97-686Council File # 9� — �o�{(.
�-< F �, .
�.;..: �,. _.
RESOLUTION
Green Sheet # �C���
''9
Presented
Referred "
1 WHEREAS, on April 2, 1997, City Council considered Resolution 97-349 which introduced the Capital City Development
2 Program, was laid over until Apri130, 1997, to be discussed at the policy meeting; and
3 WHEREAS, on Apri130, 1997, public discussions was held conceming the development of the capital City development
4 Program which couid realign city development objectives with neighborhood based proposals for housing and business
5 revitalization by tazgeting specific residential and commercial azeas which require strategies for these activities; and
6 WIIEREAS, the Capital City Development Progam is a proposal in response to policy discussions generated at the City
7 Council related to housing rehabilitation/new development and commercial development; and
8 WHEREAS, City Council directed PED staff to develop an implementation plan for the Capital City Development Program
9 to be brought back to the City Council within (6) weeks; and
10 WHEIZEAS, to facilitate discussion on these issues among City Councilmembers, City staff; and members of the community,
ll a series of Resolutions pertaining to components of the Capital city Development Program will be introduced to assist in the
12 implementation of the Program; now therefore be it
13 RESOLVED, that PED work with the Ramsey County TaY Department to resolve outstanding issues on iransference of tax
14 forfeit property by July 1, 1997; and be it further
15 RESOLVED, that PED work with HUD and other necessary agencies, private developers or community organizations to
16 develop a policy to assist community groups with acquisition and site assembly by July 1, 1997.
Requested by Deparnnent of.
�
Form Approved by City Attorney
�
Approved by Mayor for Submission to Councal
BY: �� a- L�
Approved by Mayor: Date '{
�
�
Adopted by Council: Date $"
l
Adoption Certified by Council Secretary
�11- ���
DEPAqiMENT/OFFlCE/COUNCIL DATE INIMTED
GREEN SHEET No. ��q �
COMA PERSON & PHONE � OEPARTMINf DIPECfOfl O CRY COUNqL
N FOA ❑ Cm ATTORNEY � CT' CLERK
Bk
MUST BE ON COUN AGENDA BY (DAT� NOUi1NG � BUDGEf DIRECTOfl � FlN. & MGT. SERVICE$ DIR.
� � MAVOR (OR ASSI5fANn �
'fOTAL # OF SIGNATUHE PAGES (CIIP ALL LOCATfONS FOA S{GNATUR�
ACfION RE�UESTED:
Direct Policy development for the Capital City Development Program.
RECOMMENDAnONS: nppraue (A) w Fieject (R) COUNCIL COMIAITTEERiESEAfiCH REPOIiT OPTIONAL
— PLANNING COMMISSION _ CIVIL SEflVICE COMMISSION ��Y5T PHONE NO.
_ CIB COMMITTEE _
COMMENTS:
— STAFF _
_ DISTRICT COURT _
SUPPORTS WMICH COUNCIL O&IECTIVE7
INRIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPOR7UNITV (Wha, W�et, When, Where, Why):
ADVANTACaES IF APPflOVED:
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVE�: '
�&TiYif�� F��� �}'
kril-�� `� � �I�`��
— ��a � -- �
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED:
TOTAL AMOUNT OP TRANSACTION S COST/NEVENUE BUDGETED (CIFiCLE ONE) YES NO
FUNDING SOURCE ACTIVITY NUMBER
FlNANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN)
Council File # 9� — �o�{(.
�-< F �, .
�.;..: �,. _.
RESOLUTION
Green Sheet # �C���
''9
Presented
Referred "
1 WHEREAS, on April 2, 1997, City Council considered Resolution 97-349 which introduced the Capital City Development
2 Program, was laid over until Apri130, 1997, to be discussed at the policy meeting; and
3 WHEREAS, on Apri130, 1997, public discussions was held conceming the development of the capital City development
4 Program which couid realign city development objectives with neighborhood based proposals for housing and business
5 revitalization by tazgeting specific residential and commercial azeas which require strategies for these activities; and
6 WIIEREAS, the Capital City Development Progam is a proposal in response to policy discussions generated at the City
7 Council related to housing rehabilitation/new development and commercial development; and
8 WHEREAS, City Council directed PED staff to develop an implementation plan for the Capital City Development Program
9 to be brought back to the City Council within (6) weeks; and
10 WHEIZEAS, to facilitate discussion on these issues among City Councilmembers, City staff; and members of the community,
ll a series of Resolutions pertaining to components of the Capital city Development Program will be introduced to assist in the
12 implementation of the Program; now therefore be it
13 RESOLVED, that PED work with the Ramsey County TaY Department to resolve outstanding issues on iransference of tax
14 forfeit property by July 1, 1997; and be it further
15 RESOLVED, that PED work with HUD and other necessary agencies, private developers or community organizations to
16 develop a policy to assist community groups with acquisition and site assembly by July 1, 1997.
Requested by Deparnnent of.
�
Form Approved by City Attorney
�
Approved by Mayor for Submission to Councal
BY: �� a- L�
Approved by Mayor: Date '{
�
�
Adopted by Council: Date $"
l
Adoption Certified by Council Secretary
�11- ���
DEPAqiMENT/OFFlCE/COUNCIL DATE INIMTED
GREEN SHEET No. ��q �
COMA PERSON & PHONE � OEPARTMINf DIPECfOfl O CRY COUNqL
N FOA ❑ Cm ATTORNEY � CT' CLERK
Bk
MUST BE ON COUN AGENDA BY (DAT� NOUi1NG � BUDGEf DIRECTOfl � FlN. & MGT. SERVICE$ DIR.
� � MAVOR (OR ASSI5fANn �
'fOTAL # OF SIGNATUHE PAGES (CIIP ALL LOCATfONS FOA S{GNATUR�
ACfION RE�UESTED:
Direct Policy development for the Capital City Development Program.
RECOMMENDAnONS: nppraue (A) w Fieject (R) COUNCIL COMIAITTEERiESEAfiCH REPOIiT OPTIONAL
— PLANNING COMMISSION _ CIVIL SEflVICE COMMISSION ��Y5T PHONE NO.
_ CIB COMMITTEE _
COMMENTS:
— STAFF _
_ DISTRICT COURT _
SUPPORTS WMICH COUNCIL O&IECTIVE7
INRIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPOR7UNITV (Wha, W�et, When, Where, Why):
ADVANTACaES IF APPflOVED:
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVE�: '
�&TiYif�� F��� �}'
kril-�� `� � �I�`��
— ��a � -- �
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED:
TOTAL AMOUNT OP TRANSACTION S COST/NEVENUE BUDGETED (CIFiCLE ONE) YES NO
FUNDING SOURCE ACTIVITY NUMBER
FlNANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN)
Council File # 9� — �o�{(.
�-< F �, .
�.;..: �,. _.
RESOLUTION
Green Sheet # �C���
''9
Presented
Referred "
1 WHEREAS, on April 2, 1997, City Council considered Resolution 97-349 which introduced the Capital City Development
2 Program, was laid over until Apri130, 1997, to be discussed at the policy meeting; and
3 WHEREAS, on Apri130, 1997, public discussions was held conceming the development of the capital City development
4 Program which couid realign city development objectives with neighborhood based proposals for housing and business
5 revitalization by tazgeting specific residential and commercial azeas which require strategies for these activities; and
6 WIIEREAS, the Capital City Development Progam is a proposal in response to policy discussions generated at the City
7 Council related to housing rehabilitation/new development and commercial development; and
8 WHEREAS, City Council directed PED staff to develop an implementation plan for the Capital City Development Program
9 to be brought back to the City Council within (6) weeks; and
10 WHEIZEAS, to facilitate discussion on these issues among City Councilmembers, City staff; and members of the community,
ll a series of Resolutions pertaining to components of the Capital city Development Program will be introduced to assist in the
12 implementation of the Program; now therefore be it
13 RESOLVED, that PED work with the Ramsey County TaY Department to resolve outstanding issues on iransference of tax
14 forfeit property by July 1, 1997; and be it further
15 RESOLVED, that PED work with HUD and other necessary agencies, private developers or community organizations to
16 develop a policy to assist community groups with acquisition and site assembly by July 1, 1997.
Requested by Deparnnent of.
�
Form Approved by City Attorney
�
Approved by Mayor for Submission to Councal
BY: �� a- L�
Approved by Mayor: Date '{
�
�
Adopted by Council: Date $"
l
Adoption Certified by Council Secretary
�11- ���
DEPAqiMENT/OFFlCE/COUNCIL DATE INIMTED
GREEN SHEET No. ��q �
COMA PERSON & PHONE � OEPARTMINf DIPECfOfl O CRY COUNqL
N FOA ❑ Cm ATTORNEY � CT' CLERK
Bk
MUST BE ON COUN AGENDA BY (DAT� NOUi1NG � BUDGEf DIRECTOfl � FlN. & MGT. SERVICE$ DIR.
� � MAVOR (OR ASSI5fANn �
'fOTAL # OF SIGNATUHE PAGES (CIIP ALL LOCATfONS FOA S{GNATUR�
ACfION RE�UESTED:
Direct Policy development for the Capital City Development Program.
RECOMMENDAnONS: nppraue (A) w Fieject (R) COUNCIL COMIAITTEERiESEAfiCH REPOIiT OPTIONAL
— PLANNING COMMISSION _ CIVIL SEflVICE COMMISSION ��Y5T PHONE NO.
_ CIB COMMITTEE _
COMMENTS:
— STAFF _
_ DISTRICT COURT _
SUPPORTS WMICH COUNCIL O&IECTIVE7
INRIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPOR7UNITV (Wha, W�et, When, Where, Why):
ADVANTACaES IF APPflOVED:
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVE�: '
�&TiYif�� F��� �}'
kril-�� `� � �I�`��
— ��a � -- �
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED:
TOTAL AMOUNT OP TRANSACTION S COST/NEVENUE BUDGETED (CIFiCLE ONE) YES NO
FUNDING SOURCE ACTIVITY NUMBER
FlNANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN)