Loading...
96-328Council File # q G•3a$' Green Sheet # 35 � g Presented Refened To Committee Date 1 BE IT RESOLVED, that the Council of the City of Saint Paul hereby certifies and approves the March 19,1996 2 decisaon of the Legislative Hearing Officer: 3 Property Anpealed 4 8�0-804 E. Third Street A ellan William and Alicia Olson 5 Decision: Grant the appeal concerning list of corrections for 804 E. Tkurd Street; grant the appeal concerning 6 grouped location for service disconnects for 8Q0 E_ Third Street; deny the appeal for 8Q0 E. Third Street concerning 7 exterior lightina at entrance doors and providing covering for all junction boxes, outlets and switches. 8 FURTHER RESOLVED, that tlus action shail become effecrive immediately upon approval of the Mayor. Requested by Department of: Adoption Certified by Council Secretary � Appi � RESOLUTION CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 3� � Form Approved by City Attorney � Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council � Adopted by Council: Date � n � �\�� , 9��-�asr DEPAR'TMEMNFFICFJCOUNCIL DATE INRIATEO O crrY couNCn, 3128196 GREEN SHEE - 3 5 6 7 8 INRIAVOATE WITIAVOATE CONTACf PEfl50N & PHONE � DEPAqTMENT DIflE O CT' CqUNCiL Gexry Strathwan 265-8575 nss�x � qn arroANer � cm c�aic MUST 8E ON CqUNCIL AGENDASY (OA7� qU �FOR O BUDGET OIRECTOR � FlN. 8 MGL $ERYICES DIFt. A�Tl� 3 1� OPOER � MpYOR (OR ASSI5TANT) ❑ TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES (CUP ALL LOCAIIONS FOR SIGNATURE) ACTION REQUE$TEp: Approving the decision of the L.egislative Hearing Officer on Properry: Code Enforcement Appeals for the Mazch 19, 1996 meeting. RECOMMENOanONS: nperwe (A) a Rejec[ (R) pERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER TNE FOLLOWING �UESTIONS: _. PLANNING COMMISSION _ CiVIL SERVICE COMMISSION �� Ha5 thiS parSOn/Firm ever worked under a COntf2Ct for this tlepartment? � � CB COMMITfEE YES NO _ SiAFF ^ 2. Has this personlfirm ever heert a city employee? — YES NO _ DiS7RICf COUR7 _ 3. Does this persoMirm possess a skill not normall y possessetl by any current city employee? SUPPORTSWHICHCOUNGLOBJECfiVE> YES NO Ezplefn e11 yes enawers o� separate shaet a�d aHaeh to graea sheet INITIATING PROBLEM. ISSUE.OPPtIfiTUNRY S�. W�t. Whan. W1�ere. WhY): ADYANTAGES IF APPFiOVED: DISAOVANTAGES IFAPPpOVED: DISADVANTAGES IF NOTAPPflOVED. TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ COST/pEVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE} YES NO FUNDIHCa SOURCE ACTIVITY NUMBER FINANCIAL INfORMATION. (EXPLAIN)