96-347����
� � City of St. Paul
RESOLIISZOH APPHOYIHG ASSESS�SEH2 AHD
FI%ING TI2iS OF HSABIHG THSBSOH
� �
COUNC ILE N0. ��— 3 4�
B y �f, ��/
File No. 595003
Assessment No._0342
Voting
Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and egpenses for
6 Reconstruction of sidewalk on the west side Greenbrier St. from
East Rose Ave. to East Maryland Ave. and the north side East
Rose Ave. from Payne Ave. to Greenbrier St.
Preliminary Order
Final Order
95-228
95-449
approved_March 8, 1995
approved_May 3, 1995
The assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for and in connection with
the above improvement having been submitted to the Council, and the Council
having considered same and found the said assessment satisfactory, therefore,
be it
BBSOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is herebq in all
respects approved.
t-}e 3C� p.vv.o
BESOLVED FII$THER, That a public hear' g be had on said assessment on the
Sth day of June, 1996 ,at '�° '�-•�- -` �"--° -`-'-^'- D*' , in the
Council Chamber of the Court House and City Hall Building, in the CiCy of St.
Paul; that the Valuation and Assessment Enoineer give notice of said
meetings, as required by the Charter, stating in said notice the time and
place of hearing, the nature of the improvement, and the amount assessed
against the lot or lots of the particular owner to whom the notice is
directed.
�PI9I9BU2�s
COIINCILP&RSOH
Yeas Nays
�akey
ostrom
✓G erin
rris
M�gard
✓R� ttman
i/Thune
.�.�._�.�� !. ��5
``�_In Favor
�Against
Adopted by the Council: Date� ��9 �
T
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
�
Public Hearing Date -.Tune 5, 1996 RE 3-29-96 �U���
i�s - Beal Bstate Division Date: 3-19-96 Green Shcet Nnmber. ,�4 9Q_
FPARTMFI�TT DIILF.Cl'OR Ql'Y COUN(a.
Peaw md Phone Numbec .r p A710RNEY (T1Y C7F12%
Peter White 266-8850 � � nmacmx & MGi: SVG DIR
YOR (ORASS7S1'ANl) 1 UN(II, RESE+AR(�3
bconcAma 7ngcndaby:4-17-96 Must be in Council Research Office no later than noon Friday 4-5-95
1L # OF S[GNAISIRL pAGPS 1 (QIP AIL IACAIIONS FOR S[GNANAE)
ox �ve�m Setting date of public hearing for the rat'il"ication of assessments for sidewalk
mvements on GREENBRIER AND ROSE.
� � AS�4ffi�Tl' NO. 0342
hfflffimA1ION5: APPROVB (A) OR RHiH(:f (R)
NHING COMI�QSS[ON A STAFF
iT. SPdtVi(� COIdM _
WMAff17EB
)R1S WfIIQI COIJNCII.OBJP.C1TVf.�'i NeieLborM
WARD(S): 6 Distrid Plaeni� Cauna7_ rt5
MUSPANSVVF.RIHE? POII.OWING:
Has the pexsoa/6im e�a wo�ked mder a mntxact for tha depattmentR
Hac Wis persw/£um ever 6ecn a Gty empkryee4
Docs thic person/Exm posus a sldll not mima119 P� b9 �9
Cetent (Sty cmpbyee?
plain all YES mswea ou a separate sbee[ and atlacL.
YAS
YHS
G'L:C:
is completed. Ratification is necessary in order to begin to collect assessments to help pay for the
as above.
property owners ha�e assessments payable via property ta�ces. . y ," y ,y ��'�� �,�;�9 �.��y��Y
�
not assess the benefits would be inconsistent with City policy.
��
Amount of Transaction $ 10.722.03 Cost/Revenue Budgeted YES NO
$ 5,794.73 PIA 1995
$ 4,927.30 ASSESSMENTS
Source
Inforination:
Activity Number
1 property owner will be notified of the public hearing and charges.