Loading...
91-1426 Return copy to: � •• � Co ncil File � 9�-��a � Real Estate Division 218 Ci'�.y Ha�.l - G een Sheet # (Hazelwood) (YK) RESOLUTION r CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA� 0f� r �7 � N ,� � - Presented By � Referred To Commii�tee: Date � WHEREAS , the City Council adopted City Cou cil File No. C. F. 90-1783 on October 9 , 1990 , being the ratificat ' on of assessents for the Hazelwood/Magnolia Storm Sewer Separati n identified as Finance File 18565; and WHEREAS , 1345 Ames , property identificationll number 27-29-22- 23-0063 , being legally described as Lots 23 and 24 , Corning ' s Addition was assessed for 12 ,200 square feet forl a total of $366 ; and �' �_ WHEREAS , the above described property shoulld have been -�: ; assessed for 5 ,980 square feet at the rate of 3 cents per square �`� ���;��� foot , in the amount of $179 . 40 . � � BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED , that the $366 ass�essment on parcel �' code 27-29-22-23-0063 be reduced to $179 .40; andl , ,�� BE IT FUR'rHER RESOLVED , that the excess interest payment already collected toward the assessment in the amount of $20 .62 be credited to the outstanding assessment princi}�al balance on � ; above parcel code . I _�:., BE IT FURTH�R RESOLVED, that the reduction pf $186 .60 be funded by the Sewer Separation funds . � I , Yeae Na s Absent '��},:"`^, zmon -� Requested by Depa�tment of: oswi z � on Finance & Managem�nt Services acca ee e ma - �rne �— i son By: � --$irector �� n ���L,��� Adopted by Council: Date AUG 6 1991 Form Approved by Citp Attorney Adoption Certified by Council Secretary gY; � �j✓, (�'!�M"C� 7-(��S / .� / ,� � � • By� � Approved by Mayor 'for Submission to Approved by Mayor: Date AUG � Coun i 0 By: '.•,e,i.o[�u�C� By: a PftallSNED RUG 17'91 . . q�-i��,� DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/GOUNCIL DATE INITIATED Finan�z�Re�a. Estate Division GREEN SHE T N° _ 15019 INITIAUDAT INITIAUDATE CONTACT PERSON&PHONE �DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR �CITY COUNCIL Yvonne Kastens 298-5317 ASSIGN �ITYATTORNEY �' �CITYCLERK NUMBER FOR MUST BE ON COUNCIL AQENDA BY(DATE) ROUTING �BUDGET DIRECTOR �FIN.&MGT.SERVICES DIR. ORDER �MAYOR(OR ASSISTAN� � TOTAL#OF SIGNATURE PAGES (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) ACTION REQUESTED: Pass Resolution to reduce assessment. , r- r .� � � � * � a�^�' ' ^'�:a - , :�:- � . RECOMMENDATIONS:Approve(A)or Reject(R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSW R THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONB: Y M _ PLANNING COMMISSION _ CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION 1• Has this person/firm ever worked under a contra for this departmeni7 �.f� _CIB COMMITfEE _ YES NO � �STAFF _ 2. Has this person/firm ever been a city employee? YES NO _ DIS7RICT COURT _ 3. Does this person/firm possess a skili not normali possessed by any currerrt cily employee7 SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE9 YES NO Explatn all yes answers on separete sheet and a ach to gn�n aheat 1 � t., INITIATINO PROBLEM,ISSUE,OPPORTUNITY(Who,What,When,Where,Why): r_y ., . ,�_. Housekeeping. `'":� � �ii p - �t;� 5 ADVANTAQES IF APPROVED: �q ':t':.`"' ;,��_ 3 0 1991 1� Records will be corrected. _ �` -- � - ��.'' �1TY CLERK � ,. DISADVANTAOES IF APPROVED: d None. E��ry�p , _ JUL �31991 ;#:: - -; �:. , BU / dFF�\i� ;.y: ,_ :�' DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: Records will be incorrect. Counc�! RQ�earch Center � JUL 2 6 1991 TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION S 1H6.6O COST/REVENUE BUDGETEp(C CLE ONE) YES NO FUNDING SOURCE Sewer Sevaration Funds ACTIVITY NUMBER � '��r� FINANCIAL INFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) f:' 0., �"` . NOTE: COMPLETE DIRECTIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THE GREEN SHEET INSTRUCTIONAL � 4 MANUAL AVAILABLE IN THE PURCHASING OFFICE(PHONE NO.298-4225). RQUTING ORDER: ° Below are correct routings for the five most frequent types of documents: CONTRACTS(assumes suthorized budget exists) COUNCIL RESOLUTION(Amend Budgets/Accept. Grants) � 1. Oufside i�enay 1. Department Director 2, Department Director 2. Ciry Attorney �. -9�;Cit�A�tw'r�py 3. Budget Director ��.;�4,.` {to��oMracts over.$15,000) 4. Mayor/Assistant �'r�.�6 'H��i`'it�hts(tor contracts over$50,000) 5. City Council s - 8. FIn6�t��PS and Management Services Director 6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services »: - �, 7. :yFinance Accounting r : ': . ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(Budget Revisfon) COUNCIL RESOLUTION (all others,and Ordinances) 1. Activity Manager 1. Department Director 2. Department Acxountant 2. City Attorney 3. Department Director 3. Mayor Assistant 4. Budget Director 4. City Council 5. City Clerk - . Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services INISTRATIVE ORDERS(all others) 'Department Director ' Attorney i :."':���inance and Management Services Director , 4. City Clerk �� TOTAL NUMBER OF SIGNATURE PAGES '} Indicate the�of pages on which signatures are required and paperclip or flag f� .; sech of tl»se p�pes. �,; ACTION REQUESTED Describe what the proJecVrequest seeks to accomplish in either chronologi- : cal order or order of importance,whichever is most appropriate for the � �issue. Do not write complete sentences.Begin each item in your list with verb. '��''�u .�ECOMMENDATIONS Complete If the issue in question has been presented before any body,public or private. � � SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? Indicate which Council objective(s)your project/request supports by tisting the key word(s)(HOUSING, RECREATION, NEIGHBORHOODS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, BUDGET,SEWER SEPARATION). (SEE COMPLETE LIST IN INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL.) a; PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS: This information will be used to determine the city's liabiliry for workers compensation claims,taxes and proper civil service hiring rules. INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY .. :�t Explain the situation or conditions that created a need for your project " �' or request .;, :.. � ADVANTAOES IF APPROVED Indicate whether this is simply an annual budget procedure requfred by law/ charter or whether there are specific ways in which the City of Saint Paul and its citfzens will benefit from this projecVaction. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED What negative effects or major changes to existing or past processes might . thls projecUrequest produce if it is passed(e.g.,traffic delays, noise, tax increases or assessments)?To Whom?When? For how long? DISADVANTAQES IF NOT APPROVED `What will be the negative consequences if the promised action is not approved?Inability to deliver service?Continued high traffic, noise, accident rate?Loss of revenue? FINANCIAL IMPACT Although you must tailor the information you provide here to the issue you are addressing, in general you must answer two questions: How much is it :going to cost7 Who is going to pay? :r . - �' ';_ .