96-9961
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
Presented By
Referred To
Council File # 9'G- 99�
Green Sheet # 3 \�.q�
RESOLUTION
OF SAI T AUL, MINNESOTA a �
Committee: Date
WFIEREAS, the Mayor initiated the Saint Paul Community Development Agenda during 1995 through a
task force co-sponsored by the City and several foundations, corporations, and non-profit organizations;
WHEREAS, the co-sponsor were asked to contribute funds to the budget for the Community Development
Agenda;
WHEREAS, two co-sponsors made pledges but did not actually make their contributions during 1995;
WHEREAS, PED's 1996 budget needs to be amended to show that the pledged contributions, totaling
$8,000, are being received by PED during 1996;
WHEREAS, the Council has previously accepted the process for the Community Development Agenda by
Resolution 95-273 and has authorized the budget for it by Resolution 95-502;
WHEREAS, the Mayor, pursuant to Section 10.07.1 of the City Charter, does certify that there are
available for appropriation revenues in excess of those estimated in the 1996 budget; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor recommends the following changes to the 1996 budget:
Current BudQet
FINANCING PLAN
Fund 126 PED Operations Fund
P6-126-36000-6999-64050
Corporation and foundation
to Community Development Agenda
All other Fund Financing
Tota1 PED Operations Fund
SPENDING PLAN
Fund 126 PED Operations Fund
Activity 36020 - Planning Division
P6-126-36020-0219-64050
Professional Services-Consultants
47,296
Chanees
: 111
Amended Bud¢et
55,296
7.900,696
7,947,992
46,127
�
: ���
4,000
7.900,696
7,955,992
50,127
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
:
:1
7
.
.'
:
.�
:.
..
.�
��
.
.
..
.
:�
::
Page 2 of 2
P6-126-36020-0252-64050
Travel
P6-126-36020-0299-64050
Meeting expenses
P6-126-36020-0249-64050
Printing
All Other Fund Spending
Total PED Operations Fund
Net Change
Current Bud¢et
51
472
646
7,900.696
7,947,992
� 6-�9G
Chanees Amended Budeet
-0- 51
2,000 2,472
2,000 2,646
-0- 7,900.696
8,000 7,955,992
8,000
RESOLVED, that the City Council approves these changes to the 1996 budget.
Approval recommended:
� , . `
��L1' �
?.. �-.
Requested by Department of:
annin & Ec�no 'c Develo ment
/
B :
Form A ved by torney
By:
Approved by Mayor for Submission to
Council
B (G �5��
K1SHAREDU,AS\CDABUD96.RE$
Adoption Certified by Council Secretary
By: ��� a _ �A ._.�,_
Approved by Mayor: Date /
B °`�?�t.l� �� � �
a c..�►,a�'
DEPAFiTMENT/OFFICFJCOUNpL DATEINITIATED GREEN SH N� _3 � 29 � •�
CONTACf PERSON 6 PHONE INITIAW INITIAUDATE
- � DEPARTMENTDIRE OF � qTYCAUNQL
ASSIGN �pNATfORNEV �CITYCLERK
MUST BE ON COUNCIL AGENDA BV (DATE) p������ � BUDGEf DIRE R � FIN. 8 MGT. SEflVICES DIR.
ORDER MpVOP (OR A$$IST R� �
TOTAL # OP SIGNATURE PAGES 1 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOfl SIGNATURE) � FY�P�l�7.t'KJ
ACfION PEQUESTED:
Approval of attached resolution to amend the 1996 budget for Fund 126 PED Operations Fund to receive
$8,000 in private contribu6ons to the CommuniTy Development Agenda budget
FECOMMENDATIONS: Approva (A) w Reject (R) PEHSONAL SERVICE CONTfiACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING �UESTIONS: N�A.
_ PLANNMG COMMISSION _ CIVIL SEtiVICE CAMMIS$IpN �� Hes th15 P2fSONfifin eVef WO(ketl Untlef a contfaC[ fOf ihi5 �py� �
_ CIB CAMMRTEE VES NO �
A ST � 2. Has this person/firm ever been a city employee? q pHE
— — YES NO �UCy V Z �33V
_ DISTRICT COURT — 3. Doas this personRirtn possess a skill not normally possessetl by any current ciy employce?
SUPPoHTS WHICH CDUNCIL OBJECTIVE4 YES NO .t
Explain all yes answers on seperete sheet and attac�gA�������
INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE.OPPoATUNITY (Wlw, What, When, Where, Why):
Two pledges of support for the Community Development Agenda project, totaling $8,000, were included in a
1995 PED bud"get amendment. However, the money was not received by PED during 1995. The 1996 PED
ogerating budget needs to be amended to accept these two coniributions as 1996 income and show where the
money is going. It will pay for consultant work that has already been contracted and for the printing and
meeting costs during the fmal stage of the Community Development Task Force's work. The resolution does
not increase the budget for the Community Development Agenda; the total cost now is the same as what the
Council approved in 1995.
ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED.
The two contributions will be accepted and used to pay project expenses for consultants, printing, and
meeting costs for the conclusion of the project.
DISADVANTAGES IFAPPROVED:
�`a�llflTl�S� �S3d��' ����
None.
�+�i� 1 � i�96
�
�ISADVANTACaES IF NOT APPROVED:
PED will not have funds available to pay the final consultants' bills or for printing and meetings expenses for
the task force's last meetings where the final recommendafions will be decided.
(rnt in 7996, c�s
TOTAL AMOUNT OF THANSACTION S ��� COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES O�,Z,�'
c�trikzzti� fmn Ln 1995)
FUNDIN6 SOURCE ��e• 1'Y�XO�lt �YC�luZd�l�S ACTIVITY NUMBEH 36�z� ��
FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN)
��lt].Cd1S Wlll ���� t1Y�11 �k31C� QLt. t0 O$�1.11tclPltS dTY'l fQY� F7Y0]IX.`t QI�tS.