The URL can be used to link to this page

97-687CouncilFile# Q1 -��7 Green Sheet # �V�� `� " ` °�'• ' °. # ` � t� i4 '.3 °✓ . � `�.%� o �d. �±a Presented Referred To RESOLUTION � So/ ♦ / Committee Date 1 WI7EREAS, on Apri12, 1997, City Council considered Resolution 97-349 which introduced the Capital City Development 2 Program, was laid over until Apri130, 1997, to be discussed at the policy meeting; and 3 WHEREAS, on Apri130, 1997, public discussions was held concerning the development of the capital City development 4 Program which could realign city development objectives with neighborhood based proposals for housing and business 5 revitalization by targeting specific residential and commercial areas which require strategies for these activities; and 6 W fIEREAS, the Capital City Development Program is a proposal in response to policy discussions generated at the City 7 Council related to housing rehabilitation/new development and commercial development; and 8 WF�REAS, City Council directed PED staff to develop an implementation plan for the Capital City Development Program 9 to be brought back to the City Council within (6) weeks; and 10 WHEREAS, to facilitate discussion on these issues among City Councilmembers, City staff, and members of the community, 11 a series of Resolutions pertaining to components of the Capital city Development Program will be introduced to assist in the 12 implementation of the Progam; now therefore be it 13 RESOLVED, that PED continue to work to collapse funding programs and their reporting requirements so that funds can be 14 pooled for greater flexibiliTy across the city; and be it further 15 RESOLVED, that PED develop a plan to reduce the city and federal reporting requirements to a single reporting fonn, and to 16 request the necessary federal waivers to accomplish this task by August 1, 1997. Requested by Deparhnent of: Certified by Council Secretary BY T� �-. f--�/Y��e , ApprovedbyMayor: Date � \2�'�k� � Form Approved by City Attomey � Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council � � AdoptedbyCouncil: Date� ��_��_�$'��%9'"� a _sr DEPARTMENT/OFFlCE/COUNqL DA7E IN171ATED - � c v � GREEN SHEET No. 5� CONfA PE 8 PHONE � DFPAp7MENT OIfiEC � CITY COUNqL " NUYBFR FO� O Cftt ATTORNEY � CITY CLERK MU5f BE ON COU AG BY (DAT� ROUTING � BUDGET DIFiECfOfl � FlN. & M6T. SERVICES DIR. � � MAYOR (OH ASSISTANi) � TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES (CIJP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATUFi� ACTION FiC-0UESTED: D'uect Policy development for the Capital City Development Program. RECOMMENOA7WNS: MP� (� a Ra�ect (F) COUNGIL COMMI7TEEIRESEARCH REPORT UPTIONAI _ PVJJNING COMMISSION — CINL SEflViCE COMMISSION A�Y� PHONE NO. _ qB COMMRTEE _ COMMENTS: _ STAFF _ — DISTRICT COURT _ SUPPOPTS WMICH COUNqL OBJECfIVE1 INRIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPoRTUNI7Y (Who, What. When. Where, Why): ADVANTAGES IF APPAOVED: DISqDVANTAGES IF APPROVED: � . �.'S8 tiam �.+4:';<.�a` ��F� 2 9 ��0 _,� OISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: TOTAL AMOUNT OF TfiANSACTION S COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIHCLE ONE) YES NO FUNDING SOURCE ACT�VITY NUMBER FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) CouncilFile# Q1 -��7 Green Sheet # �V�� `� " ` °�'• ' °. # ` � t� i4 '.3 °✓ . � `�.%� o �d. �±a Presented Referred To RESOLUTION � So/ ♦ / Committee Date 1 WI7EREAS, on Apri12, 1997, City Council considered Resolution 97-349 which introduced the Capital City Development 2 Program, was laid over until Apri130, 1997, to be discussed at the policy meeting; and 3 WHEREAS, on Apri130, 1997, public discussions was held concerning the development of the capital City development 4 Program which could realign city development objectives with neighborhood based proposals for housing and business 5 revitalization by targeting specific residential and commercial areas which require strategies for these activities; and 6 W fIEREAS, the Capital City Development Program is a proposal in response to policy discussions generated at the City 7 Council related to housing rehabilitation/new development and commercial development; and 8 WF�REAS, City Council directed PED staff to develop an implementation plan for the Capital City Development Program 9 to be brought back to the City Council within (6) weeks; and 10 WHEREAS, to facilitate discussion on these issues among City Councilmembers, City staff, and members of the community, 11 a series of Resolutions pertaining to components of the Capital city Development Program will be introduced to assist in the 12 implementation of the Progam; now therefore be it 13 RESOLVED, that PED continue to work to collapse funding programs and their reporting requirements so that funds can be 14 pooled for greater flexibiliTy across the city; and be it further 15 RESOLVED, that PED develop a plan to reduce the city and federal reporting requirements to a single reporting fonn, and to 16 request the necessary federal waivers to accomplish this task by August 1, 1997. Requested by Deparhnent of: Certified by Council Secretary BY T� �-. f--�/Y��e , ApprovedbyMayor: Date � \2�'�k� � Form Approved by City Attomey � Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council � � AdoptedbyCouncil: Date� ��_��_�$'��%9'"� a _sr DEPARTMENT/OFFlCE/COUNqL DA7E IN171ATED - � c v � GREEN SHEET No. 5� CONfA PE 8 PHONE � DFPAp7MENT OIfiEC � CITY COUNqL " NUYBFR FO� O Cftt ATTORNEY � CITY CLERK MU5f BE ON COU AG BY (DAT� ROUTING � BUDGET DIFiECfOfl � FlN. & M6T. SERVICES DIR. � � MAYOR (OH ASSISTANi) � TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES (CIJP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATUFi� ACTION FiC-0UESTED: D'uect Policy development for the Capital City Development Program. RECOMMENOA7WNS: MP� (� a Ra�ect (F) COUNGIL COMMI7TEEIRESEARCH REPORT UPTIONAI _ PVJJNING COMMISSION — CINL SEflViCE COMMISSION A�Y� PHONE NO. _ qB COMMRTEE _ COMMENTS: _ STAFF _ — DISTRICT COURT _ SUPPOPTS WMICH COUNqL OBJECfIVE1 INRIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPoRTUNI7Y (Who, What. When. Where, Why): ADVANTAGES IF APPAOVED: DISqDVANTAGES IF APPROVED: � . �.'S8 tiam �.+4:';<.�a` ��F� 2 9 ��0 _,� OISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: TOTAL AMOUNT OF TfiANSACTION S COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIHCLE ONE) YES NO FUNDING SOURCE ACT�VITY NUMBER FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) CouncilFile# Q1 -��7 Green Sheet # �V�� `� " ` °�'• ' °. # ` � t� i4 '.3 °✓ . � `�.%� o �d. �±a Presented Referred To RESOLUTION � So/ ♦ / Committee Date 1 WI7EREAS, on Apri12, 1997, City Council considered Resolution 97-349 which introduced the Capital City Development 2 Program, was laid over until Apri130, 1997, to be discussed at the policy meeting; and 3 WHEREAS, on Apri130, 1997, public discussions was held concerning the development of the capital City development 4 Program which could realign city development objectives with neighborhood based proposals for housing and business 5 revitalization by targeting specific residential and commercial areas which require strategies for these activities; and 6 W fIEREAS, the Capital City Development Program is a proposal in response to policy discussions generated at the City 7 Council related to housing rehabilitation/new development and commercial development; and 8 WF�REAS, City Council directed PED staff to develop an implementation plan for the Capital City Development Program 9 to be brought back to the City Council within (6) weeks; and 10 WHEREAS, to facilitate discussion on these issues among City Councilmembers, City staff, and members of the community, 11 a series of Resolutions pertaining to components of the Capital city Development Program will be introduced to assist in the 12 implementation of the Progam; now therefore be it 13 RESOLVED, that PED continue to work to collapse funding programs and their reporting requirements so that funds can be 14 pooled for greater flexibiliTy across the city; and be it further 15 RESOLVED, that PED develop a plan to reduce the city and federal reporting requirements to a single reporting fonn, and to 16 request the necessary federal waivers to accomplish this task by August 1, 1997. Requested by Deparhnent of: Certified by Council Secretary BY T� �-. f--�/Y��e , ApprovedbyMayor: Date � \2�'�k� � Form Approved by City Attomey � Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council � � AdoptedbyCouncil: Date� ��_��_�$'��%9'"� a _sr DEPARTMENT/OFFlCE/COUNqL DA7E IN171ATED - � c v � GREEN SHEET No. 5� CONfA PE 8 PHONE � DFPAp7MENT OIfiEC � CITY COUNqL " NUYBFR FO� O Cftt ATTORNEY � CITY CLERK MU5f BE ON COU AG BY (DAT� ROUTING � BUDGET DIFiECfOfl � FlN. & M6T. SERVICES DIR. � � MAYOR (OH ASSISTANi) � TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES (CIJP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATUFi� ACTION FiC-0UESTED: D'uect Policy development for the Capital City Development Program. RECOMMENOA7WNS: MP� (� a Ra�ect (F) COUNGIL COMMI7TEEIRESEARCH REPORT UPTIONAI _ PVJJNING COMMISSION — CINL SEflViCE COMMISSION A�Y� PHONE NO. _ qB COMMRTEE _ COMMENTS: _ STAFF _ — DISTRICT COURT _ SUPPOPTS WMICH COUNqL OBJECfIVE1 INRIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPoRTUNI7Y (Who, What. When. Where, Why): ADVANTAGES IF APPAOVED: DISqDVANTAGES IF APPROVED: � . �.'S8 tiam �.+4:';<.�a` ��F� 2 9 ��0 _,� OISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: TOTAL AMOUNT OF TfiANSACTION S COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIHCLE ONE) YES NO FUNDING SOURCE ACT�VITY NUMBER FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN)