94-1406 , ♦ �� �
\ ` \� \. �
�. \
` � �\� Council File # Q��' �
� \
Q v p �+
O � I � I �` , � �� Green Sheet # 7 d J�
SOLUTION �
CITY OF S PAUL, MINNESOTA 3(
;
Presented �y
Referred To Commitftee: Date
1 WHERE , Saint Paul Publi Health has requested the City;�ouncil to hold public hearings
2 to consider the advisability and nece ity of ordering the repair or �uvrecking and removal of a
3 partially gutted thre¢ story, wood f e dwelling with limestone��oundation located on property
. 4 hereinafter refened to as the "Subj Property" and common�known as 915-917 Ashland Avenue.
5 Tfiis property is legally described as ollows, to wit:
6 J , /
7 Lot 15, Blocic 19, Summit P k Addition to St. P�(il, EXCEPT the North 50 feet
8 thereof. /
9 i
/
10 WHEREAS, Ibased upon the ' rds in the sey County Recorder's Office and
11 information obtainet� by Saint �'aul blic Health n or before August 1, 1994, the following are the
12 now known interestead or respo�sible parties for e Subject Property: John D. and/or June M.
13 Robinson, 3815 Nevv Brighton Rpad Arden I�ls, MN 55112; Joseph A. Lyden, Cook, Lyden &
14 Brandt, 1025 West Everett Road, e Fore , IL 60045; John Michael Miller, Peterson, Fram &
15 Bergman, P.A., 50 East Fifth Stree�, Suite 00, St. Paul, MN 55101-1197.
16
17 WHEREAS, Saint Paul Publi has served in accordance with the provisions of
18 Chapter 45 of the Saint Paul Legisla e G� an order identified as an"Order to Abate Nuisance
19 Building(s)" dated July 20, 1994; `��
20
21 .\`�
22 WHEREAS, this order 'nfor ed the then �riown interested or responsible parties that the
23 structure located on the Subj t Pro rty is a nuisan ` building(s) pursuant to Chapter 45; and
24
25 �� ���;
26 WHEREAS, this rder infor ed the interested o� re nsible parties that they must repair or
27 demolish the structure ocated on the Subject Property by Au t 19, 1994; and
28
29
30 WHEREA , the enforcement fficer has posted a placard on Subject Property declaring
31 this building(s) t constitute a nuisan condition; subject to demolition; d
32
33
34 WH AS, this nuisance co dition has not been conected and Saint Paul blic Health
35 requested t at the City Clerk schedul public hearings before the Legislative Hearing ficer of the
36 City Cou cil and the Saint Paul City Council; and
37
38
39 WHEREAS, the interested an responsible parties have been served notice in accordance
40 wi the provisions of Chapter 45 of e Saint Paul Legislative Code, of the time, date, place and
41 purpose of the public hearings; and
. ;�
E• �
, ��
�
�
� � � �s' � aa_��a�
�, . k��'' , �'�� �
�
\� � � ��
2 WHEREAS, a hearing was h I ld before the Legislative Hearing Officer of the Saint Paul City
3 Council on Tuesday, September 20, 994 to hear testimony and evidence, and a�ter receiving
4 testimony and evidence, made the r mmendation to approve the request to or� er the interested or
5 responsible parties to make the Subj t Property safe and not detrimental to tla�e public peace, health,
6 safety and welfare and remove its bl hting influence on the community by �`ehabilita.ting this
7 structure in accorda�ce with all appl' ble codes and ordinances, or in th alternative by
8 demolishing and removing the struct re in accordance with all applicabl codes and ordinances.
9 The rehabilitation or demolition of e structure to be completed withi fifteen (15) days after the
10 date of the Council Hearing; and �
11
12 WHEREAS, a hearing was h ld before the Saint Paul Cit Council on Wednesday,
13 September 28, 1994 and the testimo and evidence including e action taken by the Legislative
14 Hearing Officer was considered by e Council; now therefor�
15 '
16 BE IT RESO�C,VED, that ba upon the testimony d evidence presented at the above
17 referenced public he}anngs, the Saint Paul City Council reby adopts the following Findings and
18 Order concerning th� Subject Prope at 915-917 Ast�and Avenue:
19 �� j
20 1. That �he Subject Pro y comprises,� nuisance condition as defined in Saint Paul
21 Legis1ative Code, Cha ter 45. �
22
23 2. That the costs of dem ition an removal of this building(s) is estimated to exceed
24 three thousand dollars $3, .00).
25
26 3. That there now exists d as existed multiple Housing or Building code violations at
27 the Subject Property.
28
29 4. That an Order to Ab Nuisance Building(s) was sent to the then known responsible
30 parties to conect ficiencies or to demolish and remove the building(s).
31
32 5. That the deficie ies using this nuisance condition have not been conected.
33
34 6. That Public ealth ha posted a placard on the Subject Property which declares it to
35 be a nuisan conditio subject to demolition.
36
37 7. That thi building has een routinely monitored by the Vacant/Nuisance Buildings
38 Code forcement Pr ram.
39
40 8. Th the known intere parties and owners are as previously stated in this
41 re lution and that the otification requirements of Chapter 45 have been fulfilled.
42
43 ORDER
44 �i
45 Th Saint Paul City Council reby makes the following order:
46
. . �
� ,�.-� qc� -.I �0�
_ �� �`�
1 ,
� �-' :�-�� �' �
1 1. The above referenced interes or responsible parties shall make the Subject P#�perty safe
2 and not detrimental to the pu lic peace, health, safety and welfare and remove its blighting
3 influence on the community rehabilitating this structure and conecting al�' deficiencies as
4 prescribed in the above refer ced Order to Abate Nuisance Building(s) irvaccordance with
5 all applicable codes and ordi ces, or in the alternative by demolishing,�nnd removing the
6 structure in accordance with 1 applicable codes and ordinances. The fehabilitation or
7 demolition and removal of th structure must be completed within fift�en (15) days after the
8 date of the Council Hearing. � �
9
10 2. If the above corrective action is not completed within this period of time the City of Saint
11 Paul, Public Health, Housing Code Enforcement Section is he#�eby authorized to take
12 whatever steps are necessary o demolish and remove this str�cture, fill the site and charge
13 the costs incuned against the ubject Property pursuant to t��e provisions of Chapter 45 of
14 the Saint Paul Legislative C e. %
15 �
16 3. In the event the building is t be demolished and remoy�d by the City of Saint Paul, all
17 personal property or fixtures f any kind which interf re with the demolition and removal
18 shall be removed from the pr perty by the responsi� parties by the end of this time period.
19 If all personal property is not removed, it shall be ' nsidered to be abandoned and the City
20 of Saint Paul shall remove an dispose of such �rty as provided by law.
21 ;
22 4. It is further ordered, that a c py of this resol tion be mailed to the owners and interested
23 parties in accordance with C pter 45 of th� aint Paul Legislative Code.
/
/
/
%
i
'
i�
Yeas Navs Ab nt Requested by Department of:
a e
rimm
uerin
arris
e ar )-/ '_
e man �`�C.(�[LC L't�CJ�-�
une BY�
Adopted by Council: Date �� Form Approved by City Attorney
Adoption Certified by Cou �il Secret ry B
Y•
B y' Approv d y Mayor for Submission to
Approved by Mayor: te Coun
�' ���� ,�� � ����
By: �
By ���-
.
I
� a�4 �� 4�
DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATE ITIATED
�b��� Health os-2 -9 GREEN SHEET N° 19056
INITIAL/DATE I ITIA AT
CON�� 3�QjJ B.PH�NE1 295 -4153 DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR CITY COUNCIL
�ss VO 6
Ass� CITY ATTORNEY Lj �, �.. rj V� CITY CLERK
NUM R FOR
MUST BE ON COUNCIL AGENDA BY (DATE) ROU G � BUDGET DIRECTOR � FIN. 8 MGT. SERVICES DIR.
September 28 � 1994 �R� MAYOR (OR ASSISTANT) O
TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES I (CLIP LL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE)
ACTION RE�UESTED:
City Council to pass this resolution hich will order the owner(s) to remo e or repair the
referenced building(s). If the owne fails to comply with the resolutio , Public Health <
is ordered to remove the building. e subject property is located at 5-917 Aahland
RECOMMENDATIONS: Approve (A) or Re)ect (R) pE SONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE F LLOWING �UESTIONB:
_ PLANNING COMMISSION _ CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION �• es this per8on/firm ever worked under a cont�ect for thi department?
_ CIB COMMITfEE _ YES NO
2. Has this person/firm ever been a city employee?
_ STAFF _
YES NO
_ DIS7RICT COURr _ 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normal possessed by any current city employee?
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OB,IECTIVE7 YES NO
Ex lafn all yes answers on seperate sheat a d sttach to 9rsen sheet
INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (Who, What, When, Where, Why):
This building(s) is a nuisance buildi g(s) as defined in hapter 45 and a vacant building:
as defined in Chapter 43 of the Saint Paul Legislative de. The owners, interested
parties and responsible parties known to the Enforceme officer were given an order to
repair or remove the building at 915- 17 Ashland Aven e by August 19, 1994, and have
failed to comply with those orders.
ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED:
Gour�c� ��a��, ���ter !� �'� E I V F�
The City will eli.minate a nuisance.
SEP 12 1994 AUG �]. 1994 _
C�T� A����I�EY ;
� . . Y••a :enl1'a�1!2dt�1.:vC"<•+�L��padakd�� � � � . .
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED:
The City will spend funds to wrec an remove this building(s). These costs will be
assessed to the property, collec d a a special assessment against the property taxes.
DISADVANTAOES IF NOT APPROVED:
A nuisance condition wi 1 remain unab ted in the City. This building(s) will continue to
blight the community,
TOTAL AMOUNT OF ANSACTION s — COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES NO -
FUNDING SOURCE Nuisance Housinq Abatemen ACTIVITY NUMBER 33261
FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN)
NOTE: COMPLETE DIRECTIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THE GREEN SHEET INSTRUCTIONAL
MANUAL AVAILABLE IN THE PURCHASING OFFICE (PHONE NO. 298-4225).
ROUTING ORDER:
Below are correct routings for the five most frequent rypes of documents:
' CONTRACTS (assumes authorized budget exists) COUNCIL RESOLUTION (Amend Budgets/Accept. Grants)
1. Outside Agency 1. Department Director
2. Department Director 2. Ciry Attorney
3. City Attorney 3. Budget Director
4. Mayor (for contracts over $15,000) 4. Mayor/Assistant
5. Human Rights (for contracts over $50,000) 5. City Council
6. Finance and Management Services Director 6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services
7. Finance Accounting
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS (Budget Revision) COUNCIL RESOWTION (all others, and Ordinances)
1. Activiry Manager 1. Department Director
2. Department Accountant 2. Ciry Attorney
3. Department Director 3. Mayor Assistant
4. Budget Director 4. City Council
5. City Clerk
6. Chief Accountant, Finance and Management Services
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS (all others)
1. Department Director
2. Ciry Attorney
3. Finance and Management Services Director
4. City Clerk
TOTAL NUMBER OF SIGNATURE PAGES
' Indicate the #of pages on which signatures are required and paperclip or fiag
sach of these pages.
ACTION REQUESTED
Describe what the projecUrequest seeks to accomplish in either chronologi-
cal order or order of importance, whichever is most appropriate for the
� issue. Do not write complete sentences. Begin each item in your list with
' a verb.
'. RECOMMENDATIONS
Complete if the issue in question has been presented before any body, public
or private.
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECT�VE?
Indicate which Council objective(s) your projecUrequest supports by listing
the key word(s) (HOUSING, RECREATION, NEIGHBORHOODS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT,
BUDGET, SEWER SEPARATION). (SEE COMPLETE LIST IN INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL.)
PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS:
This information will be used to determine the citys liability for workers compensation claims, taxes and proper civil service hiring rules.
INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY
Explain the situation or conditions that created a need for your project
or request.
; ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED
Indicate whether this is simply an annual budget procedure required by law/
charter or whether there are specific ways in which the City of Saint Paul
and its citizens will benefit from this projecVaction.
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED
What negative effects or major changes to existing or past processes might
this projecUrequest produce if it is passed (e.g., traffic delays, noise,
tax increases or assessments)? To Whom? When? For how long?
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED
What will be the negative consequences if the promised action is not
approved? Inability to deliver service? Continued high traffic, noise,
accident rate? Loss of revenue?
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Although you must tailor the information you provide here to the issue you
are addressing, in general you must answer two questions: How much is it
going to cost? Who is going to pay?
A� - I�o�
LE SLATIVE HEARINGS
eptember 20, 1994
Gerry Strathman
Legislative Hearing
Officer
i 1, Resolution ordering the owner t remove or repair the referenced building, located at
915-917 Ashland Avenue. If the wner fails to comply with the resolution, Public Health
is ordered to remove the buildi g.
Legislative Hearing Officer reco mends a three month layover in Legislative Hearings.
2. Resolution ordering the owner I remove or repair the referenced building, located at
560 Burgess Street. If the owne fails to comply with the resolution, Public Health is
ordered to remove the building.
Legislative Hearing Officer rec mends a two week layover in Legislative Hearings.
3. Resolution ordering the owner o remove or repair the referenced building, located at
396 Edmund Avenue. If the o er fails to comply with the resolution, Public
� Health is ordered to remove t building.
Legislative Hearing Officer rec mmends allowing the new owner 180 days to complete
the rehabilitation of the buildi .
4. Resolution ordering the owner l o remove or repair the referenced building, located at
692 Fourth Street East. If the o er fails to comply with the resolution, Public Health
is ordered to remove the buildi g.
Legislative Hearing officer reco mends approval
5. Summary Abatement Adjustme t- 683 E. Third
Legislative Hearing Officer reco mends adjustment of summary abatement as presented
by staff. Real Estate office to repare a resolution.
6. Summary Abatement Order - acant land residential 00000 Mound Street
Legislative Hearing Officer rec mmends denial of appeal
�y- /y db
LE SLATIVE HEARINGS
December 20, 1994
Gerry Strathman
Legislative Hearing
Officer
� .
� 1.) Resolution ordering the owner o remove or repair the referenced building, located at
�✓ 915-17 Ashland Ave. If the o er fails to comply with the resolution, Public Health
is ordered to remove the build g.
Legislative Hearing Officer rec mmends approval
2. Resolution ordering the owner o remove or repair the referenced building, located at
625 Aurora Avenue. If the o r fails to comply with the resolution, Public Health
is ordered to remove the buil g.
Legislative Hearing Officer rec mends approval
3. Resolution ordering the owner o remove or repair the referenced building, located at
284 Charles Avenue. If the own r fails to comply with the resolution, Public Health is
ordered to remove the building.l,
Legislative Hearing Officer rec mmends allowing the owner 180 days to complete the
rehabilitation, contingent on he obtaining the code compliance and appropriate bonds
before the December 28 Counci meeting. (June 20, 1995)
4. Resolution ordering the owner o remove or repair the referenced building, located at
934-936 Selby Ave. If the owne fails to comply with the resolution, Public Health is
ordered to remove the building.
. Legislative Hearing Officer rec mends approval
5. Resolution ordering the owner o remove or repair the referenced building, located at
926-932 Selby Ave. If the owne fails to comply with the resolution, Public Health is
ordered to remove the building.!
Legislative Hearing Officer rec mends allowing the owner 180 days to complete the
rehabilitation (June 20, 1995)
6. Summary Abatement Order - 7 3 E. Fourth Street
Legislative Hearing Officer rec mends denial of appeal
7. Summary Abatement Order - 1 2 E. Maryland
Legislative Hearing Officer rec mends denial of appeal
8. Summary Abatement and Vehi e Abatement Orders - 801 Sims Avenue and adjacent
properties of 935 Arcade Street
Legislative Hearing Officer rec mends denial of appeal
9. Vehicle Abatement Order - 213 Wellesley
Legislative Hearing Officer rec mends denial of appeal
. � � - lyo�
Interdepartmertt�al M kmorandum �
CTTY OF SAINT PAUL
�
DATE: September 19, 1994
TO: Councilmember Je Blakey
Councilmember Mar e Grimm
Councilmember Din Guerin
Councilmember Mik Harris
Councilmember Rob ' rta Megard
Councilmember Jani e Rettman
Councilmember Dav Thune
FROM: Dan Pahl - PED �
RE: 915-917 Ashland Av ue
This memorandum is in response t a request made at the City Council meeting on September
7, 1994 for staff to provide a rehab' 'tation feasibility evaluation of the structure located at 915-
917 Ashland Avenue, the dispositio of which will be considered at the legislative hearing on
September 20 and the City Council eeting on September 28. Please see the attached
evaluation report. Please feel free o call me at 266-6610 if you have any questions about this
property.
cc: Gerry Strathman ^
.. ��„�„•� . � y •� v
:3 .a.4! i "_ 1a.c�. ��t! �,�1`. ��.
SEP 2 3 1994
: ._.�. _�
- -
.:�
� __..
, ; . . �`-I�I�Io�
Va nt Building Initiative
Building Evaluation
Building Address: 915-917 Ashland enue
Type of Structure: x Residential j Commercial _ Mixed Use
� Project Evaluator. Dan Pahl, Neighb rhoods & Housing Division - PED
Date of Inspection: July 14, 1994
I. Structural Soundness x Yes _ No
Comments: The structure lo ted on this property is a four-unit residential building
which was originally construct as a duplex in 1903. The building has 2720 square feet
of total living area and consist of four one-bedroom units.
The structure has been partia gutted on the interior, and is in need of substantial
cosmetic improvements. Ch' ey needs to be rebuilt. Floor boards on porch aze rotted,
worn and deteriorated. Base en't windows have rotted frame and sash, and other
windows are deteriorated and oorly operating. The foundation is spalling and needs
tuckpointing. However, floor stem, superstructure and building in general appear to be
in very sound condition struct rally.
II. Extent of Rehabilitation
x Fxtensive
Moderate �
_ Minimal
Comments: Attached is an it ized inspection report showing necessary repairs to the
structure, the total cost of whi h is estimated to be $102,850. This cost estimate was
determined without the bene�i of a code compliance inspection, and may include items
which are not ultimately requ' ed in a code compliance inspection.
III. Suitability of Lot
x Yes
No
Too Small
Poor Soil
_ Bad Topography I I
_ Incompatible Use � I,
Comments: This corner lot m sures 60' x 100' (6000 sq. ft.) and is zoned RT-1 (two
family townhouse). The neigh rhood consists of a mix of single family, duplex and
. �
� � � � � �y ��t-��
915-917 Ashland Avenue
Page Two
apartment buildings. Compar bly sized rental properties in the area which are in good
condition are valued at appro ately $
IV. Marketability Yes _ No
Comments: The 1994 tax val e is $65,700. Comparably sized rental properties in the
area which are in good conditi n are valued at approximately $. The property appears
� to have amenities which make 't potentially marketable, although the present condition is
detrimental to marketability. lease see comments in items I, II and V.
V. LegalIssues Yes _ No
Comments: 1994 taxes payabl are $8181.92, and are unpaid. In addition, there are
delinquent taxes whicfi total $ 92.42. The fee owners John and June Robinson, have
stated that they intend to can 1 a contract for deed with Joe Lyden, the contract vendee,
for the purpose of obtaining p ssession of the property to resell it.
VI. Potential Reuse
x Rehabilitation
x As Housing _ As Commercial
_ Demolition and Redevelop ent
_ As Housing _ As Commercial
_ Demolition. (Could rovide a lot for infill housing or open space for adjacent
resident properties, thereby meeting a part of the 1990's Saint
Paul Ho sing Policy to improve neighborhood quality and
livability')
_ Building moved to location
_ Other Use
VII. PED Action
Note: Environmental Health ill proceed to issue orders to repair
or raze.
x Housing Division will c ntact owner regarding rental rehab loan programs.
-
I
� � `�y- I �t o �
��-��.-�: T�:�
JUL �'� �G���4
�'�� � � � �`� :y. :... . . . ., . ,1 �
I REPORT .
DATE : � ^ t �f "'c� i'!`
OWNER:
ADDRESS : 9 � 5 ^ � '���'�'�"� �
� UNITS : ' �
r�-o .�=� • �-�-v. � !�
INSPECTION PERFORMED BY: - �
S' S • , � �j . /� . � ,-,..�..r� ,
�� r�
l,tJ S , `�
N s ; � '• "
, � .. --�
c s .
.
, : . I . �� _
EXTERIOR
1. Roof
� Worn, deterior ted, cupped shingles
�Valleys and ri ges hav�-a�d--det� orated S f� 04�
asphalt coveri g or �us a� nen meta . � .
Sag in rafter pan evident.
Flat roof worn and deteriorated.
2. Gutters & Downs outs � N ��
Rusted, deteri rated.
Sag; are not h ng properly.
Paint chipped r peeling.
3. Cornice/Soffit
Wood rotted, d maged; aluminum damaged, � 9p �
deteriorated, oming apart at seams. �
�-'� Paint flaking, cl:ipged, loose, peeling.
Open, covering�,missing.
4. Window Door Misc. asin Trim
Wood rotted, d maged; aluminum damaged, �� 3
deteriorated, oming apart at seams.
V�+ Paint flaking,lchipped, loose, peeling.
Open, coveringlmissing.
5. Sidinct
Wood rotted, d maged.
Aluminum (stee or vinyl) damaged, deteriorated, �'� 3
� coming apart a seams.
Paint flaking,'�chipped, loose, peeling.
Stucco cracked worn and deteriorated.
Open area with no covering; area not finished.
Brick has loos spalling cement at joints.
6. Foundation Walls
�
!� Loose, spallin cement between limestone, block, ��
brick.
Surface coveri g loose, cracked, falling.
Leaning in or ut; failing. •
� Access area to cellar deteriorated, open, door
rotted and det�riorated.
. . . `'I `1 - � `� � �
7. Chi_mnev
�� Loose, spallin cement between brick or block. �-�a� 5"�p0
Surface coveri loose, cracked.
Bricks missing, falling.
Cap deteriorat or missing.
Not enough hei t ab of line.
�-r' Flashing missi o defective. �� ��– ��' S
— r"°z'-� °-'.-a.-�
8. Storm Windows and Do s .
Screens torn, maged.
Inserts don't 't in track.
_�,�Generally dete " orated and worn. 3: 2 � �
Doors don't ha properly; missing hardware;
damaged.
9. Lawnwalk
� Cracked, uneve , buckling. �� 2� p aO
Lawnwalk not p sent.
10. Drivewav ��
Cracked, uneve ', buckling.
Driveway not p sent.
11. Retaininq Wall ��
Cracked, spall' g, buckling; leaning in or out. �
Retaining wall ot present.
12 . Entry Steps +-�� " °-� 2- n1 S'�� �� � O�
Wood rotted� c crete spalled, cracked, broken.
Steps or deck t level. • 2 �
(. / - Handrail missi ' or not secure.
13. Porch Deck
Not level.
Posts inadequa � and don't have footings.
� Floor boards r ted, worn, deteriorated. s� p
Ceiling boards loose, hanging, warped.
�^ Paint chipped, flaking, peeling on inside. ��t �..� ��
14. Garaae ���'
Roof worn and eteriorated.
Roof sags.
Paint chipped, eeling, flaking on walls and trim.
Walls leaning ' or out.
Door and windo s missing, deteriorated,
defective.
Overhead door amaged, deteriorated. "
. . �y �yo�
. . .
INTERIOR
15. Basement Stairs
Treads missing, cracked, grooved, broken.
Carriage loose „ unsecure.
Handrail missin or loose.
Lack of adequat support.
�' Needs Guardrai . � D .
16. Foundation Walls
� � Loose, spallin cement between limestone. � D 0�
Loose, falling urface covering. `
Failing founda 'on walls.
Evidence of wat r leakage.
17. Windows Basement � �, 6D0
Rotted frame a sash.
G- Broken glass.
� No weatherstri ing.
� Poorly fitting ash with frame.
18. Post and Beams �I�
No footings. �
No plinth bloc .
Improper metal osts.
Missing where eded.
Beam inadequate y supported.
Crack sufficie to weaken function.
Rotted.
Loose, not sec ed.
Improper instal ation.
19. Floor System �L
Joists rotted.
Joists too wid y spaced.
Openings not p perly headered off.
Subfloor rotte , deteriorated.
� Joists rotted a foundation wall.
Rim joists rot d, deteriorated.
Floor sags or 1 ans up or down in certain
� direction; not evel.
20. Wall and Ceilin Cove in ��� �"�'``��
C� F a l l i n g, l o o s e l a s t e r o r o t h e r c o v e r i n g. g�� ��
( / Peeling, flaki , chipped paint.
cl Peeling, loose aper.
Ceramic, plasti tile loose, missing, chipped.
✓ Open walls, cei ing.
.
.. � °I y- � y o c�
21. Floor Coverinct
� Vinyl worn, de I � riorated, gaps at seam .
�/ �Iood floor wor and scuffed. �--T�� /D� fl� �
� Carpet worn, i 1-fitting, stained, unclean.
22. Windows
� Sash cords mis or broken.
�" Glass broken.
� Putty loose, d teriorated.
�� Paint chipped, loose on sash, sill, trim. �� ���
�� Weatherstrippi g missing, deteriorated.
�/ Lock, handle m'ssing or inoperable.
�� Painted shut.
' / Operates poorl and with difficulty.
!/ Recommend new indow sash.
23. Doors
- Entry
� Damaged, worn oor and frame.
�-� Hardware missi g.
� Deadbolt missi g or not adequate throw. �' ���
C� No weatherstri ping or deteriorated and worn
weatherstrippi g.
V Peeling, loose paint or varnish.
- Interior poors I
� Damaged. j
`' ' Poorly f itted, rehang . �,� a C� .
�� Missing or poo ly operating hardware.
� Peeling, loose paint or varnish.
�r Opening not fr med for door.�
24
. ab,i�ets
�adequate amo
�� Doors don't cl se or fit.
�^ Chipped, loose paint or varnish. lD� Dc9c'�
✓ Hang improperl .
C/ Hardware, shel ing missing.
25. Countertops "
!/ Vinyl worn, pe ling.
� Inadequate are . �� .� Z ,�
v Edges not fini hed.
� Chipped, loose paint.
,
26. Appliances «ti�
v Refrigerator - deteriorated. c� d��
�/ Stove pilot go s out. '
�/ Stove deterior ted.
.
. - .. �y-1���
27. Stairs
�reads cracked loose, grooved.
i/ Vinyl tread co ers missing, torn. � p p __
Carpet loose a d unsafe.
28. Handrails/Guardrail
�/' Loose, unsecur , issi � S ��'� � �✓ S ZF $� O
ELECTRIC
2 9. S erv i ce /' D D �° �.-
�� �� � ��
Existing servi e inadequate size to serve building
or each unit o building.
30. Circ its and Outlets
Inadequate num er of outlets and circuits.
31. Miscell neous Electr c
�Worn, exposed iring, loose unsecure wiring,
improper and u safe connections and splices.
� Unsafe and exc ssive use of extension cords.
r / Broken or worn fixtures.
� Cracked or mis ing cover plates '
—� Missing light witch.
� / Defective or w rn swtiches or outlet.
Fixture or out et not grounded.
� No ground faul interrupter outlet present.
Water meter no jumpered.
No mechanical entilation present.
PLUMBING
32. Water Heater
Improper or m'ssing temperature/pressure relief
valve.
Vent loose, b ckpitched, run too long, run
not adequatel supported.
/�Draft diverto loose, not secured, off center.
!/ Old and deter ' orated . � � sJ � �
Inadequate cl arance protection around vent
going through wall or ceiling.
. .- . c�y �yo�
�
33. Waste and Vents
� Illegal materi . �,2 � D � O
� Fixture not ve ed.
°' Leaking trap o other connection.
-``' Not supported equately.
� Deteriorated a d worn.
34. Water Lines
Corroded, worn and deteriorated. .
Low pressure. � � � 3 3
Improper mater'al.
Non-existant.
Lines damaged,l,twisted, bent.
Improper conne tion.
Replace water ervice from water main in street to
sidewalk (wo_klto be performed by City Water Dept.)
and from sidew lk to water meter (work to be performed
by Plumber, 1'�/2" copper pipe, City to supply new
meter.
35. Gas Lines C�-�
Improper, unsa e connections to stove, water
heater, furnac /boiler, dryer. �9 � 3 3
� No shut off va ve.
c/ Loose, unsecur d gas lines.
Opening not ca ped or plugged.
36. Fixtures
�nk chipped, racked, worn,.deteriorated.
�� Faucet operate poorly; hardware worn or ��, � 3�
�missing.
Water closet c ipped, cracked, worn,
deteriorated. �
Water closet t ilet seat missing, has excessive
wear, damaged,'cracked.
Flushing mecha ism inside water closet tank is
� defective.
` Bathtub chippe , cracked, worn, deteriorated.
37. HEATING '� /� O � �� ��C�
Heat exchanger rusted, corroded, �
� have accumulat d deposits.
Boiler does no have temperature-pressure
relief valve i closed system.
Gauges don't h ve proper readings or settings.
Insulation loo e, cracked, falling away,
asbestos prese t.
Firebrick dete iorated, crumbling.
Low efficiency� old, deteriorated, inadequate �
� heat supplied hroughout building. ,�� �
> � �y�1y�c�
Ducts have ope ings, don't fit tight together
at joints.
Boiler jacket as openings, rusted sections.
Vent loose, ba kpitched, run too long, run not
adequately sup orted.
Draft divertor loose, not secure, off center.
Expansion tank missing or defective.
Valve to drain expansion tank missing.
Valve to adjus water level missing.
Pilot burns ir egularly and is suspect of .
improper opera ion.
Combustion pro ucts backdrafting.
.��� o liner in ch mney.
�/ Inadequate com ustion air.
Blower fan ope ates in a defective way.
Distribution n twork imbalanced and requires
adjustment.
Circulating pu p operates in a defective way.
� �egister cover missing.
Radiator fails to give heat.
Baseboard unit damaged or do not have cover.
Water level in dequate.
Poor placement of warm air supplies and cold
air returns,
No thermostat r defective thermostat.
Improper or un afe electrical connections for
boiler or furn ce.
Space heater o d and deteriorated; distributes
inadequate hea .
Inadequate cl rance protection around vent
going through all or ceiling.
. Recommend ind r/outdoor resets and cut-off
control.
38. Miscellaneous
No smoke dete ors or smoke detector's don't �'�' 2 `�
work.
No fire wall y door at boiler area in
basemment.
39. ENERGY �
� or inadequ�te insulation in attic.
No or inadequ te insulation in walls.
Recommend cau king baseboards and window and
door casings n interior of exterior walls.
Recommend pul ey seals on window sash �ulleys.
Close and blo k off air passages around pipes
and chimneys oing through lst floor and attic.
Recommend gas ets for exterior wall outlets
and switches.
Insulate and eatherstrip attic door or
attic access oor. �
� Recommend ven damper for furnace/boiler
and water hea er.
,. .�• . � �� ��� -- t��to
�
, a '
Recommend auto atic setback thermostats.
�^ Replace existi g boiler/furnace with energy
efficient type at least 80� seasonal efficiency.
Weatherstrip d ors and windows.
Recommend roof vents.
� Install insula ion jacket for water heater. �O O
Insulate rim j ist area.
� �
� S T//►? �H �� 7a T�- L �2 �c-r�=r %ie-� C�`aS J .
�d
� 1 � ? � �
o•c I:
5��0 0 0•-a p+ I I
5 +
500 •00 +
500•�p .�
" 3 �200•00 �+
2�000•00 + I I
3�000•00 t
250•00 + I �
500•00 t
500•00 +
1, 000•00 +
1 +600•00 -�
8�000•00 + .
10 �000•00 +
8, 000 • p0 �.
4�000•00 +
��8Qfl•00 +
10 �000•QO t I .
4�000•00 + ,
400•00 t
500•00 + I I
4�000•00 + ��
2�000•00 +
1 2�0OO�OD a-
15r00Q•p0 +
�a�°00 + `
.. �
.......00.... ��
0•C
,
I