96-889�� �RI�l��� ,,�
City of St. Pavl
v -r. rr . - � . : a ,�
s� -. .� . �- .- e�_ - . - �a-
� u � ■ ■ �: • :r - � v- o�
1.� �' �.�V���'.
Sn the matter of
Ct}UNCIL FILE I3G. 9�� $ V 9
Ey
File Pdo. IB 9
�
Permanent Easement for Lighting purposes on, over and abov� the following described
pr�perty:
The Southwesterly 4£eet of Lots s through o and Lot 14;
The Northerly �1 feat of Lot 15;
That gart of Lot 32 lying within th� fo2lowin� deacri�,ed Line:
Beginning at the Northwe�terly corner of said Lot 3?, Thence rJortheasterly alona the
Northwesterly lixzz af said Lot 32 a distance c,f 8 feet to a pc,isit, t2�enee
Southea�terly vn a line per�ndicu2�s ±� ��;e3 North e�sterly line, a c�istenr� af 9
feet to a point, thence Southwesterly on s line 9£eet southeasterly of and parallel
to said Northeasterly line to a g�int on the southwestesly lir.e of °ai3 Lot 3?,
thence Northwesterly along said ;,outhwesterly line to the poixit of heginninc�;
Tnet part of Lat 31,lying within the foilowing described line:
Beginning at the Northw.esterly corner of sai.d i�ot 31, Thence Northeasterly alanes the
RJorthwestsrly line of said Lot 31 � distance of A feet to a p�int, thance
Seutheasterly on e line perpendicul�r t� a�id North easterly line, a distance of ?
feat ta a p�int, thenca S"outhwesterly on � line 4 f�Et �autheasteriy of an� parailel
to said Ncrthza�terly Iine to a point on the southwasterly liue of said Lot 31,
theaae Northvresterly along said Southwesteriy line to the point of beqir,niag;
Also that part of Lot 17 lyinq within the following described line;
�ommencin�3 at the �ost Sautherly corner ai said Lot 17, thEnce Northeasterly alonq
the Scutheasteriy lixie uf s�id Lot 17 a c�istanaa of 75 f�et ±o the point of �eginr.ir:r
of a line to bE described, thenas N�rtnwesterly �long a line 76 faet Northeasterly
�+f ane3 parallel ta rY�e Southwest line af said L.at 17 a dintar�ce cf 4 feet, thence
Northwesterly along 4 feet Nortt,westerly of snd paralle2 to said Southeasterly line
of said Lot 17 a distance af B feet, thence Southea�terly alcng a line $4 feet
Northeasterly of and parallsl to said west Iine of said Lat 17 to a point on said
SC}21L'P.2&3't�T'ty iine af said Lot 17, tnence Souihvresteriy a;.onq sai� Soutneast iine
of aai� Lat 2? tc the goint af the begi-uxing.
All in F�uditors .c.ubdivisian No. 52.
r rt }
: : t �
Pa=liatinary ^rder _96-453 ap�roved May 1, 1�95
Final Order 96-724
aYproved June 26, 1996
� �-��y
The Director af Finance having submitted his regort in the a�oce matter av to
the amount of damages awarded for the takinc} of the land cr easements therin
appropristed for the above improvement and to whom payaAle; and also hsving submitted
his assessment af benefits to property fr�m the making af vaid improvement, therefore
be it
RE90LVED, Ttist the 9aid a�aesament of benefits be and the s�me is hEre�y
approved.
RES6LVED E'[IRTflER, .'^iriat a pu�iic t�eaiinc� be ha�3 hef�re the CUUricil u�i�n said
report and far a confirma�ion of the award of damaqes made hy the c3ireotor of Finance
ar,d also upon tha said assessmant of henefits; at the Council chamber, in the e:ourt
Houye in the City of St. Pau2 an the llth day of 3ept�mber, 1996, at the hour af four
thirty �' cl�ck P.M. and that the Director of Finance be and he is directed tv yive
notice of said hearing as prescribed by the Chartar.
Yeas
�
�Bo�trom
f�' �rin
i/�ri rris
✓N?�gard
�Rettmsn
�hune
�I Rdopted by th� Council: Date � `��f�
R7ays r
Certified PHaQE$ by C�+uncil Sacratar��
!� Bp
t In Favor
�Against �
PU9liSHFn
AUG 311996
Public Hearing Date - September 11, 1996
F.M.S./REAL ESTATE DIVISION Date:
�ontad Petson and Phone Nmnber. „
Bob Novak 266-8s50 °"�' �
on Council
i
for
x
Lighting Easement for
e No. IRR29
PLANMNC COMMtSS[ON
CML SERVICE COMMISSION
CIB COMMIT(EE
WIIICEi COUNCIL OATECfIVE?
COUNCIL WARD(S)
L��
��
RE 7-29-96
7/25/96 Green Sheet.
EPARTA¢N1' DIRECTOR
iTY ATi'ORNEY
UDGEI'DIl2ECIOR
YOR (OR ASSISIANI) 1
ic Hearin� Date of Sept 11, 1
TURE)
Sf. and Seiby Ave.
�9i/�'[i I�i
i CJ,$RI(
& McT. svC. D1A.
IRSONAL SERVICE CONTRACI'S MU5C ANSWER THE FOLLAH'ING:
IIav the petso�d�irm ever worked under a contrect Cor lhis departtqent?
IIas this persoNfinn ever becn a C1ty employee?
YES IVO
YES NO
Dces this persort/Arm possesa a sldll not normetty possessed 6y any YES t�'O
current Cify employeet
_ ExP�n� a1� YES answers on a eq te 4 t a d xtta h
� DISTRICf PLANNING COUNCIL R
TIATING PROBLEM� ISSUF� OPPOR2UNITY ({1'ho, What, Wlren, Wl�ere, }Vhy?):
ie adjacent property owners requested lighting in tonjunction with the sewer separation prqject.
easement is needed because the width of the street precludes the use of the Right-of-Way for placement of
NTAGES IF APPIiOVED:
City welt receive a lighting easement at no cost, from the adjacent property owners.
IF APPROVED:
;� ��t�i �Q�f°
J�'L 3 !? 1996
�VANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED:
City coutd be requested to acquire a lighting easement at a later date and have to pay for it.
AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION:
(EXPLAI�
$O,QO COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES NO
AGTIVITY NUMBER:
The property owners requested lights for this projecf and wilt give the easement to the City fpr no cost.