94-1479 �
Council File # "i`t — �
��I����AL.
Green Sheet # 28605
RESOLUTION
�
CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
Presented By
Referred To Committee: Date
1 RESOLVED, that upon e cution and delivery of a release in full to the City of Saint
2 Paul, the proper City officers ar hereby authorized and directed to pay out of the Tort
3 Liability Fund 09070-0511 to Ch go Printing, Inc. the sum of $10,000.00 in full settlement
4 of his claim for damages sustaine May 26, 1991, as a result of a sewer backup at 95 Empire
5 Drive.
6
7
8
Yea Navs sent Requested by Department of:
a e
arris
rsmm CitV Attornev
uersn '
e ar
e man
une BY= '
� ,
� Form Approved by City Attorney
Adopted by Council: Date
Adoption Certified by Council Secr ary By: .`
By� � Approved Mayor for ubmission to Council
Approved by M . Date �� l �� `
B ,C��idiC'��Z./G�L���� � � By:
Y=
° �'' �
�� ��� ,� ���� N_ 2 8 0 � ; `
9 a� �. GR�EN SI#�E { ;.
�R a � oe�rrM�rr w� ctoR Nrrw�o+�re � cm couNC�� � �
� CITY ATTORNEY n CI7Y CLERK
MU BE ON IL BY (OA ) � C� BUDRET DIRfCi01 � FlN. � MaT. SERVICEB DIR.
(�' MAYON (OR A881STANT) �
i�'--'
TOTAL � OF SIGNATURE PAt3ES ( P ALL LOCATIONS �'t�!!i SHiNATURE)
acrwrr r�ouesr�o: '
�
Approval of resalution settling cla of Chargo Printing,: Inc. agai.nst the City of ��
St. Paul far $10,000. , 1 ,
,, � ,`
REWMMENDATIONB: Apxow (A) ar R��ect (R) PERSONAL sER1flCE CONTflACi's MUBT ANSWER 7'FIE FOILOYYING OIJBSTIONB:
_ w►trNUaG co�xsswN _ cnn� seFtwce coMrnsawr+ t. Has Mk psrsoNtkm ever worked undsr a oontrar.Y tor this deparbrrontT
_ GB COMWIIiTEE _ YES NO
2. Hss this person/firm evsr be�n t cHY BmPbY�eT
— �� — YES NO
_ Di8TR�'i c�uRT _ 3. Does tMc psraoMirm postess a ek� naA nonnaNY P� bY �Y �� �Y �� � �
sUPPORTS WHiCN COUNCIL OBJECTIVE9 YES NO {
€
Explain �U rp �n�vr�n on a�p�nb� shwt �nd �tch to ��wn �M�t
��
INITIATINO PROBI.EM. 16SUE, OPPORTUNITY (Who. WhYt. WhM. NVAs1s. l: ; e `
Charqo Printing has brou ht a negligence action against the City of
St. Paul to recover da qes it received when the City sanitary �� :
: e�ewer line backed up int its praperty, locatec� at 95 Empire Drive, °� �
three times during the summer of 1991. There is �vidence to ;� !
sugq��t that the back-u was caused by the failure to disconnect ;:
various s�orm water ca h-basins from the sanitary line. This ;' `�
,
�'
�v�r�oes ��, � 0 . 00 . �
1,
;,
E
.� i
;
;
' 'F
� DISAOVANTA3ES IF APPRQYED: �
r
� Councit Research C�nter
OCT 0 3 1994
,#
DISADVAFITAOES IF NOT APPROVED: � ,
_ �;
.;
!
9
�
,
TOTAL AMOUNT OF 1"itAN8ACT10N = 10 ��•� COST/IVEYENUE QUIiflETEO (dRCLE GNE) YES NO
Tort Liability Qgfl70 .
FUNDIN�i SOURCE ACTIVITY NUM9ER �'
flMANCIAL INFOHMATION: (EXPLAIN)
; ��� � .
4.
; NOTE: COMPLETE DIRECTIONS RRE lNCLl10EQ IN THE (3Rfi�,N SHEET INSTRUCTION!►L
MANUAL AVML/IBIE iN TFfE PURCHA3ING OFFI�E (PF� NO. 299-4225). '
� AOUTING ORDER:
Below aro correct routinps tor the tiv�s mosi treqwnt typss oi documsnts:
:' CONTRACTS (aswmes aut�iz�i budpst exists) CQUNCIL RC80LUTION (Amend BudgetsMc�pt. Ciranb) -
1. Outside AgencY. 1. Depardnent Director
2. Department Dirsctor 2. Budpet Director
3. Giry Attaney 3. Ciry Attomey
4. Mayor (for cwnttac3ta over Z/5.000) 4. MayoNAssistant
5. Human Ri�hts (tor ccntracts ovoe� S5p,000) 5. Ciy Council
8. Finance and Management Ssrvices Di►ector S. Chief Accountm�t, Finanoe and M�apement 3ervioes
?. Finance Accounting
ADMINISTRATIVE OAOERS (Budpet RsvisMn) COUNCIL RES�.UTION (ali �s, and OMMsnas)
1. Activity Maneger 1. DepertmeM Oirector
2. Depa�tment AccountaM 2. Ciry Attomey
3. Department pfrector 3. Mayor Assiatant
4. Budget Director 4. Cfly Councii
5. Ciry C1erk
6. Chfe} Accountant, Finance and Ma»agement Servkes
ADMINISTRATIVE OROER3 (all others)
1. Department Director
� 2. Ciy Attorney
3. Finance and Management Services Dfrector
� 4. City Clerk -
TOTAL NUMBER OF SIGNIITURE PAGES
InAfcate the #�of pages on which signatures aro required and py�s►cllp or II�
each ot tM� payes.
ACTION REOUESfED
Dsscribe what ths projact/roqueat aeeks to accomplish in eithek chrorwlogi-
cal order or ordsr o! in►Portence. whichsver is rtwat e�paopriate ior the
isaue. Do not wrke complete sentences. Bepin each item in your list with
: a verb.
RECOMMENDATlONS
Complete if the isaue M question haa been prossnted before any body, pubNc
or private.
� SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL 08,lECTIVE?
I�licate which Caincii objecN�ro(s) your p►ojecUrequeat supporta by I�tinp
the key word(s) (HOUSlNCi, RECREATION, NLtCiHBOAMOODS, ECONOMIC DEVHLOPMENT,
BUDGET, SEWER SEPARATION). (SEE COMPLETE L18T IN IWSTRIlCTIONAI MANUAt.)
PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS:
Thia in(ormatbn wiN be used to dstermins the city8 Uab�iq► for worke►s compensetbn Geims, taxss and prop�r civii ssrv�s h�inp rules.
)NITIATINC3 PROBLEM. tSSiIE. OPPORTUNITY �
Explain the situation or conditfona that croatsd a need for your project
i : or request.
x ` ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED
' Indicate whether this is simpiy an annual budget procedure roqutrod by fsw/
chartsr or whether thero a�e apecl�ic ways b whiCh the City of Saint Paui
;,
and its citizens vriN bsnetit hom this project/soifon.
DISADVANTAGES IF APPHOVED
What negative effects or maj� chanqss to existing � paat proceasea might
� this pro�ect/request produce it it is passed Ee.g.� t�eiNc delays, notse�
` tax increaaes or assessments)? To Wtwm? Whan? Fa how bng�
DIS/1DVANTAGES IF NOT APPR+OVED
Whai wili be the negative conaequences 1t the promised action is not
j epproved? Inability to deliver servk:e4 Continued high traHlc, rmisa,
� eccident rate? Loss ot rovenue7
FINANCIAI IMPACT
Althougt� you must taibr the informatiqn you provide here W the iasue you
are.addressing, in gerr��al you must anawer two questiona: How much is it
, going to oost? Who is going to pey?