Co ncil File No. C. F.
90-1783 on October 9 , 1990 , being the ratifica ion of assessents
for the Hazelwood/Magnolia Storm Sewer Separati n identified as
Finance File 18565; and �
WHEREAS , 1355 Ames , property identificatioh� number 27-29-22-
23-0065, being legally described as Lot 26 and 'I27 , Corning' s
Addition was assessed for 32 ,400 square feet for a total of
$972 . 00; and �:-,�
;
WHEREAS , the above described property should have been
assessed for 5 ,452 .2 square feet at the rate ofl3 cents per square ;=z,
foot , in the amount of $163 . 57 . � �+' �
BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED , that the $972 asIsessment on parcel
code 27-29-22-23-0065 be reduced to $163 . 57; anld
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED , that the excess ir�terest payment �
already collected toward the assessment in the Iamount of $89 .31
be credited to the outstanding assessment prindipal balance on
above parcel code . �-..
��
BL IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the reductior� of $808 .43 be
funded by the Sewer Separation funds. I
�.:
'�
���
Yeas Navs Absent "`�`
smon � Requested by Department of: .
oswi z -- r
on Finance Mana ment ices
acca e� - '
e t man ---` �/
une Director
i son -� BY� C
� ,
� ����/
Adopted by Council: Date A�� 6 1991 Form Approved b�+ City Attorney .
Adoptio �,Certified by Council Secretary gy: �G✓,!��- 7����g� �
�� ,_ .
�
BY� � "" Approved by Ma r for Submission to
Approved by Mayor: Date A��7 � ]9�� Council
,
By: ?'`.r,�.���/s�� By' .
PUBL�SHED RUG 17 9�� �
I
� � � g�- i�?7
DEPARTMEA /OFFIC �COUNCIL DATE INITIATED G R E E N S H E E NOi _15 0 2 0
Finance/Re�.l Estate Division
CONTACT PERSON&PHONE IN�TIAL/DATE INITIAUDATE
�DEPARTMENT DIRE R �CITY COUNCIL
Yvonne Kastens 298-5317 A$$�Gp �'CITYATTORNEY �CITYCLERK
MUST BE ON COUNCIL AOENDA BV(DATE) NUMBER FOR ❑BUDGET DIRECTOR �FIN.8 MGT.SERVICES DIR.
ROUTING
ORDER �MAYOR(OR ASSISTAN'n �
TOTAL#OF SIGNATURE PAGES (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE)
ACTION REQUESTED: _ �
.�-
pass resolution to reduce assessment.
'� ..:
;;�:., • ,��
RECOMMENDATIONS:Approve(A)or ReJect(R) pERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSW R THE FOLLOWIN(3 QUESTIONS: "
_PLANNINO COMMISSION _CIVII SERVICE COMMISSION �• Has this person/firm ever worked under a contrac for this department? ,
CIB COMMITfEE YES NO �
� - 2. Has this personHirm ever been a city employee?
_STAFF - YES NO
_DISTRICT COURT _ 3. Does ihis personlfirm possess a skfll not normall possessed by any current cNy employeeT
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE7 YES NO
Explain all yes answers on aeparate sheet and a ch to green sheet �,
1
INITIATING PROBLEM,ISSUE,OPPORTUNITV(Who,Whet,When,Where,W�y>: E C E I V E D
Housekeeping . - = �-.
UL 171991 `:�
CIT ATTORN'EY .���
�;R�
���.
ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: �
Records wi11 be correct.
. z.
:{.=
RECcIVED �
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED:
None. ���'�+� �k fH�. �fRECTOR ;a
i��':a•�'fi`Ui�NT 0� �'INANCE RECEIVED
t'.�r� �'�Al�AGEA4�NT SERVICES
�U L � 3 1991 �.:;� .�:
_ �-yr
BUDGET OFFICE
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED:
Records will be incorrect. - -
RECEIVED �oun!cE� R������^�� �'��,��� .
��1� 3 0 1991
�:i.�Y ��E�tK JUL 2 6 1991
TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION S 312.96 COST/REVENUE BUDGET p(CIRCLE ONE) YES NO z"°
FUNDING SOURCE Sewer Senaration Funds ACTIVITY NUMBER � :,;��
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:(EXPLAIN)
' .�. .� . . . � � • -• \
NOTE: COMPLETE DIRECTIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THE GREEN SHEET INSTRUCTIONAL }� � .
MANUAL AVAILABLE IN THE PURCHASIWG OFFICE(PHONE NO.298-4225). '
ROUTING ORDER: ` � 3' �
Below are correct routings for the five most frequent rypes of documents:
CONTRACTS(assumes suthorized budget exists) COUNCIL RESOLUTION(Amend Budgets/Accept. Grants)
1. Ou�Y� 1. Department Director
. 2. Oepartmienf birector 2. Ciy Attorney
3. Ciry Attorney 3. Budget Director
4. Mayor�2r contracts over$15,000) 4. Mayor/Assistant
�� -5. Hum��hts(for contracts over$50,000) 5. Ciry Council
' 6. FinBnce and Management Services Director 6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services
• 7. Finar�e Accounting
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(Budget Revision) COUNCIL RESOLUTION (all others,and Ordinances)
1. Activity Manager 1. Department Director
2. Department Accountant 2. Ciry Attorney
3. Department Director 3. Mayor Assistant
4. Budget Director 4. City Council
5. City Clerk
:� y 6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services
� INISTRATIVE ORDERS(all others)
Department Director
'City Attomey
`ance and Management Services Director
:-..t°. .. City Clerk
TOTAL NUMBER OF SIGNATURE PAGES
�� Indicate the�of pages on which signatures are required and paperclip or flag
- each of thess papss.
' � ACTION REQUESTED
� '
�� Describe what the projecUrequest seeks to axomplish in either chronologi-
�`'� ".
cai order or oMer of importance,whichever is most appropriate for the
;�'-; ' issue. Do not wrfte complete sentences. Begin each item in your list with
��,� a verb.
ECOMMENDATIONS
�`��="��omplete if the issue in question has been presented before any body, public
or private.
� SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE?
Indicate which Council objective(s)your projecVrequest supports by listing
the key word(s)(HOUSING, RECREATION, NEIGHBORHOODS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT,
BUDGET,SEWER SEPARATION). (SEE COMPLETE LIST IN INl.STRUCTIONAL MANUAL.)
PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS:
- This information will be used to determine the citys fiability for workers compensation claims,taxes and proper civil service hiring rules.
-:_.- INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE,OPPORTUNITY
�;. Explain the sftuation or conditions that created a need for your project
;.4�,��;..:; or request.
ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED
lndicate whether this is simply an annual budget procedure requfred by law/
cEiarter or whether there are speci�c ways in which the City of Saint Paul
H�d its citizens will benefit from this projecVaction.
DJ5ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED
What negative effects or major changes to existing or past processes might
thls proJecUrequest produce if it is passed (e.g.,traffic delays,noise,
tax lncreases or assessments)?To Whom?When?For how long?
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED
What will be the negative consequences if the promised action is not
approved4 Inability to deliver service?Continued high traffic, noise,
accident rate?Loss of revenue?
FINRNCIAL IMPACT
Although you must tailor the information you provide here to the issue you
_ are addressing, in general you must answer two questions:How much is it
going to cost?Who is going to pay?
�_��