The URL can be used to link to this page

98-44Council File # � V � oRi��va Presented By RESOLUTION Green Sheet � 37583 CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA Referred To ► Committee: Date � WNEREAS, the City of Saint Paul has determined that the foilowing deficient bridges on the City Street system are a 2 high priority and require repiacement or rehabilitation within the next five (5) years, and 3 Bridge Road! Estimated Federal Local Bond Funds Proposed 4 No. Street Project Cost Funds Furr� Nceded Constr. Year 5 6 90420 EarfStreet $3,740,000 $1,280,000 $2,140,000 $320,000 2000 7 over E. 7th g & UP RR. 9 WHEREAS, local roads play an essential role in the overall state transportation network and local bridges are the critical i a component of the local road systems, and 11 12 WHEREAS, State support for the replacement or rehabiiitation of local bridges continues to be crucial to maintaining 13 the integrity of the local road systems and is necessary for the City to proceed with the replacement or rehabilitation of f 4 the high priority deficient bridges described above, and � 5 WHEREAS, the City of Saint Paul iMends to proceed with replacement or rehabilitation of these bridges as soon as j � possible when State Transportation Bond Funds are available, i7 1& BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Saint Paul commits that it will proceed with the design and contract documents for t 9 these bridges immediately after being notified that funds are available in order to permit construction to take place 20 within one year of notification. 21 22 23 24 25 Requested by Department of: Public Works B �eC/L � Form Apg by City Attorney By. //��UZ�I>!iY'L� �P� Sy: Approved to Council By: Adopted by Council: Date _ Adoption Certified by Counoil Secretary DEPARTMENUOFPICE/COUNpL Department of Pubiic Works CONTACT PEASON 6 PHONE Leo Pearson 266-6181 ��-�,w OATEINITIATED �GREEN SHEET No 37583 � DEPARTMENTDIFECTOR � � CITYCOUNCIL BEONCOUNCILAGENDABY(DATE) NUMBERWR �CINA7TOANEY f ° ,L=❑CITYCLERK � ROUTING � FINANCIALSERVICESOIR. � FIN. SERYIC ORUFR � MAYOR (Ofl ASSISTANT� � � DIYISION M� Y--' TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE RAGES (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNA7URE) ACT10N REQUESTED Process resolution declaring the City's intent to request the use of Fund 29 (State Bridge Bonds) for the reconstruction of Ear! Street Bridge. RECOMMENDATIONS: Approve (A) or Reject (R) PLANNING COMMISSION PERS�NAL SERVECE CONTRACTS MUSS ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIOWS: 1. Has this persoNfirm ever worked under a contract for this department? CIB COMMITTEE YES NO CfViL SERVICE COMMISSION 2_ Has this person(firm ever been a city empbyee? YES NO S7AFF 3. Does this personffirm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current city employee? YES NO Expiain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet INITIATING PROB�EM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITV (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHEFE, WHY). MNDOT State Rid Office has requested that City and County agencies with upcoming bridge project pass resoiutions declaring their intent to request State Bridge Bonds as a partiai funding source. This will help them prepare an adequate, Iagisiative request this sessian. (See attached March 11, 1997 letter.} ADVAN7AGESIFAPPRaVED. The City would be eiigible to use State Bridge Bonds (Fund 29) as a 20% match to the 80°Jo Federai financing programed for the "bridge oniy" elements of this project. C��'Vv ,�°�o'� 013ADVANTAGES IF APPR�VED: � p�� JA�t Q7 �7 OISAOVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: MNDOT State Aid would hesitate to provide the State Bond match. TOTAL AMOUM OF 7RANSACiION $ NA FUNDING SOURCE FINANCIAI INFOftMAT10N: (EXPLAIN) COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (dRGLE ONE) YES No ACININNUMBEFi �� i'�:C{ l�q}�' J��114 i��8 �� G-E�/li �F�'J�N . _. ,. s�T, �� b � Minnesofc pepartmenf ot Transportaf(on Memo State Ald tor Locai Trpnsportatlon pivklon Maif Stop Spp 395 John Irelond Boulevard St. Paul, MN 55155 March 11, 1997 TO: County Engineers City Engineers DSAE's Consultant Engineers � � e' � f��w�� FROM: Patrick B.Murphy i ,�-�"" Stace Aid Engin �� Office tel: 612/2963071 Fcix: b12(282-2727 �'°""---------_____ _. _ � � �� 5 ii j. 7 G �.=`:.___.._�--� � r� r � 1�'nR 2 ! 1997 �! ; _ ___....� ' PUBLIC YiORKS AL ; SUBJECT: Brid;e ReplacementlRehabilitatian Using State Transponation Bond Funds As we have discussed with Counry and City representatives, we are revising the process for advisina our office of intent to use State Transportation Bonds (bridge bonding) for repiacement or rehabilitation of deficient bridges; and the process of selecting projects for fundin� with Bond funds. In order to identify the short term needs for bridge bonds, and to document each local government's intent to proceed promptiy with a project, if brid;e bonds are made available, we are asking each County and City, proposing bridge replacement/rehabilitation projects within the next five years, to adopt the attached resolution and submit it to the State Aid Division. We will consider the resolutions we receive as pre-application for bridge bonding and wil] use them to develop the Capitol Budget Request for the 1998 le�islative session. We will also prioritize the bridges included in the resolutions and use that priority list _ to select bridges to receive the desienated amount of bridge bonding authorized by the legislature. We wani to I:now the specific bridees which are candidates for bridge bondin� and that the loca] govemments are committed to proceed wich those bridees, if bond funds are made available. We believe this infonnation will make it easier to document the bridge bonding need and will provide proof that the authorized funds will be utilized, as the Capitol Budeet Request is considered in the leoislative process. An rqual oppor[unity empluyer Eridge Replacement Memo Page z March, 1997 �'�-yy This new process means ffiat eiisible nroiects wiIl no lon eg r be approved on essentiallv a first-come(first funded basis. Instead we will offer availabie funds to the ro'ects ident�ed bv County B�ard/Cirv Council resolution on a prioritv basis and expect that those local govemments will proceeti to deliver final plans and specifications in a tunely manner. Please read the attacheci resolutions and directions, since they explain the new process in more detail. If your county (including townships) or city intends to replace/rehabilitate deficient bridges in the next five years, piease complete the appropriate resolution and have it adopted by your County Board or City Council. i3nder this new process, we will not be offering bridge bonding for any bridge that has not been included in a resolution. Adopted and cert�ed resolutions should be submitted to the State Aid Division by Mav I5. 1997, since we must prepare the preliminary Capital Budget Request in June. If you have any questions, call Julie Skaliman (612l296-9875), or myself (612/296-9872). An equal opporti:run� employer Council File # � V � oRi��va Presented By RESOLUTION Green Sheet � 37583 CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA Referred To ► Committee: Date � WNEREAS, the City of Saint Paul has determined that the foilowing deficient bridges on the City Street system are a 2 high priority and require repiacement or rehabilitation within the next five (5) years, and 3 Bridge Road! Estimated Federal Local Bond Funds Proposed 4 No. Street Project Cost Funds Furr� Nceded Constr. Year 5 6 90420 EarfStreet $3,740,000 $1,280,000 $2,140,000 $320,000 2000 7 over E. 7th g & UP RR. 9 WHEREAS, local roads play an essential role in the overall state transportation network and local bridges are the critical i a component of the local road systems, and 11 12 WHEREAS, State support for the replacement or rehabiiitation of local bridges continues to be crucial to maintaining 13 the integrity of the local road systems and is necessary for the City to proceed with the replacement or rehabilitation of f 4 the high priority deficient bridges described above, and � 5 WHEREAS, the City of Saint Paul iMends to proceed with replacement or rehabilitation of these bridges as soon as j � possible when State Transportation Bond Funds are available, i7 1& BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Saint Paul commits that it will proceed with the design and contract documents for t 9 these bridges immediately after being notified that funds are available in order to permit construction to take place 20 within one year of notification. 21 22 23 24 25 Requested by Department of: Public Works B �eC/L � Form Apg by City Attorney By. //��UZ�I>!iY'L� �P� Sy: Approved to Council By: Adopted by Council: Date _ Adoption Certified by Counoil Secretary DEPARTMENUOFPICE/COUNpL Department of Pubiic Works CONTACT PEASON 6 PHONE Leo Pearson 266-6181 ��-�,w OATEINITIATED �GREEN SHEET No 37583 � DEPARTMENTDIFECTOR � � CITYCOUNCIL BEONCOUNCILAGENDABY(DATE) NUMBERWR �CINA7TOANEY f ° ,L=❑CITYCLERK � ROUTING � FINANCIALSERVICESOIR. � FIN. SERYIC ORUFR � MAYOR (Ofl ASSISTANT� � � DIYISION M� Y--' TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE RAGES (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNA7URE) ACT10N REQUESTED Process resolution declaring the City's intent to request the use of Fund 29 (State Bridge Bonds) for the reconstruction of Ear! Street Bridge. RECOMMENDATIONS: Approve (A) or Reject (R) PLANNING COMMISSION PERS�NAL SERVECE CONTRACTS MUSS ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIOWS: 1. Has this persoNfirm ever worked under a contract for this department? CIB COMMITTEE YES NO CfViL SERVICE COMMISSION 2_ Has this person(firm ever been a city empbyee? YES NO S7AFF 3. Does this personffirm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current city employee? YES NO Expiain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet INITIATING PROB�EM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITV (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHEFE, WHY). MNDOT State Rid Office has requested that City and County agencies with upcoming bridge project pass resoiutions declaring their intent to request State Bridge Bonds as a partiai funding source. This will help them prepare an adequate, Iagisiative request this sessian. (See attached March 11, 1997 letter.} ADVAN7AGESIFAPPRaVED. The City would be eiigible to use State Bridge Bonds (Fund 29) as a 20% match to the 80°Jo Federai financing programed for the "bridge oniy" elements of this project. C��'Vv ,�°�o'� 013ADVANTAGES IF APPR�VED: � p�� JA�t Q7 �7 OISAOVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: MNDOT State Aid would hesitate to provide the State Bond match. TOTAL AMOUM OF 7RANSACiION $ NA FUNDING SOURCE FINANCIAI INFOftMAT10N: (EXPLAIN) COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (dRGLE ONE) YES No ACININNUMBEFi �� i'�:C{ l�q}�' J��114 i��8 �� G-E�/li �F�'J�N . _. ,. s�T, �� b � Minnesofc pepartmenf ot Transportaf(on Memo State Ald tor Locai Trpnsportatlon pivklon Maif Stop Spp 395 John Irelond Boulevard St. Paul, MN 55155 March 11, 1997 TO: County Engineers City Engineers DSAE's Consultant Engineers � � e' � f��w�� FROM: Patrick B.Murphy i ,�-�"" Stace Aid Engin �� Office tel: 612/2963071 Fcix: b12(282-2727 �'°""---------_____ _. _ � � �� 5 ii j. 7 G �.=`:.___.._�--� � r� r � 1�'nR 2 ! 1997 �! ; _ ___....� ' PUBLIC YiORKS AL ; SUBJECT: Brid;e ReplacementlRehabilitatian Using State Transponation Bond Funds As we have discussed with Counry and City representatives, we are revising the process for advisina our office of intent to use State Transportation Bonds (bridge bonding) for repiacement or rehabilitation of deficient bridges; and the process of selecting projects for fundin� with Bond funds. In order to identify the short term needs for bridge bonds, and to document each local government's intent to proceed promptiy with a project, if brid;e bonds are made available, we are asking each County and City, proposing bridge replacement/rehabilitation projects within the next five years, to adopt the attached resolution and submit it to the State Aid Division. We will consider the resolutions we receive as pre-application for bridge bonding and wil] use them to develop the Capitol Budget Request for the 1998 le�islative session. We will also prioritize the bridges included in the resolutions and use that priority list _ to select bridges to receive the desienated amount of bridge bonding authorized by the legislature. We wani to I:now the specific bridees which are candidates for bridge bondin� and that the loca] govemments are committed to proceed wich those bridees, if bond funds are made available. We believe this infonnation will make it easier to document the bridge bonding need and will provide proof that the authorized funds will be utilized, as the Capitol Budeet Request is considered in the leoislative process. An rqual oppor[unity empluyer Eridge Replacement Memo Page z March, 1997 �'�-yy This new process means ffiat eiisible nroiects wiIl no lon eg r be approved on essentiallv a first-come(first funded basis. Instead we will offer availabie funds to the ro'ects ident�ed bv County B�ard/Cirv Council resolution on a prioritv basis and expect that those local govemments will proceeti to deliver final plans and specifications in a tunely manner. Please read the attacheci resolutions and directions, since they explain the new process in more detail. If your county (including townships) or city intends to replace/rehabilitate deficient bridges in the next five years, piease complete the appropriate resolution and have it adopted by your County Board or City Council. i3nder this new process, we will not be offering bridge bonding for any bridge that has not been included in a resolution. Adopted and cert�ed resolutions should be submitted to the State Aid Division by Mav I5. 1997, since we must prepare the preliminary Capital Budget Request in June. If you have any questions, call Julie Skaliman (612l296-9875), or myself (612/296-9872). An equal opporti:run� employer Council File # � V � oRi��va Presented By RESOLUTION Green Sheet � 37583 CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA Referred To ► Committee: Date � WNEREAS, the City of Saint Paul has determined that the foilowing deficient bridges on the City Street system are a 2 high priority and require repiacement or rehabilitation within the next five (5) years, and 3 Bridge Road! Estimated Federal Local Bond Funds Proposed 4 No. Street Project Cost Funds Furr� Nceded Constr. Year 5 6 90420 EarfStreet $3,740,000 $1,280,000 $2,140,000 $320,000 2000 7 over E. 7th g & UP RR. 9 WHEREAS, local roads play an essential role in the overall state transportation network and local bridges are the critical i a component of the local road systems, and 11 12 WHEREAS, State support for the replacement or rehabiiitation of local bridges continues to be crucial to maintaining 13 the integrity of the local road systems and is necessary for the City to proceed with the replacement or rehabilitation of f 4 the high priority deficient bridges described above, and � 5 WHEREAS, the City of Saint Paul iMends to proceed with replacement or rehabilitation of these bridges as soon as j � possible when State Transportation Bond Funds are available, i7 1& BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Saint Paul commits that it will proceed with the design and contract documents for t 9 these bridges immediately after being notified that funds are available in order to permit construction to take place 20 within one year of notification. 21 22 23 24 25 Requested by Department of: Public Works B �eC/L � Form Apg by City Attorney By. //��UZ�I>!iY'L� �P� Sy: Approved to Council By: Adopted by Council: Date _ Adoption Certified by Counoil Secretary DEPARTMENUOFPICE/COUNpL Department of Pubiic Works CONTACT PEASON 6 PHONE Leo Pearson 266-6181 ��-�,w OATEINITIATED �GREEN SHEET No 37583 � DEPARTMENTDIFECTOR � � CITYCOUNCIL BEONCOUNCILAGENDABY(DATE) NUMBERWR �CINA7TOANEY f ° ,L=❑CITYCLERK � ROUTING � FINANCIALSERVICESOIR. � FIN. SERYIC ORUFR � MAYOR (Ofl ASSISTANT� � � DIYISION M� Y--' TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE RAGES (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNA7URE) ACT10N REQUESTED Process resolution declaring the City's intent to request the use of Fund 29 (State Bridge Bonds) for the reconstruction of Ear! Street Bridge. RECOMMENDATIONS: Approve (A) or Reject (R) PLANNING COMMISSION PERS�NAL SERVECE CONTRACTS MUSS ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIOWS: 1. Has this persoNfirm ever worked under a contract for this department? CIB COMMITTEE YES NO CfViL SERVICE COMMISSION 2_ Has this person(firm ever been a city empbyee? YES NO S7AFF 3. Does this personffirm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current city employee? YES NO Expiain all yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet INITIATING PROB�EM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITV (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHEFE, WHY). MNDOT State Rid Office has requested that City and County agencies with upcoming bridge project pass resoiutions declaring their intent to request State Bridge Bonds as a partiai funding source. This will help them prepare an adequate, Iagisiative request this sessian. (See attached March 11, 1997 letter.} ADVAN7AGESIFAPPRaVED. The City would be eiigible to use State Bridge Bonds (Fund 29) as a 20% match to the 80°Jo Federai financing programed for the "bridge oniy" elements of this project. C��'Vv ,�°�o'� 013ADVANTAGES IF APPR�VED: � p�� JA�t Q7 �7 OISAOVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: MNDOT State Aid would hesitate to provide the State Bond match. TOTAL AMOUM OF 7RANSACiION $ NA FUNDING SOURCE FINANCIAI INFOftMAT10N: (EXPLAIN) COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (dRGLE ONE) YES No ACININNUMBEFi �� i'�:C{ l�q}�' J��114 i��8 �� G-E�/li �F�'J�N . _. ,. s�T, �� b � Minnesofc pepartmenf ot Transportaf(on Memo State Ald tor Locai Trpnsportatlon pivklon Maif Stop Spp 395 John Irelond Boulevard St. Paul, MN 55155 March 11, 1997 TO: County Engineers City Engineers DSAE's Consultant Engineers � � e' � f��w�� FROM: Patrick B.Murphy i ,�-�"" Stace Aid Engin �� Office tel: 612/2963071 Fcix: b12(282-2727 �'°""---------_____ _. _ � � �� 5 ii j. 7 G �.=`:.___.._�--� � r� r � 1�'nR 2 ! 1997 �! ; _ ___....� ' PUBLIC YiORKS AL ; SUBJECT: Brid;e ReplacementlRehabilitatian Using State Transponation Bond Funds As we have discussed with Counry and City representatives, we are revising the process for advisina our office of intent to use State Transportation Bonds (bridge bonding) for repiacement or rehabilitation of deficient bridges; and the process of selecting projects for fundin� with Bond funds. In order to identify the short term needs for bridge bonds, and to document each local government's intent to proceed promptiy with a project, if brid;e bonds are made available, we are asking each County and City, proposing bridge replacement/rehabilitation projects within the next five years, to adopt the attached resolution and submit it to the State Aid Division. We will consider the resolutions we receive as pre-application for bridge bonding and wil] use them to develop the Capitol Budget Request for the 1998 le�islative session. We will also prioritize the bridges included in the resolutions and use that priority list _ to select bridges to receive the desienated amount of bridge bonding authorized by the legislature. We wani to I:now the specific bridees which are candidates for bridge bondin� and that the loca] govemments are committed to proceed wich those bridees, if bond funds are made available. We believe this infonnation will make it easier to document the bridge bonding need and will provide proof that the authorized funds will be utilized, as the Capitol Budeet Request is considered in the leoislative process. An rqual oppor[unity empluyer Eridge Replacement Memo Page z March, 1997 �'�-yy This new process means ffiat eiisible nroiects wiIl no lon eg r be approved on essentiallv a first-come(first funded basis. Instead we will offer availabie funds to the ro'ects ident�ed bv County B�ard/Cirv Council resolution on a prioritv basis and expect that those local govemments will proceeti to deliver final plans and specifications in a tunely manner. Please read the attacheci resolutions and directions, since they explain the new process in more detail. If your county (including townships) or city intends to replace/rehabilitate deficient bridges in the next five years, piease complete the appropriate resolution and have it adopted by your County Board or City Council. i3nder this new process, we will not be offering bridge bonding for any bridge that has not been included in a resolution. Adopted and cert�ed resolutions should be submitted to the State Aid Division by Mav I5. 1997, since we must prepare the preliminary Capital Budget Request in June. If you have any questions, call Julie Skaliman (612l296-9875), or myself (612/296-9872). An equal opporti:run� employer