96-351i
LL �RIG�����,�
City of St. Paul
FESOLUSIOH APPB07III& ASSBSS2iSHi AHD
FI%IHG 2ZZSE OF HSARIHG THB$SOH
30
COII IL �$ 0. q t -� S'
B 9 �i�vZ�
i
File No. 595030
Assessment �Io._3983
Voting
Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and egpenses for
3 Construction of new sidewalk on both sides South Albert St.
from Randolph Ave. to Highland Pkwy.
Preliminary Order
Final Order
95-271
95-486
approved_March 15, 1995
approved_May 10, 1495_
The assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for and in connection with
the above improvement having been submitted to the Council, and the Council
having considered same and found the said assessment satisfactory, therefore,
be it
BSSOLVSD, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all
respects approved. � 3 0 �,�,
BESOLVED FIIBiHER, That a public hea ng be had on said assessment on the
Sth day of June, 1996 ,at z�--�;��. -' �' • -'-'- in the
Council Chamber of the Court House and City Hall Building, in the City of St.
Paul; that the Valuation and Assessment Engineer give notice of sa3d
meetings, as required by the Charter, stating in sa3d notice the time and
place of hearing, the nature of the improvement, and the amount assessed
against the lot or lots of the particular owner to whom the notice is
directed.
6)P i4i ��urs�
COIIACILPSgSOH
Yeas Nays
�lakey
�ostrom
��erin
✓f� rris
�ii5 gard
�/k ttman
�/'�u n e
�A�' °4 �9�� Adopted by the Council: Date � �_�A ���q_��
�
Certi�i,ed Passed by Council Secretary
L /
B
�In Favor
�
�Against
ayor
�
Public Hearing Date - June 5, 1�
FSS — &eai Sstate Division
PLone N�bez
Peter White 266-8850
t be on Cwoa7
;AL # ON SKiI
!ION RF.QUPS
provement
rb. sv�c�
���
Date: 3-19-96 I Green Sheet N�ber. 34098
PYARTA�NPDIRE(,TOR COUN[9.
s ATPORi�ILY QERg
�.
� UDGEP DIRFrF;CPOR & MGT. SVG DIIt
YOR (ORAS�TANl) 1 UN(II, RESPARCfI
4-17-96 Must be in Council Research Office no later than
.415 (t1]P All.3�(X'l�110A� POR SlGNA1VRII)
on ALBERT.
assessments
�.\�✓.\..IJ � - •i<
ECO2�1�IDAIIONS APPROVE (A) OR RF.IECl (R)
PIAtaI[NG CO2dI�4SS[ON A S1:4PF
C1VII.SERVI(BWIdIK _
(7B COkf�T1FE
U-11f1: «( IR17'.)7'.MI\/:Y
wnun(sk s n�;� rvoo�og �m� ss
RSONIAi, SERViCB CONl'RACiS I�[JST.AIVSVVE2IIIC P'OII.OWINGr.
Has the pe�ao(6rm eva worLcd under a muhact for t6is depaAment? "
Has this peaon/firm eaer bxn a Gty employee?
Does thg pe�on/fum pa�e� a still not m�J(9 P°� 6 9 �9
Cumnt Gly e�loyee7
�{31� 8Q 1'(�$ 806WC6 OLL 9 SC(181ffiC S�1CC[ 8p� LlfBCb.
4-5-96
YBS
YES
YES
is compieted. Ratification is necessary in order to begin to collect assessments to help pay for the
€�;�:i:�; �1i,ka:'''.�;^�k �i:'S�"�w�
as above.
�'�'1G� "� $ ����
AN'I'AGES IF APPROVED: .....
itted property owners ha�e assessments payable via property ta�ces. __�,
not assess the benefits would be inconsistent with City policy.
Amount of Transaction $ 72 803.69 Cost/Revenue Budgeted YES NO
$ 32,29616 PIA 1995
$ 40,507.53 ASSESSMENTS
Source
Information:
Activity Number
4 property owners will be notified of the public hearing and charges.