97-531Council File # C�s � 7 �
Green Sheet # ��.�
OF SAI
Presented
Referred
NESOTA
Committee: Date
OPPO5ING ARTICLS 11� SECTION 35 OF S.F. �`493
1 WAEREAS, the Culwral STAR Program is funded with ten percent of an addifional one-half of one percent sales taac on
2 sales transactions that occur within the City of Saint Paul, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 297A, authorized by
3 the State of Minnesota, cl�apter No. 375, article 9, section 46; and
4
5 WHEREAS, on July 13, 1994, the City Council of the City of Saint Paul established the G�iltural Capital Invesunent
6 (Cultural STAR) Program, C.F. 941005, allocafing 75% of the Cultural STAR funds to projects within the cultural
7 disuict, and allowing up to 25% of the Cultural STAR funds to be allocated outside of the cultural district; and
8
9 WHEREAS, after an open and inclusive public process, the City Council adopted guidelines for the Cultural STAR
10 Program on May 3, 1995, C.F. 95-442, which establishes program priorities and defines eligible applicants and eligible
11 activi6es wirich focus on enhancing and suppor6ng the cultural district as a visitor attracfion; and
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
WHEREAS, the City of Saint Paul remains committed to using an open and inclusive public process for evaluaring,
modi£ying, and improving ffie Cultural STAR Program which will respond to expressed concerns and groposed
modifications of the Saint Paul legislative delegation, Ciry of Saint Paul elected officials, cultural organizarions, and the
generalpublic;and
WHEREAS, the proposed State of Minnesota S.F. #493, ardcle 11, secflon 35, would, without benefit of review by the
City of 5aint Paul, all the effected cultural organizations, or the general public, inciease the allocation of Culhual
STAR funds from 75� to 80% within the culhual district and limit use of this portion of the funds exclusively to
nonprofit arts organizafions, libraries, and museums, and would decrease the allocation of Cultural STAR funds to be
used outside the cultural district from a maacimum of 25% to 20% for use by nonprofit arts organizations, libraries, and
museums and would add businesses, within the cultural district which enhance visitor enjoyment of the district, as an
eli�ble applicant for tlils 20% of the fund, _
TFIEREFORE BE IT RFSOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Saint Paul, opposes article 11, secflon 35, of
S.F. #493 and directs intergovernmental rela6ons staff to work with Saint Paul legislators and other appropriate
legislators to heip preserve an open ptocess for reviewing changes to the Cultural STAR Program.
Requested by Department of:
• r-�e �. a �- - . �-
/� / / Li�
Adopted by Council: Date �
Adoption�Certified hy Council
By:
Form Ap roved by City Attorney
♦
� BY= �t �
Approved by Mayor for Submission to
Counci�
-�'--
By:
� _, _
a�-�S3\
DEPARTMENifOFFICEICOUNCIL DATE MIITIAT D N� 2 5 4 9 5
-�p � q GREEN SHEE
INR1pt1DASE INISIALIDATE
CONTACf PERSON & � �,./ Q DEPAflTMENT DIRECTOfl � CRY COUNCII
�1 �1 Vll�� liY� �`�W�O HUYB�EFFOR �CRYATTORNEY �CINCl.ERK
MUST BE ON COUNCIL AGENDA BY (DATE) pOMNG BUDGE( OIflEC�OR � FlN. & MGT. SEFiVICE$ Dlfl.
OPDEB MAYOR (OFi ASSISTANi) O
TOTAI # OF SIGNATURE PAGES (CLIP ALL LOCA710NS FOR SIGNATUR�
ACTION flE�UE$TED:
�.�� ap��i�.rc� A�n�t-� ► I j s�na�J 3s d� g.�. � yy 3
RECqMMENDATIONS: Appmve (A) a Rejec[ (R) p�ONAL SERYICE CONTRACiS MUST ANSWER TNE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:
_ FLANNING COMMISSION _ CIVI� SERVICE CAMMISSION �� H35 ihi5 p850Nfifrt1 eVef wofked UntlEr e COMraC[ fOr Mis department?
_CIBCqMMITfEE __ YES NO
2. Has this persOn/firm ever been a city employee?
_ STAFF — YES NO
_ DI5'mici coURi _ 3. Does ihis person/firm possess s skill not normally possessed by any cuttent ciry employee?
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL O&IECTIVE? . YES NO
, Explain all yes answers on separate sheet antl attaeh to green sheet
INI7IATING PROHLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNfTY (Who. NYnap When. Where, Why) � � �}.� '
��7� l w'�-� Ti K�- 1 J�it"" �^' ( Iww...�.'� �+�iKN61 Nca�• i Tl G �`-' I`
. �.v`��i ' �� � � . ,
ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED, ' �
�T.VNVI"'��, n��- �i�n��l�v�� I"GM�S� ����1�!II�SN�Cd.J � I"M/N�'-'rsl l�
�R- "P��nn-- ��I�.n� �►-1 7� 1►rtTt►�T�.� PCT J..aCA2� L�v�
DISADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: -
� � �
DISADVANTAGES IF NOTAPPROVED:
LJVZ-'ivl�-A�- �fR�e-- �SD� U� L`rrnJt"D Pz�" �� '1� �.- �'W
�c�� � A�-�-o'c�rycsx7 � � t,�l�?--1--tt� �" C'.e�_
��2.- ��'►�� i.ua�vLD P�" ft�7�'D
70TAL AMOUN7 OF TqANSACTION $ � COST/REVENUE BUDGETED iCIRCLE ONE) YES NO
FUNDIidG SOURCE � ACTIVI7V NUMBEH N H"
FINANCIAI INFOFMATfON. (EXPI.AIN)
Council File # C�s � 7 �
Green Sheet # ��.�
OF SAI
Presented
Referred
NESOTA
Committee: Date
OPPO5ING ARTICLS 11� SECTION 35 OF S.F. �`493
1 WAEREAS, the Culwral STAR Program is funded with ten percent of an addifional one-half of one percent sales taac on
2 sales transactions that occur within the City of Saint Paul, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 297A, authorized by
3 the State of Minnesota, cl�apter No. 375, article 9, section 46; and
4
5 WHEREAS, on July 13, 1994, the City Council of the City of Saint Paul established the G�iltural Capital Invesunent
6 (Cultural STAR) Program, C.F. 941005, allocafing 75% of the Cultural STAR funds to projects within the cultural
7 disuict, and allowing up to 25% of the Cultural STAR funds to be allocated outside of the cultural district; and
8
9 WHEREAS, after an open and inclusive public process, the City Council adopted guidelines for the Cultural STAR
10 Program on May 3, 1995, C.F. 95-442, which establishes program priorities and defines eligible applicants and eligible
11 activi6es wirich focus on enhancing and suppor6ng the cultural district as a visitor attracfion; and
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
WHEREAS, the City of Saint Paul remains committed to using an open and inclusive public process for evaluaring,
modi£ying, and improving ffie Cultural STAR Program which will respond to expressed concerns and groposed
modifications of the Saint Paul legislative delegation, Ciry of Saint Paul elected officials, cultural organizarions, and the
generalpublic;and
WHEREAS, the proposed State of Minnesota S.F. #493, ardcle 11, secflon 35, would, without benefit of review by the
City of 5aint Paul, all the effected cultural organizations, or the general public, inciease the allocation of Culhual
STAR funds from 75� to 80% within the culhual district and limit use of this portion of the funds exclusively to
nonprofit arts organizafions, libraries, and museums, and would decrease the allocation of Cultural STAR funds to be
used outside the cultural district from a maacimum of 25% to 20% for use by nonprofit arts organizations, libraries, and
museums and would add businesses, within the cultural district which enhance visitor enjoyment of the district, as an
eli�ble applicant for tlils 20% of the fund, _
TFIEREFORE BE IT RFSOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Saint Paul, opposes article 11, secflon 35, of
S.F. #493 and directs intergovernmental rela6ons staff to work with Saint Paul legislators and other appropriate
legislators to heip preserve an open ptocess for reviewing changes to the Cultural STAR Program.
Requested by Department of:
• r-�e �. a �- - . �-
/� / / Li�
Adopted by Council: Date �
Adoption�Certified hy Council
By:
Form Ap roved by City Attorney
♦
� BY= �t �
Approved by Mayor for Submission to
Counci�
-�'--
By:
� _, _
a�-�S3\
DEPARTMENifOFFICEICOUNCIL DATE MIITIAT D N� 2 5 4 9 5
-�p � q GREEN SHEE
INR1pt1DASE INISIALIDATE
CONTACf PERSON & � �,./ Q DEPAflTMENT DIRECTOfl � CRY COUNCII
�1 �1 Vll�� liY� �`�W�O HUYB�EFFOR �CRYATTORNEY �CINCl.ERK
MUST BE ON COUNCIL AGENDA BY (DATE) pOMNG BUDGE( OIflEC�OR � FlN. & MGT. SEFiVICE$ Dlfl.
OPDEB MAYOR (OFi ASSISTANi) O
TOTAI # OF SIGNATURE PAGES (CLIP ALL LOCA710NS FOR SIGNATUR�
ACTION flE�UE$TED:
�.�� ap��i�.rc� A�n�t-� ► I j s�na�J 3s d� g.�. � yy 3
RECqMMENDATIONS: Appmve (A) a Rejec[ (R) p�ONAL SERYICE CONTRACiS MUST ANSWER TNE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:
_ FLANNING COMMISSION _ CIVI� SERVICE CAMMISSION �� H35 ihi5 p850Nfifrt1 eVef wofked UntlEr e COMraC[ fOr Mis department?
_CIBCqMMITfEE __ YES NO
2. Has this persOn/firm ever been a city employee?
_ STAFF — YES NO
_ DI5'mici coURi _ 3. Does ihis person/firm possess s skill not normally possessed by any cuttent ciry employee?
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL O&IECTIVE? . YES NO
, Explain all yes answers on separate sheet antl attaeh to green sheet
INI7IATING PROHLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNfTY (Who. NYnap When. Where, Why) � � �}.� '
��7� l w'�-� Ti K�- 1 J�it"" �^' ( Iww...�.'� �+�iKN61 Nca�• i Tl G �`-' I`
. �.v`��i ' �� � � . ,
ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED, ' �
�T.VNVI"'��, n��- �i�n��l�v�� I"GM�S� ����1�!II�SN�Cd.J � I"M/N�'-'rsl l�
�R- "P��nn-- ��I�.n� �►-1 7� 1►rtTt►�T�.� PCT J..aCA2� L�v�
DISADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: -
� � �
DISADVANTAGES IF NOTAPPROVED:
LJVZ-'ivl�-A�- �fR�e-- �SD� U� L`rrnJt"D Pz�" �� '1� �.- �'W
�c�� � A�-�-o'c�rycsx7 � � t,�l�?--1--tt� �" C'.e�_
��2.- ��'►�� i.ua�vLD P�" ft�7�'D
70TAL AMOUN7 OF TqANSACTION $ � COST/REVENUE BUDGETED iCIRCLE ONE) YES NO
FUNDIidG SOURCE � ACTIVI7V NUMBEH N H"
FINANCIAI INFOFMATfON. (EXPI.AIN)
Council File # C�s � 7 �
Green Sheet # ��.�
OF SAI
Presented
Referred
NESOTA
Committee: Date
OPPO5ING ARTICLS 11� SECTION 35 OF S.F. �`493
1 WAEREAS, the Culwral STAR Program is funded with ten percent of an addifional one-half of one percent sales taac on
2 sales transactions that occur within the City of Saint Paul, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 297A, authorized by
3 the State of Minnesota, cl�apter No. 375, article 9, section 46; and
4
5 WHEREAS, on July 13, 1994, the City Council of the City of Saint Paul established the G�iltural Capital Invesunent
6 (Cultural STAR) Program, C.F. 941005, allocafing 75% of the Cultural STAR funds to projects within the cultural
7 disuict, and allowing up to 25% of the Cultural STAR funds to be allocated outside of the cultural district; and
8
9 WHEREAS, after an open and inclusive public process, the City Council adopted guidelines for the Cultural STAR
10 Program on May 3, 1995, C.F. 95-442, which establishes program priorities and defines eligible applicants and eligible
11 activi6es wirich focus on enhancing and suppor6ng the cultural district as a visitor attracfion; and
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
WHEREAS, the City of Saint Paul remains committed to using an open and inclusive public process for evaluaring,
modi£ying, and improving ffie Cultural STAR Program which will respond to expressed concerns and groposed
modifications of the Saint Paul legislative delegation, Ciry of Saint Paul elected officials, cultural organizarions, and the
generalpublic;and
WHEREAS, the proposed State of Minnesota S.F. #493, ardcle 11, secflon 35, would, without benefit of review by the
City of 5aint Paul, all the effected cultural organizations, or the general public, inciease the allocation of Culhual
STAR funds from 75� to 80% within the culhual district and limit use of this portion of the funds exclusively to
nonprofit arts organizafions, libraries, and museums, and would decrease the allocation of Cultural STAR funds to be
used outside the cultural district from a maacimum of 25% to 20% for use by nonprofit arts organizations, libraries, and
museums and would add businesses, within the cultural district which enhance visitor enjoyment of the district, as an
eli�ble applicant for tlils 20% of the fund, _
TFIEREFORE BE IT RFSOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Saint Paul, opposes article 11, secflon 35, of
S.F. #493 and directs intergovernmental rela6ons staff to work with Saint Paul legislators and other appropriate
legislators to heip preserve an open ptocess for reviewing changes to the Cultural STAR Program.
Requested by Department of:
• r-�e �. a �- - . �-
/� / / Li�
Adopted by Council: Date �
Adoption�Certified hy Council
By:
Form Ap roved by City Attorney
♦
� BY= �t �
Approved by Mayor for Submission to
Counci�
-�'--
By:
� _, _
a�-�S3\
DEPARTMENifOFFICEICOUNCIL DATE MIITIAT D N� 2 5 4 9 5
-�p � q GREEN SHEE
INR1pt1DASE INISIALIDATE
CONTACf PERSON & � �,./ Q DEPAflTMENT DIRECTOfl � CRY COUNCII
�1 �1 Vll�� liY� �`�W�O HUYB�EFFOR �CRYATTORNEY �CINCl.ERK
MUST BE ON COUNCIL AGENDA BY (DATE) pOMNG BUDGE( OIflEC�OR � FlN. & MGT. SEFiVICE$ Dlfl.
OPDEB MAYOR (OFi ASSISTANi) O
TOTAI # OF SIGNATURE PAGES (CLIP ALL LOCA710NS FOR SIGNATUR�
ACTION flE�UE$TED:
�.�� ap��i�.rc� A�n�t-� ► I j s�na�J 3s d� g.�. � yy 3
RECqMMENDATIONS: Appmve (A) a Rejec[ (R) p�ONAL SERYICE CONTRACiS MUST ANSWER TNE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:
_ FLANNING COMMISSION _ CIVI� SERVICE CAMMISSION �� H35 ihi5 p850Nfifrt1 eVef wofked UntlEr e COMraC[ fOr Mis department?
_CIBCqMMITfEE __ YES NO
2. Has this persOn/firm ever been a city employee?
_ STAFF — YES NO
_ DI5'mici coURi _ 3. Does ihis person/firm possess s skill not normally possessed by any cuttent ciry employee?
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL O&IECTIVE? . YES NO
, Explain all yes answers on separate sheet antl attaeh to green sheet
INI7IATING PROHLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNfTY (Who. NYnap When. Where, Why) � � �}.� '
��7� l w'�-� Ti K�- 1 J�it"" �^' ( Iww...�.'� �+�iKN61 Nca�• i Tl G �`-' I`
. �.v`��i ' �� � � . ,
ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED, ' �
�T.VNVI"'��, n��- �i�n��l�v�� I"GM�S� ����1�!II�SN�Cd.J � I"M/N�'-'rsl l�
�R- "P��nn-- ��I�.n� �►-1 7� 1►rtTt►�T�.� PCT J..aCA2� L�v�
DISADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: -
� � �
DISADVANTAGES IF NOTAPPROVED:
LJVZ-'ivl�-A�- �fR�e-- �SD� U� L`rrnJt"D Pz�" �� '1� �.- �'W
�c�� � A�-�-o'c�rycsx7 � � t,�l�?--1--tt� �" C'.e�_
��2.- ��'►�� i.ua�vLD P�" ft�7�'D
70TAL AMOUN7 OF TqANSACTION $ � COST/REVENUE BUDGETED iCIRCLE ONE) YES NO
FUNDIidG SOURCE � ACTIVI7V NUMBEH N H"
FINANCIAI INFOFMATfON. (EXPI.AIN)