95-931� ORIG(NAL
City of St. Paul
RESOLUTION APPROVING ASSESSMEN7 AND
FIXING TIME OF HEARING THEREOIV
Voting Assessment No. 0606
Ward I the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for
2 Improve Annapolis St. between Robert St. and Kansas St.
Preliminary Ordar 95-130 approved February 8, 1995
FinalOrder 9 approve�l Auril 5. 1995
The assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for and in connection with the above impxovement having been
submitted to the CouncIl, and the Council having considered same and found the said assessment satisfactory, therefoce, be it
RESOLVED, That the said assessment 6e and the same is hereby in alt respects approved.
RESOLVED FURTH6R, That a pu6lic hearing be had on said assessment on the 4th day of
October, 1995, at 3:30 P.M. , in the Council Chamber of the
Court House and Clty Aall Building, in the City of St. Paul; that the Directox of Finance give notice of said meetings, as
required by the Charter, stating in said notice the time and p3ace of hearing, the nature of the improvement, and the
amount assessed against the loi or lots of the particular owner to whom the notice is directed.
FILE
s9
�s_y3
33i,
ei iai �ourn
COUNCILPERSON
Yeas Nays
B key
��
u� rin
vFfarris
�gard
�t tman }
Thune .�1ps r.T
AUG 26 1995
� In Favor
� Against
� Y
Adopted by the Council: Date_Jk�� ` J �
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
y �-�
Mayor
9 � y ��
Public Hearin� Date - October
FlSS — Real Bstate Division
Pctson and Yhonc N�ber-
Peter White 266-8850
Date: 7_z7_95 Green 5heet Nnmber. 33189
DFPARTMPNi' DII2ECPOR COUNCII-
�' CTIY ATIORNEY CI ERS
..�..a
� BUDGET DII2ECPOR .& MCil: SVC DIIL.
MAYOR (OR e1SSISTANi) 1 Council Reseazch
neoncoonatnyenaaby:8-16-95 Must be in Council Research Office
�I. # OF S[GNATURL PAGPS 1 (QdP ALL IACAT[ONS FOR STGNAT'URE)
r�ursrao: aemng aate ui puuuc uear,,.g �� �11C 1QLLL1644�Via v. ..ao..o.,.....-.•., -.,_
ving ANNAPOLI5 STREET BETWEEN ROBERT STREET AND KANSAS STREET.
is� n��� r�. 0606
APPROVE (A) OR RP,TP.Cr (A)
NNING COMMISSION A STAPP
tt.SERVICLWMbf _
COT�II��1Ti�L'
5 WI�IICfi COUNCII.OBJECIIVE? Neighbc
WARU(S�: 2 Dimict Planning Council= 3
SERVLCE CONL'RACIS MUST ANSWE+R THE FOLLOWING
Has the peisonjfum evec wosked undet a contcact fac this depaRment?
Has this peisonjFum ever been a City emplcryee?
poes tLis persopjfimi possess a stili not no:maliy po�sessed by any
Gtiaent Gty employee?
all YFS answeis on a separam shcet and attach.
YES
YES
l:}:�7
ect is nearing completition. Ratification is necessary in order to begin collecting assessments to help
for the project.
as above.
property owners have assessments payable via property taxes.
not assess the benefits would be inconsistent with C`ity policy.
Amount of Transaction $ 140.748.01 Cost/Revenue Budgeted YES NO
$ 128,281.24 MSA 1995
$ 12,466.77 Assessments �"t<= �
'�� :���� ���_
Source
Information:
Activity Number
J�f!_ 2, � ^Q"5
42 property owners will be notified of the public hearing and chazges.