91-1425 Return copy to: ',
Real Estate Divi�ion Cou�cil File � / �r
218 City Hall I
(Hazelwc�d.) "•�K) Grl�en Sheet �
RESOLUTION I
0 R I G I N A L CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
__
Presented By '
Referred To Commitkee: Date
WHEREAS , the City Council adopted City Cou cil File No. C. F. �
90-1783 on October 9 , 1990 , being the ratificat�ion of asse�s��:�s �
for the Hazelwood/Magnolia Storm Sewer Separatio�h identified 'as`
Finance File 18565; and
WHEREAS , 1351 Ames , property identificationjnumber 27-29-22-
23-0064 , being legally described as Lot 25 , Co�ning ' s Addition
was assessed for 3 ,266 square feet for a total of $397 .98 ; and I,,_Y3
WHEREAS , the above described property shoul�7 have been _ '����-�
assessed for 2 ,834 square feet at the rate of 3 �ents per square,�� �"`
foot , in the amount of $85 .02 . 'I ='�{�"�:��
� ' -�
BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED , that the $397 .-98 dssessment on parcel
code 27-29-22-23-0064 be reduced to $85 .02; and '
, :. ���
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the excess int�rest payment �-�
already collected toward the assessment in the a ount of $34 . 56 �'�'
be credited to the outstanding assessment princi�al balance on --='
'�';__
above parcel code.
� �:
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the reduction df $312 .96 be
funded by the Sewer Separation funds. '
���
, ;�'�;,
Yeas Navs Absent Requeated by Depa�ttment of:
imon '�—
oswi z � '
�on Finance Mana em�nt Services
ee
e man
un e / Q�,
i son By: 1 �'" -`- irector
� � , '_�ry/
Adopted by Council: Date AUG 6 1991 Form Approved by Qity Attorney
Adoption �Certified by Council Secretary gy: �� ��y�t�^ ����'��i��/
B '`�J��'=�,.� • ''
y� Approved by Mayor', for Su ission to
Approved by,D�ayor: Date AUG 7 1991 Council ',
����.�?i�' By: \ \
By:
_
PUBUSNED AUG 17 '91
i
, . 9i � i���
DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATE INITIATED G R E E N S H E ET NO -15 0 2 2
Finance,�ReaJ.-.�state Division
CONTACT PERS�N 8 PHONE INITIAUDATE INITIAUDATE
�DEPARTMENT DIFiECTOR �CITY COUNCIL
Yvonne Kastens 298-5317 ASSIGN �.CITYATTORNEY � �CITYCLERK
NUAABER FOR
MUST BE ON COUNCIL AGENDA BY(DATE) ROUTING �BUDGET DIRECTOR �FIN.&MGT.SERVICES DIR.
ORDER �MAYOR(OR ASSISTANT) �
TOTAL#OF SIGNATURE PAGES (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) -
ACTION REQUESTED: ` ? <,
s - s Sr ��
Pass resolution to reduce assessment. `_ � � . �-�`"� �
-,�
���, '_rc,. r k;
. ' 'SYr"*.r.� '� � s.�
. y^td_. '..' ' '.' _s ..
r .�,��: ,, .
RECOMMENDATIONS:Approve(A)or Reject(R) � ..v ';r -
��
PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER HE FOLLOWING QOESTiO � r� �.��4 �`�'
_ PLANNINO COMMISSION _ CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION �• Has this person/firm ever worked under a contract f r thia department? ' �, ,,,{."
CIB COMMITTEE YES NO
� — 2. Has this person/firm ever been a city employee?
_STAFF — YES NO
_ oiSTRiCr COURT _ 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normally ssessed by any current city employee?
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCII OBJECTIVE? YES NO -
Explain all yes answers on separats sheet and att ch to green sheet �:-
1
=.;.:
INITIATING PROBLEM,ISSUE,OPPORTUNITY(Who,Whet,When,Where,Why): -
Assessment was ratified. ,:_:A,
:�
� �
Cc/VFO �� .
oF. ��� _�: ;�
ADVANTAQES IF APPROVED: �t �a �
.N��RT�o,�.ty I99� -:
Records wi11 be correct. qN���� F��FCT �� ; '�.:,v
FN S�qN �
� � R
�cFS ;;
x'' �
�,
DISADVANTAQES IF APPROVED:
ya
None.
�G�v�O ,t�
. �'ry:
R�G � 1�9� RECEIVED `_� � K�;
t�l�-� �� �(. �`':
R JUL � 3 1991
DISADVANTACiES IF NOT APPROVED: G
Bunc�T oFFicE
Records wi11 be incorrect.
CO�fl1�►� ������Ch CAPttt�C
J U L 2 6 1991
TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION S 808.43 COST/REVENUE BUDGETE (CIRCLE ONE) YES NO
FUNDING SOUFiCE Sewer Separation Funds ACTIVITY NUMBER
FINANCIAL INFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) � �
i•
�;, ;�,-�`. 6>
.
NOTE: COMPLETE:QIRECTIONS ARE WCLUDED IN THE GREEN SHEET INSTRUCTIONAL �r�-.
MANUAL AVAILABLE IN THE PURCHASING�FFICE(PHONE NO.298-4225). �
ROUTING ORDER: `:`�"~ �:
Below are correct routings for the five most frequent rypes of documents:
CONTRACTS(assumes authorized budget exists) COUNCIL RESOLUTION (Amend Budgets/Accept. Grants)
_ �;�',Y ,
. 1. Outsi�ricy 1. Department Director
` � Depar;rhentDirector 2. Ciry Attorney
�
� �r - � :�Ry�i�prr�ey 3. Budget Director
�^ ,��(d��nitracts over$15,000) 4. Mayor/Assistant
, Hum�,�for contracts over$50,000) 5. Ciry Council
: Firua�r,�id"krFenagement Services Director 6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services
�.� FinBt'�i�4acouAting
,
-��° -•ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS(Budget Revision) COUNCIL RESOLUTION (all others,and Ordinances)
1. Activlty Manager 1. Department Director
2. Department Accountant 2. Ciry Attorney
3. Department Director 3. Mayor Assistant
4. Budget Director 4. Ciry Council
"` . City Clerk
' ��� Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services
ISTRATIVE ORDERS(all others)
� rtment Director
'Atiorney
'._9:• Finsnce and Management Services Director
, � 4. City Clerk
° TOTAL NUMBEA OF SIGNATURE PAGES `
�:�;� Indicate the#of pages on which signatures are required and paperclip or flag
�� � �aaCh of these pages.
""� ACTION REQUESTED
���� Describe what the projecUrequest seeks to accomplish in either chronologi-
!order or order of importance,whichever is most appropriate for the
e. Do not write complete sentences. Begin each item in your list with
�, .
rb.
' '�.COMMENDATIONS
Z`omplete if the issue in question has been presented before any body, public
or private.
; SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE?
Indicate which Council objective(s)your projecUrequest supports by listing
the key word(s)(HOUSING, RECREATION, NEIGHBORHOODS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT,
BUDGET, SEWER SEPARATION). (SEE COMPLETE LIST IN INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL.)
''-* PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS:
��: This information will be used to determine the ciry"s liabiliry for workers compensation claims,taxes and proper civil service hiring rules.
-_- INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY
'e °'�� Explain the situation or conditions that created a need for your project
�.�
- or request.
J 'ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED
'�lndicate whether this is simply an annual budget procedure required by law/
charter or whether there are specific ways in which the Ciry of Saint Paul
and its citizens wlll benefit from this projecUaction.
pISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED
What negative effects or major changes to existing or past processes might
this projecUrequest produce if it is passed (e.g.,traffic delays, noise,
tax increases or assessments)?To Whom?When? For how long?
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED
What will be the negative consequences if the promised action is not
approved? Inability to deliver service?Continued high traffic, noise,
accident rate?Loss of revenue?
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Although you must tailor the information you provide here to the issue you
are addressing, in general you must answer two questions: How much is it
going to cost?Who is going to pay?