97-503L ` � City of St. Paul
RSSOLIITION APPROVING ASSESSMENT AND
FIXING TIME OF HSARING THSREON
COUNCIL FILE NO_ l�I —SO�J �/
By�� �/�,�syt� tD
�—�-,
File No. 596005,596045,596048,596049
Assessment No. 0372,0388,0390,0391
Voting
Ward
6 & 7
In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for
596005 - Recon of sidewalk on both sides Maria Ave from Euclid
St to Surrey Ave
596045 - Recon of sidewalk on both sides E Montana Ave from
Flandrau St to N White Bear Ave
596�48 - Recon of sidewalk on both sides Ross Ave from Flandrau
St to N White Bear Ave
596049 - Recon of sidewalk on both sides E 5eventh St from
Hazelwood St to Germain St
P1IRI icucry
MAY 31 1997
Preliminary Order: 96-741, 96-751 & 96-753 approved: July 3, 1996
Final Order: 96-1046, 96-1059 & 96-1061 approved: August 28, 1996
The assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for and in connection with the
above improvement having been submitted to the Council, and the Council having
considered same and found the said assessment satisfactory, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the Same is hereby in all respects
approved.
RESOLVED FURTHTR, That a public hearing be had on said assessment on the 2nd
day of July, 1997, at the hour of Four thirty o'clock P.M., in the Council Chamber
of the Court House and City Hall Building, in the City of St. Paul; that the
Valuation and Assessment Engineer give notice of said meetings, as required by the
Charter, stating in said notice the time and place of hearing, the nature of the
improvement, and the amount assessed against the lot or lots of the particular owner
to whom the notice is directed.
Yeas� Nays
✓ B�.akey
�B� strom
�/Harri s
Megard
�rton
j�P�une
✓�o l I �` ns
Adopted by the Council: Date \ � ��`�
Certifp�ed Passed by Council Secreta
� In Favor
�Against
Mayor
Public Hearing Date = July 2, 1997 ���� BE 4-25-97�� � ���
T.M.S./REAL ESTATE DIVISION Date: April 1, 1997 Green Sheet umber: 39531
Contact Persoa and Phone N� e EPAR7'MENT DIItECTOR CTCY COUNCII,
Peter White 266-8850 AT`'o'� c�
UDGEC DIILECfOR FFICE OF FEVANCfAL SVCS.
�C �ncCo�m eAgendaby:5-14-97 Must 172 _ YOR(ORASSLSTAN'7) 1 OUNCII,RESEARCH
OTAL # OF SIGNA'I'URE PAGES 1 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR STGNATURE)
�oN �Q�: a �t - �3
Setting date of public hearing for the ratification of assessments for sidewalk improvements on
MARIA, EAST MONTANA, ROSS & EAST SEVENTH.
File No. S9b005, 596045, 596048, S96049 ASSFSSMENT NO. 0372, 0388, 0390, 0391
�t¢COMMENDATIONS: APPROVE GU OR REJEC!' (Ip ERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER 1T� FOLLOWING:
1. Has the person/Fum ever worked under a contract for this department? YES NO
PLAN�IRiG COMhIL5S70N A SCAEF
. Has this person/firm ever been a City employee? YES NO
CIVQ. SERVICE COMMISSION
. Does this person/firm possess a skID uot normally possessed by any YES NO
current City employee?
CB COMM7ITEE
Ex tain all YES answers on a se arate sheet and attach.
PORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? Nei hborhoods
COUNCII. WARD(S� ��7 DISTRICT PLANNING COUNCII. 2��(
iNTTIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNI'I'Y (Whq WLat, When, Where, Why?):
Project is completed. Ratification is necessary to begin to collect assessments to help pay for the
project.
uvarrrncESiFnrrxov�n: �;p�l�ril n;,r�•r§1 G�'11�A(
Same as above. f�@('e 2 5����1
ISADVANTAGES SF AYPROVED:
„ U,.<..�vnk. �-
Benefitted property owners have assessments payable via property taxes: --� �' `� "` °
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED:
To not assess the benefits would be inconsistent with City policy.
OTAL AMOIINI' OF TRANSACTION: $2O�SS6.ZZ COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CII2CLE ONE) YES NO
$11,996.78 PIA 1996 A°Tj°ITY��°
$8859.44ASSESSMENTS
FUNDING SOURCE:
FINANCIAI, IlVFORMATION: (EXPLAII�
4G property owners will be notified of the public hearing and charges.
L ` � City of St. Paul
RSSOLIITION APPROVING ASSESSMENT AND
FIXING TIME OF HSARING THSREON
COUNCIL FILE NO_ l�I —SO�J �/
By�� �/�,�syt� tD
�—�-,
File No. 596005,596045,596048,596049
Assessment No. 0372,0388,0390,0391
Voting
Ward
6 & 7
In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for
596005 - Recon of sidewalk on both sides Maria Ave from Euclid
St to Surrey Ave
596045 - Recon of sidewalk on both sides E Montana Ave from
Flandrau St to N White Bear Ave
596�48 - Recon of sidewalk on both sides Ross Ave from Flandrau
St to N White Bear Ave
596049 - Recon of sidewalk on both sides E 5eventh St from
Hazelwood St to Germain St
P1IRI icucry
MAY 31 1997
Preliminary Order: 96-741, 96-751 & 96-753 approved: July 3, 1996
Final Order: 96-1046, 96-1059 & 96-1061 approved: August 28, 1996
The assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for and in connection with the
above improvement having been submitted to the Council, and the Council having
considered same and found the said assessment satisfactory, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the Same is hereby in all respects
approved.
RESOLVED FURTHTR, That a public hearing be had on said assessment on the 2nd
day of July, 1997, at the hour of Four thirty o'clock P.M., in the Council Chamber
of the Court House and City Hall Building, in the City of St. Paul; that the
Valuation and Assessment Engineer give notice of said meetings, as required by the
Charter, stating in said notice the time and place of hearing, the nature of the
improvement, and the amount assessed against the lot or lots of the particular owner
to whom the notice is directed.
Yeas� Nays
✓ B�.akey
�B� strom
�/Harri s
Megard
�rton
j�P�une
✓�o l I �` ns
Adopted by the Council: Date \ � ��`�
Certifp�ed Passed by Council Secreta
� In Favor
�Against
Mayor
Public Hearing Date = July 2, 1997 ���� BE 4-25-97�� � ���
T.M.S./REAL ESTATE DIVISION Date: April 1, 1997 Green Sheet umber: 39531
Contact Persoa and Phone N� e EPAR7'MENT DIItECTOR CTCY COUNCII,
Peter White 266-8850 AT`'o'� c�
UDGEC DIILECfOR FFICE OF FEVANCfAL SVCS.
�C �ncCo�m eAgendaby:5-14-97 Must 172 _ YOR(ORASSLSTAN'7) 1 OUNCII,RESEARCH
OTAL # OF SIGNA'I'URE PAGES 1 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR STGNATURE)
�oN �Q�: a �t - �3
Setting date of public hearing for the ratification of assessments for sidewalk improvements on
MARIA, EAST MONTANA, ROSS & EAST SEVENTH.
File No. S9b005, 596045, 596048, S96049 ASSFSSMENT NO. 0372, 0388, 0390, 0391
�t¢COMMENDATIONS: APPROVE GU OR REJEC!' (Ip ERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER 1T� FOLLOWING:
1. Has the person/Fum ever worked under a contract for this department? YES NO
PLAN�IRiG COMhIL5S70N A SCAEF
. Has this person/firm ever been a City employee? YES NO
CIVQ. SERVICE COMMISSION
. Does this person/firm possess a skID uot normally possessed by any YES NO
current City employee?
CB COMM7ITEE
Ex tain all YES answers on a se arate sheet and attach.
PORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? Nei hborhoods
COUNCII. WARD(S� ��7 DISTRICT PLANNING COUNCII. 2��(
iNTTIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNI'I'Y (Whq WLat, When, Where, Why?):
Project is completed. Ratification is necessary to begin to collect assessments to help pay for the
project.
uvarrrncESiFnrrxov�n: �;p�l�ril n;,r�•r§1 G�'11�A(
Same as above. f�@('e 2 5����1
ISADVANTAGES SF AYPROVED:
„ U,.<..�vnk. �-
Benefitted property owners have assessments payable via property taxes: --� �' `� "` °
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED:
To not assess the benefits would be inconsistent with City policy.
OTAL AMOIINI' OF TRANSACTION: $2O�SS6.ZZ COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CII2CLE ONE) YES NO
$11,996.78 PIA 1996 A°Tj°ITY��°
$8859.44ASSESSMENTS
FUNDING SOURCE:
FINANCIAI, IlVFORMATION: (EXPLAII�
4G property owners will be notified of the public hearing and charges.
L ` � City of St. Paul
RSSOLIITION APPROVING ASSESSMENT AND
FIXING TIME OF HSARING THSREON
COUNCIL FILE NO_ l�I —SO�J �/
By�� �/�,�syt� tD
�—�-,
File No. 596005,596045,596048,596049
Assessment No. 0372,0388,0390,0391
Voting
Ward
6 & 7
In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for
596005 - Recon of sidewalk on both sides Maria Ave from Euclid
St to Surrey Ave
596045 - Recon of sidewalk on both sides E Montana Ave from
Flandrau St to N White Bear Ave
596�48 - Recon of sidewalk on both sides Ross Ave from Flandrau
St to N White Bear Ave
596049 - Recon of sidewalk on both sides E 5eventh St from
Hazelwood St to Germain St
P1IRI icucry
MAY 31 1997
Preliminary Order: 96-741, 96-751 & 96-753 approved: July 3, 1996
Final Order: 96-1046, 96-1059 & 96-1061 approved: August 28, 1996
The assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for and in connection with the
above improvement having been submitted to the Council, and the Council having
considered same and found the said assessment satisfactory, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the Same is hereby in all respects
approved.
RESOLVED FURTHTR, That a public hearing be had on said assessment on the 2nd
day of July, 1997, at the hour of Four thirty o'clock P.M., in the Council Chamber
of the Court House and City Hall Building, in the City of St. Paul; that the
Valuation and Assessment Engineer give notice of said meetings, as required by the
Charter, stating in said notice the time and place of hearing, the nature of the
improvement, and the amount assessed against the lot or lots of the particular owner
to whom the notice is directed.
Yeas� Nays
✓ B�.akey
�B� strom
�/Harri s
Megard
�rton
j�P�une
✓�o l I �` ns
Adopted by the Council: Date \ � ��`�
Certifp�ed Passed by Council Secreta
� In Favor
�Against
Mayor
Public Hearing Date = July 2, 1997 ���� BE 4-25-97�� � ���
T.M.S./REAL ESTATE DIVISION Date: April 1, 1997 Green Sheet umber: 39531
Contact Persoa and Phone N� e EPAR7'MENT DIItECTOR CTCY COUNCII,
Peter White 266-8850 AT`'o'� c�
UDGEC DIILECfOR FFICE OF FEVANCfAL SVCS.
�C �ncCo�m eAgendaby:5-14-97 Must 172 _ YOR(ORASSLSTAN'7) 1 OUNCII,RESEARCH
OTAL # OF SIGNA'I'URE PAGES 1 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR STGNATURE)
�oN �Q�: a �t - �3
Setting date of public hearing for the ratification of assessments for sidewalk improvements on
MARIA, EAST MONTANA, ROSS & EAST SEVENTH.
File No. S9b005, 596045, 596048, S96049 ASSFSSMENT NO. 0372, 0388, 0390, 0391
�t¢COMMENDATIONS: APPROVE GU OR REJEC!' (Ip ERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER 1T� FOLLOWING:
1. Has the person/Fum ever worked under a contract for this department? YES NO
PLAN�IRiG COMhIL5S70N A SCAEF
. Has this person/firm ever been a City employee? YES NO
CIVQ. SERVICE COMMISSION
. Does this person/firm possess a skID uot normally possessed by any YES NO
current City employee?
CB COMM7ITEE
Ex tain all YES answers on a se arate sheet and attach.
PORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? Nei hborhoods
COUNCII. WARD(S� ��7 DISTRICT PLANNING COUNCII. 2��(
iNTTIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNI'I'Y (Whq WLat, When, Where, Why?):
Project is completed. Ratification is necessary to begin to collect assessments to help pay for the
project.
uvarrrncESiFnrrxov�n: �;p�l�ril n;,r�•r§1 G�'11�A(
Same as above. f�@('e 2 5����1
ISADVANTAGES SF AYPROVED:
„ U,.<..�vnk. �-
Benefitted property owners have assessments payable via property taxes: --� �' `� "` °
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED:
To not assess the benefits would be inconsistent with City policy.
OTAL AMOIINI' OF TRANSACTION: $2O�SS6.ZZ COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CII2CLE ONE) YES NO
$11,996.78 PIA 1996 A°Tj°ITY��°
$8859.44ASSESSMENTS
FUNDING SOURCE:
FINANCIAI, IlVFORMATION: (EXPLAII�
4G property owners will be notified of the public hearing and charges.