94-1316 1 R 1 nL/ 8,Q City of St. Paul I U L COUNCIL FILE NO. `7"T' — /& /(p
RESOLUTION RATIFYING ASS:SSMENT By
File No. 59344
Voting Assessment No. 3844
Ward In the matter of the assessment of bene ts, cost and expenses for
4 Reconstruction of side tk on both sides Canfield Avenue from
Arona St. To N. Snellin Ave. and south side Midway Parkway from •
Arona St. to N. S nellint Ave.
Preliminary Order 93-771 approved . June R 1993
Final Order 93.974 approved July 11, 1993
A public hearing having been had upon the assessment for the above improvement, and said assessment having
been further considered by the Council, and ha ng been considered finally satisfactory, therefore, by it
RESOLVED, That the said assessment b and the same is hereby in all respects ratified.
RESOLVED FURTHER, That the said asse sment be and it is hereby determined to be payable in one thru twenty
equal installments. as per Section 64.14 of the Saint Paul Administrative Code.
COUNCILPERSON Adopted by the Council: Date ■. r l \9. 9 9
Yeas Nays P h\
,, Certified Passed by Council Secretary
��C r£n, ✓ `c' In F ' '� vor By _, _ Alit . -
a �ttl 0Ag.• st (I, �► �
P ,Se rvi -- Mayor
L e
City of St. Paul COUNCIL FILE NO. 1
Office of The Director of Finance
REPORT OF COMPLETION OF ASSESSMENT By
File No. *934i
Voting
Ward Assessment No. 3a4%
In the matter of the assessment of ben( fits, cost and expenses for
4 **construction of sidewalk an both sLd,a Canfield Avenue from
Aron* $t. To k. Snellint Aye. and south side Ifideray Parkway frs
Arooa St. to N. Snel1ir Ave.
Preliminary Order 93-771 approved Jaffna E, 1443
Final Order 93 -974 approved • July 13, 1$
To the Council of the City of St. Paul:
The Director of Finance hereby reports to the Council the following as a statement of the expenditures necessarily
incurred for and in connection with the making of the above improvement, viz:
Total construction costs $ 5,916.37
Engineering and Inspection $ 1,774.91
Valuation and Assessment Services $ 354.98
Process Serving Charge $
Abatement Service Charge $
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 8,046.26
Charge To P b1ic Impxoverpent.41t1 1993 $ 3.704.18
Net Assessment $ 4,342.08
Said Director further reports that he has Lssessed and levied the total amount as above ascertained, to -wit: the sum
of $ upon each anc every lot, part or parcel of land deemed benefited by the said improve-
ment, and in the case of each lot, part or parc(1 of land in accordance with the benefits conferred thereon; that the said
assessment has been completed, and that hereto ttached, identified by the signature of the said Director, and made a part
hereof, is the said assessment as completed by him, and which is herewith submitted to the Council for such action
thereon as may be considered proper.
Dated
6 7z/+
/
Director of Finance
Public Hearing Date - September 7, 1994 RE 7 -1 -94 14- l 3l
FMS - Real Estate Division Date: 6 -24 -94 Green Sheet Number. 28791
::' DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR CrTY COUNCIL
Contact Person and Phone Number: `� �`'' " '' "� ` ` ��
°` CITY ATTORNEY CITY CLERK
Peter White- 266 -8850 zs BUDGET DIRECTOR FIN. &MGT. SVC DIR.
MAYOR (OR ASSISTANT) 1 Council Research
Must be on Council Agenda by. 7 -20 -94 Must be in l ouncil Research Office no later than noon Monday 7 -11 -9/
TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 (CLIP • LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE)
ACHON REQUESTED: Setting date of public hea ing of the ratification of assessments for sidewalk
reconstruction on CANFIELD AVENUE an, . MIDWAY PARKWAY.
File No. S9344 Assessment No. 3844
RECOMMENDATIONS: APPROVE (A) OR REJECT (R) ERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING:
_PLANNING COMMISSION A STAFF . Has the person/firm ever worked under a contract for this department? YES No
_CIVIL SERVICE COMM _ Has this person /firm ever been a City employee? YES Ni
_CIB COMMITTEE Does this person /firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any
Current City employee? YES N •
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? Neighborhoods
- 1 .lain all YES answers on a separate sheet and attach.
COUNCIL WARD(S): 4 District Planning Council: 10 I
INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (Who, What, hen, Where, Why):
l
Project is completed. Ratification is necess. in order to begin to collect assessments to help pay for the
project.
r -ADVA \rAGES IF APPROVED:
Same as above.
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED:
property owners have assessment- payable Benefitted pro
P y payable vla property taxes.
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED:
1
To not assess the benefits would be inconsist nt with City policy.
Total Amount of Transaction $ 8,046.26 Cost /Revenue Budgeted YES NO
$ 3,704.18 PI. 1993
$ 4,342.08 As • ssments 1 4144 4 S:''
Funding Source Activity umber I - + , ,, ,,
Financial Information: (Explain)
5 property owners will be notified of the public hearing and charges.
• CO O M t O
N N N M
W O O O O I O O
0 •-• O 0 O 1 O O
Q
C N M M M M M
1— M* M M M M*
z Z
W M a M M M M C
C N g N N N N$
\ O W . W
0••
X P P P P X
C N W N CO N N W
i {1
..(fir j N N N ! N N
N N N N N
1 CO 0 0 11 O P O I I P M O M 0 0 1 0 0 0 I I O
F 0 In II VI N.. O II ti ti O ti O O 1 0 0 0 II O
a • • 11 • • • 11 1 • • • 11 •
O ti II ^ P O II P
VD O �O NI O I M O VI 11 Vl
\ O 64 NI 11 NI 64 11 P t t VI fA 1 Vl 44 O 11 O
„ v V � S N. II N. d9 II di. 64 fA ER 1 W .4 11 . V) Q • 11 11 1 44 11 0
n\ M 11 M 11 1 11
\ v im `.,\ • 64 11 69 11 I 11
CL O 11 11 1 11
W 1- 11 11 1 11
0 U 11 11 1 11
< Q 11 11 1 II
2 Ii 11 11 1 11
Q
DE V) O O O O 0
1- O O O O O
Z O O O O 0
t Z
t O • •O CT • 1 1. 0
CO Vl CV N
Vl •O
CO CL P .O
J O
4k 1-
U
I- <
Z W
V)
V) W O O O O CD CD CD C> CD CD
Q 1- N O N O N O N O N O
Q P Vl P VI P Vl I P Vl P VI
t N. CV N. NI 1'.. N r - iv r... at
t 1- 1
M
P Z
En p 1
1-
U
w
I
O
ce I
a ce ce ce ce m
In W V) W ti W 0) W V) W
O: w U1 wx W wx
O ce I - CY I - CY 1 - C P. CC 1-
C w 0 0 O 0 O
Z 2 2 2 i 2 2 ,
1- < 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
V) a U U U 0 U U I U U U 0
W W W W W W 1 W W W W
-J CG C1' CC CY CC ce ce ce ce ce ce
0
( 1• - YY YY Id Id YY Y
Z U J J J J J J .J J J J
< QQ CC et QQ QQ QQ
CG tL 33 33 33 33 33
Q
W U
X Q
> 1
I- 1
Z w 1
w =
z 2 1- I
W 0 1
> > u-
0 I- Z 3 0 2 a i 2 a
C>: 0 - 0 a[ 0 0 0 0
C 0. -.1
z ce 1.- -J 1- 1- I- 1-
.--. U >- Q
co 0 Q 0 C O 0 CO O 11 00
O W C 3 C 0 0 1 0 O M VI u t II 0
4. CJ Q CI Q M Q N41 Q NI < 0 • • 11 •
- J J - .Q - J J - J J ZIC C>. CV 11 N
CO > - YOZ YOY YONo Y OY Y Q Pt 11 t
O 1- ce Q 2 ce Q J C e Q- K Q -J C < CO a - 11 M
C CL' Q C O-• QC CO QC CL, QC CO <0M 44 .11
W Cl 1- 0- 0. 0- C . - t t 11 -
C 1- > N I- N 1- u I- '0 1- 44 11 84
O W Z 1L W a Ill Z 1 W a W Z V) 11
Ce Y -. CO J Y Y .+ 1- 14 .-. h' IC •-• 1- Y .4 1- 1- 11
C Q Q M J J Q Q O Q Q di Q Q O Q Q O O 11
-J 0) 0) Q CO J CO -J J 0) - I J N J J CO J J 11
11 W
11 J
11 W
11 U
M M I M M M 11 ce
P P P P P 11 Q
V• 11 C
W 11 I -
— c— N2 OC 11
eo CV P t V)
N N W it W N W N> W x 11 C
t 3 >- W 1� Vl >1• W V• >ti W Vl >ti 00 >f•. tY h II Z
P ce > - N 30 > N Q O > C\ Q O W> N QO Y O et CD O 11 W
W 3 C Y et CO z et CC J QCO 3‘ Z 11 X
C. >- 0 IC 0 C •• W 0 0 •• O C C •• Y O 0 • 0 Y Vl 0 •• O O 11 W
CD Q aC— 1+. a 0y J li V) O. - -J 4. 0 J W 2 C U1 2C ti U U 11
C Y. Vl Y 0 0 J Vl W O - J V• W O •. J VI W O 44 O W W 11 J N
P X >- Vl < Q W VI -. 7 W 111 z W III •-• Y 2 -J C CC 11 Q
O Q W Q 3 CO 1 - .-. C V) Q .-. C+. V) x •-. U. 0) W < Z J V) 11 I-
1- 232 Q Z U. a Z < C C Z2 < U LL Z 2 Q Z3 •+ W Q IL IL 11 O
O CD Z .4 0Z Z < 2•E < N2 Z Q 0 Z2 - - 11 1 - N
t C>< x • z0 DE ...0 00 et et 00 Q UC7 x.. V) 0 QQ II -J
• 0 z 2 0 -J 2 U J a - 7 UJ 2 DE - Z 33 111- W
Z 04 •-• Z D t .-.. Q = •o .- 0 .-. Z = 0 .. 11 0 C)
o CC O t QIn 0 t et CV CI -• •O Q 0 > - CD et t0 O t et CT C] -J -J II W CC
• W J VI C VI > - N C WI z C'M C Vl2 0t 0Vl Z - U1 CL C4 Z Q Q 11 - 2 Q
▪ z 0Vl — W ce Cn •- UJ CD VI r W ZVl UJ OM Y - W I - 1 - 11 O C
'0 3 x — I -0 C Q. 1 O C J•- - FAO C Q• 1-0 C me r - I - O C 00 11 Z
.-- O 0) O En • 1 i1 Z O V) i1 •11 0 O Cal* 41 2 O V) 41 i1 V) O V) a1 i1 1- H 11 C u,
2 ,ITY O F S � Saint Paul City Council l�`�
2e.,,,,
a Public Hearing Not
r d
_ R .atif ica tion of Assessment
/... ,854
OWNER OR TAXPAYER COUNCIL DISTRICT #4
PLANNING COUNCIL #10
FILE # :59344
ASSESSMENT #
PROPERTY ADDRESS
PARCEL ID
PROPERTY TAX DESCRIPTION
,
THE TIME: WEDNESCAY, SEPTEMBER 7, 1994 AT 3:30 P.M.
PUBLIC PLACE: City Coma Chambers, 3rd Floor City Hall-Court House
HEARING Written or oral statements by any owner will be considered by
the Council at this hearing.
PURPOSE To consider appioval of the assessment for:
RECONSTRUCTION OF SIDEWALK ON BOTH SIDES CANFIELD AVENUE FROM ARONA ST. TO
N. SNELLING AVE. AND SOUTH SIDE MIDWAY PARKWAY FROM ARONA ST. TO N.
SNELLING AVE. (WORK PONE IN 1993)
ASSESSMENT The proposed assessment for the above property is $,
INFORMATION If the City Council approves the assessment you will have 30
days to pay without interest. Any unpaid balance will be
collected with yo4r property taxes over 11 year(s) at 6.000%
interest. The proposed assessment roll for this project is available
for review in the Finance Department, Room 140, City Hall.
ASSESSMENT
CALCULATION
NOTE: THIS IS NOT YOUR BILL. YOU WILL RECEIVE AN INVOICE AFTER THE HEARING
SPECIFYING THE AMOUNT APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL WITH COMPLETE
INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO PAY THIS ASSESSMENT.
CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE' NOTIFICATION DATE 08/19/94