96-4011
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
�RICI��'��
Council File # " �1
Green Sheet # .�.��r„
RESOLUTION
OF SAINT PAU.L, MINNESOTA
Presented By
Referred To ', �
is
Committee: Date
WIIEREAS, on May 3, 1995, the Council of the City of Saint Paul approved an interim zoning ordinance
(Ordinance 95-350) which is effective far a period of one year and which permits drop-in centers in B-4,
B-5, and I-1 zoning districts if located at least 600 feet from other drop-in centers and specified "protected
uses";
WHEREAS, Section 3 of the interim ordinance provides for the extension of the ordinance beyond May 3,
1996, by resolution in the event such extension is required to complete studies and adopt possible
amendments to the zoning code;
WHEREAS, the studies of the plamiing commission and deliberations of the City Council to consider
amendments to the zoning code will require additional time;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council extends the interim ordinance (Ord'mance
95-350), continuing the regulation of drop-in centers for a period of one year, or until the completion of
studies by the Planuing Commission and deliberations of the City Council and the enactment on new
zoning regulation if deemed appropriate, whichever occurs first.
Absent II Requested by Department of:
Adopted by Council: Date
Adoption Certified by Council Secretary
By ' '—
� � Approved b ayo : D e
By : •� v
Pla ' n & Econ xv� c Dev ment
By:
Form Approved by City Attorney
By ���G.���+�vr�� �/ •/L^ 5 6
Approved by Mayor for Submission to
Co 1
BYu / �� " �}�/
q`����
oera PED M P F LPNNING�� oa � 04�15/96 N� 2 9 7 2 2
GREEN SHEET
CONTACT PERSON & PHONE INITIFVD/� INRIAVDATE
DEPARTMENTDIflECTOfl CRYCOUNdL
Roger Ryan 66574 Q
- ASSIGN � CIN ATTORNEV � CITY CLERK
XUYBEpFOP
MUST B ON COUNCIL AGENDA BV (OATE) pOVfING O gUIX3ET DIRECTOF O F g��MGT. SE�RVICES Dlfl.
� v , � � � / OPDEfl MqYOR (OR A$$ISTANn � r U�� .. Y �
1 f0 _a_ae91�aa
TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE)
ACL7�N REQUES7E0: .
Extend interim zoning ordinance regulating drop-in centers.
FiECOMMENDATIONS: Appmve (A) or Reject (F) pERSONAL SERVICE CONTHACTS MUST ANSWER TNE FOLLOWING �UESTIONS:
_ PLANNING CqMMIS510N _ CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION �� Has ihis personRirtn ever worketl untler a contract for this department?
CIB COMMITfEE VES NO
� S7AFF _ 2, Has ihis person/firm ever been a city employee?
YES NO
_ DISTRiGi CoUR7 _ 3. Does this personKrm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current city employee?
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? VES NO ,
Explain all yes answers on separate sheet antl attach to green sheet
INITIATING PROB�EM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITV (Who, What, When, Where, Why)
Concentration of drop-in centers may be creating an unusually high number of police
calls.
ADVANTAGESIFAPPFOVED
City will be able to assess the proper location and regulation of drop-in centers.
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED:
None. Iv � p. p
�AASSiR�✓4} . ?:t _.i'i.:'! A�i52bib!�
E�E�" .�, �u €�Ss'd53
�a��,
OISADVANTAGES IF NOTAPPFOVED�
Drop-in centers may continue to concentrate.
70TAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ COST/HEVENUE BUDGE7ED (CIRCLE ONE) YES NO
FUNDIfdG SOURCE ACTIVITY NUMBER
FINANCIAL INFORMATION. (EXPLAIN)
NOTE: COMPLETE DIRECTIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THE GAEEN�SHEEf �INSTRUCTIONAL
MANWAL AVMlABLEJpI THE PURCHASING OFFICE' (PHONE NO. 298-4225). '" �
ROUTINGORDER: ' ' -' � �
8efow are correct routings for the five most frequent types of documents: ,, � ', ' � ,
CONTRACTS (assumes authorized 6udget exists) CAUNCIL RESOLU7tON {Punend Budgets/AccepC. Greci,tsy
t. OutsideAgency ,1. Depa �, � � � � ''
2. DepartmerttDirector 2 Budget Director' �� , � � �
3. CifyAttnrney �, , ' ' �3_ City�Attomey � , , � '
4. Mayor (for conVacts over $15,000) ' 4. Mayor/Assisfant � , ' ' ,
5. Human RigMs (for wntracts over $50,000)' ' 5. City bovnc�l' ' �� � � �
6. Finance and Managemen. Services Direclor �6. Chief Accotintan; Finance ancf,Management Services
7. Rnance �Accountlng � ' , , � , , , , . , , , ,
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS (Budget Revision) � � COUNCII, RESOLUTION (all others, end Ordfnences)
1. Adivity Manager ' 1. � Department �irector „ , ' �
2. Department Accountant � � � ' 2. City Atlomey , , ,
3. DepartmentDiiector , 3.� MayorAssistant , ' �
4. Budget Director � � 4. City Council � � � �
5. CiTy Clerk � "
6. Chief Accountant, Finance artd Management Services ' ,
ADMhNISTRATIVE ORDERS (all others) ' ' �,
1. Department Director , ' ' � �
2. CityAttomey ' , ' �
3. Finaace and Management Services Director
4. City Cferk, ' ', ' � '
TOTAL NUMBER O,F SIGNATURE PAGES �
Indiiate the #of pages on wbich signatures are required and paperelip or,fleg ��
each ot tlieae pages. � ' ' �
�ACTION REQUESTED ' � , � '
Descnbe what the projecVrequest seeks to accom,piish in either chroriologi- ' '
cal orde[ or ordet of, importance, whicheyer is mosi appropriate tor the '
issue.'DO not write complete� sentences. Begin each item in your list with
a veibC � ' � � ' � � ' ' , , , ' , , , , � ,
RECOMMENDATIONS � � ' � ,
Complete if the issue in questioo has been presen[ed before any body, public , �
or private. � � , � �
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OB.IEC7NE? , � � , �
Indica(e wbicti Council abjective(s) your projecVrequest supports by listing ' , , ', ' �
the key vrord(s}� (HOUSING, RECREATION, NEIGHBORHOODS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, , � ' � ,, ' '
BUDGET, SEWER SEPARATION).^(SEE COMPLETE LI5T IN, INSTRUCTIONkC MANUAL.) ,� ' �,
PERSONAC SERVICE CQNTRACTS: � ' ,' ' � , . � � , � � � � ' � �
This information will be used to, determine the cityS liability for workers compensadon cfaims taxes and pioper civil service hiring, rules;
INIT{ATING PROBLEM, ISSFFE, OPPORTUNITY � ' , ' � , , ' ,
6cplafn the situafion or conditioos that created a need for your project "' �,'"' �' ' �
or request. ' � ' . ' ' ' ' ' ' ' �
� ADVANTAGES fFAPPROVED '
Indicate whether 4his is simply an armual budget pronedure required by law/ �
;"' �chaiter'oY'whether't1�e�e�areSpecificways'inwhiCh'(fie'City,ofSaintPaul ' "' �
, and its ,citizens will benefit'from this projecVac,tion. � , , � �
� � DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED � ' , ' , �
, What negative effects or major changes to existing, or past processes mighY �� '
this projecVreques[ produce if��it is passed (e.g:, traHic�delays, noise, ' '
tax increases or assessments)Z So Whom? When? For how long? ' ,
DISADVANTA6ES IF NOT APPROVED � '
�What will, tie the negative consequences if the promised action is not �' '
, appmved? Inabiiiry to deliver service? Continued high tra�c, noise; �� ,
, accident {ate?, Loss ot revenue? � , , � � �
� FINANCIAL IMPACT � ' � � � �
��Althougfi you must taibr the information you provide here, to ihe issue you � � �
' are addressing, in general you must answer two questions: How much is it
going to cost? Who is goin9 �' P� , ' "
' � � , , ,� � � ,
� , , � � . ., " „� � . . � r .,,..�. i ...