96-279ORIC1����
L� City of St. Paul
RESOLUTION APPROVING ASSESSMENT AND
FIXING TIME OF HEARING THEREOIV
� ,
COUNC FILE NO ��� `
B ���^�
FIle No. 59440
Voting Assessment No. 3965
Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for
5 Reconstruction of sidewalk on both sides W. Idaho Ave.
from Fernwood St. to Huron St.
Preliminary Order 94-567 approved Mav 4, 1994
FinalOrder 94-913 approved June 22, 1994
The assessment of beneFits, cost and expenses for and in connection with the above unprovement having been
submitted to the Council, and the Council having considered sazne and found the said assessment satisfactory, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects approved.
RESOLVED FURTHER, That a public hearing be had on said assessment on the 8th day of
May, 1996 at 5:00 P.M. � in the CouncIl Chamber of the
Court House and City Hall BuIlding, in the City of St. Paul; that the Director of Finance give notice of said meetings, as
required by the Charter, stating in said notice the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement, and the
amount assessed against the lot or lots of the parlicular owner to whom the notice is directed.
�
COUNCILPERSON
Yeas Nays
✓�lakey
�ostrom
�erin
�rris
Megard — �+h,s�,yt
✓IFettman
�une
APR ° 6 ��9� Qq
Adopted by the Council: Dat� ��� 1 l�
Certified assed by Council Secretary
� In Favor By --��
� � v
� Against
� �tbSC.rv'j"" ✓ Mayor
�
Public Hearing Date - May 8, 1996 RE 3-1-96 GST
b�.1�
Flss -&eal Bstate Division Date: 2-22-96 Green She� Nnmber: 34086
� FPAKiM@lf DIItE.C' 1�OR (SPY COUNCII.
�ct Peava aad PLone Numbct .... Q1Y A71�ORI�Y QERg
��l�p
Peter White 266-8850 � UDGL�P DIRECIOR & MGi: SVC DIIt
YOR(ORASSISIANI) 1 Rrsazfi
�stbeonCoundtAgendaby3-20-96 Must be in Council Research Office no later than nopn Frida 3-8-96
# OF S[GNAIVRE PAGES 1 (QdP AI]. LOC211IONS FOR S[GNA1VRf.,�
cnoxxeQU��: Setting date of public hearing for the rat'it'ication of assessments for sidewalk
' provements on IDAHO AVENUE. .
t�o. s9aw nss�rr xo. �s
RL�OOhII1f@IDATIONS: APPROVE (A) OR RL�TF.(Gl' (R) tERSONAL SERVI(T? CONPRACIS MUST ANSWER THL POIdAWING
PIANh1ING COMA4S5[ON A STAFP L Has the pesan/fum ever aodced undct a oonttact for this depaxlmeet? yIS N
QVII. SERVIGB COMM _ Ilas this peisan/fum exr bxn a Gry employee? YPS N
CID COMPSCIiFL _ Dors this peaou/fum po� a sHll not noimallY I� bY �Y
� �9 �� YPS N
R1S WHICFI COUNQ[. OB1EC11VE?
Fsplain all Y&S answea oa a sepe�ate ahect and attach.
UN((a.. WARD(S): 5 Dist�ct Plaoning Coundl: 10
NPTIAT7NG PROB M, ISSOE, OPPORTIJ (Who, What, When, Where, hy :
roject is compieted. Ratification is necessary in order to begin to collect assessments to help pay for the
roject.
,,,
. tSeAy...... . ' . ..�, ..�5:'
Same as above. [ ± �'; �^ ; �
�;",
ISADVAN"t'AGES IF APPROVED:
enefitted property owners have assessments payable via property taaces.
1SADVANI'AGES IF NOTAPPROVED:
o not assess the benefits would be inconsistent with City policy.
otal Amount of Transaction $ 9.290.38 Cost/Revenue Budgeted YES NO
$ 7,103.15 PIA 1995
$ 2,187.23 ASSESSMENT'S
unding Source Activity Number
inancial Information: (F_a�plain)
11 property owners will be notified of the public hearing and charges.