96-254�►�I�I����{� ��
City of St. Paui
RESOLUTION APPROVING ASSESSMENT AND
FIXING TIME OF HEARING THEREON
Voting Assessment No.
Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for
2 Reconstruction of sidewalk on the north side Otto
Ave. from S. Milton St. to S. Chatsworth St. and
the south side Otto Ave. from W. Seventh St. to
S. Chatsworth St.
Preliminary
Final
94-441
2
.�
a�,
,
�
approve�l June 1, 1994
Julv 6, 1994
The assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for and in connection wi4h the above improvement having been
submitted to the CouncIl, and the Council having considered same and found the said assessment satisfactory, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects approved.
RESOLVED FURTHER, That a public hearing be had on said assessment on the $th day of
May, 1996 at 5:00 P.M. �c�kRkec����5c�emc�kk�k�., in the CouncIl Chamber of the
Court House and City Hall BuIlding, in the City of St. Paul; that the Director of Finance give notice of said meetings, as
required by the Charter, stating in said notice the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement, and the
amount assessed against the lot or lots of the particular owner to whom the notice is directed.
�!!�{1�6JGfs
COUNCILPERSON
Yeas Nays
✓ Blakey
✓ Bostrom
✓ Guerin
Harris— ��s�"�
✓Megard
✓ Rettman
,i Thune
. �. * .. �, " • � �,
�,2 In Favor
�_ Against
/ ,/fr3�tr�iv
Adopted by the Council:
Mayor
Public Hearing Date - May 8, 1996 RE 3-1-96 ��� Z� ���
F!(S - xeal Sstate Division Date: 2-22-96 g� She� Number. 34087
FPARIMPNI' DIRECPDR (71Y COUNCII.
Ptaoa and PLone N�bd .� ATPORHI.+Y QERg
��tla
PeterWhite 266-8850 � GEl'DIILECI'OR &MGI:SVGDIR
YOR(ORhS9Sri1Ni) 1 Rac�h
�����13 3 Must be in Council Research Office no later than noon Friday 3
# OF S[GNATURE YACPS 1 (Q.IP AII. IACATiONS FOR S[GNANRL�
cnox xr.QU��: Setting date of pnblic hearing for the ratification of assessments for sidewalk
' pmvements on OTTO AVENLTE. .
Nn SM41 ASS�S4�Nt NO. 396G
MII�IDATIONS: APPROVE (A) OR RE7F.CP (R) rERSONAi. SERVICE CONIRACIS MUST ANSWER 1HE POIdAWINGr.
PIAHIIIIIQG COMI�SSION A SfiIFF L Has the peson/fi� ever wodad under a mntrdct for tLis department? YES N
LVII. SERVI(73 COMAd _ Has this peaon/fiim evcr been a Gty employee? YES N
c� co�r� _ n� ru� ��/s� �� a smu nar m�usr� br �r
a.mrnr ary emp��? �s x
roxis wtncH couruc�„ oam.cnv� rr�nta�ooas
Bcplain all YPS antiwea ou a sepatate sheet aixi a+rarh
UNCCa.. WARD(S�: 2 Disttic[ Plannmg Councl: 09
IATiNG PROBLEM, ISSU$ OPPORIUNPTY (Who, What, When, Where, Why):
roject is completed. Ratification is necessary in order to begin to collect assessments to help pay for the
roject.
n .
ame as above. "
ISADVANTAGES 7F APPROVED: � -�..- „' � •� - �
enefitted property owners have assessments payable via property tases.
ISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED:
o not assess the benefits would be inconsistent with City policy.
otal Amount of Transaction $ 8.488.05 Cost/Revenue Budgeted YES NO
$ 5,199.11 PIA 1995
$ 3,288.94 ASSESSMENTS
unding Source Activity Number
inancial Information: (E7cplain)
16 property owners will be notified of the public hearing and charges.