94-1321 srt
City of St. Paul 0 R 1G1NAL COUNCIL FILE NO. qT- /3
RESOLUTION RATIFYING ASSESSMENT By
File No. S9351
Voting Assessment No. 3851
Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for
Reconstruction of sidewalk on north side Wynne Avenue from
N. Ilamline Ave, to N. Albert St .
Preliminary Order 93 --77O approved June 8 199
Final Order 91• -9$1 approved July 13, 1993
A public hearing having been had uI on the assessment for the above improvement, and said assessment having
been further considered by the Council, and having been considered finally satisfactory, therefore, by it
RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects ratified.
RESOLVED FURTHER, That the said assessment be and it is hereby determined to be payable in one thru twenty
equal installments. as per Section 6 i.04 of the Saint Paul Administrative Code.
COUNCILPERSON Adopted by the Council: Date -- 4'p`' , • Acrly
Yeas Nays .] 1 \ `DS-z -r.
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
wrist n Favor By ilk -
ri 9 4111MIVIP ✓" gar9 0 against
Mayor
ttstan l
ure
is
y ,
City of St. Paul COUNCIL FILE NO. 14 '
Office of The Director of :inance
By
REPORT OF COMPLETION O = ASSESSMENT
File No. 89351
Voting Assessment No. 3031
Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for
Reconstruction of sidevnik on north side WYnne Avenue fry
S. Ranaline Awe. to N. Albert St.
Preliminary Order 93-770 approved June 133. 19 3
Final Order 93-981 approvers • Jul 13, 1993
To the Council of the City of St. Paul:
The Director of Finance hereby report to the Council the following as a statement of the expenditures necessarily
incurred for and in connection with the ma Ling of the above improvement, viz:
Total construction costs $ 398.30
Engineering and Inspection $ 119.49
Valuation and Assessment Services $ 23.90
Process Serving Charge $
Abatement Service Charge $
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 541.69
Charge To Public Improvement Aid 199$ $ 369.23
Net Assessment $ 152.46
Said Director further reports that he has assessed and levied the total amount as above ascertained, to -wit: the sum
of $ upon each and every lot, part or parcel of land deemed benefited by the said improve-
ment, and in the case of each lot, part or parcel of land in accordance with the benefits conferred thereon; that the said
assessment has been completed, and that hereto attached, identified by the signature of the said Director, and made a part
hereof, is the said assessment as completed by him, and which is herewith submitted to the Council for such action
thereon as may be considered proper.
///
r
Dated v L 4
Director of Finance
it r
Public Hearing Date - September 7, 1994 RE 7 -1 -94 CH _ 1, t
FMS - Real Estate Division bate: 6 -24 -94 Green Sheet Number: 28796
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR CITY COUNCIL Contact Person and Phone Number. « .,... CITY ATTORNEY CTTy CLERK
MUBA4 fOR
Peter White 266 -8850 - BUDGET DIRECTOR FIN. & MGT. SVC DIR. MAYOR (OR ASSISTANT) 1 Council Research
Must be on Council Agenda by7 -2 0 - 9 4 Must be in C •uncil Research Office no later than noon Monday 7 -11 -94
TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 (CLIP • LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE)
ACTION REQUESTED: Setting date of public hea ing of the ratification of assessments for sidewalk
reconstruction on WYNNE AVENUE.
File No. S9351 Assessment No. 3851
RECOMMENDATIONS: APPROVE (A) OR REJECT (R) I ' ERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING:
_PLANNING COMMISSION A STAFF 1 Has the person /firm ever worked under a contract for this department? YES NO
CIVIL SERVICE COMM _ • Has this person /firm ever been a City employee? YES NO
CIB COQ _
Current :. Does this person /firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any
— NO
City employee? YES
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? Neighborhoods
xplain all YES answers on a separate sheet and attach.
COUNCIL WARD(S): 4 District Planning Council: 10
INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (Who, What' When, Where, Why):
I
Project is completed. Ratification is necess : ry in order to begin to collect assessments to help pay for the
project.
ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED:
Same as above.
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED:
Benefitted property owners have assessmen s payable via property taxes.
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED:
To not assess the benefits would be inconsitent with City policy.
Total Amount of Transaction $ 541.69 1 Cost /Revenue Budgeted YES NO
$ 389.23 P 1993 ''c.e.sX1t4* t lete '
$ 152.46 ' Lsessments
` `
Funding Source Activi t, Number
Financial Information: (Explain)
e
4 property owners will be notifid of the public hearing and charges.
.- N CO
3 st .t
W 0 0 O 0
0 s. 0 0 0
4
o_ >
5- N N N
IX
w M M M
a N N N
O
Ce P P P
CL N N N
\ `vv ^\ N N N
N II - st 11 st II CO O II O
5- O 11 O N 11 N 11 .
• 11 •
Z • 11 II 11 11
7 N II N P 11 P 11 ti M ll M
''N\ O N 11 N .4 11 44 11 6Y M 11 M
F 4A 11 fA W 11 M 44 11 fA
7- 1 ¢ u II 11 11 ER II
� � ii ii I ii ii
\1 a o II u n n
VVVV"`... W r •I 11 11 II
c� v n n III n
¢ 4 n n n n
z � n u I n n
4
F CO O O O
r o 0 0
\ 2 M ...3 O
LA M
•
O M ul •
M CL'
O
I- r
U
r ¢
Cn
N W O O O
4 5- 0 0 • 0
4 43 43 •O
O VD .p
Vl 5-
M
P 2
N 7
5-
U
W I
O
a
a
co, co N
re w W 1 W
O CL• CL a'
1i w I
E Z Z Z '
I- Q O O O
N 2 U U U
W W W
J ▪ CC CN CL• • K
O
co 5- Y Y Y
z U J J J
4 4 Q Q
0 w 3 3 3
a
w
a a z
5- z z a
z
w Z F Z
F a
w o - -
> J J J
O r 7 7 7
a a 4 Q Q
a a a • a
E a
-. U •
to r 5- r •O a 4 3
U W CO N CO N N CO N 1 11 1
se CI • 11 •
J W 1 . , - Y W Y Y W Y N 11 N
C0 5- UO -J UJ J U 5-J Vl 11 M
7 r < m QCO CO Qu e- 11 , -
a Ce J 5- J - 99 a iR
w a u- ul a 43 0- 1n (V 11
a N N 11
O 0 0 O 0 3 II
Ce F T 5- E 5- 5- E r 11
a 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 X 0 II
U 3 J t) J J U W J II
11 N
11 J
11 W
11 U
M M M M II K
P P P P 11 Q
• ¢ 11 a
M M M M 11
P x P P P N 11 5-
r 3 4 1 W 11 a
.t '0 (.- 7 .0 1- •0 N. •O 1'- re 11 F
P CL' N O 0/ N 0 N 0 N 0 11 W
W CO W CO W CO W CO W 2 11 X
1 - > - W O D. •• = W O N. •• W O N. •• >- W O N. •• O 11 w
O Q 1x D. •-Q 1i (3 >•- et u- >e- et u- Q N. .- et u- U 1•
a w Q 1n 0 7 Q in 0 ¢ in 0 > 4 in 0 W II J o
P X U• Vl W ¢ Vl UJ 11) W U Vl W CC 11 Q
0 Q W W Z CO Z W Z 0) 1 W Z (1) Z W z (n 1I 5-
5- • -•=ZZQ Y azz4 • a ZQ zza4 Y II 0
Ys X 5- J 2F5- z X a- (1)zz >- J 11 r 01
M O: Y 3 0 > 3 0 I > - 3 (3 r 3 (3 4 11 J
4 0 W 3 J 2 F= 3 J Z •• 3 J a a 3 - 2 3 11 r UJ
•• Z 7 M •• 4 C7 7 t•-•-• I 7 W 7 t- •-• II U U
O K -+ M¢ U1 0 • - • 7 1s 4 Vl 0 .- 4 CO 0 = 1s Q 00 0 -J 11 W K
O W -J 1 n a M Z J 4111 a M Z CO CL M 2 0. 000. M a Q 11 - 7 4
2 7M . - W J2M e- W •• 5- W UJ MI e- UJ 5- 110 a
•O 3 4. 5- O a ... Nr 5-Oa .- rOa r.5- Oa O 11 1x
.- O 0.0 Nit i1 3J001* i1 •• ON4I i1 (/)0(/41 it 5- 11 a .t
,
A
T Y 11110
Z s + 9\ Saint Paul City Council n g, 8fi ° ° Publ c Hearing Notice
II II Ratif is tion of Assessment
I II M1
IIt01 1854
1 " 1Nq•■■∎ ∎ ∎■
`
OWNER OR TAXPAYER COUNCIL DISTRICT #4
PLANNING COUNCIL #10
FILE # ;59351
ASSESSMENT #
PROPERTY ADDRESS
PARCEL ID
PROPERTY TAX DESCRIPTION
THE TIME: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 7, 1994 AT 3:30 P.M.
PUBLIC PLACE: City CI uncil Chambers, 3rd Floor City Hall -Court House
HEARING Written or oral 1 .tatements by any owner will be considered by
the Council at is hearing.
PURPOSE To consider alp, royal of the assessment for:
RECONSTRUCTION OF (SIDEWALK ON NORTH SIDE WYNNE AVENUE FROM N. HAMLINE AVE.
TO N. ALBERT ST. (W I I RK DONE IN 1993)
ASSESSMENT The proposed a sessment for the above
Coun' it approves property is $;
INFORMATION If the City pproves the assessment you will have 30
days to pay wit out interest. Any unpaid balance will be
collected with y ur property taxes over 1 year(s) at 6.000%
interest. The pr l e posed assessment roll for this project is available
for review in the Finance Department, Room 140, City Hall.
ASSESSMENT
CALCULATION
NOTE: THIS IS NOT YOUR BILL. YO WILL RECEIVE AN INVOICE AFTER THE HEARING
SPECIFYING THE AMOUNT AP ROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL WITH COMPLETE
INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO P Y THIS ASSESSMENT.
CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE NOTIFICATION DATE 08/19/94