The URL can be used to link to this page

97-722/� Council File � `� � � � .� �� ' ` Green Sheet # �ZS�� ° RESOLUTION _ CITY OF SAWT PAUL, MINNESOTA L�3 ir . Presented By Referred To Committee: Date 1 WHEREAS, Public Health has requested the City Council to hold public hearings to consider 2 the advisability and necessity of ordering the repair or wrecking and removal of a two-story, wood 3 frame dwelling and detached, two-vehicle, wood frame garage located on property hereinafter 4 referred to as the "Subject Property" and commonly l�own as 1359 Biair Avenue. This property is 5 legally described as follows, to wit: 6 7 L.ot 26, Block 6, Syndicate No. 5 Addition. 8 9 WHEREAS, based upon the records in the Ramsey County Recorder's Office and 10 information obtained by Public Health on or before April 8, 1997, the following are the now known 11 interested or responsible parties for the Subject Property: Quoc Tuan Nguyen, 850 University 12 Avenue North, St. Paul, MN 55104; Twin City Federal Mortgage Corp., SOl Marquette Avenue, 13 Mpls., MN 55402. 14 15 WHEREAS, Public Health has served in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 45 of the 16 Saint Paul L,egislative Code an order identified as an"Order to Abate Nuisance Building(s)" dated 17 March 26, 1997; and 18 19 WHEREAS, this order informed the then known interested or responsible parties that the 20 structure located on the Subject Property is a nuisance building(s) pursuant to Chapter 45; and 21 22 WHEREAS, this order informed the interested or responsible parties that they must repair or 23 demolish the structure located on the Subject Properry by April 25, -1997; and 24 25 WHEREAS, the enforcement officer has posted a placard on the Subject Property declaring 26 this building(s) to constitute a nuisance condition; subject to demolition; and 27 28 WHEREAS this nuisance condition has not been corrected and Public Health requested that 29 the City Clerk schedule public hearings before the Legislative Hearing Officer of the City Council 30 and the Saint Paul City Council; and 31 32 WHEREAS, the interested and responsible parties have been served notice in accordance 33 with the provisions of Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code, of the time, date, place and 34 purpose of the public hearings; and 35 36 WHEREAS, a hearing was held before the L.egislative Heuing Officer of the Saint Paul City 37 Council on Tuesday, 7une 3, 1997 to hear testimony and evidence, and after receiving testunony and 38 evidence, made the recommendation to approve the request to order the interested or responsible 39 parties to make the Subject Property safe and not detrimental to the public peace, health, safety and 40 welfare and remove its blighting influence on the community by rehabilitating this structure in 41 accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances, or in the alternative by demolishing and 42 removing the structure in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances. The rehabilitation or 43 demolition of the structure to be completed within fifteen (15) days after the date of the Council 44 Hearing; and °t� - �aa WHEREAS, a hearing was held before the Saint Paul City Council on Wednesday, 7une il, 1997 and the testimony and evidence including the action taken by the I.egislative Hearing Officer was considered by the Council; now therefore BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon the tesrimony and evidence presented at the above referenced public hearings, the Saint Paul City Council hereby adopts the following Findings and Order concerning the Subject Properry at 1359 Blair Avenue: 1. That the Subject Property comprises a nuisance condition as defined in Saint Paul Legislative Code, Chapter 45. 2. That the costs of demolition and removal of this building(s) is estunated to exceed three thousand dollars ($3,000.00). 3. That there now exists and has existed mulfiple Housing or Building code violations at the SubjeCt PiopeTt�- ; and that it has a documented and confirmed history as a blighting influence on the community. 4. That an Order to Abate Nuisance Building(s) was sent to the then known responsible parties to correct the deficiencies or to demolish and remove the building(s). 5. That the deficiencies causing this nuisance condition have not been corrected. 6. That Public Health has posted a placard on the Subject Property which declares it to be a nuisance condition subject to demolition. 7. That this building has been routinely monitored by the Vacant/Nuisance Buildings Code Enforcement Program. S. That the known interested parties and owners are as previously stated in this resolution and that the noti�cation requirements of Chapter 45 have been fulfilled. 9. Cammunications of Hamline Midway Coalition and H-MARC, and photos of the site, are with all testimony and other Q�E� files and records, accepted as part o� tTie record. The Saint Paul Ciry Council hereby makes the following order: 1. The above referenced interested or responsible parties shall make the Subject Property safe and not detrimental to the public peace, health, safety and weifare and remove its blighting influence on the community by rehabilitating this structure and correcting all deficiencies as prescribed in the above referenced Order to Abate Nuisance Building(s) in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances, or in the alternative by demolishing and removing the structure in accordance with ali applicable codes and ordinances. The rehabilitation or demolition and removal of the structure must be completed w�rf'�{�3}da3�s�i€�fi� �� -��-��j��jng- by August 11, 1997, and if rehabilitated, such rehabilitation must be totally complete, and done by a licensed, bonded contxactor. �l1-�� 2. If the above corrective action is not completed within this period of time the Public Health, Code Enforcement Program is hereby authorized to take whatever steps aze necessary to demolish and remove this structure, fill the site and charge the costs incurred against the Subject Properry pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul I.egislative Code. 3. In the event the building is to be demolished and removed by ffie City of Saint Paul, all personal property or fiYtures of any kind which interfere with the demolition and removal shall be removed from the property by the responsible parties by the end of this time period. If all personal properry is not removed, it shall be considered to be abandoned and the City of Saint Paul shall remove and dispose of such properry as provided by law. 4. It is further ordered, that a copy of this resolution be mailed to the owners and interested parties in accordance with Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code. 5. No further extensions will be Requested by Department o£: By: � By: Ey: d' liC-�'.f-iC� 1�� Form App n�ved by City ttorney By: Adopted by Council: Date Adoption Certified by Council cretary a�-�a� DEPAflTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATE INRIATED N� 3 2 5 7 5 GREEN SHEET _ . _ CONTACTPEFSON&PHONE � INITIAVDATE INfiIAVDATE DEPAfiTMEMDIRECfOfl CITYCAUNCIL Charles VOt01. 298-4153 A�K'N CINATfOflNEY CRYCLEflK MUST BE ON COUNCIL AGENDA BY (DATE) NWBER FOfl O BUDGET DIfiECTOR � FlN. & MGT. SEflVICES DIFi. NOUTING ORO6fl MAVOR (OR ASSI51ANn ,�' � TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES (CLIP AlL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) ACT10N AE�UESTED: City Council to pass this resolution which will order the owner(s) to remove or repair the re£erenced building(s). I£ the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Public Health is ordered to remove the building. The subject property is located at 1359 Blair Avenue. RECOMMENDA77oNS: nppmve (A) a Reject (H) pEtiSONAL SEiiVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING �UESTIONS: ._ PLANNING COMMISSfON _ CIVIL SEqViCE CAMMISSKIN t. 4ia5 t4lis p850nfi1iT eY¢f wolk0d under a ContfdCt for thls depaftRlBnt? . _ qe COMMITTEE , YES �NO — �� F 2. Has this person/firm ever been a ciry employee? — VES NO _ DISTRICT COUi�i � 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill no[ normally possessetl by any curreM ciry emplqree? SUPPOflTS WNICH COUNCIL O&IECTIVE? YES NO F�plain all yes answers on seperete sheet and attach to green sheet MRIA7ING PROBLEM, iSSUE. OPPORTUNYTY �Who. Whet, When, Where, Wh»: This building(s) is a nuisance building(s) as defined in ChapCer 45 and a vacant building as defined in Chapter 43 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code. The owners, interested parties and responsible parties known to the Enforcement Officer were given an order to repair or remove the building at 1359 Blair Avenue by April 25, 1997, and have failed to comply with those orders. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: The City wi11 eliminate a nuisance. ��'u� � � �� C 7 A � 7 �sT ��'�� . OISAOVANT0.GES IF APPROVEO' The City will spend funds to wreck and remove this building(s). These costs will be assessed to the property, collected as a special assessment against the property taxes. �Ci�""� ��e��°�3 $�P f�iP;! 21 1�97 DISADVANTA6E5 IF NOT APPROVED: A nuisance condition will remain unabated in the City. This building(s) will continue to blight the community. 70iALAMOUNTOFTRANSAC710N $$9 000 -$10 000 COST/HEVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE) VES NO FUNDINGSOURCE Nuis�riCe HOUSing AbatOment p�7�y�TYNUMBER 33261 FINANCIAL INFOBMATION: (EXPLAIN) � CITY OF SAINT PAUL Norm Co[eman, Mayar May 9, 1997 SAINT PAUL PUBLIC HEALTH Nea1 Holtan, M.D., M.P.H., Drrecto� h'UISANCE BUILDI��GS CODE ENFORCE�LIEN7' SSS Cedar Skee1 Saint Paul, MN SSIOI-1260 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARTNGS Council President and Members of the City Council a� -�aa 612-298-4153 � "''�' � � .� _ _ . .. . . � e e::; (vi� ? V .eJesf Saint Paul Public Health, Vacant/Nuisance Buildings Enforcement Unit has requested the City Council schedule public heazings to consider a resolution ordering the repair or removal of the nuisance building(s) located at: 1359 Blair Avenue The City Council has scheduled the date of these hearings as follows: Legislative Hearing - Tuesday, June 3, 1997 City Council Hearing - Wednesday, June 11, 1997 The owners and responsible parties of record are: Name and Last Known Address Quoc Tuan Nguyen 850 University Avenue North St. Paul, MN 55104 Interest Fee Owner Twin City Federal Mortgage Corp. 801 Marquette Avenue Mpls., MN 55402 The legal description of this property is: Mortgagee Lot 26, Block 6, Syndicate No. 5 Addition a►�-�a�. 1359 Blair Avenue May 9, 1997 Page 2 Saint Paul Public Health has declazed this building(s) to constitute a"nuisance" as defined by Legislative Code, Chapter 45. Public Health has issued an order to the then known responsible parties to eliminate this nuisance condition by correcting the deficiencies or by razing and removing this building(s). Inasmuch as this Order to Abate has not been complied with the nuisance condition remains unabated, the community continues to suffer the blighting influence of this property. It is the recommendation of Public Health that the City Council pass a resolution ordering the responsible parties to either repair, or demolish and remove this building in a timely manner, and failing that, authorize Public Health to proceed to demolition and removal, and to assess the costs incurred against the real estate as a special assessment to be collected in the same manner as taxes. � ncerely, �!u/ a � l - Reneta Weiss Program Supervisor Vacant/Nuisance Building Unit Saint Paul Public Health RW:mI cc: Jan Gasterland, Building Inspection and Design Stephen Christie, City Attorneys Office Nancy Anderson, Assistant Secretary to the Council Steve Zaccard, Fire Mazshall Dan Pahl, PED-Housing Division q�t-�aa, REPORT: Date: June 3, 1997 Time: 10:00 a.m. Place: Room 330 Ciry Hall 15 West Kellogg Boulevard LEGISLATIVE HEARING Gerry Strathman Legislative Hearing Officer 1. Resolution ratifying assessment of benefits, costs and elcpenses for summary abatements for the following (Laid over from May 6, 1997 Legislative Hearing): 2106 Mazshall Ave. (J9705AA) 473 Cretin Ave. S. (J9705AA) 1857 E. Cottage Ave. (J9705AA) 2176 Stillwater Ave. (J9705AA) 695 St. Anthony Ave. (39705AA) 1110 Forest 5t. (J9704A4) Legislative Hearing Officer recomimended approval of the assessments with the following exceptions: 2106 Marshall (J9705AA) laid over to June 17, 1997 2176 Stillwater Avenue (79705AA) reduce assessment to $37.50 2. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the referenced building, located at 1359 Blair Avenue. If the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Public Health is ordered to remove the building. Legislative Hearing Officer recommended approval and amended the date for repair or removal of the structure to October 11, 1997. 3. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the referenced building located at $4,¢ Western Avenue North. If the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Public Health is ordered to remove the building. Legislative Hearing Officer recommended approval. q�-�aa` 4. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the referenced building located at�95 Michi,g�n Street. If the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Public Health is ordered to remove the building. Legislative Hearing Officer recommended approval and amended the date for repair or removal of the shvcture to 180 days. 5. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the referenced building located at�77 Kent Street. If the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Public Health is ordered to remove the building. Legislative Hearing Officer recommended approval. 6. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the referenced building located at� Harrison Avenue. If the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Public Health is ordered to remove the building. Legislative Hearing Officer recommended laying this matter over to July 1, 1997. 7. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the referenced building located at Q15 �herburne Avenue. If the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Public Health is ordered to remove the building. Legislative Heazing Officer recomwended approval and amended the date for repair or removal of the structure to 180 days if the $200 vacant building fee is paid and $2,000 bond is posted by noon on June 11, 1997. 8. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the referenced building located at� Canitol Hei¢hts. If the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Public Aealth is ordered to remove the building. Legislative Hearing Officer recommended approval and amended the date for repair or removal of the structure to November 12, 1997. 9. S�mmary abatement appeal for 1176 Portland Avenue; Bonnie J. Iiughes, appellant. The appeal was withdrawn a� - �a� MINUTES OF LEGISLATIVE HEARING June 3, 1997 Room 330, Ciry Hall Gerry Strathman, Legislative Hearing Officer STAFF PRESENT: Chuck Votel, Guy Willits, Public Health; Roxanna Flink, Real Estate. Gerry Strathman, L,egislative Hearing Officer, called the meeting to order at 10:05 a.m. 1. Resolution ratifying assessment of benefits, costs and expenses for summary abatements for the following (I.aid over from May 6, 1997 I,egislative Hearing): 2106 Marshall Ave. (39705AA) 473 Cretin Ave. S. (J9705AA) 1857 E. Cottage Ave. (J9705AA) 2176 Stillwater Ave. (39705AA) 695 St. Anthony Ave. (J9705AA) 1110 Forest St. (J9704A4) Legislative Hearing Officer recommended approval of the assessments with the following exceptions: 2106 Marshall (J9705AA) laid over to June 17, 1997 2176 Stillwater Avenue (J9705AA) reduce assessment to $37.50 1857 E Cottagg Avenue Guy Willits, Public Health, showed a video of the properry and reviewed the staff report. Orders were mailed on 7anuary 30, 1997, to remove snow from the walk. A recheck was done on February 3, 1997; and the city did the work on February 5, 1997. Mazy Kelly, property owner, appeared and stated that she was having back problems and could not shovel her sidewalk. During that time is when they had the ice storm and she tried chopping the ice but she didn't have the strength. Mr. Strathman stated it is the property owner's responsibility to shovel the walk or make anangements to have it done. The video ciearly shows the work was done by city crews and recommended approving the assessment. 473 Cretin Avenue S. . No one appeared; recommended approving the assessment. 4� r �� ll10 Forest Guy Willits, Public Heaith, showed a video of the property and reviewed the staff report. Orders were mailed on October 31, 1996 to remove mattresses, couch, refrigerators, refuse, carpeting, and discarded range. A recheck was done on November 8, 1996, the property was not cleaned up, and the work was done by the city on November 19, 1996. Chadoua and Youa Vue, properry owners, appeared. Mr. Vue stated that they bought the properiy on September 16, 1996. The previous owner lived on the property until October 5, 1996. VJhen she moved out, she toid them she would clean everything including the basement and the garage. She unlocked the garage so that it would be easy for her people to move things out. They waited for her to come back and in the meantime, they put some of her things in the back yard so they could clean building for people moving in. Everything that was taken from the back yard and garage belonged to the previous owner. Mr. Strathman inquired where the orders were sent. Mr. Votel responded that they were mailed to Bob Van L.ee at ]110 Forest, the previous owner. Orders were also posted at the property, there was no phone listing, and the garage was not secured. Mr. Vue stated that the only order he saw was the one dated December 24, 1996. Mr. Strathman stated that ihe order mailed October 31, 1996, was sent to the previous owner because she was listed on the tax records as the official owner. The previous owner had a legal obligation to inform the new owners that this order was outstanding. The city is required under the law to send notice to the property owner as recorded at the Ramsey county property taxation. The city followed the proper legal procedures, the video clearly shows the work was done by the city, and recommended approval of the assessment. 122 Manitoba Avenue No one appeared. This assessment was ratified on May 9, 1997 and was not part of the laid over assessments for today's hearing. It was re-discussed and no action was taken. 2106 Marshall Avenue Laid over to June 17, 1997 458 Maryland Avenue No one appeared. This assessment was ratified on May 14, 1997 and was not part of the laid over assessments for today's hearing. It was re-discussed and no action was taken. 2 �� I � V � 1303 Randolph Avenue No one appeared. This assessment was ratified on May 14, 1997 and was not part of the laid over assessments for today's hearing. It was re-discussed and no action was taken. 695 St Anthony Avenue Guy Willits, Public Aealth, showed a video of the properry and reviewed the staff report. The order was mailed December 20, 1996, to remove snow and ice from the walk. The properry was rechecked on January 15, 1997; the city did the work on January 16, 1997. Mike Peters, property owner, appeared and stated that in early 7anuary when he received the notice from the city, he took care of the probiem. He received no further warnings. At that time, it stormed back-to-back and the snow was blowing all week. Mr. Strathman clarified that two sets of orders were issued to clean the walk, December 20, 1996 and January 7, 1947. City ordinance requires that snow be removed within 24 hours after a snow fall. In viewing the video, it is clear that the snow had been on the sidewalk for more than 24 hours. Mr. Peters explained that the walk had been shoveled 4 or 5 times after he was notified. It was a record winter for snow fa11. The reason he never got his walk done by the next day was because he was doing snowplowing and was usually out for 2 days. He stated that he had a right to be informed and to have a chance to take care of the problem, the city didn't do that. Mr. Strathman stated that according to city records, the letter sent on 7anuary 7, 1997 indicated the snow was to be removed. A recheck was done on 7anuary 15 and the snow still hadn't been removed; on Janaary 16 the city crew went out and removed the snow. It is clear on the video that there was snow on the sidewaik and recommended approval of the assessment. 2176 Stillwater Avenue Guy Willits, Public Health, showed a video of the property and reviewed the staff report. Orders were mailed on January 21, 1997 and again January 24 to remove snow. The property was rechecked on January 23, 1997; the city did the work on February 1, 1997. Jeff Miller, property owner, appeared and stated that he shoveled the sidewalk 3' wide. He did contact the city 3 times on Friday the 31st after he received the notice that the work order had been issued. He called tl�e inspector at 9:00 a.m., 10:00 a.m., and paged him at 1130 a.m., and he never returned his call. The Wednesday prior to that, he went out to clear the walk and couldn't chisel through the ice. By Friday it had warmed and he spent 3 hours clearing the sidewalk. 3 � I �� 9 � All the city did was probably plow another inch, dug up his lawn and put dirt and sand over what he had already shoveled. Mr. Strathman stated that in viewing the video, it appears an attempt was made to clean it up the snow although it wasdt quite �dequate. IIe recommended reducing the assessment from $132.50 to $37.50. 251 Wayzata Street No one appeazed. This assessment was ratified on April 9, 1997 and was not part of the laid over assessments for today's hearing. It was re-discussed and no action was taken. Mr. Strathman noted that a letter was received from Dawn Snnon the property owner explaining that she was having personal difficulties and financial hardships. 3. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the referenced building, located at 1359 Blair Avenue. If the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Public Health is ordered to remove the building. Chuck Votel, Public Health, reviewed the staff report stating that the building was condemned in July 1996, 5 summary abatement notices were issued to remove various nuisance law violations. After an inspection In March 1997, the building was declared a nuisance. A code compliance inspection was obtained on May 28, 1997, and the estimated amount of money needed to repair the structure makes it unlikely and not economically feasible to rehabilitate. He also noted a letter was received from community members in support of condemnation. Mr. Strathman questioned why this matter was being heard when a bond had been posted on April 11, 1997, and permits obtained. Mr. Votel referred to the code compliance inspection report and stated that under item #4, the inspector noted that most of the work that had been done to the building and garage was substandard and would have to be redone. The building is still in a nuisance condition as it has been for some time which is the basis for requesting an order for repair or removal. Mr. Nguyen stated that they obtained the permit on October 1, 1997, and posted the bond which gives them 6 months to bring the house up to code. The vacant building fee of $200 and the code compliance was paid. He's in the process of re-roofing the house; iYs a slow process but he does has 6 months to complete the work. Mr. Strathman asked the property owner if he expected to have the work completed in 6 months. Mr. Nguyen responded that he would not have posted the $2,000 bond if he didn't plan to have the work done in 6 months. When he talked to Don Wagner, he was told he could either try to sell the house the way it was or he could try to repair it, and if he posted a bond, 0 �� ,� r l'S.� - the city was pretty lenient if 50% of the work was done within 6 months. Mr. Strathman asked about the complaints received on the property. Mr. Votel stated that they had so many problems with the property that they issued a notice to board all accessible first floor openings to the building. It wasn't done and the city had to have the contractor go out and put 16 boards on the building to secure it. There hasn't been any zeal effort to complete the repairs and the city is concerned because the inspector stated in his report that the work that has already been done needs to be redone. It is substandard work and is not going to get a code compliance. The people next door want some resolution to this property. Mr. Nguyen stated that every time an abatement was sent, he took care of it. Basically all he wants to do is fix up the house and either rehab or sell it. F3e has the code cotnpliance list and is making sure that the work he does meets code. Quoc Nguyen, previous owner of the house, stated he deeded the property to his son, but explained that he still holds the mortgage and has some responsibility in the matter. He is very concerned about the rehabilitation or the sale of the property to pay the balance of the mortgage. He wants to compiy with the city. Mr. Strathman stated concern about the house being a nuisance to the neighborhood and the possibility that the work on the building may not be 50% completed when the 6-month period expires. If this is allowed to continue, they may be in a worse situation in a couple of months. Mr. Nguyen stated there are 4 more months and 11 days before the bond expires. The reason it doesn't look like much work has been done to the building is because everything has been on the interior. He's now ready to re-roof the house and do the siding. 'Tom Ryan, 1363 Blair, appeared and stated that the time line here seems to be skewed to some extent by the fact that the permit was not puiled until April 11, 1997. The building became vacant on July 30, 1996, and subsequently went into the vacant house status. It is his understanding, through contact with the inspectors, that the owner made no move to get the building inspected until the last possible minute when he would be forced by abatement order to do so. It was only in the face of those orders that the perznit was pulled and that the inspection was made. That inspection speaks for itself in terms of the quality of the work. The records contain a copy of a petition signed by neighbors signed on August 12, 1996. He also presented a new petition signed by 25 individuals surrounding the property in question urging the city to either insure that rehabilitation go forward promptly to bring this property up to the city codes and neighborhood standards, or that this dangerous and unsightly structure be 5 �� -� �. �- removed. The neighbors have had enough. If time is going to be granted to rehabilitate, then the most strenuous supervision should be put into place. Beth Randall, Executive Director of H-Mark, stated this properiy has been an issue with repairs according to neighbors since Januaty of 1995. It doesn't appear to be economically feasible to renovate. She mentioned that one thing that may not have been suggested as a financial option is selective ciearance. Also selling the building as is rather than putting money into it. Her company would be willing to pay for the lot but they would not renovate the building, it would be tom down. She would discourage putting more money into the building. They are in support of the neighbors to make sure that there is a solution in a very timely fashion. Extending the time line isn't going to solve the problem. Quoc Nguyen indicated that if the community wants to buy the property, he would be happy to seli it. Mr. Strathman stated that the fact that the bond has been posted and legal permits have been pulled, he would not recommend proceeding with demolition until the 6 month period had expired. Ae recommended giving the property owner until October 11, 1997 to complete the repairs. 3. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the referenced building located at $46 Western Avenue North. If the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Public Health is ordered to remove the building. Dave Assitt, attorney representing Bankers Trust Company, mortgage holder on the property, appeared and stated that they have commenced fareclosure proceedings. The property went to sale on March 22, 1997. The are in the process of reducing the redemption period from 6 months to 5 weeks and if successful, they would be the owner of the property about July 31, 1997. They h�ve had limited accessed to the property but diey believe the structure may be rehabilitated. He requested that if the buiiding is to be removed, the order be delayed 60 days to allow time for their client to obtain titie and possession. Mr. Strathman stated that based on the information presented by staff and in viewing the photographs, the building is clearly a public nuisance and therefore recommended approval of the order to remove or repair within 15 days. 4. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the referenced building located at 395Michigan tr et. If the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Public Health is ordered to remove the building. Bill Manson, property owner, appeared and stated that he purchased the home from HUD on April 15, 1997 and he is in the process of rehabilitating the structure. � q�_�z�-- Chuck Votel, Public Health, reviewed the staff report stating that the building has been vacant since May 1996. It went through HUD's foreclosure process and was to Mr. Manson. Previous to that, it has been a problem property for the ciry since 7uly 1996. At this point, Mr. Manson has posted the bond and pulled building permits which are valid until November 20 ,1 997. Mr. Strathman recommended the property owner be given 180 days to complete the rehabilitation. 5. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the referenced building located at 677 Kent Street. If the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Public Health is ordered to remove the building. Faye Madison, Murnane I.aw Firm, appeared and stated that they have been retained by Bank of America the mortgage holder to represent them. The mortgage is FE3A and they are dealing with HUD on the property as weli. Chuck Votel, Public Health, reviewed the staff report stating that the building has been vacant since February 1997 and Bank of America has begun foreclosure proceedings. The properry would be transferred to HUD after the redemption period. The city has had to board the building and three summary abatement notices were issued. Real estate taxes are currently paid; the estimated cost to repair the building makes it unlikely and not economically feasible to rehabilitate. Ms. Madison stated that they will be handiing the mortgage foreclosure in the near future. The file is currentiy in shipping between Bank of America's pre-foreclosure and foreclosure departments. They haven't done any title work on the property yet but they have received indication that the property was deeded to Paul Schwartz by Bahram Ghassemlou. After talking with Mr. Ghassemlou, it is her understanding the he deeded the property back to Paul Schwartz but he doesn't want it back. It was also indicated the Mr. Schwartz and Mr. Ghassemlou would be willing to enter into negotiations for a deed in lieu of foreclosure which would speed up the process. They have been in touch with Sophie Hallauer from HUD who has ordered an emergency HUD inspection report. Mr. Strathman stated he sympachized with their objective but explained that the city is dealing with a building that has been vacant, declared to be a public nuisance, and the recommendation by city inspectors is that rehabilitation is not economically feasible. In view of those facts, he recommended approvai of the order. 7 q � _'11�1- 6. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the referenced building located at 275 Harrison Avenue. If the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Public Health is ordered fo remove the buiiding. Brett L.arson, Ramsey Counry Property Records and Revenue, reported that the property in question is scheduled for auction June 19, 1997. There has been interest from potential buyers and he's fairly certain that it will sell. He meet with the West 7th neighborhood group and they indicated that there is some history behind the house. He requested time to ailow the property to be sold at the auction. Chuck Votel, Public Health, reported that the property is secured. The building was condemned in October 1996. The estimated amount of money needed to properly repair the structure makes rehabilitation unlikely and not economicaliy feasible. Mr. Strathman recommended the matter be laid over to July 1, 1997. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the referenced building located at 915 Sherburne Avenue. If the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Public Health is ordered to remove the building. Chuck Votel, Public Heaith, reviewed the staff report stating the building has been vacant since August 1996, and there have been two summary abateznent orders issued. The real estate taxes are paid and vacant building registration fees are due. A code compliance was done on April 16, 1997; the estimated amount of money needed to properly repair the structure makes rehabilitation unlikely and not economically feasible. Ron Widerhoft, property owner, appeared and stated that he plans to sell the property to Todd who intends to rehab the building but wants to make sure that it won't be torn down. Mr. Strathman stated that based on the information presented by staff and in viewing the photographs of the building, he would require that a$2,000 bond is posted and permits pulled as an assurance that the building would be rehabilitated within 6 months. The perspective buyer indicated that would not be a problem. Mr. Strathman recommended giving the property owner 180 days to repair the building on the condition that the vacant building fees are paid, and a$2,000 bond is posted by noon on Wednesday, June 11, 1997. 8. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the referenced building located at 774 Capitol Aei¢hts. If the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Public Health is ordered to remove the building. Chuck Votel, Public Health, reviewed the staff report and stated that the building was condemned in October 1496. The city had to board the building, zegistration fees and taxes are paid. On April 8, 1997 a Code Compliance inspection was done. The bond was posted with the building inspection departrnent on May 12, 1997, and a permit obtained which is valid until November 12, 1997. Public Health wants an order that says if the owner doesn't get the work done, the building is tozn down. Mike Davis, grandson of the property owner, Emil I.emke, appeared and stated that he 9ntends to rehabilitate the building. He explained that he was late ]n posting the bond because he went to the wrong address and by the time he got to the right office it had closed. The following Monday he posted the bond but notice had already been mailed. Mr. Strathman recommended amending the resolution and giving the property owner until November 12, 1997. 9. Summary abatement appeal for 1176 Portland Avenue; Bonnie J. Hughes, appeliant. No one appeared. The appeal was withdrawn; the garage was removed. The meeting adjoumed at 11:45 a.m. Gerry Strat�(man, L,egislative Hearing Officer E 9'1- �1 �� Ay HAMLINE MIDWAY COALITION Hamllne Park Playground Building � 1�64 Lafond;lcenue. Saint Paul, >L� 5510� � 6L-646-1986 � Fa� 6L-6=i1 July 7,1997 Councilmember Roberta Megard 310D City Hall 15 Kellogg Boulevard St. Paul MN 55102 Dear Councilmember Megard: On behalf of the Hamline Midway Coalition Board of Directors, I am writing to seek action by the City Council to demolish the property at 1359 Blair Avenue. As you know, FiMC has supported the efforts of Blair Avenue neighbors, City departments and the Hamline-Midway Area Rehab. Corp. to seek resolution to a long list of nuisance behaviors, health risks and the blighting effect of this property for years. I trust that these issues are fully outlined in your reports from past administrative proceedings, Health Department inspection reports, police records, and Bruce Noyes' estimate of the rehabilitation costs. Neighbors may elaborate further in your review of this matter before the City Council today. I understand that the Council will consider a staff recommendation to grant the property owner additional time to abate the numerous code violations. 'This extension is unacceptable and, in our opinion, futile, given a long-standing pattern of inadequate and last-minute attention to these issues on the part of the owner. Neighbors have patientiy awaited improvements and sought several alternatives to demolition for too long. In the meantime, the condition of the property has only deteriorated further, to the point where: 1) it appears entirely uneconomical to rehabilitate the existing structure; 2) a significant nuisance has continued for neighbors; and 3) the City's administrative and enforcement resources have been wasted on a problem that shows no serious hope of being resolved by the responsible parties. I urge you to deny Mr. Nguyen's request for an extension and to proceed immediately with an order to demolish 1359 Blair Avenue. Sincerely, ( �"�` 1 ,� ` � jodi M. Bantley Executive Director /jmb ec: Co�c�l' �e��e�ns��Bet1�J�R�da�1 i a better plctce to lir�e inzct u ork. e rare ;,r ..,..,,�.�� .�,.��„��,��,�«,,,�r H-MARC a�e.�aW�nr� a��nc�� J,�yz, i�� c�.y co,m«� �t�: 9� As you may be aware, the property at 1359 Blair Ave. ]�as be� a problem property in several instauces in its history withthe past year being particularly troublesome. The propertywas condenmed'm 3uly of 1996. The code compliance ins�tiam was nat requested until Mardi and the b�td and birilding pemrit c�re na� secured imtil April of this year. Since April, work has be� slow and accorcling to building inspedors, nat g�erally of a worlm�an like maimer. Wththe cooperati� ofthe owner, Quoc Nguyai and Bnu:e Noyes of the Hrnue Loan Ftmd staff, a rel�ab loan inspec�a� was d�e last week. This inspedion indicated an e.stimate3 $56,500 in repairs. I feel this nwnber is canservative y� deuwmstrates the level of d�erioration tbat is pres�t. I have suggeste3I xmderstand the owner's desire to r�ovate yet can not in good c�sci�ce support lris de�isian. I feel that the homeno longer has signifir<nrt value and should be tom down. There are several redevdapm�t aptions for the land suc� as side yard, a house moue or new caa�slrudioai. After some researcli a�n mY part, I have suggested the City of Samt Paul's Seledive Clearance Progravi to the o�met. The ProgcamPmvides paym�t of debt of up to $15,000, retocatimi for fihe owner ($5,�0-$i0,tM30) and deauolitian ofthe building paidfor bythe Selecxive Clearance budg�. I fet3 Uris is the best sodutionfor all involved Selective Clearance gives srnne mon�ary s�.tlem�k to the owner, pays off the existing mortgage, and d�nolishes the build"mg. There is a small mortgage on the property held by TCF �o also supports the Selective {�earance opti� as they aze ready to foredose at �ytime as a rec�t de�and ldterhas not be� satisfied. M�YP�Ple inciudingthe Hamline Nfidway Coatiti�, biock club leac�s, neiSli��, b��S �o�> �S' r�ab advisor, lender, vacavt bu�ldings staff, public health staff andmyselfl�ave sp�t an �omious amowrt of time � resolving issues azoimdUris ProP�9. I feel a viabie soltrti� has be� readied and to date Uie owner has not presenYed any viable altemativenort�as i�e appliedfor Seledive Clearance. The couummityhas waitedlaUg �ough for this siwation to be resolved. I woutd recam�m�dthat the cotmcil take the strongest adion possible to move the process of demolitiari fotward. I appreaate your commitm�t to birildinS stron8 etYn�Shbo�hoods andhelping commimities maintain dec�t qualityho Thank youfor yo�s ca�siderati� of flris l�ter. SincerelY, ) � .,►► , ; l,, � :,�,,.. �V i� ' � �Y � (612)644-0065 Hamline Branch I.ibrary Bldg. 1558 West Mumehaha Avenue Saint Paul, MN 55104 / �\ � �1 �'� a� HAMLINE MIDWAY COALITION Hamline Park Playground Building � 1564 Lafond Avenue, Saint Pau1, \�'V 5� 104 � 612-646-1986 � FaY 612-641 July 7,1997 Councilmember Roberta Megard 310D City Hall 15 Kellogg Boulevard St. Paul NIN 55102 Dear Councilmember Megard: On behalf of the Hamline Midway Coalition Board of Directors, I am writing to seek action by the City Council to demolish the property at 1359 Blair Ayenue. . As you know, HMC has'supported the efforts of Blair Avenue nei�hbors, City departments and the Hamline-Midway Area Rehab. Corp. to seek resolution fo a long list of nuisance behaviors, health risks and the blighting effect of this property - far-years. I trust that these issues "are fi�1Ty outiined in your repor�s f�om past . adminisfrative proceedings, Health;Department inspection reports, police records, and Bruce Noyes'- estimate of the rehabilitation costs. Neighbors may elaborate furfher.in your review of.tliis matter before the.Cit� Council today. . I understand that the Council,willyconsider a,staff recommendation ta grant the pxoperty awner additional,time to abate the-nuinerous-cbde violations...This �._ extenaion is�unaccepfable; and', in our. opinion,. futi�s, given � long-standing patter� of inadequate andlasE-xninute attention�to tYiese issues on,'the-part of the owrier. � Neighbors have patiently` a�vaited impxovements and sought several alternatives to demolition for too long. In meantiine, fhe condition of the property has only deteriorated further, to the point_where: 1) .it appears entirely uneconomical to rehabilitate the existing structure; 2) a significant nuisance has continued for - neighbors; and 3) the City's administrative and enforcement resources have been wasted on a problem that shows no serious hope of being resolved by the . responsible parties. - � � � � , � � � I urge you to deny Mr. Nguyeri s request for an extension and to proceed immediately with an, order to demolish 1359 Blair Avenue. Sincerely, .� � �- �� jo i M. BantleX Executive Director /jmb cc ��o�e� ca�e�o e �i�z B ng�be� m�in�e� - z u a �ieighborbood a better plRCe to live and work. io,"� rerycltdPW++ t0%pos+mnsumerxane JUL-02-1997 09�11 CfIY OF SAII�T PAUL xo.�,c�c.�».ar�. FROM FROM 5T. PRUL PED r -��-��, �a,�� ;�I i �!lAAA; �� Date: 7une 30, 1997 To: Tom Harren From: Bsuce Noyes TO DEPARiMBNi R ECONOMIC 1 ,z� Re: Pursuant to your request to inspect the premises at I359 Blair, EXTERIOR: 1. Roof: The shingles have been removed from the majority of the ro unstungled areas. The roof de�k is deteriorated in several places. Ext� an entire redecking will be required. A standard wood window has be The second floor/attic spaces have finished walis and ceilings, therefc underside of the roof structure was not possible. However, walls and are water stained in several areas. The clsimney flashing is old and he� and cap sre mostly detedorated. The chimney should be rebuilt ebova 2. Eaves: The eaves are covered wiih aluzninum on the south eave in Soffit and facia members are missiq,c in substantial portions of the ea� revealing rotted, deteriorated and missing members. Soffit panels on instafled in a workmanlike manner. There is flaking and peeling paint 92668574 P.02 �� cirl�n Tebphnnt: 61L2666626 Faeu�n�k: 612-22&33I1 Paul, MI�7. surfaces. Tarps cover the dve roof board repairs or instailed as a skylight. an examination o£the ilings on the second floor ly tarred. Chimney bricks �e roofline. umvorktnatilike manner. on the north and the east, : west side were not �everal areas. 3. Siding: The majority of sidin,g on the east, south and west of the hd � se is composite "hard- boazd" siding. It was nat installed in a workmanlike mannez and may n t have be�n new material. The north and west walts are covered with material not manufactured� br use as siding (pieces of reclaimed storm doors7). d. Doors aad Windows: Door and window trim members are wood v flaking and peeiing paint. Most main floor windows and doors are "bd windows on the second story are generaily in poor condition with bro� panels, and torn and missing screens. The front entry door is ill fltting, without proper locks. The front storm door shouid be replaced. � 5. Miscellsaeous: The bas�nseM windows are "boarded up". There a� ' �� foundation. The north addition foundation was not installed in a wor ' doors appeat to have been used as concrete fonn work) and it is not �+ substaMiat amouMS of ed up> The stocm and missing glass orly weathetized and cracks actd holes in the inlike manner (storm �per1Y attached to the Yage 1 0£ 5 � � J1�-02-1997 09-11 FROM FROM ST. PRUL PED TO old� foundation sections. Brick repairs are unworkmanlike. The la 92666574 P.03 a � "� step is broken, cracked and spalled. Enhy doocs lack deadbolt locks to wde. There si� structural deficiencies where wis►dows and doors have been altered. There ars lazge amouuts' �f debris. 6. Garsge: The shingle cut at the rake u►ds ofthe roof do not meet e_ There are no rake boards. The service door is out of square. The concrete drive is deteri � ted. The siding materials were not installeQ in a workmanlike manner. ;; INTERIOR: 1. Kitcheo, (components are to be found in two different rooms): Floor: Wom and dirry tiardwood floor in sonth sectioa i�o fi Reclaimed storm doors have been vsed as sub-flooring in the Walls and Ceilings: There is cracked plaster, flaking and pe� The sheetrock taping in the north section was not done in a portions are not completed. Cabinets: The kitchen cabinets lack coumertops and are not south section. The plumbing is not hooked up at the sink in Oiher: The radiator has flaking and peeling paint. Z. Batkrooms (3): Basemern: The ceramic tile floor was not instalied in a wo� unfinished. The wall paneling is un5nished, wet and milde� complete. The sink is illegally ve,nted. The toilet is old and an openable window or a fan and does not meet code requ ceiling consists of reclaimed lnmber. There is no GFI rece� Main Floor. The vanity sink is in poor condition. There is no floor in north section. section. in the south section. ike manner and itly attached in the section. like manner and is he tub instailaiion is not The room does not have �ts for ventilation. The base. Second Floor: The tub is old and dirty and wom. The ceramic�e is not instatted in a worlananlike manner. There is no door trim, no window trim d no base molding. There is water damage on the ceiling. � ;� � 3. Liv;ng Room and Dining Rooms: Floors: The wood plank flooring is worn, dirty and scratched. � e walis, ceilings and interior irim are characterized by cracked pIaster, water damag �, soiied surfaces, flaking and peeling paint. The double hung windows (4) are characte '' by loose and deteriorated putty, flaldng peeling paim, missing hardware and oor weather stripping. Page 2 of 5 � JUL-02-1997 09=12 4. �edrooms (4): FROM FROM ST. PFlUL PED � Basement: The floor is wet and there is no 5nished floor. The water stained, miidewed and malodorous. The window does nok meet egess requirements for escape and rescue. The ceiling has water stains and open ph�imbing acs;ess hoSes. � � Second Floor, IQorth {2): The aze no ficnshed floors. There is Tha sheetrock installation and taping were not done in a wor� Sec.ond Floor, South: The mixture of wood flooring and There is a variety of wall and ceiling coverings including in various states of repair. Portions are wet and water sta tntted. 92668574 P.04 a'�� walls are wet, or case moldings. ; manner. pg is wom and dirty. y shceuock, paneling and $�e skylight frame is 4. Secoad Ftoor Porches (2): Unfinished and um+vorkmanlike wali an �c�iling installations including 1/4 inch plywood and exposed newspaper. There is flaldng d peeling paint. 1'he rear porch is malodorous. � 5. Common Bsllway: Tbere is wom and deteriorate3 cacpet. There peeling paint on the walis. 6. Basement stairs: The treads are wom. There is no handrail or properly headered off. 7. Bssement: The majority ofthe concrete floors and foundation of standing water and mildew. The subfloor on the north portion reclaimed storm doors. The entire basement is matodorous. 8. Fireplace: Not constructed in a worl:manlike manner. ELECTRTCAIJMECHAIVICAL: plaster and The opening is not ire wet. There are areas hous� consists of 2. Electrieal: There is a 100 amp service panel oversized circuit br ' s and illegal connections. There are no hard wired smoke detectors. There are wiring runs in th' asement ceiling that do not meet code. 'There are reverse po3arities, raceptacles with no groun g, missing covers and fixture,s throughout the house too mimerous ta mention. New constru on standards for wiring were not obsecved where waIts have been nevviy constivcted or where � id watls were fully opened. 2. Plumbing: The basement fixtures are not vented to code. The n wastelvent and numerous other waste and supply fittings which do for the kit�hen stove does not meet wde. 3. Hcsting: Unable to check the opent+onal condition of the gas unknown. Fin tube and cast iron radiators are mixed. There is no bath has an illegal code. The gas cACk therefare its condition is istion sir. Yage 3 of 5 JUL-02-1997 69�12 FROM FROM ST. PRUL PED 92668574 P.05 � y y q ,�, � Extezior: i. Roof 2. Eaves 3. Siding 4. Aoors & Wu►dows 5. Misc. 6. Garage � Imerior: cost Eshmate TO 58,500 Tear off old rovfing and aay newly insta meet code, install new roo� repair roof I deck if building official requires, reptace chimney above the roofline 52,800 Remove soffit and facia members, repaii lookouts and subfacia. Install new alumi 35,000 Repair and paint "hard-board" on hwsa dispose of material not manufactured fo� with new siding to match balance of hou $2,600 Repair or replace prime doors and windi door, repair or replac� stotsn windows, a members, paint trim or cover with form $3,000 Repair or replacR basemesu windows, m rear foundation section to code, repair b step, rebuild headers above ahezed door (especially the sliding door on the east si geaeral clean up of the premises $1,500 Repair roof, install rake boards, repiace 1. Kitchens $4,400 2. Bathrooms $5,500 3. Liv. Room 54,200 & 1?in. Rm • 4. Bedrooms $5,140 i. Porches $2,400 6. Hallway $1,000 7. Basement $1,500 Stairs 8. Basement 52,000 9. Fireplace $1,000 � Install new vinyl sheet goods flooring, n watis, ceifings, doors, and cabinets, scra Rework ceramic tile installations, repia� materiais, complete basement tub install code, replace basement bath ceiling, insl necessary Repair floon or replace floor coverings, doors, repair window sash Install new finished floors, replace or re; installed walis and ceilings, install egres: case moldings, remove skylight Instatl finished floors, repair and paint v Replace floor cAVering, repair and paint Rebuild basement stairs with header, ins to code Properly iandscape pe�rimeter of foundai infiluation into basement Remove and rIispose of Page 4 of S roofing wtrich does not ds, instal[ new roof brick and mortar rafter tail ends, i soffit and facia l garage. Remove and ting use and replace s, replace front storm �sir deteriosated trim atvminum point faundation, sepair kwork, replace lawnwalk �d window openings of the house), pmvide �lace sub-floor, repair : and paint cadiatot wet wall and ceiling ion, install ventilation to ;l trim membecs as walis, ceilings and deteriorated or poorly low, install base and � and ceilings, daodorize 1s and ceilittgs handraii and guard rail to prevent water ,� JUL-02-1997 09�13 FROM FROM 5T. PHUL PED �CGttICSVMCC}I3i1tCd�: 1. Elecuic � $2,000 2. Plumbing S],500 3.Heating 52,500 ?otal Costs S56,SOU TO 9266�74 P.06 ��' �� Wire house to Bulletin 80-1 standards, e fully renovated sections of house to new consuuction starrdards � Instatt waste and vent to code in 3locati � ns, install a gas cock to code for the stove, replace illegai water pply fittings, Remove 5n tube radiation and inctall iron, install r.flmbustion air , ; � � Page 5 of 5 TOTqL P.06 JUN-26-1997 09�44 CITY OF ST PRl1� LIEP Interdepartmental Memorandum CITY OF SATNT PAUL ...��.. June 26,1997 20: FROM: RE: Ann Cieslak, Legzslative Aide to Councilmember Megazd Beth Randall, Executive Director of H-M,AItC Joseph Ehrlich, St. Paul Building Inspector 612 266 9124 P.01 �l� �� Status Report for Vacant Building Located at 1359 BIair Avenue 'Ihe building has many deficiencies, as enuonerated in the code campliance report submitted by Don Wagner on March 31, 1997. The building is repairable, but will require very significant investment to correct the deterioration and sub-standard workmanship of the past several years. Theze aze some stzuctural deficiencies � evident in the floor system of the fisst level, observable from the basemeat. There aze indications of excessive deflection of the Second Floor suuctural system as well. The Second Floor structure is not visibie. Some cosmecic repairs ha�e been conducted on the interiot. Re-roofing of the bualdia� is pxesentiy underway. I recommend, if this buiidiz�,g is to be saved, that the owner focus on repairing the exterior and struciural components of the building first All rotted members must be replaced and any areas wheze water may pene�ate must be sealeci, including problem azeas in the foundation wall. Any rotted or improperly constructed frazning must be replaced and/or reinforced. Questionable framing that has aiready been covered must be uncovered to verify its condirion and repair as necessary. In my opinion, fhe workmanship evidenced on this building, demonstrates a lack of understanding by the wozlanen of basic construction principles. I do not feel tha[ the individuals perfotming the work have the knowledge or desire to satisfactorily restore t�is building to a liveable condirion. The recent flurry of repau activity seems designed more to impress than to accomplish a goat. The tepair effort appears to be very unorganized and is leaving the building wlnerable to fiuther decay azzd deterioration. If furthc^� investment in this property is approved, l believe a successful outcome can be achieved only by retainiq,a the services of a competent craftsman to complete the work. JE:aznw � �:� fiATllStE S11YER" fAX MEtdO OY516 o ^s56 � SS L ' a66- 9aas aG� - 90 99 TOTAL P.01 /� Council File � `� � � � .� �� ' ` Green Sheet # �ZS�� ° RESOLUTION _ CITY OF SAWT PAUL, MINNESOTA L�3 ir . Presented By Referred To Committee: Date 1 WHEREAS, Public Health has requested the City Council to hold public hearings to consider 2 the advisability and necessity of ordering the repair or wrecking and removal of a two-story, wood 3 frame dwelling and detached, two-vehicle, wood frame garage located on property hereinafter 4 referred to as the "Subject Property" and commonly l�own as 1359 Biair Avenue. This property is 5 legally described as follows, to wit: 6 7 L.ot 26, Block 6, Syndicate No. 5 Addition. 8 9 WHEREAS, based upon the records in the Ramsey County Recorder's Office and 10 information obtained by Public Health on or before April 8, 1997, the following are the now known 11 interested or responsible parties for the Subject Property: Quoc Tuan Nguyen, 850 University 12 Avenue North, St. Paul, MN 55104; Twin City Federal Mortgage Corp., SOl Marquette Avenue, 13 Mpls., MN 55402. 14 15 WHEREAS, Public Health has served in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 45 of the 16 Saint Paul L,egislative Code an order identified as an"Order to Abate Nuisance Building(s)" dated 17 March 26, 1997; and 18 19 WHEREAS, this order informed the then known interested or responsible parties that the 20 structure located on the Subject Property is a nuisance building(s) pursuant to Chapter 45; and 21 22 WHEREAS, this order informed the interested or responsible parties that they must repair or 23 demolish the structure located on the Subject Properry by April 25, -1997; and 24 25 WHEREAS, the enforcement officer has posted a placard on the Subject Property declaring 26 this building(s) to constitute a nuisance condition; subject to demolition; and 27 28 WHEREAS this nuisance condition has not been corrected and Public Health requested that 29 the City Clerk schedule public hearings before the Legislative Hearing Officer of the City Council 30 and the Saint Paul City Council; and 31 32 WHEREAS, the interested and responsible parties have been served notice in accordance 33 with the provisions of Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code, of the time, date, place and 34 purpose of the public hearings; and 35 36 WHEREAS, a hearing was held before the L.egislative Heuing Officer of the Saint Paul City 37 Council on Tuesday, 7une 3, 1997 to hear testimony and evidence, and after receiving testunony and 38 evidence, made the recommendation to approve the request to order the interested or responsible 39 parties to make the Subject Property safe and not detrimental to the public peace, health, safety and 40 welfare and remove its blighting influence on the community by rehabilitating this structure in 41 accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances, or in the alternative by demolishing and 42 removing the structure in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances. The rehabilitation or 43 demolition of the structure to be completed within fifteen (15) days after the date of the Council 44 Hearing; and °t� - �aa WHEREAS, a hearing was held before the Saint Paul City Council on Wednesday, 7une il, 1997 and the testimony and evidence including the action taken by the I.egislative Hearing Officer was considered by the Council; now therefore BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon the tesrimony and evidence presented at the above referenced public hearings, the Saint Paul City Council hereby adopts the following Findings and Order concerning the Subject Properry at 1359 Blair Avenue: 1. That the Subject Property comprises a nuisance condition as defined in Saint Paul Legislative Code, Chapter 45. 2. That the costs of demolition and removal of this building(s) is estunated to exceed three thousand dollars ($3,000.00). 3. That there now exists and has existed mulfiple Housing or Building code violations at the SubjeCt PiopeTt�- ; and that it has a documented and confirmed history as a blighting influence on the community. 4. That an Order to Abate Nuisance Building(s) was sent to the then known responsible parties to correct the deficiencies or to demolish and remove the building(s). 5. That the deficiencies causing this nuisance condition have not been corrected. 6. That Public Health has posted a placard on the Subject Property which declares it to be a nuisance condition subject to demolition. 7. That this building has been routinely monitored by the Vacant/Nuisance Buildings Code Enforcement Program. S. That the known interested parties and owners are as previously stated in this resolution and that the noti�cation requirements of Chapter 45 have been fulfilled. 9. Cammunications of Hamline Midway Coalition and H-MARC, and photos of the site, are with all testimony and other Q�E� files and records, accepted as part o� tTie record. The Saint Paul Ciry Council hereby makes the following order: 1. The above referenced interested or responsible parties shall make the Subject Property safe and not detrimental to the public peace, health, safety and weifare and remove its blighting influence on the community by rehabilitating this structure and correcting all deficiencies as prescribed in the above referenced Order to Abate Nuisance Building(s) in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances, or in the alternative by demolishing and removing the structure in accordance with ali applicable codes and ordinances. The rehabilitation or demolition and removal of the structure must be completed w�rf'�{�3}da3�s�i€�fi� �� -��-��j��jng- by August 11, 1997, and if rehabilitated, such rehabilitation must be totally complete, and done by a licensed, bonded contxactor. �l1-�� 2. If the above corrective action is not completed within this period of time the Public Health, Code Enforcement Program is hereby authorized to take whatever steps aze necessary to demolish and remove this structure, fill the site and charge the costs incurred against the Subject Properry pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul I.egislative Code. 3. In the event the building is to be demolished and removed by ffie City of Saint Paul, all personal property or fiYtures of any kind which interfere with the demolition and removal shall be removed from the property by the responsible parties by the end of this time period. If all personal properry is not removed, it shall be considered to be abandoned and the City of Saint Paul shall remove and dispose of such properry as provided by law. 4. It is further ordered, that a copy of this resolution be mailed to the owners and interested parties in accordance with Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code. 5. No further extensions will be Requested by Department o£: By: � By: Ey: d' liC-�'.f-iC� 1�� Form App n�ved by City ttorney By: Adopted by Council: Date Adoption Certified by Council cretary a�-�a� DEPAflTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATE INRIATED N� 3 2 5 7 5 GREEN SHEET _ . _ CONTACTPEFSON&PHONE � INITIAVDATE INfiIAVDATE DEPAfiTMEMDIRECfOfl CITYCAUNCIL Charles VOt01. 298-4153 A�K'N CINATfOflNEY CRYCLEflK MUST BE ON COUNCIL AGENDA BY (DATE) NWBER FOfl O BUDGET DIfiECTOR � FlN. & MGT. SEflVICES DIFi. NOUTING ORO6fl MAVOR (OR ASSI51ANn ,�' � TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES (CLIP AlL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) ACT10N AE�UESTED: City Council to pass this resolution which will order the owner(s) to remove or repair the re£erenced building(s). I£ the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Public Health is ordered to remove the building. The subject property is located at 1359 Blair Avenue. RECOMMENDA77oNS: nppmve (A) a Reject (H) pEtiSONAL SEiiVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING �UESTIONS: ._ PLANNING COMMISSfON _ CIVIL SEqViCE CAMMISSKIN t. 4ia5 t4lis p850nfi1iT eY¢f wolk0d under a ContfdCt for thls depaftRlBnt? . _ qe COMMITTEE , YES �NO — �� F 2. Has this person/firm ever been a ciry employee? — VES NO _ DISTRICT COUi�i � 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill no[ normally possessetl by any curreM ciry emplqree? SUPPOflTS WNICH COUNCIL O&IECTIVE? YES NO F�plain all yes answers on seperete sheet and attach to green sheet MRIA7ING PROBLEM, iSSUE. OPPORTUNYTY �Who. Whet, When, Where, Wh»: This building(s) is a nuisance building(s) as defined in ChapCer 45 and a vacant building as defined in Chapter 43 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code. The owners, interested parties and responsible parties known to the Enforcement Officer were given an order to repair or remove the building at 1359 Blair Avenue by April 25, 1997, and have failed to comply with those orders. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: The City wi11 eliminate a nuisance. ��'u� � � �� C 7 A � 7 �sT ��'�� . OISAOVANT0.GES IF APPROVEO' The City will spend funds to wreck and remove this building(s). These costs will be assessed to the property, collected as a special assessment against the property taxes. �Ci�""� ��e��°�3 $�P f�iP;! 21 1�97 DISADVANTA6E5 IF NOT APPROVED: A nuisance condition will remain unabated in the City. This building(s) will continue to blight the community. 70iALAMOUNTOFTRANSAC710N $$9 000 -$10 000 COST/HEVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE) VES NO FUNDINGSOURCE Nuis�riCe HOUSing AbatOment p�7�y�TYNUMBER 33261 FINANCIAL INFOBMATION: (EXPLAIN) � CITY OF SAINT PAUL Norm Co[eman, Mayar May 9, 1997 SAINT PAUL PUBLIC HEALTH Nea1 Holtan, M.D., M.P.H., Drrecto� h'UISANCE BUILDI��GS CODE ENFORCE�LIEN7' SSS Cedar Skee1 Saint Paul, MN SSIOI-1260 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARTNGS Council President and Members of the City Council a� -�aa 612-298-4153 � "''�' � � .� _ _ . .. . . � e e::; (vi� ? V .eJesf Saint Paul Public Health, Vacant/Nuisance Buildings Enforcement Unit has requested the City Council schedule public heazings to consider a resolution ordering the repair or removal of the nuisance building(s) located at: 1359 Blair Avenue The City Council has scheduled the date of these hearings as follows: Legislative Hearing - Tuesday, June 3, 1997 City Council Hearing - Wednesday, June 11, 1997 The owners and responsible parties of record are: Name and Last Known Address Quoc Tuan Nguyen 850 University Avenue North St. Paul, MN 55104 Interest Fee Owner Twin City Federal Mortgage Corp. 801 Marquette Avenue Mpls., MN 55402 The legal description of this property is: Mortgagee Lot 26, Block 6, Syndicate No. 5 Addition a►�-�a�. 1359 Blair Avenue May 9, 1997 Page 2 Saint Paul Public Health has declazed this building(s) to constitute a"nuisance" as defined by Legislative Code, Chapter 45. Public Health has issued an order to the then known responsible parties to eliminate this nuisance condition by correcting the deficiencies or by razing and removing this building(s). Inasmuch as this Order to Abate has not been complied with the nuisance condition remains unabated, the community continues to suffer the blighting influence of this property. It is the recommendation of Public Health that the City Council pass a resolution ordering the responsible parties to either repair, or demolish and remove this building in a timely manner, and failing that, authorize Public Health to proceed to demolition and removal, and to assess the costs incurred against the real estate as a special assessment to be collected in the same manner as taxes. � ncerely, �!u/ a � l - Reneta Weiss Program Supervisor Vacant/Nuisance Building Unit Saint Paul Public Health RW:mI cc: Jan Gasterland, Building Inspection and Design Stephen Christie, City Attorneys Office Nancy Anderson, Assistant Secretary to the Council Steve Zaccard, Fire Mazshall Dan Pahl, PED-Housing Division q�t-�aa, REPORT: Date: June 3, 1997 Time: 10:00 a.m. Place: Room 330 Ciry Hall 15 West Kellogg Boulevard LEGISLATIVE HEARING Gerry Strathman Legislative Hearing Officer 1. Resolution ratifying assessment of benefits, costs and elcpenses for summary abatements for the following (Laid over from May 6, 1997 Legislative Hearing): 2106 Mazshall Ave. (J9705AA) 473 Cretin Ave. S. (J9705AA) 1857 E. Cottage Ave. (J9705AA) 2176 Stillwater Ave. (J9705AA) 695 St. Anthony Ave. (39705AA) 1110 Forest 5t. (J9704A4) Legislative Hearing Officer recomimended approval of the assessments with the following exceptions: 2106 Marshall (J9705AA) laid over to June 17, 1997 2176 Stillwater Avenue (79705AA) reduce assessment to $37.50 2. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the referenced building, located at 1359 Blair Avenue. If the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Public Health is ordered to remove the building. Legislative Hearing Officer recommended approval and amended the date for repair or removal of the structure to October 11, 1997. 3. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the referenced building located at $4,¢ Western Avenue North. If the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Public Health is ordered to remove the building. Legislative Hearing Officer recommended approval. q�-�aa` 4. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the referenced building located at�95 Michi,g�n Street. If the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Public Health is ordered to remove the building. Legislative Hearing Officer recommended approval and amended the date for repair or removal of the shvcture to 180 days. 5. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the referenced building located at�77 Kent Street. If the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Public Health is ordered to remove the building. Legislative Hearing Officer recommended approval. 6. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the referenced building located at� Harrison Avenue. If the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Public Health is ordered to remove the building. Legislative Hearing Officer recommended laying this matter over to July 1, 1997. 7. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the referenced building located at Q15 �herburne Avenue. If the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Public Health is ordered to remove the building. Legislative Heazing Officer recomwended approval and amended the date for repair or removal of the structure to 180 days if the $200 vacant building fee is paid and $2,000 bond is posted by noon on June 11, 1997. 8. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the referenced building located at� Canitol Hei¢hts. If the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Public Aealth is ordered to remove the building. Legislative Hearing Officer recommended approval and amended the date for repair or removal of the structure to November 12, 1997. 9. S�mmary abatement appeal for 1176 Portland Avenue; Bonnie J. Iiughes, appellant. The appeal was withdrawn a� - �a� MINUTES OF LEGISLATIVE HEARING June 3, 1997 Room 330, Ciry Hall Gerry Strathman, Legislative Hearing Officer STAFF PRESENT: Chuck Votel, Guy Willits, Public Health; Roxanna Flink, Real Estate. Gerry Strathman, L,egislative Hearing Officer, called the meeting to order at 10:05 a.m. 1. Resolution ratifying assessment of benefits, costs and expenses for summary abatements for the following (I.aid over from May 6, 1997 I,egislative Hearing): 2106 Marshall Ave. (39705AA) 473 Cretin Ave. S. (J9705AA) 1857 E. Cottage Ave. (J9705AA) 2176 Stillwater Ave. (39705AA) 695 St. Anthony Ave. (J9705AA) 1110 Forest St. (J9704A4) Legislative Hearing Officer recommended approval of the assessments with the following exceptions: 2106 Marshall (J9705AA) laid over to June 17, 1997 2176 Stillwater Avenue (J9705AA) reduce assessment to $37.50 1857 E Cottagg Avenue Guy Willits, Public Health, showed a video of the properry and reviewed the staff report. Orders were mailed on 7anuary 30, 1997, to remove snow from the walk. A recheck was done on February 3, 1997; and the city did the work on February 5, 1997. Mazy Kelly, property owner, appeared and stated that she was having back problems and could not shovel her sidewalk. During that time is when they had the ice storm and she tried chopping the ice but she didn't have the strength. Mr. Strathman stated it is the property owner's responsibility to shovel the walk or make anangements to have it done. The video ciearly shows the work was done by city crews and recommended approving the assessment. 473 Cretin Avenue S. . No one appeared; recommended approving the assessment. 4� r �� ll10 Forest Guy Willits, Public Heaith, showed a video of the property and reviewed the staff report. Orders were mailed on October 31, 1996 to remove mattresses, couch, refrigerators, refuse, carpeting, and discarded range. A recheck was done on November 8, 1996, the property was not cleaned up, and the work was done by the city on November 19, 1996. Chadoua and Youa Vue, properry owners, appeared. Mr. Vue stated that they bought the properiy on September 16, 1996. The previous owner lived on the property until October 5, 1996. VJhen she moved out, she toid them she would clean everything including the basement and the garage. She unlocked the garage so that it would be easy for her people to move things out. They waited for her to come back and in the meantime, they put some of her things in the back yard so they could clean building for people moving in. Everything that was taken from the back yard and garage belonged to the previous owner. Mr. Strathman inquired where the orders were sent. Mr. Votel responded that they were mailed to Bob Van L.ee at ]110 Forest, the previous owner. Orders were also posted at the property, there was no phone listing, and the garage was not secured. Mr. Vue stated that the only order he saw was the one dated December 24, 1996. Mr. Strathman stated that ihe order mailed October 31, 1996, was sent to the previous owner because she was listed on the tax records as the official owner. The previous owner had a legal obligation to inform the new owners that this order was outstanding. The city is required under the law to send notice to the property owner as recorded at the Ramsey county property taxation. The city followed the proper legal procedures, the video clearly shows the work was done by the city, and recommended approval of the assessment. 122 Manitoba Avenue No one appeared. This assessment was ratified on May 9, 1997 and was not part of the laid over assessments for today's hearing. It was re-discussed and no action was taken. 2106 Marshall Avenue Laid over to June 17, 1997 458 Maryland Avenue No one appeared. This assessment was ratified on May 14, 1997 and was not part of the laid over assessments for today's hearing. It was re-discussed and no action was taken. 2 �� I � V � 1303 Randolph Avenue No one appeared. This assessment was ratified on May 14, 1997 and was not part of the laid over assessments for today's hearing. It was re-discussed and no action was taken. 695 St Anthony Avenue Guy Willits, Public Aealth, showed a video of the properry and reviewed the staff report. The order was mailed December 20, 1996, to remove snow and ice from the walk. The properry was rechecked on January 15, 1997; the city did the work on January 16, 1997. Mike Peters, property owner, appeared and stated that in early 7anuary when he received the notice from the city, he took care of the probiem. He received no further warnings. At that time, it stormed back-to-back and the snow was blowing all week. Mr. Strathman clarified that two sets of orders were issued to clean the walk, December 20, 1996 and January 7, 1947. City ordinance requires that snow be removed within 24 hours after a snow fall. In viewing the video, it is clear that the snow had been on the sidewalk for more than 24 hours. Mr. Peters explained that the walk had been shoveled 4 or 5 times after he was notified. It was a record winter for snow fa11. The reason he never got his walk done by the next day was because he was doing snowplowing and was usually out for 2 days. He stated that he had a right to be informed and to have a chance to take care of the problem, the city didn't do that. Mr. Strathman stated that according to city records, the letter sent on 7anuary 7, 1997 indicated the snow was to be removed. A recheck was done on 7anuary 15 and the snow still hadn't been removed; on Janaary 16 the city crew went out and removed the snow. It is clear on the video that there was snow on the sidewaik and recommended approval of the assessment. 2176 Stillwater Avenue Guy Willits, Public Health, showed a video of the property and reviewed the staff report. Orders were mailed on January 21, 1997 and again January 24 to remove snow. The property was rechecked on January 23, 1997; the city did the work on February 1, 1997. Jeff Miller, property owner, appeared and stated that he shoveled the sidewalk 3' wide. He did contact the city 3 times on Friday the 31st after he received the notice that the work order had been issued. He called tl�e inspector at 9:00 a.m., 10:00 a.m., and paged him at 1130 a.m., and he never returned his call. The Wednesday prior to that, he went out to clear the walk and couldn't chisel through the ice. By Friday it had warmed and he spent 3 hours clearing the sidewalk. 3 � I �� 9 � All the city did was probably plow another inch, dug up his lawn and put dirt and sand over what he had already shoveled. Mr. Strathman stated that in viewing the video, it appears an attempt was made to clean it up the snow although it wasdt quite �dequate. IIe recommended reducing the assessment from $132.50 to $37.50. 251 Wayzata Street No one appeazed. This assessment was ratified on April 9, 1997 and was not part of the laid over assessments for today's hearing. It was re-discussed and no action was taken. Mr. Strathman noted that a letter was received from Dawn Snnon the property owner explaining that she was having personal difficulties and financial hardships. 3. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the referenced building, located at 1359 Blair Avenue. If the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Public Health is ordered to remove the building. Chuck Votel, Public Health, reviewed the staff report stating that the building was condemned in July 1996, 5 summary abatement notices were issued to remove various nuisance law violations. After an inspection In March 1997, the building was declared a nuisance. A code compliance inspection was obtained on May 28, 1997, and the estimated amount of money needed to repair the structure makes it unlikely and not economically feasible to rehabilitate. He also noted a letter was received from community members in support of condemnation. Mr. Strathman questioned why this matter was being heard when a bond had been posted on April 11, 1997, and permits obtained. Mr. Votel referred to the code compliance inspection report and stated that under item #4, the inspector noted that most of the work that had been done to the building and garage was substandard and would have to be redone. The building is still in a nuisance condition as it has been for some time which is the basis for requesting an order for repair or removal. Mr. Nguyen stated that they obtained the permit on October 1, 1997, and posted the bond which gives them 6 months to bring the house up to code. The vacant building fee of $200 and the code compliance was paid. He's in the process of re-roofing the house; iYs a slow process but he does has 6 months to complete the work. Mr. Strathman asked the property owner if he expected to have the work completed in 6 months. Mr. Nguyen responded that he would not have posted the $2,000 bond if he didn't plan to have the work done in 6 months. When he talked to Don Wagner, he was told he could either try to sell the house the way it was or he could try to repair it, and if he posted a bond, 0 �� ,� r l'S.� - the city was pretty lenient if 50% of the work was done within 6 months. Mr. Strathman asked about the complaints received on the property. Mr. Votel stated that they had so many problems with the property that they issued a notice to board all accessible first floor openings to the building. It wasn't done and the city had to have the contractor go out and put 16 boards on the building to secure it. There hasn't been any zeal effort to complete the repairs and the city is concerned because the inspector stated in his report that the work that has already been done needs to be redone. It is substandard work and is not going to get a code compliance. The people next door want some resolution to this property. Mr. Nguyen stated that every time an abatement was sent, he took care of it. Basically all he wants to do is fix up the house and either rehab or sell it. F3e has the code cotnpliance list and is making sure that the work he does meets code. Quoc Nguyen, previous owner of the house, stated he deeded the property to his son, but explained that he still holds the mortgage and has some responsibility in the matter. He is very concerned about the rehabilitation or the sale of the property to pay the balance of the mortgage. He wants to compiy with the city. Mr. Strathman stated concern about the house being a nuisance to the neighborhood and the possibility that the work on the building may not be 50% completed when the 6-month period expires. If this is allowed to continue, they may be in a worse situation in a couple of months. Mr. Nguyen stated there are 4 more months and 11 days before the bond expires. The reason it doesn't look like much work has been done to the building is because everything has been on the interior. He's now ready to re-roof the house and do the siding. 'Tom Ryan, 1363 Blair, appeared and stated that the time line here seems to be skewed to some extent by the fact that the permit was not puiled until April 11, 1997. The building became vacant on July 30, 1996, and subsequently went into the vacant house status. It is his understanding, through contact with the inspectors, that the owner made no move to get the building inspected until the last possible minute when he would be forced by abatement order to do so. It was only in the face of those orders that the perznit was pulled and that the inspection was made. That inspection speaks for itself in terms of the quality of the work. The records contain a copy of a petition signed by neighbors signed on August 12, 1996. He also presented a new petition signed by 25 individuals surrounding the property in question urging the city to either insure that rehabilitation go forward promptly to bring this property up to the city codes and neighborhood standards, or that this dangerous and unsightly structure be 5 �� -� �. �- removed. The neighbors have had enough. If time is going to be granted to rehabilitate, then the most strenuous supervision should be put into place. Beth Randall, Executive Director of H-Mark, stated this properiy has been an issue with repairs according to neighbors since Januaty of 1995. It doesn't appear to be economically feasible to renovate. She mentioned that one thing that may not have been suggested as a financial option is selective ciearance. Also selling the building as is rather than putting money into it. Her company would be willing to pay for the lot but they would not renovate the building, it would be tom down. She would discourage putting more money into the building. They are in support of the neighbors to make sure that there is a solution in a very timely fashion. Extending the time line isn't going to solve the problem. Quoc Nguyen indicated that if the community wants to buy the property, he would be happy to seli it. Mr. Strathman stated that the fact that the bond has been posted and legal permits have been pulled, he would not recommend proceeding with demolition until the 6 month period had expired. Ae recommended giving the property owner until October 11, 1997 to complete the repairs. 3. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the referenced building located at $46 Western Avenue North. If the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Public Health is ordered to remove the building. Dave Assitt, attorney representing Bankers Trust Company, mortgage holder on the property, appeared and stated that they have commenced fareclosure proceedings. The property went to sale on March 22, 1997. The are in the process of reducing the redemption period from 6 months to 5 weeks and if successful, they would be the owner of the property about July 31, 1997. They h�ve had limited accessed to the property but diey believe the structure may be rehabilitated. He requested that if the buiiding is to be removed, the order be delayed 60 days to allow time for their client to obtain titie and possession. Mr. Strathman stated that based on the information presented by staff and in viewing the photographs, the building is clearly a public nuisance and therefore recommended approval of the order to remove or repair within 15 days. 4. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the referenced building located at 395Michigan tr et. If the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Public Health is ordered to remove the building. Bill Manson, property owner, appeared and stated that he purchased the home from HUD on April 15, 1997 and he is in the process of rehabilitating the structure. � q�_�z�-- Chuck Votel, Public Health, reviewed the staff report stating that the building has been vacant since May 1996. It went through HUD's foreclosure process and was to Mr. Manson. Previous to that, it has been a problem property for the ciry since 7uly 1996. At this point, Mr. Manson has posted the bond and pulled building permits which are valid until November 20 ,1 997. Mr. Strathman recommended the property owner be given 180 days to complete the rehabilitation. 5. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the referenced building located at 677 Kent Street. If the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Public Health is ordered to remove the building. Faye Madison, Murnane I.aw Firm, appeared and stated that they have been retained by Bank of America the mortgage holder to represent them. The mortgage is FE3A and they are dealing with HUD on the property as weli. Chuck Votel, Public Health, reviewed the staff report stating that the building has been vacant since February 1997 and Bank of America has begun foreclosure proceedings. The properry would be transferred to HUD after the redemption period. The city has had to board the building and three summary abatement notices were issued. Real estate taxes are currently paid; the estimated cost to repair the building makes it unlikely and not economically feasible to rehabilitate. Ms. Madison stated that they will be handiing the mortgage foreclosure in the near future. The file is currentiy in shipping between Bank of America's pre-foreclosure and foreclosure departments. They haven't done any title work on the property yet but they have received indication that the property was deeded to Paul Schwartz by Bahram Ghassemlou. After talking with Mr. Ghassemlou, it is her understanding the he deeded the property back to Paul Schwartz but he doesn't want it back. It was also indicated the Mr. Schwartz and Mr. Ghassemlou would be willing to enter into negotiations for a deed in lieu of foreclosure which would speed up the process. They have been in touch with Sophie Hallauer from HUD who has ordered an emergency HUD inspection report. Mr. Strathman stated he sympachized with their objective but explained that the city is dealing with a building that has been vacant, declared to be a public nuisance, and the recommendation by city inspectors is that rehabilitation is not economically feasible. In view of those facts, he recommended approvai of the order. 7 q � _'11�1- 6. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the referenced building located at 275 Harrison Avenue. If the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Public Health is ordered fo remove the buiiding. Brett L.arson, Ramsey Counry Property Records and Revenue, reported that the property in question is scheduled for auction June 19, 1997. There has been interest from potential buyers and he's fairly certain that it will sell. He meet with the West 7th neighborhood group and they indicated that there is some history behind the house. He requested time to ailow the property to be sold at the auction. Chuck Votel, Public Health, reported that the property is secured. The building was condemned in October 1996. The estimated amount of money needed to properly repair the structure makes rehabilitation unlikely and not economicaliy feasible. Mr. Strathman recommended the matter be laid over to July 1, 1997. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the referenced building located at 915 Sherburne Avenue. If the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Public Health is ordered to remove the building. Chuck Votel, Public Heaith, reviewed the staff report stating the building has been vacant since August 1996, and there have been two summary abateznent orders issued. The real estate taxes are paid and vacant building registration fees are due. A code compliance was done on April 16, 1997; the estimated amount of money needed to properly repair the structure makes rehabilitation unlikely and not economically feasible. Ron Widerhoft, property owner, appeared and stated that he plans to sell the property to Todd who intends to rehab the building but wants to make sure that it won't be torn down. Mr. Strathman stated that based on the information presented by staff and in viewing the photographs of the building, he would require that a$2,000 bond is posted and permits pulled as an assurance that the building would be rehabilitated within 6 months. The perspective buyer indicated that would not be a problem. Mr. Strathman recommended giving the property owner 180 days to repair the building on the condition that the vacant building fees are paid, and a$2,000 bond is posted by noon on Wednesday, June 11, 1997. 8. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the referenced building located at 774 Capitol Aei¢hts. If the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Public Health is ordered to remove the building. Chuck Votel, Public Health, reviewed the staff report and stated that the building was condemned in October 1496. The city had to board the building, zegistration fees and taxes are paid. On April 8, 1997 a Code Compliance inspection was done. The bond was posted with the building inspection departrnent on May 12, 1997, and a permit obtained which is valid until November 12, 1997. Public Health wants an order that says if the owner doesn't get the work done, the building is tozn down. Mike Davis, grandson of the property owner, Emil I.emke, appeared and stated that he 9ntends to rehabilitate the building. He explained that he was late ]n posting the bond because he went to the wrong address and by the time he got to the right office it had closed. The following Monday he posted the bond but notice had already been mailed. Mr. Strathman recommended amending the resolution and giving the property owner until November 12, 1997. 9. Summary abatement appeal for 1176 Portland Avenue; Bonnie J. Hughes, appeliant. No one appeared. The appeal was withdrawn; the garage was removed. The meeting adjoumed at 11:45 a.m. Gerry Strat�(man, L,egislative Hearing Officer E 9'1- �1 �� Ay HAMLINE MIDWAY COALITION Hamllne Park Playground Building � 1�64 Lafond;lcenue. Saint Paul, >L� 5510� � 6L-646-1986 � Fa� 6L-6=i1 July 7,1997 Councilmember Roberta Megard 310D City Hall 15 Kellogg Boulevard St. Paul MN 55102 Dear Councilmember Megard: On behalf of the Hamline Midway Coalition Board of Directors, I am writing to seek action by the City Council to demolish the property at 1359 Blair Avenue. As you know, FiMC has supported the efforts of Blair Avenue neighbors, City departments and the Hamline-Midway Area Rehab. Corp. to seek resolution to a long list of nuisance behaviors, health risks and the blighting effect of this property for years. I trust that these issues are fully outlined in your reports from past administrative proceedings, Health Department inspection reports, police records, and Bruce Noyes' estimate of the rehabilitation costs. Neighbors may elaborate further in your review of this matter before the City Council today. I understand that the Council will consider a staff recommendation to grant the property owner additional time to abate the numerous code violations. 'This extension is unacceptable and, in our opinion, futile, given a long-standing pattern of inadequate and last-minute attention to these issues on the part of the owner. Neighbors have patientiy awaited improvements and sought several alternatives to demolition for too long. In the meantime, the condition of the property has only deteriorated further, to the point where: 1) it appears entirely uneconomical to rehabilitate the existing structure; 2) a significant nuisance has continued for neighbors; and 3) the City's administrative and enforcement resources have been wasted on a problem that shows no serious hope of being resolved by the responsible parties. I urge you to deny Mr. Nguyen's request for an extension and to proceed immediately with an order to demolish 1359 Blair Avenue. Sincerely, ( �"�` 1 ,� ` � jodi M. Bantley Executive Director /jmb ec: Co�c�l' �e��e�ns��Bet1�J�R�da�1 i a better plctce to lir�e inzct u ork. e rare ;,r ..,..,,�.�� .�,.��„��,��,�«,,,�r H-MARC a�e.�aW�nr� a��nc�� J,�yz, i�� c�.y co,m«� �t�: 9� As you may be aware, the property at 1359 Blair Ave. ]�as be� a problem property in several instauces in its history withthe past year being particularly troublesome. The propertywas condenmed'm 3uly of 1996. The code compliance ins�tiam was nat requested until Mardi and the b�td and birilding pemrit c�re na� secured imtil April of this year. Since April, work has be� slow and accorcling to building inspedors, nat g�erally of a worlm�an like maimer. Wththe cooperati� ofthe owner, Quoc Nguyai and Bnu:e Noyes of the Hrnue Loan Ftmd staff, a rel�ab loan inspec�a� was d�e last week. This inspedion indicated an e.stimate3 $56,500 in repairs. I feel this nwnber is canservative y� deuwmstrates the level of d�erioration tbat is pres�t. I have suggeste3I xmderstand the owner's desire to r�ovate yet can not in good c�sci�ce support lris de�isian. I feel that the homeno longer has signifir<nrt value and should be tom down. There are several redevdapm�t aptions for the land suc� as side yard, a house moue or new caa�slrudioai. After some researcli a�n mY part, I have suggested the City of Samt Paul's Seledive Clearance Progravi to the o�met. The ProgcamPmvides paym�t of debt of up to $15,000, retocatimi for fihe owner ($5,�0-$i0,tM30) and deauolitian ofthe building paidfor bythe Selecxive Clearance budg�. I fet3 Uris is the best sodutionfor all involved Selective Clearance gives srnne mon�ary s�.tlem�k to the owner, pays off the existing mortgage, and d�nolishes the build"mg. There is a small mortgage on the property held by TCF �o also supports the Selective {�earance opti� as they aze ready to foredose at �ytime as a rec�t de�and ldterhas not be� satisfied. M�YP�Ple inciudingthe Hamline Nfidway Coatiti�, biock club leac�s, neiSli��, b��S �o�> �S' r�ab advisor, lender, vacavt bu�ldings staff, public health staff andmyselfl�ave sp�t an �omious amowrt of time � resolving issues azoimdUris ProP�9. I feel a viabie soltrti� has be� readied and to date Uie owner has not presenYed any viable altemativenort�as i�e appliedfor Seledive Clearance. The couummityhas waitedlaUg �ough for this siwation to be resolved. I woutd recam�m�dthat the cotmcil take the strongest adion possible to move the process of demolitiari fotward. I appreaate your commitm�t to birildinS stron8 etYn�Shbo�hoods andhelping commimities maintain dec�t qualityho Thank youfor yo�s ca�siderati� of flris l�ter. SincerelY, ) � .,►► , ; l,, � :,�,,.. �V i� ' � �Y � (612)644-0065 Hamline Branch I.ibrary Bldg. 1558 West Mumehaha Avenue Saint Paul, MN 55104 / �\ � �1 �'� a� HAMLINE MIDWAY COALITION Hamline Park Playground Building � 1564 Lafond Avenue, Saint Pau1, \�'V 5� 104 � 612-646-1986 � FaY 612-641 July 7,1997 Councilmember Roberta Megard 310D City Hall 15 Kellogg Boulevard St. Paul NIN 55102 Dear Councilmember Megard: On behalf of the Hamline Midway Coalition Board of Directors, I am writing to seek action by the City Council to demolish the property at 1359 Blair Ayenue. . As you know, HMC has'supported the efforts of Blair Avenue nei�hbors, City departments and the Hamline-Midway Area Rehab. Corp. to seek resolution fo a long list of nuisance behaviors, health risks and the blighting effect of this property - far-years. I trust that these issues "are fi�1Ty outiined in your repor�s f�om past . adminisfrative proceedings, Health;Department inspection reports, police records, and Bruce Noyes'- estimate of the rehabilitation costs. Neighbors may elaborate furfher.in your review of.tliis matter before the.Cit� Council today. . I understand that the Council,willyconsider a,staff recommendation ta grant the pxoperty awner additional,time to abate the-nuinerous-cbde violations...This �._ extenaion is�unaccepfable; and', in our. opinion,. futi�s, given � long-standing patter� of inadequate andlasE-xninute attention�to tYiese issues on,'the-part of the owrier. � Neighbors have patiently` a�vaited impxovements and sought several alternatives to demolition for too long. In meantiine, fhe condition of the property has only deteriorated further, to the point_where: 1) .it appears entirely uneconomical to rehabilitate the existing structure; 2) a significant nuisance has continued for - neighbors; and 3) the City's administrative and enforcement resources have been wasted on a problem that shows no serious hope of being resolved by the . responsible parties. - � � � � , � � � I urge you to deny Mr. Nguyeri s request for an extension and to proceed immediately with an, order to demolish 1359 Blair Avenue. Sincerely, .� � �- �� jo i M. BantleX Executive Director /jmb cc ��o�e� ca�e�o e �i�z B ng�be� m�in�e� - z u a �ieighborbood a better plRCe to live and work. io,"� rerycltdPW++ t0%pos+mnsumerxane JUL-02-1997 09�11 CfIY OF SAII�T PAUL xo.�,c�c.�».ar�. FROM FROM 5T. PRUL PED r -��-��, �a,�� ;�I i �!lAAA; �� Date: 7une 30, 1997 To: Tom Harren From: Bsuce Noyes TO DEPARiMBNi R ECONOMIC 1 ,z� Re: Pursuant to your request to inspect the premises at I359 Blair, EXTERIOR: 1. Roof: The shingles have been removed from the majority of the ro unstungled areas. The roof de�k is deteriorated in several places. Ext� an entire redecking will be required. A standard wood window has be The second floor/attic spaces have finished walis and ceilings, therefc underside of the roof structure was not possible. However, walls and are water stained in several areas. The clsimney flashing is old and he� and cap sre mostly detedorated. The chimney should be rebuilt ebova 2. Eaves: The eaves are covered wiih aluzninum on the south eave in Soffit and facia members are missiq,c in substantial portions of the ea� revealing rotted, deteriorated and missing members. Soffit panels on instafled in a workmanlike manner. There is flaking and peeling paint 92668574 P.02 �� cirl�n Tebphnnt: 61L2666626 Faeu�n�k: 612-22&33I1 Paul, MI�7. surfaces. Tarps cover the dve roof board repairs or instailed as a skylight. an examination o£the ilings on the second floor ly tarred. Chimney bricks �e roofline. umvorktnatilike manner. on the north and the east, : west side were not �everal areas. 3. Siding: The majority of sidin,g on the east, south and west of the hd � se is composite "hard- boazd" siding. It was nat installed in a workmanlike mannez and may n t have be�n new material. The north and west walts are covered with material not manufactured� br use as siding (pieces of reclaimed storm doors7). d. Doors aad Windows: Door and window trim members are wood v flaking and peeiing paint. Most main floor windows and doors are "bd windows on the second story are generaily in poor condition with bro� panels, and torn and missing screens. The front entry door is ill fltting, without proper locks. The front storm door shouid be replaced. � 5. Miscellsaeous: The bas�nseM windows are "boarded up". There a� ' �� foundation. The north addition foundation was not installed in a wor ' doors appeat to have been used as concrete fonn work) and it is not �+ substaMiat amouMS of ed up> The stocm and missing glass orly weathetized and cracks actd holes in the inlike manner (storm �per1Y attached to the Yage 1 0£ 5 � � J1�-02-1997 09-11 FROM FROM ST. PRUL PED TO old� foundation sections. Brick repairs are unworkmanlike. The la 92666574 P.03 a � "� step is broken, cracked and spalled. Enhy doocs lack deadbolt locks to wde. There si� structural deficiencies where wis►dows and doors have been altered. There ars lazge amouuts' �f debris. 6. Garsge: The shingle cut at the rake u►ds ofthe roof do not meet e_ There are no rake boards. The service door is out of square. The concrete drive is deteri � ted. The siding materials were not installeQ in a workmanlike manner. ;; INTERIOR: 1. Kitcheo, (components are to be found in two different rooms): Floor: Wom and dirry tiardwood floor in sonth sectioa i�o fi Reclaimed storm doors have been vsed as sub-flooring in the Walls and Ceilings: There is cracked plaster, flaking and pe� The sheetrock taping in the north section was not done in a portions are not completed. Cabinets: The kitchen cabinets lack coumertops and are not south section. The plumbing is not hooked up at the sink in Oiher: The radiator has flaking and peeling paint. Z. Batkrooms (3): Basemern: The ceramic tile floor was not instalied in a wo� unfinished. The wall paneling is un5nished, wet and milde� complete. The sink is illegally ve,nted. The toilet is old and an openable window or a fan and does not meet code requ ceiling consists of reclaimed lnmber. There is no GFI rece� Main Floor. The vanity sink is in poor condition. There is no floor in north section. section. in the south section. ike manner and itly attached in the section. like manner and is he tub instailaiion is not The room does not have �ts for ventilation. The base. Second Floor: The tub is old and dirty and wom. The ceramic�e is not instatted in a worlananlike manner. There is no door trim, no window trim d no base molding. There is water damage on the ceiling. � ;� � 3. Liv;ng Room and Dining Rooms: Floors: The wood plank flooring is worn, dirty and scratched. � e walis, ceilings and interior irim are characterized by cracked pIaster, water damag �, soiied surfaces, flaking and peeling paint. The double hung windows (4) are characte '' by loose and deteriorated putty, flaldng peeling paim, missing hardware and oor weather stripping. Page 2 of 5 � JUL-02-1997 09=12 4. �edrooms (4): FROM FROM ST. PFlUL PED � Basement: The floor is wet and there is no 5nished floor. The water stained, miidewed and malodorous. The window does nok meet egess requirements for escape and rescue. The ceiling has water stains and open ph�imbing acs;ess hoSes. � � Second Floor, IQorth {2): The aze no ficnshed floors. There is Tha sheetrock installation and taping were not done in a wor� Sec.ond Floor, South: The mixture of wood flooring and There is a variety of wall and ceiling coverings including in various states of repair. Portions are wet and water sta tntted. 92668574 P.04 a'�� walls are wet, or case moldings. ; manner. pg is wom and dirty. y shceuock, paneling and $�e skylight frame is 4. Secoad Ftoor Porches (2): Unfinished and um+vorkmanlike wali an �c�iling installations including 1/4 inch plywood and exposed newspaper. There is flaldng d peeling paint. 1'he rear porch is malodorous. � 5. Common Bsllway: Tbere is wom and deteriorate3 cacpet. There peeling paint on the walis. 6. Basement stairs: The treads are wom. There is no handrail or properly headered off. 7. Bssement: The majority ofthe concrete floors and foundation of standing water and mildew. The subfloor on the north portion reclaimed storm doors. The entire basement is matodorous. 8. Fireplace: Not constructed in a worl:manlike manner. ELECTRTCAIJMECHAIVICAL: plaster and The opening is not ire wet. There are areas hous� consists of 2. Electrieal: There is a 100 amp service panel oversized circuit br ' s and illegal connections. There are no hard wired smoke detectors. There are wiring runs in th' asement ceiling that do not meet code. 'There are reverse po3arities, raceptacles with no groun g, missing covers and fixture,s throughout the house too mimerous ta mention. New constru on standards for wiring were not obsecved where waIts have been nevviy constivcted or where � id watls were fully opened. 2. Plumbing: The basement fixtures are not vented to code. The n wastelvent and numerous other waste and supply fittings which do for the kit�hen stove does not meet wde. 3. Hcsting: Unable to check the opent+onal condition of the gas unknown. Fin tube and cast iron radiators are mixed. There is no bath has an illegal code. The gas cACk therefare its condition is istion sir. Yage 3 of 5 JUL-02-1997 69�12 FROM FROM ST. PRUL PED 92668574 P.05 � y y q ,�, � Extezior: i. Roof 2. Eaves 3. Siding 4. Aoors & Wu►dows 5. Misc. 6. Garage � Imerior: cost Eshmate TO 58,500 Tear off old rovfing and aay newly insta meet code, install new roo� repair roof I deck if building official requires, reptace chimney above the roofline 52,800 Remove soffit and facia members, repaii lookouts and subfacia. Install new alumi 35,000 Repair and paint "hard-board" on hwsa dispose of material not manufactured fo� with new siding to match balance of hou $2,600 Repair or replace prime doors and windi door, repair or replac� stotsn windows, a members, paint trim or cover with form $3,000 Repair or replacR basemesu windows, m rear foundation section to code, repair b step, rebuild headers above ahezed door (especially the sliding door on the east si geaeral clean up of the premises $1,500 Repair roof, install rake boards, repiace 1. Kitchens $4,400 2. Bathrooms $5,500 3. Liv. Room 54,200 & 1?in. Rm • 4. Bedrooms $5,140 i. Porches $2,400 6. Hallway $1,000 7. Basement $1,500 Stairs 8. Basement 52,000 9. Fireplace $1,000 � Install new vinyl sheet goods flooring, n watis, ceifings, doors, and cabinets, scra Rework ceramic tile installations, repia� materiais, complete basement tub install code, replace basement bath ceiling, insl necessary Repair floon or replace floor coverings, doors, repair window sash Install new finished floors, replace or re; installed walis and ceilings, install egres: case moldings, remove skylight Instatl finished floors, repair and paint v Replace floor cAVering, repair and paint Rebuild basement stairs with header, ins to code Properly iandscape pe�rimeter of foundai infiluation into basement Remove and rIispose of Page 4 of S roofing wtrich does not ds, instal[ new roof brick and mortar rafter tail ends, i soffit and facia l garage. Remove and ting use and replace s, replace front storm �sir deteriosated trim atvminum point faundation, sepair kwork, replace lawnwalk �d window openings of the house), pmvide �lace sub-floor, repair : and paint cadiatot wet wall and ceiling ion, install ventilation to ;l trim membecs as walis, ceilings and deteriorated or poorly low, install base and � and ceilings, daodorize 1s and ceilittgs handraii and guard rail to prevent water ,� JUL-02-1997 09�13 FROM FROM 5T. PHUL PED �CGttICSVMCC}I3i1tCd�: 1. Elecuic � $2,000 2. Plumbing S],500 3.Heating 52,500 ?otal Costs S56,SOU TO 9266�74 P.06 ��' �� Wire house to Bulletin 80-1 standards, e fully renovated sections of house to new consuuction starrdards � Instatt waste and vent to code in 3locati � ns, install a gas cock to code for the stove, replace illegai water pply fittings, Remove 5n tube radiation and inctall iron, install r.flmbustion air , ; � � Page 5 of 5 TOTqL P.06 JUN-26-1997 09�44 CITY OF ST PRl1� LIEP Interdepartmental Memorandum CITY OF SATNT PAUL ...��.. June 26,1997 20: FROM: RE: Ann Cieslak, Legzslative Aide to Councilmember Megazd Beth Randall, Executive Director of H-M,AItC Joseph Ehrlich, St. Paul Building Inspector 612 266 9124 P.01 �l� �� Status Report for Vacant Building Located at 1359 BIair Avenue 'Ihe building has many deficiencies, as enuonerated in the code campliance report submitted by Don Wagner on March 31, 1997. The building is repairable, but will require very significant investment to correct the deterioration and sub-standard workmanship of the past several years. Theze aze some stzuctural deficiencies � evident in the floor system of the fisst level, observable from the basemeat. There aze indications of excessive deflection of the Second Floor suuctural system as well. The Second Floor structure is not visibie. Some cosmecic repairs ha�e been conducted on the interiot. Re-roofing of the bualdia� is pxesentiy underway. I recommend, if this buiidiz�,g is to be saved, that the owner focus on repairing the exterior and struciural components of the building first All rotted members must be replaced and any areas wheze water may pene�ate must be sealeci, including problem azeas in the foundation wall. Any rotted or improperly constructed frazning must be replaced and/or reinforced. Questionable framing that has aiready been covered must be uncovered to verify its condirion and repair as necessary. In my opinion, fhe workmanship evidenced on this building, demonstrates a lack of understanding by the wozlanen of basic construction principles. I do not feel tha[ the individuals perfotming the work have the knowledge or desire to satisfactorily restore t�is building to a liveable condirion. The recent flurry of repau activity seems designed more to impress than to accomplish a goat. The tepair effort appears to be very unorganized and is leaving the building wlnerable to fiuther decay azzd deterioration. If furthc^� investment in this property is approved, l believe a successful outcome can be achieved only by retainiq,a the services of a competent craftsman to complete the work. JE:aznw � �:� fiATllStE S11YER" fAX MEtdO OY516 o ^s56 � SS L ' a66- 9aas aG� - 90 99 TOTAL P.01 /� Council File � `� � � � .� �� ' ` Green Sheet # �ZS�� ° RESOLUTION _ CITY OF SAWT PAUL, MINNESOTA L�3 ir . Presented By Referred To Committee: Date 1 WHEREAS, Public Health has requested the City Council to hold public hearings to consider 2 the advisability and necessity of ordering the repair or wrecking and removal of a two-story, wood 3 frame dwelling and detached, two-vehicle, wood frame garage located on property hereinafter 4 referred to as the "Subject Property" and commonly l�own as 1359 Biair Avenue. This property is 5 legally described as follows, to wit: 6 7 L.ot 26, Block 6, Syndicate No. 5 Addition. 8 9 WHEREAS, based upon the records in the Ramsey County Recorder's Office and 10 information obtained by Public Health on or before April 8, 1997, the following are the now known 11 interested or responsible parties for the Subject Property: Quoc Tuan Nguyen, 850 University 12 Avenue North, St. Paul, MN 55104; Twin City Federal Mortgage Corp., SOl Marquette Avenue, 13 Mpls., MN 55402. 14 15 WHEREAS, Public Health has served in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 45 of the 16 Saint Paul L,egislative Code an order identified as an"Order to Abate Nuisance Building(s)" dated 17 March 26, 1997; and 18 19 WHEREAS, this order informed the then known interested or responsible parties that the 20 structure located on the Subject Property is a nuisance building(s) pursuant to Chapter 45; and 21 22 WHEREAS, this order informed the interested or responsible parties that they must repair or 23 demolish the structure located on the Subject Properry by April 25, -1997; and 24 25 WHEREAS, the enforcement officer has posted a placard on the Subject Property declaring 26 this building(s) to constitute a nuisance condition; subject to demolition; and 27 28 WHEREAS this nuisance condition has not been corrected and Public Health requested that 29 the City Clerk schedule public hearings before the Legislative Hearing Officer of the City Council 30 and the Saint Paul City Council; and 31 32 WHEREAS, the interested and responsible parties have been served notice in accordance 33 with the provisions of Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code, of the time, date, place and 34 purpose of the public hearings; and 35 36 WHEREAS, a hearing was held before the L.egislative Heuing Officer of the Saint Paul City 37 Council on Tuesday, 7une 3, 1997 to hear testimony and evidence, and after receiving testunony and 38 evidence, made the recommendation to approve the request to order the interested or responsible 39 parties to make the Subject Property safe and not detrimental to the public peace, health, safety and 40 welfare and remove its blighting influence on the community by rehabilitating this structure in 41 accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances, or in the alternative by demolishing and 42 removing the structure in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances. The rehabilitation or 43 demolition of the structure to be completed within fifteen (15) days after the date of the Council 44 Hearing; and °t� - �aa WHEREAS, a hearing was held before the Saint Paul City Council on Wednesday, 7une il, 1997 and the testimony and evidence including the action taken by the I.egislative Hearing Officer was considered by the Council; now therefore BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon the tesrimony and evidence presented at the above referenced public hearings, the Saint Paul City Council hereby adopts the following Findings and Order concerning the Subject Properry at 1359 Blair Avenue: 1. That the Subject Property comprises a nuisance condition as defined in Saint Paul Legislative Code, Chapter 45. 2. That the costs of demolition and removal of this building(s) is estunated to exceed three thousand dollars ($3,000.00). 3. That there now exists and has existed mulfiple Housing or Building code violations at the SubjeCt PiopeTt�- ; and that it has a documented and confirmed history as a blighting influence on the community. 4. That an Order to Abate Nuisance Building(s) was sent to the then known responsible parties to correct the deficiencies or to demolish and remove the building(s). 5. That the deficiencies causing this nuisance condition have not been corrected. 6. That Public Health has posted a placard on the Subject Property which declares it to be a nuisance condition subject to demolition. 7. That this building has been routinely monitored by the Vacant/Nuisance Buildings Code Enforcement Program. S. That the known interested parties and owners are as previously stated in this resolution and that the noti�cation requirements of Chapter 45 have been fulfilled. 9. Cammunications of Hamline Midway Coalition and H-MARC, and photos of the site, are with all testimony and other Q�E� files and records, accepted as part o� tTie record. The Saint Paul Ciry Council hereby makes the following order: 1. The above referenced interested or responsible parties shall make the Subject Property safe and not detrimental to the public peace, health, safety and weifare and remove its blighting influence on the community by rehabilitating this structure and correcting all deficiencies as prescribed in the above referenced Order to Abate Nuisance Building(s) in accordance with all applicable codes and ordinances, or in the alternative by demolishing and removing the structure in accordance with ali applicable codes and ordinances. The rehabilitation or demolition and removal of the structure must be completed w�rf'�{�3}da3�s�i€�fi� �� -��-��j��jng- by August 11, 1997, and if rehabilitated, such rehabilitation must be totally complete, and done by a licensed, bonded contxactor. �l1-�� 2. If the above corrective action is not completed within this period of time the Public Health, Code Enforcement Program is hereby authorized to take whatever steps aze necessary to demolish and remove this structure, fill the site and charge the costs incurred against the Subject Properry pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul I.egislative Code. 3. In the event the building is to be demolished and removed by ffie City of Saint Paul, all personal property or fiYtures of any kind which interfere with the demolition and removal shall be removed from the property by the responsible parties by the end of this time period. If all personal properry is not removed, it shall be considered to be abandoned and the City of Saint Paul shall remove and dispose of such properry as provided by law. 4. It is further ordered, that a copy of this resolution be mailed to the owners and interested parties in accordance with Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code. 5. No further extensions will be Requested by Department o£: By: � By: Ey: d' liC-�'.f-iC� 1�� Form App n�ved by City ttorney By: Adopted by Council: Date Adoption Certified by Council cretary a�-�a� DEPAflTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATE INRIATED N� 3 2 5 7 5 GREEN SHEET _ . _ CONTACTPEFSON&PHONE � INITIAVDATE INfiIAVDATE DEPAfiTMEMDIRECfOfl CITYCAUNCIL Charles VOt01. 298-4153 A�K'N CINATfOflNEY CRYCLEflK MUST BE ON COUNCIL AGENDA BY (DATE) NWBER FOfl O BUDGET DIfiECTOR � FlN. & MGT. SEflVICES DIFi. NOUTING ORO6fl MAVOR (OR ASSI51ANn ,�' � TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES (CLIP AlL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) ACT10N AE�UESTED: City Council to pass this resolution which will order the owner(s) to remove or repair the re£erenced building(s). I£ the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Public Health is ordered to remove the building. The subject property is located at 1359 Blair Avenue. RECOMMENDA77oNS: nppmve (A) a Reject (H) pEtiSONAL SEiiVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING �UESTIONS: ._ PLANNING COMMISSfON _ CIVIL SEqViCE CAMMISSKIN t. 4ia5 t4lis p850nfi1iT eY¢f wolk0d under a ContfdCt for thls depaftRlBnt? . _ qe COMMITTEE , YES �NO — �� F 2. Has this person/firm ever been a ciry employee? — VES NO _ DISTRICT COUi�i � 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill no[ normally possessetl by any curreM ciry emplqree? SUPPOflTS WNICH COUNCIL O&IECTIVE? YES NO F�plain all yes answers on seperete sheet and attach to green sheet MRIA7ING PROBLEM, iSSUE. OPPORTUNYTY �Who. Whet, When, Where, Wh»: This building(s) is a nuisance building(s) as defined in ChapCer 45 and a vacant building as defined in Chapter 43 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code. The owners, interested parties and responsible parties known to the Enforcement Officer were given an order to repair or remove the building at 1359 Blair Avenue by April 25, 1997, and have failed to comply with those orders. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: The City wi11 eliminate a nuisance. ��'u� � � �� C 7 A � 7 �sT ��'�� . OISAOVANT0.GES IF APPROVEO' The City will spend funds to wreck and remove this building(s). These costs will be assessed to the property, collected as a special assessment against the property taxes. �Ci�""� ��e��°�3 $�P f�iP;! 21 1�97 DISADVANTA6E5 IF NOT APPROVED: A nuisance condition will remain unabated in the City. This building(s) will continue to blight the community. 70iALAMOUNTOFTRANSAC710N $$9 000 -$10 000 COST/HEVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE) VES NO FUNDINGSOURCE Nuis�riCe HOUSing AbatOment p�7�y�TYNUMBER 33261 FINANCIAL INFOBMATION: (EXPLAIN) � CITY OF SAINT PAUL Norm Co[eman, Mayar May 9, 1997 SAINT PAUL PUBLIC HEALTH Nea1 Holtan, M.D., M.P.H., Drrecto� h'UISANCE BUILDI��GS CODE ENFORCE�LIEN7' SSS Cedar Skee1 Saint Paul, MN SSIOI-1260 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARTNGS Council President and Members of the City Council a� -�aa 612-298-4153 � "''�' � � .� _ _ . .. . . � e e::; (vi� ? V .eJesf Saint Paul Public Health, Vacant/Nuisance Buildings Enforcement Unit has requested the City Council schedule public heazings to consider a resolution ordering the repair or removal of the nuisance building(s) located at: 1359 Blair Avenue The City Council has scheduled the date of these hearings as follows: Legislative Hearing - Tuesday, June 3, 1997 City Council Hearing - Wednesday, June 11, 1997 The owners and responsible parties of record are: Name and Last Known Address Quoc Tuan Nguyen 850 University Avenue North St. Paul, MN 55104 Interest Fee Owner Twin City Federal Mortgage Corp. 801 Marquette Avenue Mpls., MN 55402 The legal description of this property is: Mortgagee Lot 26, Block 6, Syndicate No. 5 Addition a►�-�a�. 1359 Blair Avenue May 9, 1997 Page 2 Saint Paul Public Health has declazed this building(s) to constitute a"nuisance" as defined by Legislative Code, Chapter 45. Public Health has issued an order to the then known responsible parties to eliminate this nuisance condition by correcting the deficiencies or by razing and removing this building(s). Inasmuch as this Order to Abate has not been complied with the nuisance condition remains unabated, the community continues to suffer the blighting influence of this property. It is the recommendation of Public Health that the City Council pass a resolution ordering the responsible parties to either repair, or demolish and remove this building in a timely manner, and failing that, authorize Public Health to proceed to demolition and removal, and to assess the costs incurred against the real estate as a special assessment to be collected in the same manner as taxes. � ncerely, �!u/ a � l - Reneta Weiss Program Supervisor Vacant/Nuisance Building Unit Saint Paul Public Health RW:mI cc: Jan Gasterland, Building Inspection and Design Stephen Christie, City Attorneys Office Nancy Anderson, Assistant Secretary to the Council Steve Zaccard, Fire Mazshall Dan Pahl, PED-Housing Division q�t-�aa, REPORT: Date: June 3, 1997 Time: 10:00 a.m. Place: Room 330 Ciry Hall 15 West Kellogg Boulevard LEGISLATIVE HEARING Gerry Strathman Legislative Hearing Officer 1. Resolution ratifying assessment of benefits, costs and elcpenses for summary abatements for the following (Laid over from May 6, 1997 Legislative Hearing): 2106 Mazshall Ave. (J9705AA) 473 Cretin Ave. S. (J9705AA) 1857 E. Cottage Ave. (J9705AA) 2176 Stillwater Ave. (J9705AA) 695 St. Anthony Ave. (39705AA) 1110 Forest 5t. (J9704A4) Legislative Hearing Officer recomimended approval of the assessments with the following exceptions: 2106 Marshall (J9705AA) laid over to June 17, 1997 2176 Stillwater Avenue (79705AA) reduce assessment to $37.50 2. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the referenced building, located at 1359 Blair Avenue. If the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Public Health is ordered to remove the building. Legislative Hearing Officer recommended approval and amended the date for repair or removal of the structure to October 11, 1997. 3. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the referenced building located at $4,¢ Western Avenue North. If the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Public Health is ordered to remove the building. Legislative Hearing Officer recommended approval. q�-�aa` 4. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the referenced building located at�95 Michi,g�n Street. If the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Public Health is ordered to remove the building. Legislative Hearing Officer recommended approval and amended the date for repair or removal of the shvcture to 180 days. 5. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the referenced building located at�77 Kent Street. If the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Public Health is ordered to remove the building. Legislative Hearing Officer recommended approval. 6. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the referenced building located at� Harrison Avenue. If the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Public Health is ordered to remove the building. Legislative Hearing Officer recommended laying this matter over to July 1, 1997. 7. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the referenced building located at Q15 �herburne Avenue. If the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Public Health is ordered to remove the building. Legislative Heazing Officer recomwended approval and amended the date for repair or removal of the structure to 180 days if the $200 vacant building fee is paid and $2,000 bond is posted by noon on June 11, 1997. 8. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the referenced building located at� Canitol Hei¢hts. If the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Public Aealth is ordered to remove the building. Legislative Hearing Officer recommended approval and amended the date for repair or removal of the structure to November 12, 1997. 9. S�mmary abatement appeal for 1176 Portland Avenue; Bonnie J. Iiughes, appellant. The appeal was withdrawn a� - �a� MINUTES OF LEGISLATIVE HEARING June 3, 1997 Room 330, Ciry Hall Gerry Strathman, Legislative Hearing Officer STAFF PRESENT: Chuck Votel, Guy Willits, Public Health; Roxanna Flink, Real Estate. Gerry Strathman, L,egislative Hearing Officer, called the meeting to order at 10:05 a.m. 1. Resolution ratifying assessment of benefits, costs and expenses for summary abatements for the following (I.aid over from May 6, 1997 I,egislative Hearing): 2106 Marshall Ave. (39705AA) 473 Cretin Ave. S. (J9705AA) 1857 E. Cottage Ave. (J9705AA) 2176 Stillwater Ave. (39705AA) 695 St. Anthony Ave. (J9705AA) 1110 Forest St. (J9704A4) Legislative Hearing Officer recommended approval of the assessments with the following exceptions: 2106 Marshall (J9705AA) laid over to June 17, 1997 2176 Stillwater Avenue (J9705AA) reduce assessment to $37.50 1857 E Cottagg Avenue Guy Willits, Public Health, showed a video of the properry and reviewed the staff report. Orders were mailed on 7anuary 30, 1997, to remove snow from the walk. A recheck was done on February 3, 1997; and the city did the work on February 5, 1997. Mazy Kelly, property owner, appeared and stated that she was having back problems and could not shovel her sidewalk. During that time is when they had the ice storm and she tried chopping the ice but she didn't have the strength. Mr. Strathman stated it is the property owner's responsibility to shovel the walk or make anangements to have it done. The video ciearly shows the work was done by city crews and recommended approving the assessment. 473 Cretin Avenue S. . No one appeared; recommended approving the assessment. 4� r �� ll10 Forest Guy Willits, Public Heaith, showed a video of the property and reviewed the staff report. Orders were mailed on October 31, 1996 to remove mattresses, couch, refrigerators, refuse, carpeting, and discarded range. A recheck was done on November 8, 1996, the property was not cleaned up, and the work was done by the city on November 19, 1996. Chadoua and Youa Vue, properry owners, appeared. Mr. Vue stated that they bought the properiy on September 16, 1996. The previous owner lived on the property until October 5, 1996. VJhen she moved out, she toid them she would clean everything including the basement and the garage. She unlocked the garage so that it would be easy for her people to move things out. They waited for her to come back and in the meantime, they put some of her things in the back yard so they could clean building for people moving in. Everything that was taken from the back yard and garage belonged to the previous owner. Mr. Strathman inquired where the orders were sent. Mr. Votel responded that they were mailed to Bob Van L.ee at ]110 Forest, the previous owner. Orders were also posted at the property, there was no phone listing, and the garage was not secured. Mr. Vue stated that the only order he saw was the one dated December 24, 1996. Mr. Strathman stated that ihe order mailed October 31, 1996, was sent to the previous owner because she was listed on the tax records as the official owner. The previous owner had a legal obligation to inform the new owners that this order was outstanding. The city is required under the law to send notice to the property owner as recorded at the Ramsey county property taxation. The city followed the proper legal procedures, the video clearly shows the work was done by the city, and recommended approval of the assessment. 122 Manitoba Avenue No one appeared. This assessment was ratified on May 9, 1997 and was not part of the laid over assessments for today's hearing. It was re-discussed and no action was taken. 2106 Marshall Avenue Laid over to June 17, 1997 458 Maryland Avenue No one appeared. This assessment was ratified on May 14, 1997 and was not part of the laid over assessments for today's hearing. It was re-discussed and no action was taken. 2 �� I � V � 1303 Randolph Avenue No one appeared. This assessment was ratified on May 14, 1997 and was not part of the laid over assessments for today's hearing. It was re-discussed and no action was taken. 695 St Anthony Avenue Guy Willits, Public Aealth, showed a video of the properry and reviewed the staff report. The order was mailed December 20, 1996, to remove snow and ice from the walk. The properry was rechecked on January 15, 1997; the city did the work on January 16, 1997. Mike Peters, property owner, appeared and stated that in early 7anuary when he received the notice from the city, he took care of the probiem. He received no further warnings. At that time, it stormed back-to-back and the snow was blowing all week. Mr. Strathman clarified that two sets of orders were issued to clean the walk, December 20, 1996 and January 7, 1947. City ordinance requires that snow be removed within 24 hours after a snow fall. In viewing the video, it is clear that the snow had been on the sidewalk for more than 24 hours. Mr. Peters explained that the walk had been shoveled 4 or 5 times after he was notified. It was a record winter for snow fa11. The reason he never got his walk done by the next day was because he was doing snowplowing and was usually out for 2 days. He stated that he had a right to be informed and to have a chance to take care of the problem, the city didn't do that. Mr. Strathman stated that according to city records, the letter sent on 7anuary 7, 1997 indicated the snow was to be removed. A recheck was done on 7anuary 15 and the snow still hadn't been removed; on Janaary 16 the city crew went out and removed the snow. It is clear on the video that there was snow on the sidewaik and recommended approval of the assessment. 2176 Stillwater Avenue Guy Willits, Public Health, showed a video of the property and reviewed the staff report. Orders were mailed on January 21, 1997 and again January 24 to remove snow. The property was rechecked on January 23, 1997; the city did the work on February 1, 1997. Jeff Miller, property owner, appeared and stated that he shoveled the sidewalk 3' wide. He did contact the city 3 times on Friday the 31st after he received the notice that the work order had been issued. He called tl�e inspector at 9:00 a.m., 10:00 a.m., and paged him at 1130 a.m., and he never returned his call. The Wednesday prior to that, he went out to clear the walk and couldn't chisel through the ice. By Friday it had warmed and he spent 3 hours clearing the sidewalk. 3 � I �� 9 � All the city did was probably plow another inch, dug up his lawn and put dirt and sand over what he had already shoveled. Mr. Strathman stated that in viewing the video, it appears an attempt was made to clean it up the snow although it wasdt quite �dequate. IIe recommended reducing the assessment from $132.50 to $37.50. 251 Wayzata Street No one appeazed. This assessment was ratified on April 9, 1997 and was not part of the laid over assessments for today's hearing. It was re-discussed and no action was taken. Mr. Strathman noted that a letter was received from Dawn Snnon the property owner explaining that she was having personal difficulties and financial hardships. 3. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the referenced building, located at 1359 Blair Avenue. If the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Public Health is ordered to remove the building. Chuck Votel, Public Health, reviewed the staff report stating that the building was condemned in July 1996, 5 summary abatement notices were issued to remove various nuisance law violations. After an inspection In March 1997, the building was declared a nuisance. A code compliance inspection was obtained on May 28, 1997, and the estimated amount of money needed to repair the structure makes it unlikely and not economically feasible to rehabilitate. He also noted a letter was received from community members in support of condemnation. Mr. Strathman questioned why this matter was being heard when a bond had been posted on April 11, 1997, and permits obtained. Mr. Votel referred to the code compliance inspection report and stated that under item #4, the inspector noted that most of the work that had been done to the building and garage was substandard and would have to be redone. The building is still in a nuisance condition as it has been for some time which is the basis for requesting an order for repair or removal. Mr. Nguyen stated that they obtained the permit on October 1, 1997, and posted the bond which gives them 6 months to bring the house up to code. The vacant building fee of $200 and the code compliance was paid. He's in the process of re-roofing the house; iYs a slow process but he does has 6 months to complete the work. Mr. Strathman asked the property owner if he expected to have the work completed in 6 months. Mr. Nguyen responded that he would not have posted the $2,000 bond if he didn't plan to have the work done in 6 months. When he talked to Don Wagner, he was told he could either try to sell the house the way it was or he could try to repair it, and if he posted a bond, 0 �� ,� r l'S.� - the city was pretty lenient if 50% of the work was done within 6 months. Mr. Strathman asked about the complaints received on the property. Mr. Votel stated that they had so many problems with the property that they issued a notice to board all accessible first floor openings to the building. It wasn't done and the city had to have the contractor go out and put 16 boards on the building to secure it. There hasn't been any zeal effort to complete the repairs and the city is concerned because the inspector stated in his report that the work that has already been done needs to be redone. It is substandard work and is not going to get a code compliance. The people next door want some resolution to this property. Mr. Nguyen stated that every time an abatement was sent, he took care of it. Basically all he wants to do is fix up the house and either rehab or sell it. F3e has the code cotnpliance list and is making sure that the work he does meets code. Quoc Nguyen, previous owner of the house, stated he deeded the property to his son, but explained that he still holds the mortgage and has some responsibility in the matter. He is very concerned about the rehabilitation or the sale of the property to pay the balance of the mortgage. He wants to compiy with the city. Mr. Strathman stated concern about the house being a nuisance to the neighborhood and the possibility that the work on the building may not be 50% completed when the 6-month period expires. If this is allowed to continue, they may be in a worse situation in a couple of months. Mr. Nguyen stated there are 4 more months and 11 days before the bond expires. The reason it doesn't look like much work has been done to the building is because everything has been on the interior. He's now ready to re-roof the house and do the siding. 'Tom Ryan, 1363 Blair, appeared and stated that the time line here seems to be skewed to some extent by the fact that the permit was not puiled until April 11, 1997. The building became vacant on July 30, 1996, and subsequently went into the vacant house status. It is his understanding, through contact with the inspectors, that the owner made no move to get the building inspected until the last possible minute when he would be forced by abatement order to do so. It was only in the face of those orders that the perznit was pulled and that the inspection was made. That inspection speaks for itself in terms of the quality of the work. The records contain a copy of a petition signed by neighbors signed on August 12, 1996. He also presented a new petition signed by 25 individuals surrounding the property in question urging the city to either insure that rehabilitation go forward promptly to bring this property up to the city codes and neighborhood standards, or that this dangerous and unsightly structure be 5 �� -� �. �- removed. The neighbors have had enough. If time is going to be granted to rehabilitate, then the most strenuous supervision should be put into place. Beth Randall, Executive Director of H-Mark, stated this properiy has been an issue with repairs according to neighbors since Januaty of 1995. It doesn't appear to be economically feasible to renovate. She mentioned that one thing that may not have been suggested as a financial option is selective ciearance. Also selling the building as is rather than putting money into it. Her company would be willing to pay for the lot but they would not renovate the building, it would be tom down. She would discourage putting more money into the building. They are in support of the neighbors to make sure that there is a solution in a very timely fashion. Extending the time line isn't going to solve the problem. Quoc Nguyen indicated that if the community wants to buy the property, he would be happy to seli it. Mr. Strathman stated that the fact that the bond has been posted and legal permits have been pulled, he would not recommend proceeding with demolition until the 6 month period had expired. Ae recommended giving the property owner until October 11, 1997 to complete the repairs. 3. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the referenced building located at $46 Western Avenue North. If the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Public Health is ordered to remove the building. Dave Assitt, attorney representing Bankers Trust Company, mortgage holder on the property, appeared and stated that they have commenced fareclosure proceedings. The property went to sale on March 22, 1997. The are in the process of reducing the redemption period from 6 months to 5 weeks and if successful, they would be the owner of the property about July 31, 1997. They h�ve had limited accessed to the property but diey believe the structure may be rehabilitated. He requested that if the buiiding is to be removed, the order be delayed 60 days to allow time for their client to obtain titie and possession. Mr. Strathman stated that based on the information presented by staff and in viewing the photographs, the building is clearly a public nuisance and therefore recommended approval of the order to remove or repair within 15 days. 4. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the referenced building located at 395Michigan tr et. If the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Public Health is ordered to remove the building. Bill Manson, property owner, appeared and stated that he purchased the home from HUD on April 15, 1997 and he is in the process of rehabilitating the structure. � q�_�z�-- Chuck Votel, Public Health, reviewed the staff report stating that the building has been vacant since May 1996. It went through HUD's foreclosure process and was to Mr. Manson. Previous to that, it has been a problem property for the ciry since 7uly 1996. At this point, Mr. Manson has posted the bond and pulled building permits which are valid until November 20 ,1 997. Mr. Strathman recommended the property owner be given 180 days to complete the rehabilitation. 5. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the referenced building located at 677 Kent Street. If the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Public Health is ordered to remove the building. Faye Madison, Murnane I.aw Firm, appeared and stated that they have been retained by Bank of America the mortgage holder to represent them. The mortgage is FE3A and they are dealing with HUD on the property as weli. Chuck Votel, Public Health, reviewed the staff report stating that the building has been vacant since February 1997 and Bank of America has begun foreclosure proceedings. The properry would be transferred to HUD after the redemption period. The city has had to board the building and three summary abatement notices were issued. Real estate taxes are currently paid; the estimated cost to repair the building makes it unlikely and not economically feasible to rehabilitate. Ms. Madison stated that they will be handiing the mortgage foreclosure in the near future. The file is currentiy in shipping between Bank of America's pre-foreclosure and foreclosure departments. They haven't done any title work on the property yet but they have received indication that the property was deeded to Paul Schwartz by Bahram Ghassemlou. After talking with Mr. Ghassemlou, it is her understanding the he deeded the property back to Paul Schwartz but he doesn't want it back. It was also indicated the Mr. Schwartz and Mr. Ghassemlou would be willing to enter into negotiations for a deed in lieu of foreclosure which would speed up the process. They have been in touch with Sophie Hallauer from HUD who has ordered an emergency HUD inspection report. Mr. Strathman stated he sympachized with their objective but explained that the city is dealing with a building that has been vacant, declared to be a public nuisance, and the recommendation by city inspectors is that rehabilitation is not economically feasible. In view of those facts, he recommended approvai of the order. 7 q � _'11�1- 6. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the referenced building located at 275 Harrison Avenue. If the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Public Health is ordered fo remove the buiiding. Brett L.arson, Ramsey Counry Property Records and Revenue, reported that the property in question is scheduled for auction June 19, 1997. There has been interest from potential buyers and he's fairly certain that it will sell. He meet with the West 7th neighborhood group and they indicated that there is some history behind the house. He requested time to ailow the property to be sold at the auction. Chuck Votel, Public Health, reported that the property is secured. The building was condemned in October 1996. The estimated amount of money needed to properly repair the structure makes rehabilitation unlikely and not economicaliy feasible. Mr. Strathman recommended the matter be laid over to July 1, 1997. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the referenced building located at 915 Sherburne Avenue. If the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Public Health is ordered to remove the building. Chuck Votel, Public Heaith, reviewed the staff report stating the building has been vacant since August 1996, and there have been two summary abateznent orders issued. The real estate taxes are paid and vacant building registration fees are due. A code compliance was done on April 16, 1997; the estimated amount of money needed to properly repair the structure makes rehabilitation unlikely and not economically feasible. Ron Widerhoft, property owner, appeared and stated that he plans to sell the property to Todd who intends to rehab the building but wants to make sure that it won't be torn down. Mr. Strathman stated that based on the information presented by staff and in viewing the photographs of the building, he would require that a$2,000 bond is posted and permits pulled as an assurance that the building would be rehabilitated within 6 months. The perspective buyer indicated that would not be a problem. Mr. Strathman recommended giving the property owner 180 days to repair the building on the condition that the vacant building fees are paid, and a$2,000 bond is posted by noon on Wednesday, June 11, 1997. 8. Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the referenced building located at 774 Capitol Aei¢hts. If the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Public Health is ordered to remove the building. Chuck Votel, Public Health, reviewed the staff report and stated that the building was condemned in October 1496. The city had to board the building, zegistration fees and taxes are paid. On April 8, 1997 a Code Compliance inspection was done. The bond was posted with the building inspection departrnent on May 12, 1997, and a permit obtained which is valid until November 12, 1997. Public Health wants an order that says if the owner doesn't get the work done, the building is tozn down. Mike Davis, grandson of the property owner, Emil I.emke, appeared and stated that he 9ntends to rehabilitate the building. He explained that he was late ]n posting the bond because he went to the wrong address and by the time he got to the right office it had closed. The following Monday he posted the bond but notice had already been mailed. Mr. Strathman recommended amending the resolution and giving the property owner until November 12, 1997. 9. Summary abatement appeal for 1176 Portland Avenue; Bonnie J. Hughes, appeliant. No one appeared. The appeal was withdrawn; the garage was removed. The meeting adjoumed at 11:45 a.m. Gerry Strat�(man, L,egislative Hearing Officer E 9'1- �1 �� Ay HAMLINE MIDWAY COALITION Hamllne Park Playground Building � 1�64 Lafond;lcenue. Saint Paul, >L� 5510� � 6L-646-1986 � Fa� 6L-6=i1 July 7,1997 Councilmember Roberta Megard 310D City Hall 15 Kellogg Boulevard St. Paul MN 55102 Dear Councilmember Megard: On behalf of the Hamline Midway Coalition Board of Directors, I am writing to seek action by the City Council to demolish the property at 1359 Blair Avenue. As you know, FiMC has supported the efforts of Blair Avenue neighbors, City departments and the Hamline-Midway Area Rehab. Corp. to seek resolution to a long list of nuisance behaviors, health risks and the blighting effect of this property for years. I trust that these issues are fully outlined in your reports from past administrative proceedings, Health Department inspection reports, police records, and Bruce Noyes' estimate of the rehabilitation costs. Neighbors may elaborate further in your review of this matter before the City Council today. I understand that the Council will consider a staff recommendation to grant the property owner additional time to abate the numerous code violations. 'This extension is unacceptable and, in our opinion, futile, given a long-standing pattern of inadequate and last-minute attention to these issues on the part of the owner. Neighbors have patientiy awaited improvements and sought several alternatives to demolition for too long. In the meantime, the condition of the property has only deteriorated further, to the point where: 1) it appears entirely uneconomical to rehabilitate the existing structure; 2) a significant nuisance has continued for neighbors; and 3) the City's administrative and enforcement resources have been wasted on a problem that shows no serious hope of being resolved by the responsible parties. I urge you to deny Mr. Nguyen's request for an extension and to proceed immediately with an order to demolish 1359 Blair Avenue. Sincerely, ( �"�` 1 ,� ` � jodi M. Bantley Executive Director /jmb ec: Co�c�l' �e��e�ns��Bet1�J�R�da�1 i a better plctce to lir�e inzct u ork. e rare ;,r ..,..,,�.�� .�,.��„��,��,�«,,,�r H-MARC a�e.�aW�nr� a��nc�� J,�yz, i�� c�.y co,m«� �t�: 9� As you may be aware, the property at 1359 Blair Ave. ]�as be� a problem property in several instauces in its history withthe past year being particularly troublesome. The propertywas condenmed'm 3uly of 1996. The code compliance ins�tiam was nat requested until Mardi and the b�td and birilding pemrit c�re na� secured imtil April of this year. Since April, work has be� slow and accorcling to building inspedors, nat g�erally of a worlm�an like maimer. Wththe cooperati� ofthe owner, Quoc Nguyai and Bnu:e Noyes of the Hrnue Loan Ftmd staff, a rel�ab loan inspec�a� was d�e last week. This inspedion indicated an e.stimate3 $56,500 in repairs. I feel this nwnber is canservative y� deuwmstrates the level of d�erioration tbat is pres�t. I have suggeste3I xmderstand the owner's desire to r�ovate yet can not in good c�sci�ce support lris de�isian. I feel that the homeno longer has signifir<nrt value and should be tom down. There are several redevdapm�t aptions for the land suc� as side yard, a house moue or new caa�slrudioai. After some researcli a�n mY part, I have suggested the City of Samt Paul's Seledive Clearance Progravi to the o�met. The ProgcamPmvides paym�t of debt of up to $15,000, retocatimi for fihe owner ($5,�0-$i0,tM30) and deauolitian ofthe building paidfor bythe Selecxive Clearance budg�. I fet3 Uris is the best sodutionfor all involved Selective Clearance gives srnne mon�ary s�.tlem�k to the owner, pays off the existing mortgage, and d�nolishes the build"mg. There is a small mortgage on the property held by TCF �o also supports the Selective {�earance opti� as they aze ready to foredose at �ytime as a rec�t de�and ldterhas not be� satisfied. M�YP�Ple inciudingthe Hamline Nfidway Coatiti�, biock club leac�s, neiSli��, b��S �o�> �S' r�ab advisor, lender, vacavt bu�ldings staff, public health staff andmyselfl�ave sp�t an �omious amowrt of time � resolving issues azoimdUris ProP�9. I feel a viabie soltrti� has be� readied and to date Uie owner has not presenYed any viable altemativenort�as i�e appliedfor Seledive Clearance. The couummityhas waitedlaUg �ough for this siwation to be resolved. I woutd recam�m�dthat the cotmcil take the strongest adion possible to move the process of demolitiari fotward. I appreaate your commitm�t to birildinS stron8 etYn�Shbo�hoods andhelping commimities maintain dec�t qualityho Thank youfor yo�s ca�siderati� of flris l�ter. SincerelY, ) � .,►► , ; l,, � :,�,,.. �V i� ' � �Y � (612)644-0065 Hamline Branch I.ibrary Bldg. 1558 West Mumehaha Avenue Saint Paul, MN 55104 / �\ � �1 �'� a� HAMLINE MIDWAY COALITION Hamline Park Playground Building � 1564 Lafond Avenue, Saint Pau1, \�'V 5� 104 � 612-646-1986 � FaY 612-641 July 7,1997 Councilmember Roberta Megard 310D City Hall 15 Kellogg Boulevard St. Paul NIN 55102 Dear Councilmember Megard: On behalf of the Hamline Midway Coalition Board of Directors, I am writing to seek action by the City Council to demolish the property at 1359 Blair Ayenue. . As you know, HMC has'supported the efforts of Blair Avenue nei�hbors, City departments and the Hamline-Midway Area Rehab. Corp. to seek resolution fo a long list of nuisance behaviors, health risks and the blighting effect of this property - far-years. I trust that these issues "are fi�1Ty outiined in your repor�s f�om past . adminisfrative proceedings, Health;Department inspection reports, police records, and Bruce Noyes'- estimate of the rehabilitation costs. Neighbors may elaborate furfher.in your review of.tliis matter before the.Cit� Council today. . I understand that the Council,willyconsider a,staff recommendation ta grant the pxoperty awner additional,time to abate the-nuinerous-cbde violations...This �._ extenaion is�unaccepfable; and', in our. opinion,. futi�s, given � long-standing patter� of inadequate andlasE-xninute attention�to tYiese issues on,'the-part of the owrier. � Neighbors have patiently` a�vaited impxovements and sought several alternatives to demolition for too long. In meantiine, fhe condition of the property has only deteriorated further, to the point_where: 1) .it appears entirely uneconomical to rehabilitate the existing structure; 2) a significant nuisance has continued for - neighbors; and 3) the City's administrative and enforcement resources have been wasted on a problem that shows no serious hope of being resolved by the . responsible parties. - � � � � , � � � I urge you to deny Mr. Nguyeri s request for an extension and to proceed immediately with an, order to demolish 1359 Blair Avenue. Sincerely, .� � �- �� jo i M. BantleX Executive Director /jmb cc ��o�e� ca�e�o e �i�z B ng�be� m�in�e� - z u a �ieighborbood a better plRCe to live and work. io,"� rerycltdPW++ t0%pos+mnsumerxane JUL-02-1997 09�11 CfIY OF SAII�T PAUL xo.�,c�c.�».ar�. FROM FROM 5T. PRUL PED r -��-��, �a,�� ;�I i �!lAAA; �� Date: 7une 30, 1997 To: Tom Harren From: Bsuce Noyes TO DEPARiMBNi R ECONOMIC 1 ,z� Re: Pursuant to your request to inspect the premises at I359 Blair, EXTERIOR: 1. Roof: The shingles have been removed from the majority of the ro unstungled areas. The roof de�k is deteriorated in several places. Ext� an entire redecking will be required. A standard wood window has be The second floor/attic spaces have finished walis and ceilings, therefc underside of the roof structure was not possible. However, walls and are water stained in several areas. The clsimney flashing is old and he� and cap sre mostly detedorated. The chimney should be rebuilt ebova 2. Eaves: The eaves are covered wiih aluzninum on the south eave in Soffit and facia members are missiq,c in substantial portions of the ea� revealing rotted, deteriorated and missing members. Soffit panels on instafled in a workmanlike manner. There is flaking and peeling paint 92668574 P.02 �� cirl�n Tebphnnt: 61L2666626 Faeu�n�k: 612-22&33I1 Paul, MI�7. surfaces. Tarps cover the dve roof board repairs or instailed as a skylight. an examination o£the ilings on the second floor ly tarred. Chimney bricks �e roofline. umvorktnatilike manner. on the north and the east, : west side were not �everal areas. 3. Siding: The majority of sidin,g on the east, south and west of the hd � se is composite "hard- boazd" siding. It was nat installed in a workmanlike mannez and may n t have be�n new material. The north and west walts are covered with material not manufactured� br use as siding (pieces of reclaimed storm doors7). d. Doors aad Windows: Door and window trim members are wood v flaking and peeiing paint. Most main floor windows and doors are "bd windows on the second story are generaily in poor condition with bro� panels, and torn and missing screens. The front entry door is ill fltting, without proper locks. The front storm door shouid be replaced. � 5. Miscellsaeous: The bas�nseM windows are "boarded up". There a� ' �� foundation. The north addition foundation was not installed in a wor ' doors appeat to have been used as concrete fonn work) and it is not �+ substaMiat amouMS of ed up> The stocm and missing glass orly weathetized and cracks actd holes in the inlike manner (storm �per1Y attached to the Yage 1 0£ 5 � � J1�-02-1997 09-11 FROM FROM ST. PRUL PED TO old� foundation sections. Brick repairs are unworkmanlike. The la 92666574 P.03 a � "� step is broken, cracked and spalled. Enhy doocs lack deadbolt locks to wde. There si� structural deficiencies where wis►dows and doors have been altered. There ars lazge amouuts' �f debris. 6. Garsge: The shingle cut at the rake u►ds ofthe roof do not meet e_ There are no rake boards. The service door is out of square. The concrete drive is deteri � ted. The siding materials were not installeQ in a workmanlike manner. ;; INTERIOR: 1. Kitcheo, (components are to be found in two different rooms): Floor: Wom and dirry tiardwood floor in sonth sectioa i�o fi Reclaimed storm doors have been vsed as sub-flooring in the Walls and Ceilings: There is cracked plaster, flaking and pe� The sheetrock taping in the north section was not done in a portions are not completed. Cabinets: The kitchen cabinets lack coumertops and are not south section. The plumbing is not hooked up at the sink in Oiher: The radiator has flaking and peeling paint. Z. Batkrooms (3): Basemern: The ceramic tile floor was not instalied in a wo� unfinished. The wall paneling is un5nished, wet and milde� complete. The sink is illegally ve,nted. The toilet is old and an openable window or a fan and does not meet code requ ceiling consists of reclaimed lnmber. There is no GFI rece� Main Floor. The vanity sink is in poor condition. There is no floor in north section. section. in the south section. ike manner and itly attached in the section. like manner and is he tub instailaiion is not The room does not have �ts for ventilation. The base. Second Floor: The tub is old and dirty and wom. The ceramic�e is not instatted in a worlananlike manner. There is no door trim, no window trim d no base molding. There is water damage on the ceiling. � ;� � 3. Liv;ng Room and Dining Rooms: Floors: The wood plank flooring is worn, dirty and scratched. � e walis, ceilings and interior irim are characterized by cracked pIaster, water damag �, soiied surfaces, flaking and peeling paint. The double hung windows (4) are characte '' by loose and deteriorated putty, flaldng peeling paim, missing hardware and oor weather stripping. Page 2 of 5 � JUL-02-1997 09=12 4. �edrooms (4): FROM FROM ST. PFlUL PED � Basement: The floor is wet and there is no 5nished floor. The water stained, miidewed and malodorous. The window does nok meet egess requirements for escape and rescue. The ceiling has water stains and open ph�imbing acs;ess hoSes. � � Second Floor, IQorth {2): The aze no ficnshed floors. There is Tha sheetrock installation and taping were not done in a wor� Sec.ond Floor, South: The mixture of wood flooring and There is a variety of wall and ceiling coverings including in various states of repair. Portions are wet and water sta tntted. 92668574 P.04 a'�� walls are wet, or case moldings. ; manner. pg is wom and dirty. y shceuock, paneling and $�e skylight frame is 4. Secoad Ftoor Porches (2): Unfinished and um+vorkmanlike wali an �c�iling installations including 1/4 inch plywood and exposed newspaper. There is flaldng d peeling paint. 1'he rear porch is malodorous. � 5. Common Bsllway: Tbere is wom and deteriorate3 cacpet. There peeling paint on the walis. 6. Basement stairs: The treads are wom. There is no handrail or properly headered off. 7. Bssement: The majority ofthe concrete floors and foundation of standing water and mildew. The subfloor on the north portion reclaimed storm doors. The entire basement is matodorous. 8. Fireplace: Not constructed in a worl:manlike manner. ELECTRTCAIJMECHAIVICAL: plaster and The opening is not ire wet. There are areas hous� consists of 2. Electrieal: There is a 100 amp service panel oversized circuit br ' s and illegal connections. There are no hard wired smoke detectors. There are wiring runs in th' asement ceiling that do not meet code. 'There are reverse po3arities, raceptacles with no groun g, missing covers and fixture,s throughout the house too mimerous ta mention. New constru on standards for wiring were not obsecved where waIts have been nevviy constivcted or where � id watls were fully opened. 2. Plumbing: The basement fixtures are not vented to code. The n wastelvent and numerous other waste and supply fittings which do for the kit�hen stove does not meet wde. 3. Hcsting: Unable to check the opent+onal condition of the gas unknown. Fin tube and cast iron radiators are mixed. There is no bath has an illegal code. The gas cACk therefare its condition is istion sir. Yage 3 of 5 JUL-02-1997 69�12 FROM FROM ST. PRUL PED 92668574 P.05 � y y q ,�, � Extezior: i. Roof 2. Eaves 3. Siding 4. Aoors & Wu►dows 5. Misc. 6. Garage � Imerior: cost Eshmate TO 58,500 Tear off old rovfing and aay newly insta meet code, install new roo� repair roof I deck if building official requires, reptace chimney above the roofline 52,800 Remove soffit and facia members, repaii lookouts and subfacia. Install new alumi 35,000 Repair and paint "hard-board" on hwsa dispose of material not manufactured fo� with new siding to match balance of hou $2,600 Repair or replace prime doors and windi door, repair or replac� stotsn windows, a members, paint trim or cover with form $3,000 Repair or replacR basemesu windows, m rear foundation section to code, repair b step, rebuild headers above ahezed door (especially the sliding door on the east si geaeral clean up of the premises $1,500 Repair roof, install rake boards, repiace 1. Kitchens $4,400 2. Bathrooms $5,500 3. Liv. Room 54,200 & 1?in. Rm • 4. Bedrooms $5,140 i. Porches $2,400 6. Hallway $1,000 7. Basement $1,500 Stairs 8. Basement 52,000 9. Fireplace $1,000 � Install new vinyl sheet goods flooring, n watis, ceifings, doors, and cabinets, scra Rework ceramic tile installations, repia� materiais, complete basement tub install code, replace basement bath ceiling, insl necessary Repair floon or replace floor coverings, doors, repair window sash Install new finished floors, replace or re; installed walis and ceilings, install egres: case moldings, remove skylight Instatl finished floors, repair and paint v Replace floor cAVering, repair and paint Rebuild basement stairs with header, ins to code Properly iandscape pe�rimeter of foundai infiluation into basement Remove and rIispose of Page 4 of S roofing wtrich does not ds, instal[ new roof brick and mortar rafter tail ends, i soffit and facia l garage. Remove and ting use and replace s, replace front storm �sir deteriosated trim atvminum point faundation, sepair kwork, replace lawnwalk �d window openings of the house), pmvide �lace sub-floor, repair : and paint cadiatot wet wall and ceiling ion, install ventilation to ;l trim membecs as walis, ceilings and deteriorated or poorly low, install base and � and ceilings, daodorize 1s and ceilittgs handraii and guard rail to prevent water ,� JUL-02-1997 09�13 FROM FROM 5T. PHUL PED �CGttICSVMCC}I3i1tCd�: 1. Elecuic � $2,000 2. Plumbing S],500 3.Heating 52,500 ?otal Costs S56,SOU TO 9266�74 P.06 ��' �� Wire house to Bulletin 80-1 standards, e fully renovated sections of house to new consuuction starrdards � Instatt waste and vent to code in 3locati � ns, install a gas cock to code for the stove, replace illegai water pply fittings, Remove 5n tube radiation and inctall iron, install r.flmbustion air , ; � � Page 5 of 5 TOTqL P.06 JUN-26-1997 09�44 CITY OF ST PRl1� LIEP Interdepartmental Memorandum CITY OF SATNT PAUL ...��.. June 26,1997 20: FROM: RE: Ann Cieslak, Legzslative Aide to Councilmember Megazd Beth Randall, Executive Director of H-M,AItC Joseph Ehrlich, St. Paul Building Inspector 612 266 9124 P.01 �l� �� Status Report for Vacant Building Located at 1359 BIair Avenue 'Ihe building has many deficiencies, as enuonerated in the code campliance report submitted by Don Wagner on March 31, 1997. The building is repairable, but will require very significant investment to correct the deterioration and sub-standard workmanship of the past several years. Theze aze some stzuctural deficiencies � evident in the floor system of the fisst level, observable from the basemeat. There aze indications of excessive deflection of the Second Floor suuctural system as well. The Second Floor structure is not visibie. Some cosmecic repairs ha�e been conducted on the interiot. Re-roofing of the bualdia� is pxesentiy underway. I recommend, if this buiidiz�,g is to be saved, that the owner focus on repairing the exterior and struciural components of the building first All rotted members must be replaced and any areas wheze water may pene�ate must be sealeci, including problem azeas in the foundation wall. Any rotted or improperly constructed frazning must be replaced and/or reinforced. Questionable framing that has aiready been covered must be uncovered to verify its condirion and repair as necessary. In my opinion, fhe workmanship evidenced on this building, demonstrates a lack of understanding by the wozlanen of basic construction principles. I do not feel tha[ the individuals perfotming the work have the knowledge or desire to satisfactorily restore t�is building to a liveable condirion. The recent flurry of repau activity seems designed more to impress than to accomplish a goat. The tepair effort appears to be very unorganized and is leaving the building wlnerable to fiuther decay azzd deterioration. If furthc^� investment in this property is approved, l believe a successful outcome can be achieved only by retainiq,a the services of a competent craftsman to complete the work. JE:aznw � �:� fiATllStE S11YER" fAX MEtdO OY516 o ^s56 � SS L ' a66- 9aas aG� - 90 99 TOTAL P.01